Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Perceived Performance of Gastronomy Destinations: The Case of Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Sanlıurfa, and Mardin

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 44 - 58, 15.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.58636/jtis.1697663

Abstract

The advent of gastronomy as a discipline has occurred in tandem with the emergence of gastronomic tourism as a concept. Türkiye boasts a multitude of destinations that hold significant importance and promise in this regard. Despite the existence of numerous academic studies in the field of gastronomic tourism, there remains a paucity of research addressing the issue of competitiveness among destinations. The present research was conducted with the objective of assessing the competitiveness and reputation of Gaziantep, Şanlıurfa, Mardin, Hatay, and Adana—destinations that are widely regarded as being at the forefront of gastronomy in Türkiye—in the eyes of the public. This assessment was undertaken within the framework of this gap. In this research, a multifaceted approach was employed to assess the perceptions and perspectives of tourists visiting the research destinations concerning regional culinary traditions. This approach entailed the utilization of both quantitative and qualitative data collection instruments, thereby facilitating a comprehensive evaluation of the destinations' competitiveness in the culinary tourism sector. In the quantitative section of the research, data were collected using a structured interview form. In the qualitative component of the research, an average of 200 reviews were collected from Tripadvisor for each city. In the research, the data sets were compared, and the strengths and weaknesses of the destinations were identified. The primary rationale for employing the research as a tool by regional managers and business owners involved in the economic cycle is its capacity for comparative analysis of data. Accordingly, the destinations are hereby ranked according to the scores given by potential tourists who participated in the survey. The sequence of cities traversed is as follows: Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Şanlıurfa, and Mardin. However, according to the opinions expressed by tourists who have traveled to these destinations and experienced the restaurants in the region, the destinations are ranked as follows: The sequence of cities traversed is Hatay, Adana, Şanlıurfa, Gaziantep, and Mardin.

Ethical Statement

Ethical Committee Approval was obtained from the Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Committee at the meeting dated 16.12.2020 with the decision number 71.

References

  • Akdağ, G. (2015). Wine tourism for local tourists following the Thracian vineyard route experiences. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 3(4), 3-11.
  • Akgöl, Y. (2012). Gastronomy tourism and foreign tourists visiting Türkiye evaluation of gastronomy experiences. Mersin University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Tourism Management, Mersin.
  • Akoğlu, A., Sergeant, O.. and Bayhan, I. (2017). The Michelin Star Restaurant Chefs' Moleküler Gastronomi Algı ve Eğilimleri: San. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 43, 59.
  • Ballı, E. (2013). Gastronomy tourism and Adana culinary culture. 2 East Mediterranean Turizm Sempozyumu, Adana, 206-218.
  • Batu, A. (2016). Konya in terms of culture and gastronomy tourism. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 4(30), 20-38.
  • Björk, P. and Kauppinen-Räisänen, H. (2017). Interested in eating and drinking? How food affects travel satisfaction and the overall holiday experience. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 17(1), 9-26.
  • Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism management, 21(1), 97-116.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
  • Çağlı, I. B. (2012). The Role of Local Culture in Tourism-oriented Development in Türkiye: Example of gastronomy Tourism (Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Science).
  • Çorman, G., and Yılmaz, G. Ö. (2024). Gastro-kültürel turlara katılan yerli ziyaretçilerin otantiklik algısı ve tur deneyim kalitesi: turist rehberlerinin yorumlayıcı rolünün etkisi. Journal of Tourism & Gastronomy Studies, 12(1), 332-352.
  • Eren, D. (2011). As an alternative kind of tourism, the kitchen is tourist research on the review of the opinions of industry representatives regarding their assessment. Düzce University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Tourism Management and Hotels, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Düzce.
  • Evren, S. (2016). Türkiye's winter tourism destinations are competitive positioning.
  • Evren, S. ve Kozak, N. (2019). Winter Tourism Destinations detected Performance: Comparison of five Destinations in Türkiye. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 30(1), 45-56.
  • Fields, K. (2002). Demand for the gastronomy tourism product: motivational factors. Tourism and gastronomy, 4(2), 36-50.
  • Fire, U. (2014). The contribution of gastronomy tourism to Çanakkale tourism. Unpublished Master's thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Institute of Social Sciences, Çanakkale.
  • Generous, M. and Ozkaya, F.. D. (2014). Turkish cuisine in gastronomy tourism matters. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 2(2), 62-66.
  • Gillespie, C. and Cousins, J. A. (2001). European gastronomy into the 21st century. Routledge.
  • Gürbüz, S. and Şahin, F. (2014). Research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Exclusive Publishing.
  • Hall, C. M. and Mitchell, R. (2000). Wine tourism in the Mediterranean: A tool for restructuring and development. Thunderbird International Business Review, 42(4), 445-465.
  • Hall, C. M. ve Sharples, L. (2004). The consumption of experiences or the experience of consumption? An introduction to the tourism of taste. Food tourism around the world, 13-36.
  • Hardworking, he (2013). In terms of destination competitiveness and travel motivation gastronomic id. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 1(2), 39-51.
  • Harrington, R. J. (2005). Defining gastronomic identity: The impact of environment and culture on prevailing components, texture and flavors in wine and food. Journal of culinary science & technology, 4(2-3), 129-152.
  • Henderson, J. C. (2009). Food tourism reviewed. British food journal, 111(4), 317-326.
  • Hjalager, A. M. (2002). A typology of gastronomy tourism. Tourism and gastronomy, 21.
  • Hjalager, A. M., & Richards, G. (Eds.). (2003). Tourism and gastronomy. Routledge.
  • Hussin, H. (2018). Gastronomy, tourism, and the soft power of Malaysia. Sage Open, 8(4).
  • Ignatov, E. and Smith, S. (2006). Segmenting Canadian culinary tourists. Current issues in tourism, 9(3), 235.
  • Kargiglioğlu, Ş. (2015). Gaziantep’te Gastronomi Turizmi: Gaziantep’i Gastronomi A Research on the opinions of local tourists visiting within the scope of tourism (Master's Thesis).
  • Kılıç, S. (2016). Cronbach's alpha trust coefficient. Journal of Mood Disorders, 6(1), 47-48.
  • Kivela, J. and Crotts, J. C. (2005). Gastronomy tourism: A meaningful travel market segment. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology, 4(2-3), 39-55.
  • Koçak, A. and Arun, Ö. (2006). Sampling problem in content analysis studies.
  • Kodaş, D. (2018). Gastronomi deneyimi, gastronomi motivasyonu, destinasyon tatmini ve destinasyon marka denkliği ilişkisi: Gaziantep örneği (Doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University (Turkey).
  • Kozak, M. Baloğlu, Ş., and Bahar, O. (2009). Measuring destination competitiveness: Multiple destinations versus multiple nationalities. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19(1), 56-71.
  • Leech, N. L. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School psychology quarterly, 22(4), 557.
  • Lightning, A.. and lightning, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. (9. Extended Edition) Ankara: The selected Publisher.
  • Lohana, S., Rashid, U. K. B., Nasuredin, J., and Kumar, V. (2019). Management and Business Research Quarterly. López‐Guzmán, T. and Sánchez‐Cañizares, S. (2012). Culinary tourism in Córdoba (Spain). British Food Journal.
  • Marchiori, E., Inversini, A., Cantoni, L. ve Dedekind, C. (2010, April). Towards a tourism destination reputation model. A first step. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference “Thought Leaders in Brand Management”, (Lugano, Switzerland, 18-20 April 2010), CD-ROM (pp. 921-930).
  • Martilla, J. A. and James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of marketing, 41(1), 77-79.
  • Martins, M. (2016). Gastronomic tourism and the creative economy. Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing, 2(2), 33-37.
  • Oh, H., Fiore, A. M. and Jeoung, M. (2007). Measuring experience economy concepts: Tourism applications. Journal of travel research, 46(2), 119-132.
  • Pine, B. J. and Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard business review, 76, 97-105. Pretes, M. (2003). Tourism and nationalism. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(1), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00035-X
  • Richards, G. (2001). Gastronomy as a source of regional identity and tourism development. In ATLAS Gastronomy Special Interest Group Meeting.
  • Sava, C., Karabašević, D. and Cleşiu, S. R. (2019). Culinary tourism-a reality of our days. Quaestus, (14), 269-278.

Perceived Performance of Gastronomy Destinations: The Case of Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Sanlıurfa, and Mardin

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 44 - 58, 15.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.58636/jtis.1697663

Abstract

The advent of gastronomy as a discipline has occurred in tandem with the emergence of gastronomic tourism as a concept. Türkiye boasts a multitude of destinations that hold significant importance and promise in this regard. Despite the existence of numerous academic studies in the field of gastronomic tourism, there remains a paucity of research addressing the issue of competitiveness among destinations. The present research was conducted with the objective of assessing the competitiveness and reputation of Gaziantep, Şanlıurfa, Mardin, Hatay, and Adana—destinations that are widely regarded as being at the forefront of gastronomy in Türkiye—in the eyes of the public. This assessment was undertaken within the framework of this gap. In this research, a multifaceted approach was employed to assess the perceptions and perspectives of tourists visiting the research destinations concerning regional culinary traditions. This approach entailed the utilization of both quantitative and qualitative data collection instruments, thereby facilitating a comprehensive evaluation of the destinations' competitiveness in the culinary tourism sector. In the quantitative section of the research, data were collected using a structured interview form. In the qualitative component of the research, an average of 200 reviews were collected from Tripadvisor for each city. In the research, the data sets were compared, and the strengths and weaknesses of the destinations were identified. The primary rationale for employing the research as a tool by regional managers and business owners involved in the economic cycle is its capacity for comparative analysis of data. Accordingly, the destinations are hereby ranked according to the scores given by potential tourists who participated in the survey. The sequence of cities traversed is as follows: Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Şanlıurfa, and Mardin. However, according to the opinions expressed by tourists who have traveled to these destinations and experienced the restaurants in the region, the destinations are ranked as follows: The sequence of cities traversed is Hatay, Adana, Şanlıurfa, Gaziantep, and Mardin.

Ethical Statement

Ethical Committee Approval was obtained from the Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Committee at the meeting dated 16.12.2020 with the decision number 71.

References

  • Akdağ, G. (2015). Wine tourism for local tourists following the Thracian vineyard route experiences. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 3(4), 3-11.
  • Akgöl, Y. (2012). Gastronomy tourism and foreign tourists visiting Türkiye evaluation of gastronomy experiences. Mersin University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Tourism Management, Mersin.
  • Akoğlu, A., Sergeant, O.. and Bayhan, I. (2017). The Michelin Star Restaurant Chefs' Moleküler Gastronomi Algı ve Eğilimleri: San. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 43, 59.
  • Ballı, E. (2013). Gastronomy tourism and Adana culinary culture. 2 East Mediterranean Turizm Sempozyumu, Adana, 206-218.
  • Batu, A. (2016). Konya in terms of culture and gastronomy tourism. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 4(30), 20-38.
  • Björk, P. and Kauppinen-Räisänen, H. (2017). Interested in eating and drinking? How food affects travel satisfaction and the overall holiday experience. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 17(1), 9-26.
  • Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism management, 21(1), 97-116.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
  • Çağlı, I. B. (2012). The Role of Local Culture in Tourism-oriented Development in Türkiye: Example of gastronomy Tourism (Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Science).
  • Çorman, G., and Yılmaz, G. Ö. (2024). Gastro-kültürel turlara katılan yerli ziyaretçilerin otantiklik algısı ve tur deneyim kalitesi: turist rehberlerinin yorumlayıcı rolünün etkisi. Journal of Tourism & Gastronomy Studies, 12(1), 332-352.
  • Eren, D. (2011). As an alternative kind of tourism, the kitchen is tourist research on the review of the opinions of industry representatives regarding their assessment. Düzce University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Tourism Management and Hotels, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Düzce.
  • Evren, S. (2016). Türkiye's winter tourism destinations are competitive positioning.
  • Evren, S. ve Kozak, N. (2019). Winter Tourism Destinations detected Performance: Comparison of five Destinations in Türkiye. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 30(1), 45-56.
  • Fields, K. (2002). Demand for the gastronomy tourism product: motivational factors. Tourism and gastronomy, 4(2), 36-50.
  • Fire, U. (2014). The contribution of gastronomy tourism to Çanakkale tourism. Unpublished Master's thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Institute of Social Sciences, Çanakkale.
  • Generous, M. and Ozkaya, F.. D. (2014). Turkish cuisine in gastronomy tourism matters. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 2(2), 62-66.
  • Gillespie, C. and Cousins, J. A. (2001). European gastronomy into the 21st century. Routledge.
  • Gürbüz, S. and Şahin, F. (2014). Research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Exclusive Publishing.
  • Hall, C. M. and Mitchell, R. (2000). Wine tourism in the Mediterranean: A tool for restructuring and development. Thunderbird International Business Review, 42(4), 445-465.
  • Hall, C. M. ve Sharples, L. (2004). The consumption of experiences or the experience of consumption? An introduction to the tourism of taste. Food tourism around the world, 13-36.
  • Hardworking, he (2013). In terms of destination competitiveness and travel motivation gastronomic id. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 1(2), 39-51.
  • Harrington, R. J. (2005). Defining gastronomic identity: The impact of environment and culture on prevailing components, texture and flavors in wine and food. Journal of culinary science & technology, 4(2-3), 129-152.
  • Henderson, J. C. (2009). Food tourism reviewed. British food journal, 111(4), 317-326.
  • Hjalager, A. M. (2002). A typology of gastronomy tourism. Tourism and gastronomy, 21.
  • Hjalager, A. M., & Richards, G. (Eds.). (2003). Tourism and gastronomy. Routledge.
  • Hussin, H. (2018). Gastronomy, tourism, and the soft power of Malaysia. Sage Open, 8(4).
  • Ignatov, E. and Smith, S. (2006). Segmenting Canadian culinary tourists. Current issues in tourism, 9(3), 235.
  • Kargiglioğlu, Ş. (2015). Gaziantep’te Gastronomi Turizmi: Gaziantep’i Gastronomi A Research on the opinions of local tourists visiting within the scope of tourism (Master's Thesis).
  • Kılıç, S. (2016). Cronbach's alpha trust coefficient. Journal of Mood Disorders, 6(1), 47-48.
  • Kivela, J. and Crotts, J. C. (2005). Gastronomy tourism: A meaningful travel market segment. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology, 4(2-3), 39-55.
  • Koçak, A. and Arun, Ö. (2006). Sampling problem in content analysis studies.
  • Kodaş, D. (2018). Gastronomi deneyimi, gastronomi motivasyonu, destinasyon tatmini ve destinasyon marka denkliği ilişkisi: Gaziantep örneği (Doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University (Turkey).
  • Kozak, M. Baloğlu, Ş., and Bahar, O. (2009). Measuring destination competitiveness: Multiple destinations versus multiple nationalities. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19(1), 56-71.
  • Leech, N. L. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School psychology quarterly, 22(4), 557.
  • Lightning, A.. and lightning, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. (9. Extended Edition) Ankara: The selected Publisher.
  • Lohana, S., Rashid, U. K. B., Nasuredin, J., and Kumar, V. (2019). Management and Business Research Quarterly. López‐Guzmán, T. and Sánchez‐Cañizares, S. (2012). Culinary tourism in Córdoba (Spain). British Food Journal.
  • Marchiori, E., Inversini, A., Cantoni, L. ve Dedekind, C. (2010, April). Towards a tourism destination reputation model. A first step. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference “Thought Leaders in Brand Management”, (Lugano, Switzerland, 18-20 April 2010), CD-ROM (pp. 921-930).
  • Martilla, J. A. and James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of marketing, 41(1), 77-79.
  • Martins, M. (2016). Gastronomic tourism and the creative economy. Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing, 2(2), 33-37.
  • Oh, H., Fiore, A. M. and Jeoung, M. (2007). Measuring experience economy concepts: Tourism applications. Journal of travel research, 46(2), 119-132.
  • Pine, B. J. and Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard business review, 76, 97-105. Pretes, M. (2003). Tourism and nationalism. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(1), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00035-X
  • Richards, G. (2001). Gastronomy as a source of regional identity and tourism development. In ATLAS Gastronomy Special Interest Group Meeting.
  • Sava, C., Karabašević, D. and Cleşiu, S. R. (2019). Culinary tourism-a reality of our days. Quaestus, (14), 269-278.
There are 43 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Gastronomy
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Oğulcan Bayram

Pelin Arsezen 0000-0002-6643-5731

Publication Date June 15, 2025
Submission Date May 22, 2025
Acceptance Date June 12, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Bayram, O., & Arsezen, P. (2025). Perceived Performance of Gastronomy Destinations: The Case of Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Sanlıurfa, and Mardin. Journal of Tourism Intelligence and Smartness, 8(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.58636/jtis.1697663