Research Article

The Effect of Mobbing Behaviors on Students’ Burnout: An Empirical Study on Undergraduate Students of the Faculty of Sports Sciences

Volume: 5 Number: 1 June 30, 2020
EN TR

The Effect of Mobbing Behaviors on Students’ Burnout: An Empirical Study on Undergraduate Students of the Faculty of Sports Sciences

Abstract

Numerous variables influence student burnout, one of which is mobbing. In this study, the effect of mobbing behaviors on undergraduate students’ burnout was investigated. The data were obtained from students of a faculty of sports sciences (n=223). To measure mobbing, we used a modified version of the Negative Acts Questionnaire–Revised (NAQ–R: Einarsen et al., 2009) adapted to the higher education context. The new version of this scale was developed in this study, and it was labeled as the Negative Acts Questionnaire–Student (NAQ–S). For the validity of the scale, both exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were applied. In addition, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated for the reliability of the scale. The validity and reliability analyzes showed high values. As a result, NAQ–S contained 12 items (see the appendix) and a two–factor structure: academic mobbing (1–4 items) and non–academic mobbing (5–12 items). On the other hand, to measure students’ burnout, Maslach Burnout Inventory–Student Survey (MBI–SS: Schaufeli et al., 2002) was used. Then, hierarchical regression analysis was used to investigate the relationships between variables. The results showed that mobbing behaviors had a significant and positive effect on students’ burnout (β=.350; p<0.01).

Keywords

References

  1. Alex-Hart, B.A., Okagua, J. and Opara, P. (2015). Prevalence of bullying in secondary schools in Port Harcourt. Int J Adolesc Med Health, 27(4), 391-396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2014-0038.
  2. Brislin, R.W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 1(3), 187-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301.
  3. Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K. A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds) Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage.
  4. Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS – Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Publishers.
  5. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H. and Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & Stress, 23(1), 24-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370902815673.
  6. Furrer, C.J, Skinner, E.A. and Pitzer, J.R. (2014). The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students’ classroom engagement and everyday motivational resilience. National Society for the Study of Education, 113(1), 101-123.
  7. Giovazoalias, T. and Malikiosi-Loizos, M. (2015). Bullying at Greak universities: Cross-national perspectives. In H. Cowie, C.A. Myers (Eds.), Bullying among university students (pp. 110-126). London: Routledge.
  8. Goodboy, A., Martin, M. and Johnson, Z. (2015). The relationships between workplace bullying by graduate faculty with graduate students’ burnout and organizational citizenship behaviors. Communication Research Reports, 32(3), 272-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2015.1052904.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Sports Medicine , Tourism (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2020

Submission Date

October 31, 2019

Acceptance Date

March 13, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 5 Number: 1

APA
Yıldız, S. M. (2020). Mobbing Davranışlarının Öğrenci Tükenmişliğine Etkisi: Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi Lisans Öğrencileri Üzerinde Ampirik Bir İnceleme. Journal of Sport Sciences Research, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.25307/jssr.640401

26355     18836     18837         8748

Journal Download Statistics