Reflection of Leadership Approaches on Job Satisfaction from the Cockpit to the Terminal

Year 2026, Volume: 25 Issue: 2 , 663 - 683 , 30.04.2026

Fatih Karaman

https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.1831491

https://izlik.org/JA78ZL79TU

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of different leadership styles—digital, transformational, and transactional leadership—on employee job satisfaction in the aviation industry today, as digital technologies are increasingly integrated into business processes. In this era, where digital technologies are being comprehensively integrated into business processes, leadership approaches are believed to play a significant role not only in operational efficiency but also in employee engagement and motivation. The research was designed as a quantitative study involving flight, cabin, terminal, and ground handling personnel working at an airport in Türkiye. Data were collected using a structured survey technique and scales used to measure leadership styles, digital leadership competencies, and job satisfaction levels. Confirmatory factor, correlation, and regression analyses were conducted using SPSS and AMOS software during the analysis phase. The findings reveal that digital and transformational leadership styles have a significant and positive impact on employee job satisfaction. However, the impact of transactional leadership style was limited. The results of the research demonstrate that leaders' digital competencies and transformational vision are key factors in increasing employee satisfaction and organizational commitment in the aviation industry. These findings both contribute theoretically to the literature and offer important practical recommendations for developing effective leadership strategies in the digital age. Future studies are recommended to examine leadership styles in conjunction with variables such as employee performance, organizational commitment, and burnout, and to conduct comparative research encompassing different airports and airlines.

Keywords

Aviation Industry , Leadership , Job Satisfaction , Aviation Management

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Istanbul Medipol University Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee pursuant to Decision No. 288 dated June 2, 2025.

Kokpitten Terminale Liderlik Anlayışlarının İş Tatminine Yansıması

https://izlik.org/JA78ZL79TU

Abstract

Bu çalışma, dijital dönüşümün hızlandığı günümüzde havacılık alanında farklı liderlik tarzlarının -dijital, dönüşümcü ve etkileşimci liderlik- çalışanların iş tatmini üzerindeki etkilerini araştırmayı hedeflemektedir. Dijital teknolojilerin iş süreçlerine kapsamlı bir şekilde entegre olduğu bu dönemde, liderlik yaklaşımlarının yalnızca operasyonel verimliliği değil, bununla beraber çalışanların bağlılıkları ve motivasyonları üzerinde de önemli bir rol oynadığı düşünülmektedir. Araştırma, Türkiye'deki bir havalimanında çalışan uçuş, kabin, terminal ve yer hizmetleri personelini içeren bir nicel çalışma olarak planlanmıştır. Veriler, yapılandırılmış anket tekniğiyle toplanmış ve liderlik tarzları, dijital liderlik yeterlilikleri ile iş tatmini düzeylerini ölçmeye yönelik ölçeklerden yararlanılmıştır. Analiz aşamasında SPSS ve AMOS yazılımlarından faydalanılarak doğrulayıcı faktör, korelasyon ve regresyon işlemleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, dijital ve dönüşümcü liderlik stillerinin çalışanların iş tatmini üzerinde anlamlı ve pozitif bir etki oluşturduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bununla birlikte etkileşimci liderlik tarzının etkisi sınırlı kalmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları, havacılık sektöründe liderlerin dijital yetkinlikleri ile dönüşümcü vizyonlarının çalışan memnuniyetini ve kurumsal bağlılığı artırmada önemli bir faktör olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bulgular hem literatüre teorik katkı sunmakta hem de dijital dönemde etkili liderlik stratejilerinin oluşturulmasına dair önemli pratik önerilerde bulunmaktadır. Gelecek çalışmalarda, liderlik tarzlarının çalışan performansı, örgütsel bağlılık ve tükenmişlik gibi değişkenlerle birlikte ele alınması ve farklı havalimanları ile havayolu işletmelerini kapsayan karşılaştırmalı araştırmaların yapılması önerilmektedir.

Keywords

Havacılık Sektörü , Liderlik , İş Tatmini , Havacılık Yönetimi

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışma için İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Bilimsel Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu Komisyonu'nun 02.06.2025 tarih ve 288 sayılı kararı ile etik kurul onayı alınmıştır.

References

• Abolnasser, M. S. A., Abdou, A. H., Hassan, T. H., & Salem, A. E. (2023). Transformational leadership, employee engagement, job satisfaction, and psychological well-being among hotel employees after the height of the COVID-19 pandemic: a serial mediation model. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20(4), 3609.
• Ahmed, I., Nawaz, M. M., Iqbal, N., Ali, I., Shaukat, Z., & Usman, A. (2010). Effects of motivational factors on employees job satisfaction a case study of University of the Punjab, Pakistan. International journal of business and management, 5(3), 70.
• Akyurt, N., Alparslan, A. M., & Oktar, Ö. F. (2016). Sağlik Çalişanlarinda Liderlik Tarzlari-İş Tatmini-Örgütsel Bağlilik Modeli. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 6(13), 50-61.
• AlNuaimi, B. K., Singh, S. K., Ren, S., Budhwar, P., & Vorobyev, D. (2022). Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy. Journal of Business Research, 145, 636-648.
• Andrade, M. S., & Westover, J. H. (2018). Generational differences in work quality characteristics and job satisfaction. In Evidence-based HRM: A global forum for empirical scholarship (Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 287-304). Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Antonopoulou, H., Halkiopoulos, C., Barlou, O., & Beligiannis, G. (2019). Transition from educational leadership to e-leadership: A data analysis report from TEI of Western Greece. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(9), 238-255.
• Ariyani, N., & Hidayati, S. (2018). Influence of transformational leadership and work engagement on innovative behavior. Etikonomi, 17(2), 275-284.
• Arnold, K. A. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: A review and directions for future research. Journal of occupational health psychology, 22(3), 381.
• Arzi, S., & Farahbod, L. (2014). Relationship of transformational and transactional leadership style with job satisfaction. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 6(3), 187-204.
• Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S., & Dodge, G. E. (2000). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. The leadership quarterly, 11(4), 615-668.
• Ay, F. A., & Keleş, K. (2017). Etkileşimci ve dönüşümcü liderlik tarzlarının işten ayrılma niyeti ve iş performansı üzerinde etkisi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(4), 193-203.
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations (Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 481-484). New York: Free press.
• Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries?. American psychologist, 52(2), 130.
• Bass, B. M. and Avolio, B. J. (1994), Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership, sage.
• Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology press.
• Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of business ethics, 139(3), 517-536.
• Benitez, J., Arenas, A., Castillo, A., & Esteves, J. (2022). Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information & Management, 59(2), 103590.
• Beugré, C. D., Acar, W., & Braun, W. (2006). Transformational leadership in organizations: an environment‐induced model. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 52-62.
• Braf, E., & Melin, U. (2020). Leadership in a digital era-is “digital leadership” a buzzword or a significant phenomenon?.
• Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual review of psychology, 53(1), 279-307.
• Brown, D. J. ve Keeping, L. M. (2005). Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(2), 245-272.
• Bui, H. T. (2017). Big Five personality traits and job satisfaction: Evidence from a national sample. Journal of General Management, 42(3), 21-30.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership and followership. Leadership, 18, 18-23.
• Claassen, K., Dos Anjos, D.R., Kettschau, J.P., Wrede, S.J.S., & Broding, H.C. (2023). DigiFuehr 2.0: Novel insights for digital leadership. Journal of Occupational Health, 65(1), e12383. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12383
• Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 456340.
• Çalışkan, A., & Köroğlu, E. Ö. (2023). Job satisfaction: a scale development study. Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 112-134.
• De Hoogh, A. H., Den Hartog, D. N., & Koopman, P. L. (2005). Linking the Big Five‐Factors of personality to charismatic and transactional leadership; perceived dynamic work environment as a moderator. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(7), 839-865.
• Eren, M. Ş., & Titizoğlu, Ö. Ç. (2014). Dönüşümcü ve etkileşimci liderlik tarzlarinin örgütsel özdeşleşme ve iş tatmini üzerindeki etkileri. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(27), 275-303.
• Fisk, P. (2002). The making of a digital leader. Business Strategy Review, 13(1), 43-50.
• Ghafoor, A., Qureshi, T. M., Khan, M. A., & Hijazi, S. T. (2011). Transformational leadership, employee engagement and performance: Mediating effect of psychological ownership. African journal of business management, 5(17), 7391.
• Giddens, J. (2018). Transformational leadership: What every nursing dean should know. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34(2), 117-121.
• Gomes, A. R. (2014). Transformational leadership: Theory, research, and application to sports.
• Guay, R. P. (2013). The relationship between leader fit and transformational leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(1), 55-73.
• Head, T. C. (2005). Structural changes in turbulent environments: a study of small and mid-size Chinese organizations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(2), 82-93.
• Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of management, 44(2), 501-529.
• Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, K. E. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of applied psychology, 84(5), 680.
• Klein, M. (2020). Leadership characteristics in the era of digital transformation. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(1), 883-902.
• Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M., & Terborg, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of organizational behavior, 16(4), 319-333.
• Kopperud, K. H., Martinsen, Ø., & Humborstad, S. I. W. (2014). Engaging leaders in the eyes of the beholder: On the relationship between transformational leadership, work engagement, service climate, and self–other agreement. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(1), 29-42.
• Krishnan, V. R. (2005). Transformational leadership and outcomes: Role of relationship duration. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(6), 442-457.
• Kuhnert, K. W., & Lewis, P. (1987). Transactional and transformational leadership: A constructive/developmental analysis. Academy of Management review, 12(4), 648-657.
• Lekka, C. (2011). High reliability organisations: A review of the literature. Health and Safety Executive, 1-34.
• Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology.
• Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior an evidence-based approach twelfth edition.
• Madi Odeh, R. B., Obeidat, B. Y., Jaradat, M. O., Masa'deh, R. E., & Alshurideh, M. T. (2023). The transformational leadership role in achieving organizational resilience through adaptive cultures: the case of Dubai service sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(2), 440-468.
• Marotto, M., Roos, J., & Victor, B. (2007). Collective virtuosity in organizations: A study of peak performance in an orchestra. Journal of Management Studies, 44(3), 388-413.
• Mert, G., Dördüncü, H., & İncaz, S. (2019). Dönüştürücü Liderlik Davranışlarının İş Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkisi: Vakıf Üniversitesi Örneği. Journal of International Social Research, 12(65).
• Montano, D., Reeske, A., Franke, F., & Hüffmeier, J. (2017). Leadership, followers' mental health and job performance in organizations: A comprehensive meta‐analysis from an occupational health perspective. Journal of organizational behavior, 38(3), 327-350.
• Nazim, F. (2016). Principals' Transformational and Transactional Leadership Style and Job Satisfaction of College Teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(34), 18-22.
• Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human resource management review, 27(3), 521-535.
• Oplatka, I., & Mimon, R. (2008). Women principals’ conceptions of job satisfaction and dissatisfaction: An alternative view?. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(2), 135-153.
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (2020). Transformational leader or narcissist? How grandiose narcissists can create and destroy organizations and institutions. California Management Review, 62(3), 5-27.
• Ören, M. E., & Atik, S. (2025). Digital leadership in educational organizations: A scale adaptation study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 12(1), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1468887
• Pepe, M. (2010). The impact of extrinsic motivational dissatisfiers on employee level of job satisfaction and commitment resulting in the intent to turnover. Journal of business & economics research, 8(9), 99.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
• Porfírio, J. A., Carrilho, T., Felício, J. A., & Jardim, J. (2021). Leadership characteristics and digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, 124, 610-619.
• Prince, K. A. (2017). Industrie 4.0 and leadership.
• Ramsey, J. R., Rutti, R. M., Lorenz, M. P., Barakat, L. L., & Sant’anna, A. S. (2017). Developing global transformational leaders. Journal of World Business, 52(4), 461-473.
• Rasool, S. F., Samma, M., Wang, M., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2019). How human resource management practices translate into sustainable organizational performance: the mediating role of product, process and knowledge innovation. Psychology research and behavior management, 1009-1025.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2024). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6229-6235). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Salas, E., Reyes, D. L., & McDaniel, S. H. (2018). The science of teamwork: Progress, reflections, and the road ahead. American Psychologist, 73(4), 593.
• Schmitt, A., Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2016). Transformational leadership and proactive work behaviour: A moderated mediation model including work engagement and job strain. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 89(3), 588-610.
• Sheninger, E. (2014). Pillars of digital leadership. International Center for Leadership in Education, 1(4), 1-4. Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü (2024). Faaliyet Raporu. Ankara.
• Smith, B. N., Montagno, R. V., & Kuzmenko, T. N. (2004). Transformational and servant leadership: Content and contextual comparisons. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(4), 80-91.
• Sommer, S. A., Howell, J. M., & Hadley, C. N. (2016). Keeping positive and building strength: The role of affect and team leadership in developing resilience during an organizational crisis. Group & Organization Management, 41(2), 172-202.
• Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3). Sage.
• Sudershana, S., Satpathy, I., & Patnaik, B. C. M. (2019). Impact of age, gender and job satisfaction on employee engagement in the IT sector. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng, 9(2), 4841-4845.
• Sun, R., & Henderson, A. C. (2017). Transformational leadership and organizational processes: Influencing public performance. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 554-565.
• Tu, L., Plaisent, M., Bernard, P., & Maguiraga, L. (2005). Comparative age differences of job satisfaction on faculty at higher education level: China and Taiwan. International journal of educational management, 19(3), 259-267.
• Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of business research, 122, 889-901.
• Wang, G., Oh, I. S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & organization management, 36(2), 223-270.
• Warner, K. S., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long range planning, 52(3), 326-349.