The Relationship between Economic Complexity and Growth: A Sectoral Approach in Turkey

Year 2025, Volume: 24 Issue: 4, 1690 - 1717, 30.10.2025

Yusuf Ünsal

https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.1666727

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between economic complexity and economic growth in Turkey by considering sector-specific dynamics. Focusing on the period from 1995 to 2023, it calculates and analyzes separate economic complexity indices for the industrial and agricultural sectors, along with an overall economic complexity index. The analysis employs the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model and the Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) method to estimate both short- and long-term effects. The results indicate that industrial economic complexity significantly and positively contributes to economic growth in both the short and long run. While the overall economic complexity index shows a positive association with long-term growth, the magnitude of its impact remains relatively modest. On the other hand, the agricultural economic complexity index does not exhibit a statistically significant influence on growth. These findings highlight the importance of sectoral disaggregation when examining the structural components of economic performance. From a policy perspective, enhancing production diversity and fostering technological advancement in the industrial sector emerge as key priorities for achieving sustainable economic growth.

Keywords

Economic Complexity , Economic Growth , Sectoral Economic Complexity , ARDL

Ekonomik Karmaşıklık ve Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye’de Sektörel Bir Yaklaşım

Abstract

Bu çalışma, ekonomik karmaşıklığın Türkiye’de ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkilerini sektörel düzeyde analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. 1995–2023 dönemini kapsayan çalışmada, genel ekonomik karmaşıklığın yanı sıra sanayi ve tarım sektörlerine ait ekonomik karmaşıklık endeksleri ayrı ayrı hesaplanarak büyüme üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiştir. Ekonometrik analizlerde Otoregresif Dağıtılmış Gecikmeler (ARDL) modeli ile Dinamik En Küçük Kareler (DOLS) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Analiz bulguları, sanayi sektörüne ilişkin ekonomik karmaşıklığın hem kısa hem de uzun vadede ekonomik büyüme üzerinde pozitif ve anlamlı etkiler yarattığını göstermektedir. Genel ekonomik karmaşıklık endeksi uzun vadede büyümeyi destekleyici bir etki sunmakla birlikte, bu etkinin daha sınırlı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Tarım sektörüne ilişkin ekonomik karmaşıklık endeksinin ise ekonomik büyüme üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi tespit edilememiştir. Çalışma, üretim yapısının sektörel niteliğini dikkate alan yaklaşımların büyüme analizlerinde daha bütüncül sonuçlar sunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Politika yapıcılar açısından, sanayi sektöründe üretim çeşitliliğini ve teknolojik derinliği artırmaya yönelik stratejiler geliştirilmesi, sürdürülebilir büyüme hedefleri açısından kritik bir adım olarak değerlendirilmektedir.

Keywords

Ekonomik Karmaşıklık , Sektörel Ekonomik Karmaşıklık , Ekonomik Büyüme , ARDL

References

• Adam, A., Garas, A., Katsaiti, M. S., Lapatinas, A. (2023). Economic complexity and jobs: an empirical analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 32(1), 25-52.
• Agu, C., Ogbuabor, J. E., Onah, B. U. (2024). How are Economic Governance Institutions Moderating the Effect of Economic Complexity on Trade, FDI Inflow, Environmental Degradation, and Economic Growth in Africa?. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. Advance online publication: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02284-2
• Akar, T. (2023). Ekonomik karmaşıklık, AR-GE harcamaları ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (55), 315-329.
• Akusta, E. (2025). Does globalızatıon promote or hınder sustaınable development? Evıdence from Türkiye on the three dımensıons of globalızatıon. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 66, 117-137.
• Alam, M. B., Hossain, M. S. (2024). Investigating the connections between China's economic growth, use of renewable energy, and research and development concerning CO2 emissions: An ARDL Bound Test Approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123220.
• Asteriou, D., Hall, S. G. (2021). Applied econometrics (4th Edition). London: Macmillan Education.
• Azimi, M. N., Rahman, M. M., Maraseni, T. (2025). Advancing sustainable development goal 8 Targets: The role of institutional Quality, economic Complexity, and state fragility in G20 nations (2000–2023). Journal Pre-proofs. Advance online publication: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2025.100278
• Bahar, D., Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A. (2014). Neighbors and the evolution of the comparative advantage of nations: Evidence of international knowledge diffusion?. Journal of International Economics, 92(1), 111-123.
• Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33(2), 99-123.
• Bayar, İ. (2022). Ekonomik karmaşıklık indeksi ve ekonomik büyüme: CIVETS ülkelerinden ampirik kanıtlar. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (36), 237-251.
• Begum, R. A., Raihan, A., ve Said, M. N. M. (2020). Dynamic Impacts of Economic Growth and Forested Area on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Malaysia. Sustainability, 12(22), 9375.
• Benli, M., Atıcı, G. (2023). Türkiye’de Ekonomik Kompleksite ve İktisadi Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkisi. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 38(2), 400-429.
• Canh, N. P., Thanh, S. D. (2022). The dynamics of export diversification, economic complexity and economic growth cycles: Global evidence. Foreign Trade Review, 57(3), 234-260.
• Cardoso, B. H. F., Catela, E. Y. D. S., Viegas, G., Pinheiro, F. L., Hartmann, D. (2024). Did industrial and export complexity drive regional economic growth in Brazil?. PloS One, 19(12), e0313945.
• Chavez, J. C., Mosqueda, M. T., Gómez-Zaldívar, M. (2017). Economic complexity and regional growth performance: Evidence from the Mexican Economy. Review of Regional Studies, 47(2), 201-219.
• Cristelli, M., Gabrielli, A., Tacchella, A., Caldarelli, G., Pietronero, L. (2013). Measuring the intangibles: A metrics for the economic complexity of countries and products. PLoS One, 8(8), 1-20.
• Çınar, İ. T. (2023). Regional Development Trap and Economic Complexity in Turkey: Evidence from Provincial Data. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 15(9), 2224-2252.
• Çınar, I. T., Korkmaz, I., Baycan, T. (2022). Regions’ economic fitness and sectoral labor productivity: Evidence from Turkey. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 14(3), 575-599.
• De Queiroz Stein, A., Britto, G., Medeiros, V. (2024). Agricultural economic complexity and regional inequalities: a new approach using census data from Brazil. Regional Studies, 58(12), 2368-2388.
• Dickey, D. A., Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 49(9), 1057-1072.
• Domini, G. (2022). Patterns of specialization and economic complexity through the lens of universal exhibitions, 1855-1900. Explorations in Economic History, 83, 101421.
• Donis, S., Gómez, J., Salazar, I. (2023). Economic complexity, property rights and the judicial system as drivers of eco-innovations: An analysis of OECD countries. Technovation, 128, 102868.
• Du, K., O’Connor, A. (2021). Examining economic complexity as a holistic innovation system effect. Small Business Economics, 56(1), 237-257.
• Dünya Bankası (2025). Dünya Bankası Türkiye. https://www.worldbank.org/tr/country/turkey/overview#:~:text=T%C3%BCrkiye%20ekonomisi%2C%20COVID%2D19%20pandemisine,y%C3%BCzde%205%2C5%20b%C3%BCy%C3%BCme%20kaydetmi%C5%9Ftir, Erşim Tarihi:15.03.2025.
• Dünya Bankası (2025). World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators, Erişim Tarihi: 17.03.2025.
• Gala, P., Rocha, I., Magacho, G. (2018). The structuralist revenge: Economic complexity as an important dimension to evaluate growth and development. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 38(2), 219-236.
• Gao, J., Zhou, T. (2018). Quantifying China’s regional economic complexity. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 492, 1591-1603.
• Gaulier, G., Zignago, S. (2010). BACI: International Trade Database at The Product-Level (The 1994-2007 Version). CEPII Working Paper, No: 2010-23.
• Gomez-Zaldivar, M., Fonseca, F. J., Mosqueda, M. T., Gomez-Zaldivar, F. (2020). Spillover effects of economic complexity on the per capita GDP growth rates of Mexican states, 1993-2013. Estudios de Economía, 47(2), 221-243.
• Hacıimamoğlu, T., Sungur, O. (2024). Human capital, physical capital, economic complexity, and economic growth nexus in Türkiye: New evidence from bootstrap fourier Granger causality in quantiles approach. İnsan ve İnsan, 11(37), 11-26.
• Hausmann, R., C. A. Hidalgo, S. Bustos, Coscia, M., Simoes, A., Yıldırım, M. A. (2014). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Hartmann, D., Guevara, M. R., Jara-Figueroa, C., Aristarán, M., Hidalgo, C. A. (2017). Linking economic complexity, institutions, and income inequality. World Development, 93, 75-93.
• Hidalgo, C. A., Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10570-10575.
• Hidalgo, C. A. (2021). Economic complexity theory and applications. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(2), 92-113.
• Hoeriyah, L., Nuryartono, N., Pasaribu, S. H. (2022). Economic complexity and sustainable growth in developing countries. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 11(1), 23-33.
• Ikram, M., Xia, W., Fareed, Z., Shahzad, U., Rafique, M. Z. (2021). Exploring the nexus between economic complexity, economic growth and ecological footprint: contextual evidences from Japan. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47, 101460.
• Inoua, S. (2023). A simple measure of economic complexity. Research Policy, 52(7), 104793.
• Ivanova, I., Strand, Ø., Kushnir, D., Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Economic and technological complexity: A model study of indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 77-89.
• Jayne, T., Yeboah, F. K., Henry, C. (2017). The future of work in African agriculture trends and drivers of change. International Labour Organization Working Paper, No: 25.
• Koch, P. (2021). Economic complexity and growth: Can value-added exports better explain the link?. Economics Letters, 198, 109682.
• Korkmaz, İ., Çınar, İ. T., Baycan, T. (2024). Economic complexity and regional growth in Turkey: Implications for east-west disparity. Eastern European Economics. Advance online publication: https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2024.2304220
• Li, H. S., Geng, Y. C., Shinwari, R., Yangjie, W., Rjoub, H. (2021). Does renewable energy electricity and economic complexity index help to achieve carbon neutrality target of top exporting countries?. Journal of Environmental Management, 299, 113386.
• Li, J., He, W., Li, G. (2024). Natural resources, economic complexity and growth nexus: Role of digital governance in addressing the resource curse. Resources Policy, 92, 105003.
• Li, Q., He, H., Oskenbayev, Y., Ullah, I. (2024). Exploring the nexus of geopolitical risk, green financing, and natural resource rents: A study of Russia's economic growth. Resources Policy, 96, 105199.
• Liza, J. I., Majumder, S. C., Rahman, M. H. (2025). Scrutinizing the impact of blue economy factors on the economic growth in Bangladesh: An empirical study. Marine Policy, 173, 106542.
• Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1986). Adaptive behavior and economic theory. Journal of Business, 59(4), 401–426.
• Mesagan, E. P., Vo, X. V. (2024). The importance of economic complexity in the resource-growth discourse: Empirical evidence from Africa. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 2772-2793.
• Mighri, Z., AlSaggaf, M. I. (2023). Asymmetric impacts of renewable energy consumption and economic complexity on economic growth in Saudi Arabia: evidence from the NARDL model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(3), 7446-7473.
• Narayan, P. K., Smyth, R. (2007). Mean reversion versus random walk in G7 stock prices evidence from multiple trend break unit root tests. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 17(2), 152-166.
• Ogbuabor, J. E., Agu, C., Onah, B. U., ve Urama, C. E. (2025). Economic Complexity and Sectoral Performance in Africa: The Role of Economic Governance Institutions. Sustainable Development. Advance online publication: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3363
• Operti, F. G., Pugliese, E., Andrade Jr, J. S., Pietronero, L., Gabrielli, A. (2018). Dynamics in the fitness-income plane: Brazilian states vs world countries. PloS One, 13(6), e0197616.
• Pata, U. K., Yurtkuran, S., Kalça, A. (2016). Türki̇ye’de enerji̇ tüketi̇mi̇ ve ekonomi̇k büyüme: ardl sinir testi̇ yaklaşimi. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 38(2), 255-255.
• Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57, 1361–1401.
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
• Phillips, P. C., Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
• Raihan, A., Tuspekova, A. (2022). Role of economic growth, renewable energy, and technological innovation to achieve environmental sustainability in Kazakhstan. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 100165.
• Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.
• Rusnak, J., Bucekova, N., Bucekova, I. (2024). Export, economic complexity and growth in the integrated periphery of the European automotive industry. Post-Communist Economies, 36(8), 881-905.
• Sarsar, L., Echaoui, A. (2024). Empirical analysis of the economic complexity boost on the impact of energy transition on economic growth: A panel data study of 124 countries. Energy, 294, 130712.
• Saud, S., Haseeb, A., Zafar, M. W., Li, H. (2023). Articulating natural resource abundance, economic complexity, education and environmental sustainability in MENA countries: Evidence from advanced panel estimation. Resources Policy, 80, 103261.
• Servedio, V. D., Buttà, P., Mazzilli, D., Tacchella, A., ve Pietronero, L. (2018). A new and stable estimation method of country economic fitness and product complexity. Entropy, 20(10), 783.
• Smolski, F. M. D. S., Ruffoni, J., Mascarini, S. (2025). The effect of economic complexity and relatedness on the economic growth of brazilian microregions. Estudos Econômicos, 54, e53575442.
• Stojkoski, V., Kocarev, L. (2017). The relationship between growth and economic complexity: evidence from Southeastern and Central Europe. MPRA Paper, 77837, 1-25.
• Stojkoski, V., Koch, P., Hidalgo, C. A. (2023). Multidimensional economic complexity and inclusive green growth. Communications Earth and Environment, 4(1), 130.
• Szirmai, A., Verspagen, B. (2015). Manufacturing and economic growth in developing countries, 1950–2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 34, 46-59.
• Tabash, M. I., Mesagan, E. P., Farooq, U. (2022). Dynamic linkage between natural resources, economic complexity, and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Africa. Resources Policy, 78, 102865.
• Tacchella, A., Cristelli, M., Caldarelli, G., Gabrielli, A., Pietronero, L. (2012). A new metrics for countries' fitness and products' complexity. Scientific Reports, 2(723), 1-7.
• Tacchella, A., Cristelli, M., Caldarelli, G., Gabrielli, A., Pietronero, L. (2013). Economic complexity: conceptual grounding of a new metrics for global competitiveness. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(8), 1683-1691.
• The Heritage Foundation (2025). Index of economic freedom, government spending. https://www.heritage.org/index/pages/all-country-scores, Erişim Tarihi: 17.03.2025.
• TÜİK (2025). Öğretim yılı ve eğitim seviyesine göre okullaşma oranı. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=Egitim,-Kultur,-Spor-ve-Turizm-105, Erişim Tarihi: 18.03.2025.
• Uppenberg, K. (2011). Economic growth in the US and the EU: A sectoral decomposition. EIB Papers, 16(1), 18–51.
• Ünsal, Y. (2024). Economic complexity and environmental sustainability: sectoral perspectives from OECD countries. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences. Advance online publication: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00958-6
• Voumik, L. C., Rahman, M. H., Rahman, M. M., Ridwan, M., Akter, S., Raihan, A. (2023). Toward a sustainable future: Examining the interconnectedness among Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), urbanization, trade openness, economic growth, and energy usage in Australia. Regional Sustainability, 4(4), 405-415.
• Zhang, C., Waris, U., Qian, L., Irfan, M., Rehman, M. A. (2024). Unleashing the dynamic linkages among natural resources, economic complexity, and sustainable economic growth: Evidence from G‐20 countries. Sustainable Development, 32(4), 3736-3752.
• Zhu, S., Li, R. (2017). Economic complexity, human capital and economic growth: empirical research based on cross-country panel data. Applied Economics, 49(38), 3815-3828.
• Zivot, E., Andrews, D. (1992). Further evidence of the great crash, the oil-price shock and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 251–270.