Dear authors,

Please submit your manuscript via the submission system of DergiPark. You can click the link to initiate and track the progress of your submission.

Important Note: Manuscripts can only be submitted through the official submission system. Submissions sent via postal mail or email will not be considered for evaluation.

Please ensure that your manuscript is prepared according to the first-submission template. The template can be accessed [here]. Manuscripts that do not adhere to the template may be rejected before the editorial review process.

General Submission Rules

Manuscripts must be submitted in “.docx” format.

All submissions must comply with the author guidelines provided by JTEE.

Review articles should include the following sections: Introduction, Theoretical Framework/Contents, Conclusion, and References.

Research articles should include the following sections: Introduction, Theoretical Framework, Methodology, Findings, Discussion, Conclusion, and References.

Citations and references must adhere to the APA-7 format.

Required Submission Files

Your submission must include the following files:

1. Blind Manuscript – prepare according to the author guidelines and first-submission template, without any author affiliations.

2. Title Page – include current affiliations, full contact details (address, phone, and email), and ORCID IDs of all authors.

3. Cover Letter – explaine how your research or review aligns with the field of teacher education and the scope of the journal.

For any further inquiries, please refer to the journal’s submission guidelines or contact the editorial office.

Structuring the Blind Version of Manuscript File

Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the template before uploading them to the system.

Papers must be written in English. Authors should aim at an international audience, using a clear style and avoiding jargon.

Acronyms, abbreviations and technical terms should be defined when they are first used.

All manuscripts must include an abstract and 3-5 keywords. Abstracts describing the essence of the manuscript must be 150-200 words.

Tables should be designed by considering APA-7 style. All tables must be explained for readers. Do not use te terms ‘below/above/following tables’. Refer to the name of the table when explanining it.

All graphical images are termed as ‘Figures’ and should be referred to as such in the manuscript. They should be numbered consecutively. Graphical images should be presented in a form suitable for immediate reproduction. Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproduction of any illustrations, tables, or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.

Headings: Author(s) must organize their headings as follows:

Heading Level 1: Teacher Education (Bold, title case)

Heading level 2: Teacher education (Single-line indented, bold, sentence case)

Heading level 3: Teacher education (Single-line indented, bold, italicized, sentence case )

Heading level 4: Teacher education (Single-line indented, italicized, sentence case)

Title Page

For the purposes of blind review, the title, the full name of each author with current affiliation and full address/phone/fax/email details and ORCID ID must be supplied on a separate paper.

The corresponding author must upload the title page in the first step of submission.

You can find a sample for the title page at here.

Citations

Authors must follow APA-7 for citations and references:

Include an in-text citation when you refer to, summarize, paraphrase, or quote from another source.

For every in-text citation in your paper, there must be a corresponding entry in your reference list.

Use the author(s)’ last name followed by the year of publication for in-text citations.

In narrative citations (within the text), use “and” to connect authors’ names. Example: Hoy and Miskel (2013) stated that…

In parenthetical citations, use “&” to connect authors’ names. Example: (Hoy & Miskel, 2013)

If a work has three or more authors, use only the first author’s last name followed by et al. in all in-text citations, even the first time you cite the work. Example: (Hoy et al., 2013) or Hoy et al. (2013) stated that…

References

The reference list should be arranged in alphabetical order by the first author’s last name.

If there is more than one work by the same author, list them in chronological order, from oldest to newest.

Use “&” instead of “and” when listing multiple authors in a reference list entry.

The first line of each reference entry is left-aligned, and all subsequent lines are indented using a hanging indent (1 cm).

Italicize the titles of books, journals, and web documents. However, journal article titles and book chapter titles are NOT italicized.

All types of sources (books, journal articles, web documents, brochures, etc.) should be arranged alphabetically in a single reference list—not separated by type.

If a work has 20 or fewer authors, list all of them. If a work has 21 or more authors, list the first 19 authors, followed by an ellipsis (…), and then include the final author’s name (without an ampersand before the last author).

If available, always include the DOI as a clickable link (https://doi.org/xxxxx).

For serial/journal articles; (1) do not use “Vol.” before the number, (2) include all page numbers in full (e.g., 102–115, not 102-15).

Examples for References:

* Books

Morrison, K. (1998). Management Theories for Educational Change. Paul Chapman Publishing.

Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive domain. McKay.

* Chapter in an Edited Book

Zeichner, K. (1982). Why bother with teacher induction? In G. Hall (Ed.), Beginning teacher induction: Five dilemmas (pp. 25–35). University of Texas Research and Development Center for Teacher Education.

* Serial/Journal Articles

Gokce, F. (2009). Behaviour of Turkish elementary school principals in the change process. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(2), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143208100298

Caram, C. A., & Davis, P. B. (2005). Inviting student engagement with questioning. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2005.10532080

Schleppenbach, M., Perry, M., Miller, K. F., Sims, L., & Fang, G. (2007). The answer is only the beginning: Extended discourse in Chinese and U.S. mathematics classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 380–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.380

Waqas, A., Bashir, U., Sattar, M. F., Abdullah, H. M., Hussain, I., Anjum, W., Ali, M. A., & Arshad, R. (2014). Factors influencing job satisfaction and its impact on job loyalty. International Journal of Learning and Development, 4(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v4i2.6095

* Institutional Publication

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2010). Human development statistical tables. Human development report. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2010 (If the report is available online, include the direct link to the source.)

* Thesis/Dissertation

Unpublished Dissertation:
Linn, J. A. (2003). Active or avoidant: Two methods of resisting persuasion (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Arkansas.

Published Dissertation (Database):
Linn, J. A. (2003). Active or avoidant: Two methods of resisting persuasion (Doctoral dissertation). University of Arkansas. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

Published Dissertation (Institutional Repository):
Linn, J. A. (2003). Active or avoidant: Two methods of resisting persuasion (Doctoral dissertation). University of Arkansas. https://[repository_url]

* Papers Presented at Congress or Symposium:

Unpublished Conference Paper (Not in Proceedings, Online)
MacColl, F., Ker, I., Huband, A., Veith, G., & Taylor, J. (2009, November 12–13). Minimising pedestrian-cyclist conflict on paths [Conference presentation]. Seventh New Zealand Cycling Conference, New Plymouth, New Zealand. https://cyclingconf.org.nz/system/files/NZCyclingConf09_2A_MacColl_PedCycleConflicts.pdf

Published Conference Paper (In Proceedings)
Williams, J., & Seary, K. (2010). Bridging the divide: Scaffolding the learning experiences of the mature age student. In J. Terrell (Ed.), Making the links: Learning, teaching and high quality student outcomes (pp. 104–116). Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the New Zealand Association of Bridging Educators, Wellington, New Zealand.

* Online Resources:

Ministry of Health. (2014). Ebola: Information for the public. https://www.health.govt.nz/your-health/conditions-and-treatments/diseases-and-illnesses/ebola-information-public

JTEE adheres strictly to the COPE guidelines on good publishing practice, and follows procedures set out in the COPE flowcharts when handling cases of suspected misconduct.

Ethics Statements
Editors, editorial board members, authors and reviewers of JTEE must follow the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The publication processes conducted in the JTEE establish the basis for the development and distribution of scientific information in an objective and respectful manner. All stakeholders of the review and publication process (authors, researchers, publisher, reviewers and editors) are expected to comply with the standards for ethical principles strictly.

Ethical Responsibilities of Publisher
The publisher provides JTEE with the required resources such as website hosting of the journal, manuscript submission and publication portal, plagiarism checking tools, layout. The publisher is responsible for taking reasonable steps to protect the editorial autonomy, protecting the intellectual property rights of all the articles published in JTEE, ensuring the independent editorial decision, taking the precautions against scientific abuse, fraud and plagiarism.

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
The author(s) who submit a manuscript to the JTEE are expected to comply with the following ethical responsibilities:

*All the submitted manuscripts must be the authors’ original study. When the author(s) use other scientific sources, they are required to cite completely and accurately.
*The author(s) must confirm that the manuscript has not been published elsewhere or is not currently under review by another journal. Multiple submission of the same manuscript to different journals is an ethical violation that the authors should avoid.
*Authors must express any potential competing interests openly and transparently.
*People who do not contribute to the content intellectually must not be specified as the author.
*All funding information (if applicable) must be clearly stated.
*When the authors are asked to supply raw data, they should be ready to submit such data and information
*The author(s) must notify the editor or the Publisher promptly if they notice substantial mistakes or inconsistencies in a submitted manuscript or in a manuscript that is already published. In such a case, the author(s) should cooperate with the editors during the correction or withdrawal process.
*Researches that involve living subjects should have appropriate ethical approval documents.
*Informed consent to participate in the study must be obtained from participants for the researches involving human subjects, (Informed consent to participate in the study are obtained from the legal guardians of the people under 18).
*The author(s) should confirm that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
The editor and associate editors are responsible for managing the editorial processes of the submitted manuscripts. It is obligatory to act impartially in editorial processes without making any discrimination based on religion, language, gender, region, country, nationality or etc. Also the editor and associate editors of JTEE must obey the following ethical responsibilities that are based on the COPE Guidelines such as Core Practices and the Principles of Transparency, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing, COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors ,COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. These guidelines are published as open Access by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

The editors should:
*Provide explanatory and informative feedback to the author(s),
*Ensure academic integrity,
*Establish an open and constructive communication with the authors and reviewers,
*Keep the identities of reviewers secret in blind review,
*Select the reviewers based on their expertise and the subject of the study,
*Keep all the information about the manuscript confidential,
*Supervise the quality of review process,
*Make sure that articles in the journal are published in accordance with the publication policies of the journal and international standards,
*Take precautions against possible abuse and malpractice,
*Editorial process for a manuscript submitted by the one of the editors or a member of the editorial board must be conducted by another editor to ensure the objectivity and transparency.

Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
All submitted manuscripts to JTEE are subject to double blind review process. This process ensures confidentiality by objective and independent review and aims to increase the quality of scientific material. Review process (selecting and assigning the reviewers) is conducted on DergiPark Journal Management System. Reviewers do not contact the authors directly, and the reviews and comments are conveyed through the journal management system. JTEE reviewers are supposed to bear the certain ethical responsibilities.

The reviewers should:
*Accept to review the manuscripts in their subject of expertise,
*Notify the editor immediately in case of conflict of interests, malpractice, plagiarism or serious ethical violation,
*Review the manuscript in terms of its content and scientific quality
*Avoid making personal comments including hostility, slander and insult while writing review report
*Review the manuscript in a constructive and kind tone,
*Keep all the information about the manuscript confidential,
*Make sure that nationality, gender, religious and political beliefs, and race do not influence the review process,
*Conduct the review process in accordance with the ethical rules stated above within a reasonable timeframe.

Plagiarism, Malpractice and Retraction Policy
Authors must ensure the academic integrity and avoid any unethical and improper actions such as fabrication, fraud authorship, plagiarism, simultaneous submission, copyright breaches, hiding competing interests, undeclared funders or sponsors etc. Contributions submitted to JTEE for publication must be the author(s) original work. Submitted manuscripts go through an initial editorial screening in terms of format, scope and originality. After the initial screening, all the submissions are checked by a plagiarism detection software to check a paper’s originality before sending out for review. The submissions which cannot verify content originality are rejected immediately.

The editors or the publisher may decide to retract an article in cases plagiarism, falsification of data, inappropriate editing and manipulating of images or republication of previously published work. If the scientific misconduct cannot be appropriately judged and assessed by the editors, the publisher may ask for an institutional investigation. JTEE journal follows the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) for retraction.

If the editorial board detects any ethical violations for the articles published in an issue or in early release, the retraction and reporting procedures are applied in 5 days. The paper which is detected to have plagiarism, multiple submission, fabrication of the data or unethical research is labelled as “Retraction” in the electronic environment. A retraction notification is published on the website of the journal with the reason that caused retraction. The online version of the article is preceded by a screen containing the retraction note. The HTML version of the retracted manuscript is removed. The editor informs the institutions that the author(s) is affiliated with. Also the editor notifies the related institutions and databases where the journal is indexed about the retraction.

If you encounter any ethical violation, unethical act or content in JTEE apart from the ethical responsibilities listed above, please notify the journal by e-mail at jtee.editor@gmail.com

Funding
The authors have to provide all funding information (if applicable), including name of the funding institution and the grant numbers. Funding information should be declared under the heading “Funding” at the end of the manuscript file, before the references.

The published material in JTEE is under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which enables reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material for noncommercial purposes. You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.