As an Instructional Technology the Contribution of Geography Information Systems (GIS) to Social Studies Education and Teacher’s Attitudes Related to GIS-Bir Ö?retim Teknolojisi Olarak Co?rafi Bilgi Sistemlerinin (CBS) Sosyal Bilgiler Dersinin Ö?retimine

Abstract

Abstract:The aim of this study is to determine whether the teacher of social studies uses the GIS Technologies in primary schools. An attitude scale which was build up by Thomas R. Baker and adapted to Turkish is used in the study. The reliability coefficient of this scale was computed and it was found as 84. Without making any changes, the scale was administered to 84 teachers of social studies in Turkey. The results were analysed by using the program SPSS 16.0. In this study variables such as the attitudes of the teachers about using GIS, their gender, graduation level, seniority, the number of the classes which they take, whether they entered any courses about GIS, and whether they have laboratories in the schools they work were investigated. According to the results obtained in the study, although an important difference was found between the teachers’ attitudes and having computer laboratories in schools, there was not an important difference between the variables previous GIS experience, gender, graduation level, seniority, the number of the classes. Özet: Ara?t?rman?n amac?, ilkö?retim sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin CBS teknolojisini bilip bilmediklerini biliyorlarsa, kullan?p kullanmad?klar?n? ortaya koymakt?r. Bu amaçla Thomas R. Baker tarafından geli?tirilen ve taraf?m?zda Türkçeye çevrilmi? olan bir tutum anketi kullan?lm??t?r. Bu anketin güvenirlik (34 sosyal bilgiler öğretmenine uygulanm??) çalışmas? yap?lm?? ve alfa güvenirlik katsay?s?. 84 olarak tespit edilmi?tir. Güvenirlik çalışmas? yap?lan anket aynen kabul edilmek kayd?yla Türkiye’de de?i?ik okullarda görev yapan toplam 84 sosyal bilgiler öğretmenine uygulanm?? ortaya ç?kan sonuçlar SPSS 16.0 paket program?nda de?erlendirilerek yorumlanm??t?r. Bu ara?t?rmada öğretmenlerin CBS’yi kullanma konusundaki tutumlar?; cinsiyet, k?dem, ö?renim durumlar?, eğitim ö?retim yapt?klar? Sınıflar?n mevcutlar?, CBS ile ilgili herhangi bir kursa kat?l?p kat?lmama, uygulama yap?p yapmama, okullar?nda bilgisayar laboratuar? bulunup bulunmama gibi çe?itli de?i?kenler aç?s?ndan incelenmeye çal???lm??t?r. Çal??madan elde edilen sonuçlara göre öğretmenlerin, CBS’ye yönelik tutumlar? ile okullar?nda bilgisayar laboratuar? bulunup bulunmamas? arasında anlaml? bir fark tespit edilmi?, cinsiyet, k?dem, ö?renim durumu, Sınıf mevcudu, kurs al?p almama, uygulama yap?p yapmama de?i?kenleri ile tutumlar? arasında anlaml? bir farkl?l?k tespit edilememi?tir.

Keywords

• Social Studies, Instructional Technology, Geography Information Systems, Attitude

-

Öz

Araştırmanın amacı, ilköğretim sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin CBS teknolojisini bilip bilmediklerini biliyorlarsa, kullanıp kullanmadıklarını ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaçla Thomas R. Baker tarafından geliştirilen ve tarafımızda Türkçeye çevrilmiş olan bir tu tum anketi kullanılmıştır. Bu anketin güvenirlik (34 sosyal bilgiler öğretmenine uygulanmış) çalışması yapılmış ve alfa güvenirlik katsayısı. 84 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Güvenirlik çalışması yapılan anket aynen kabul edilmek kaydıyla Türkiye’de değişik ok ullarda görev yapan toplam 84 sosyal bilgiler öğretmenine uygulanmış ortaya çıkan sonuçlar SPSS 16.0 paket programında değerlendirilerek yorumlanmıştır. Bu araştırmada öğretmenlerin CBS’yi kullanma konusundaki tutumları; cinsiyet, kıdem, öğrenim durumları, eğitim öğretim yaptıkları sınıfların mevcutları, CBS ile ilgili herhangi bir kursa katılıp katılmama, uygulama yapıp yapmama, okullarında bilgisayar laboratuarı bulunup bulunmama gibi çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmeye çalışılmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre öğretmenlerin, CBS’ye yönelik tutumları ile okullarında bilgisayar laboratuarı bulunup bulunmaması arasında anlamlı bir fark tespit edilmiş, cinsiyet, kıdem, öğrenim durumu, sınıf mevcudu, kurs alıp almama, uygulama yapıp yapmama değişkenleri ile tutumları arasında anlamlı bir farklılık tespit edilememiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal Bilgiler,Öğretim Teknolojisi, Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri, Tutum

References

1. Alibrandi, M. (2003). GIS in the classroom: Using geographic information systems in social studies and environmental sciences. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
2. Al-Kamali, A. A. (2007). An investigation of Northwest Arkansas High School Students’ attitudes towards using GIS in learning social studies, University of Arkansas. ProQuest Digital Dissertations Document ID No. 130949391.
3. Artvinli, E. (2010).The contribution of geographic information systems (GIS) to geography education and secondary school students’ attitudes related to GIS, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice (ESTP) 10 (3), 1277-1292.
4. Audet, R.H. ve Abegg, G. L. (1996). Geographic information systems: Implications for problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 21-45.
5. Audet, R. H. ve J. Paris. (1997). GIS implementation model for schools: Assessing the critical concerns. Journal of Geography. 96(6), 293-300.
6. Baker, T.R.(2001). The history and application of GIS in K-12 education, GIS Development, 5 (1), 29-31, 42.
7. Baker, T. R. (2002). The effects of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) technologies on students’ attitudes, self-efficacy, and achievement in middle school science classrooms. Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Teaching and the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Kansas, USA.
8. Baker, T. R. ve White, S. H. (2003).The effects of GIS on students’ attitudes, selfefficacy, and achievement in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Geography, 102(6), 243-254.

9. Baker, T.R. (2005). Internet-based GIS mapping in support of K-12 education KanCRN Collaborative Research Network Center for Research on Learning, University of Kansas.
10. Bednarz S. W. ve Schee, J. V. (2006). Europe and the United States: The implementation of Geographic Information Systems in secondary education in two contexts technology. Pedagogy and Education, 15(2), 191–205.
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2001). Deneysel desenler, öntest-sontest, kontrol grubu desen ve veri analiz kitabı,Ankara: PegemA Press.
12. Comrey,A. L. & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. (2th Edition), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale.
13. Donert, K. (2006). The use of ICT e-learning in Ggeography. In K. Purnell, J.Lidstone & S. Hodgson, (Eds.), HERODOT perspectives in European higher education, changes in geographical education: Past, present and future, IGU, CGE Symposium (pp.146-154). Brisbane: Royal Geographical Society of Queensland.
14. Houtsonen, L. (2003). Maximising the use of communication technologies in geographical education. In: Gerber, R. (ed.), International Handbook on Geographical Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Jenner, P. (2006). Engaging students through the use of GIS at Pimlico State High School. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education,15(3), 278-282.
16. Johansson, T. (2006). Geographical information systems applications for schoolsGISAS. Finland: University of Helsinki.
17. Karasar, N. (2006). Scientific research methods, 16 th Edition, Ankara: Nobel Press. Keiper, T.A. (1999). GIS for elementary students: An inquiry into a new approach to learning geography. Journal of Geography, 98 (2), 47-59.
18. Kemp, K. K. ve Goodchild, M. F. (1990). The NCGIA core curriculum in GIS: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, University of California-Santa Barbara CA.
19. Kerski, J. (2000).The implementation and effectiveness of GIS, technology and methods in secondary education. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Colorado, USA.
20. Kerski, J. (2003). The implementation and effectiveness of Geographic Information Systems technology in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 102 (3), 128-1
21. Kidman, G., ve Palmer, G. (2006). GIS: The technology is there but the teaching is yet to catch up.International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(3), 289-296
22. Mark, W. P., Kay, R., ve Dan, P. (2003).Integrating Geographic Information Systems into the secondary curricula. Journal of Geography, 102(6), 275-281.
23. MEB. (2005). Elementary social studies education program and guide,6 and 7 th . Classes, Ankara
24. NCSS. (1992). The social studies professional Washington DC: National Council for the Social Studies, January-February.
25. Öztürk, C. (2008). Life studies and social studies instruction; A constructivist approach. Ankara:PegemA Press.
26. Özden, Y. (2002). Transformation in Eeducation, New values in education (6th. Edition), Ankara: PegemA Press.
27. Ratinen, L. ve Johansson, T. (2005). Teacher’s opinions of the incorporation of GIS in the Upper Secondary Schools in Finland. www.cartesia.org/.../icc2005/.../ILKKA.
28. Sui, D. Z. (1995).A pedagogic framework to link GIS to the intellectual core of Geography. Journal of Geography, 94(6), 578-591.
29. Summerby-Murray, R. (2001). Analyzing heritage landscapes with historical GIS: Contributions from problem-based inquiry and constructivist pedagogy. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 25 (1) (2001), pp. 37–52.
30. Şimşek, N. (2007). The influence of applications and activities based on GIS in the teaching of social studies on the student’s success and attitudes to the social studies, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Gazi, Ankara.
31. Şimşek, N. (2008). Using Geography Information Systems (GIS) technologies in social studies lessons, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu Education Journal, 16 (1), 191-198), March 2008.
32. Tekin, H. (1996). Measurement and evaluation in education (9 th Edition), Ankara: Yargı Press.
33. Tinker, R. F. (1992). Mapware: Educational applications of Geographic Information Systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 1 (1), 35-48.
34. Wiegand, P. (2001). Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. 10 (1), 68