Where Do We Start?: Initiating a Practice-Based Teacher Education Program Around High-Leverage Practices

Year 2020, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 169 - 199, 31.08.2020

Amanda Hurlbut , Daniel Krutka

Abstract

In recent years, there has been renewed interest in practice-based teacher education around the enactment of high leverage practices, but there is scant scholarship detailing the perceptions of faculty members who must implement such programmatic shifts. Our study utilized survey and interview data to better understand faculty members’ beliefs and prior work related to this line of inquiry. Initial results suggest that despite practical concerns, our participants are optimistic about high leverage practices, and in contrast to deficiency narratives about teacher education, participants articulated sophisticated teacher preparation methods along these lines. Participants also desired programmatic coherence.

Keywords

teacher education, high-leverage practices

References

• Apple, M. W. (2001). Markets, standards, teaching, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(3), 182-196.
• Apple, M. W. & Teitelbaum, K. (1986). Are teachers losing control of their skills and curriculum? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(2), 177-184.
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-31). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Ball, D., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511.
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Cochran-Smith, M., Feiman-Nemser, S., & McIntryre, J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 1177-1182). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S.L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
• Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D. J., Gatlin, S. J., & Heilig, J. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42).
• Forzani, F. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 357-368.
• Goodwin, A. L., Smith, L., Souto-Manning, M., Cheruvu, R., Tan, M. Y., Reed, R., & Taveras, L. (2014). What should teacher educators know and be able to do? Perspectives from practicing teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 284-302.
• Green, E. (2014). Building a better teacher: How teaching works (and how to teach it to everyone). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
• Grossman, P. (2011). Framework for teaching practice: A brief history of an idea. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2836-2843.
• Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205.
• Hatch, T., & Grossman, P. (2009). Learning to look beyond the boundaries of representation: Using technology to examine teaching (Overview for a digital exhibition: Learning from the practice of teaching). Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 70-85.
• Hiebert, J., & Morris, A. K. (2012). Teaching, rather than teachers, as a path toward improving classroom instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 92-102.
• Lampert, M. & Graziani, F. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers’ and teacher educators’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 491-509. DOI: 0013-5984/2009/10905-0005$10.00.
• Loughran, J. (2008). Toward a better understanding of teaching and learning about teaching. In McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378-386.
• McLeskey, J. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
• Mehta, J. D. & Teles, S. (2014). Professionalization 2.0: The case for plural professionalization in education. In M. McShane & F. Hess (Eds), Teacher quality 2.0: Will today’s reforms hold back tomorrow’s schools? Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
• Meuwissen, K. W., & Thomas, A. L. (2016). Can studying adolescents’ thinking amplify high-leverage social studies teaching practice? Challenges of synthesizing pedagogies of investigation and enactment in school–institutional contexts. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(3), 385-415.
• Mitchell, D.M. & Reid, J. (2017). (Re)turning to practice in teacher education: Embodied knowledge in learning to teach. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 42-58. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2016.1203775.
• Neel, M.A. (2017). Making sense and facing tensions: An investigation of core practice complexities. Teaching Education, 28(3), 257-278. DOI:10.1080/10476210.2017.1296826.
• Peercy, M.M. & Troyan, F. J. (2017). Making transparent the challenges of developing a practice-based pedagogy of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 26-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.005.
• Philip, T. M., Souto-Manning, M., Anderson, L., Horn, I., J. Carter Andrews, D., Stillman, J., & Varghese, M. (2019). Making justice peripheral by constructing practice as “core”: How the increasing prominence of core practices challenges teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 251-264.
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
• TeachingWorks. (n.d.). High-leverage practices. Retrieved from http://www.teachingworks.org/work-of-teaching/high-leverage-practices.
• Turnbull, B. (2002). Teacher participation and buy-in: Implications for school reform initiatives. Learning Environments Research, 5(3), 235-252.
• Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2007). The culturally responsive teacher. Educational Leadership, 64(6), 28-33.
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers: Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why? Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1311-1360.
• Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 376-382.