Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2022, , 367 - 386, 16.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1035565

Abstract

Supporting Institution

Destekleyen Kurum Yoktur

References

  • Agatić, A and Kolanović, I. (2020). Improving the seaport service quality by implementing digital Technologies. Pomorstvo, 34(1), 93-101.
  • Aggarwal, A., Gupta, S. And Ojha, M. K. (2019). Evaluation of key challenges to industry 4.0 in Indian context: a DEMATEL approach. Advances in Industrial and Production Engineering, 387-396. Singapore: Springer.
  • Arabelen, G. and Bastug, S. (2019). Nesnelerin İnternetinin Pazarlama Faaliyetlerine Katkısı: Lojistik Bilgi Teknolojileri Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Mersin Üniversitesi Denizcilik ve Lojistik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 17-31.
  • Bakhtari, A. R., Kumar, V., Waris, M. M., Sanin, C. and Szczerbicki, E. (2020). Industry 4.0 implementation challenges in manufacturing industries: An interpretive structural modelling approach. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 2384-2393.
  • Bastug, S., Arabelen, G., Vural, C. A. and Deveci, D. A. (2020). A value chain analysis of a seaport from the perspective of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 12(4), 367-397.
  • Blockchain Turkey (2020). Blockchain Turkey Platform. https://www.google.com/ search?q=Blockchain+Turkey&rlz=1C1GCEU _trTR821TR821&oq=Blockchain+Turkey&aqs=chrome.. 69i57j0i22i30l4.759j0j7&sourceid= chrome&ie=UTF-8, Access Date: 20.07.2020.
  • Brennen, B. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods for Media Studies. New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Bucak, U., Dincer, M.F., Demirel, H. (2019). Evaluation of The Maritime 4.0 Using The AHP Method. III. Global Conference on Innovation in Marine Technology and the Future of Maritime Transportation, 18-19 April 2019, Selcuk-Izmir.
  • Castelo-Branco, I., Cruz-Jesus, F. and Oliveira, T. (2019). Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing: Evidence for the European Union. Computers in Industry, 107, 22-32.
  • Chauhan, C., Singh, A. and Luthra, S. (2021). Barriers to industry 4.0 adoption and its performance implications: An empirical investigation of emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124809.
  • Cointelegraph (2020). TradeLens’e Dünyaca Ünlü Bir Banka Katıldı. https:// tr.cointelegraph.com/news/ standard-chartered-joins-ibm-and-maersks-blockchain-shipping-platform. Access Date: 01.09.2020.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. USA: Sage Publications.
  • Deloitte (2015). Industry 4.0. Challenges and solutions for the digital transformation and use of exponential technologies. Deloitte, 1–30.
  • Deniz Haber (2020). Yılport Holding, Gebze Ve Gemport Terminallerinde Blockchain Kullanacak. https://www.denizhaber.net/mobi/news_detail. php?id=96612. Access Date: 01.09.2020.
  • DP World (2020). DP World Joins With TradeLens To Digitise Global Supply Chains. https://www.dpworld.com/ news/releases/dp-world-joins-with-tradelens-to-digitise-global-supply-chains/. Access Date: 01.09.2020.
  • Duck, D. (2017). Global threats: cybersecurity in ports, Hemispheric Conference on Port Competitiveness & Security, Miami (USA), University of Miami. Retrieved on 01.01.2022 from http://portalcip.org/wp- content/uploads/2017/03/Max-Bobys.pdf.
  • Erdogdu, M. (2021). Dünya’da Lojistik 4.0, Dijital Lojistiğin Gelişiminin Dünya Ticaretine Etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
  • Esmer, S. (2017). Endüstri 4.0, Lojistik 4.0, Denizcilik 4.0, Liman 4.0…. https://www.7deniz.net/haber- endustri-40-lojistik-40-denizcilik-40-liman-40- 22601.html. Access Date: 21.06.2020.
  • Gromovs, G. and Lammi, K. (2017). Blockchain and internet of things require innovative approach to logistics education. Transport Problems, 12 (Special Edition), 23-34.
  • Haddud, A., DeSouza, A., Khare, A. and Lee, H. (2017). Examining potential benefits and challenges associated with the Internet of Things integration in supply chains. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(8), 1055-1085.
  • Heilig, L., Schwarze, S. and Voss, S. (2017). An analysis of digital transformation in the history and future of modern ports, Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 1341–1350.
  • Horváth, D. and Szabó, R. Z. (2019). Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 119-132.
  • Krippendorf, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. USA: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A. and Sharma, R. (2018). Analysis of the driving and dependence power of barriers to adopt industry 4.0 in Indian manufacturing industry. Computers in Industry, 101, 107-119.
  • Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., Parekh, H. and Joshi, S. (2019). Modeling the internet of things adoption barriers in food retail supply chains. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 48, 154-168.
  • Kasypi, M. and Shah, M. (2012). Agile supply chain for container terminal. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(5), 69-82.
  • Khan, U. and Haleem, A. (2015). Improving to smart organization: an integrated ISM and fuzzy-MICMAC modelling of barriers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(6), 807-829.
  • Kumar, P., Bhamu, J. and Sangwan, K. S. (2021). Analysis of barriers to Industry 4.0 adoption in Manufacturing Organizations: an ISM Approach. Procedia CIRP, 98, 85-90.
  • Kvale S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
  • Kumar, S., Raut, R. D., Nayal, K., Kraus, S., Yadav, V. S. and Narkhede, B. E. (2021). To identify industry 4.0 and circular economy adoption barriers in the agriculture supply chain by using ISM-ANP. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126023.
  • Luthra, S. and Mangla, S. K. (2018). Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 168-179.
  • Luthra, S., Yadav, G., Kumar, A., Anosike, A., Mangla, S. K. and Garg, D. (2020). Study of key enablers of industry 4.0 practices implementation using ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach. In International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Proceedings of IEOM Society International, 241-251.
  • Lee, J., Kao, H. A. and Yang, S. (2014). Service innovation and smart analytics for industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia CIRP, 16, 3-8.
  • Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18-23.
  • Machado, C. G., Winroth, M., Carlsson, D., Almström, P., Centerholt, V. and Hallin, M. (2019). Industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing companies: challenges and enablers towards increased digitalization. Procedia Cirp, 81, 1113-1118.
  • Maersk (2019). Major ocean carriers CMA CGM and MSC to join TradeLens blockchain-enabled digital shipping platform. https://www.maersk.com/ news/articles/2019/05/28/cma-cgm-and-msc-to-join- tradelens-digital-shipping-platform. Access Date: 01.09.2020.
  • Majeed, A. A. and Rupasinghe, T. D. (2017). Internet of things (IoT) embedded future supply chains for industry 4.0: An assessment from an ERP-based fashion apparel and footwear industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 6(1), 25-40.
  • Majumdar, A., Garg, H. and Jain, R. (2021). Managing the barriers of Industry 4.0 adoption and implementation in textile and clothing industry: Interpretive structural model and triple helix framework. Computers in Industry, 125, 103372.
  • Malhotra, N. and Birks, D. (2007). Marketing Research: An Applied Approach. Essex/UK: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Marcon, E., Marcon, A., Le Dain, M. A., Ayala, N. F., Frank, A. G., & Matthieu, J. (2019). Barriers for the digitalization of servitization. Procedia CIRP, 83, 254-259.
  • Martín-Soberón, A. M., Monfort, A., Sapiña, R., Monterde, N. and Calduch, D. (2014). Automation in port container terminals, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 160(2014), 195-204.
  • McKinsey Digital (2016). Industry 4.0 after the Initial Hype. Where Manufacturers Are Finding Value and How They Can Best Capture it. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/ mckinsey%20digital/our%20insights/getting%20the%20most%20out%20of%20industry%204%200/ mckinsey_industry_40_2016.pdf, Access Date: 06.07.2021.
  • Miles, B. and Huberman, A. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Moeuf, A., Lamouri, S., Pellerin, R., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., Tobon-Valencia, E. and Eburdy, R. (2020). Identification of critical success factors, risks and opportunities of Industry 4.0 in SMEs. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1384-1400.
  • Moktadir, M. A., Ali, S. M., Kusi-Sarpong, S. and Shaikh, M. A. A. (2018). Assessing challenges for implementing Industry 4.0: Implications for process safety and environmental protection. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 730-741.
  • Mollaoglu, M. (2021). Endüstri 4.0’ın Denizcilik Sektörü Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Bulanık Tabanlı Yöntemlerle Değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit Universitesi, Zonguldak.
  • Morrar, R., Arman, H. and Mousa, S. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): A social innovation perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11), 12-20.
  • Oesterreich, T. D. and Teuteberg, F. (2016). Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers in Industry, 83, 121-139.
  • Peillon, S. and Dubruc, N. (2019). Barriers to digital servitization in French manufacturing SMEs. Procedia CIRP, 83, 146-150.
  • Petrillo, A., De Felice, F., Cioffi, R. and Zomparelli, F. (2018). Fourth industrial revolution: Current practices, challenges, and opportunities. Digital Transformation in Smart Manufacturing, 1-20.
  • Raj, A., Dwivedi, G., Sharma, A., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. and Rajak, S. (2020). Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 224, 107546.
  • Riedl, J., Delenclos, F. X. and Rasmussen, A. (2018). To Get Smart, Ports Go Digital. https://image-src. bcg.com/Images/BCG-To-Get-Smart-Ports-Go- Digital-Apr-2018_tcm9-188400.pdf. Access Date: 20.06.2020.
  • Rüssmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P. and Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group, 9(1), 54-89.
  • Salido, M. A., Rodriguez-Molins, M. and Barber, F. (2011). Integrated intelligent techniques for remarshaling and berthing in maritime terminals. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(3), 435-451.
  • Sanchez-Gonzalez, P. L., Díaz-Gutiérrez, D., Leo, T. J. and Núñez-Rivas, L. R. (2019). Toward digitalization of maritime transport? Sensors, 19(4), 926.
  • Schroder C. (2017). The challenges of industry 4.0 for small and medium-sized enterprises. Friedrich-Ebert- Stiftung, Bonn. Germany 2017. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/wiso/12683.pdf., Access Date: 25.08.2021.
  • Shahbakhsh, M., Emad, G. R. And Cahoon, S. (2021). Industrial revolutions and transition of the maritime industry: The case of Seafarer’s role in autonomous shipping. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 38(1), 10-18.
  • Solé, M. (2018). Workplace implications of Industry 4.0 at the Port of Barcelona, Published Thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
  • Sullivan, B. P., Desai, S., Sole, J., Rossi, M., Ramundo, L., & Terzi, S. (2020). Maritime 4.0–opportunities in digitalization and advanced manufacturing for vessel development. Procedia manufacturing, 42, 246-253.
  • Szozda, N. (2017). Industry 4.0 and its impact on the functioning of supply chains. Logforum, 13(4), 401-414. Tas, A. (2021). Lojistik Sektörü Özelinde Endüstri 4.0 Farkındalık Düzeyleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Doktora Tezi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
  • Thaver, V. (2019). A Smart Port City. 1st Annual Durban Maritime Summit, Municipal Institute of Learning, EThekwini Municipality, Durban, South Africa. Retrieved on 30.11.2021 from http://www.mile.org.za/ QuickLinks/News/Pages/news_20160225.aspx.
  • Thoben, K. D., Wiesner, S. and Wuest, T. (2017). “Industrie 4.0” and smart manufacturing-a review of research issues and application examples. International Journal of Automation Technology, 11(1), 4-16.
  • TradeLens (2020). TradeLens Offical Web Site. www.tradelens.com. Access Date: 01.09.2020.
  • Turkish Time Magazine (2018). Maersk ve IBM’den, TradeLens adlı Blockchain Sevkiyat Çözümünün tanıtımı. http://www.turkishtimedergi.com/sponsorlu/ guler-dinamik/maersk-ve-ibmden-tradelens-adli- blockchain-sevkiyat-cozumunun-tanitimi/. Access Date: 01.09.2020.
  • Turkyilmaz, A., Dikhanbayeva, D., Suleiman, Z., Shaikholla, S. and Shehab, E. (2021). Industry 4.0: Challenges and opportunities for Kazakhstan SMEs. Procedia CIRP, 96, 213-218.
  • Zarzuelo, I..P., Soeane, M. J. F. And Bermúdez, B. L. (2020). Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 20, Article 100173.
  • Zarzuelo, I..P. (2021). Cybersecurity in ports and maritime industry: Reasons for raising awareness on this issue. Transport Policy, 100, 1-4.
  • Zhou, K., Liu, T. and Zhou, L. (2015). Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges.
  • 12th International conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD), 2147-2152. IEEE.

What Are The Barriers to the Adoption of Industry 4.0 in Container Terminals? A Qualitative Study on Turkish Ports

Year 2022, , 367 - 386, 16.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1035565

Abstract

Seaports are nodal points in global supply chains. Industry 4.0 applications, which have entered our lives with the rapid technological developments, are also seen in the port sector. The use of Industry 4.0 technologies started in container ports first, and applications were predominantly encountered in this type of ports. The aim of the study was to investigate the nature of digital technologies in container ports and to reveal the major barriers to the adoption of Industry 4.0 in Turkish container ports. First, extant literature was reviewed, and the main obstacles to the adoption of Industry 4.0 were determined. Later, considering the literature findings, in-depth interviews were conducted with port managers. Then, content analysis was performed by examining transcripts and notes taken during the interviews using a professional computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software, MAXQDA-12. According to the findings, four main difficulties were identified as technological, operational, legal, and organizational difficulties. Operational barriers were revealed to be industry-related obstacles. Technological and operational challenges were the most frequently mentioned ones by the participants. Finally, the findings of the study were discussed, and suggestions were proposed to overcome those obstacles.

References

  • Agatić, A and Kolanović, I. (2020). Improving the seaport service quality by implementing digital Technologies. Pomorstvo, 34(1), 93-101.
  • Aggarwal, A., Gupta, S. And Ojha, M. K. (2019). Evaluation of key challenges to industry 4.0 in Indian context: a DEMATEL approach. Advances in Industrial and Production Engineering, 387-396. Singapore: Springer.
  • Arabelen, G. and Bastug, S. (2019). Nesnelerin İnternetinin Pazarlama Faaliyetlerine Katkısı: Lojistik Bilgi Teknolojileri Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Mersin Üniversitesi Denizcilik ve Lojistik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 17-31.
  • Bakhtari, A. R., Kumar, V., Waris, M. M., Sanin, C. and Szczerbicki, E. (2020). Industry 4.0 implementation challenges in manufacturing industries: An interpretive structural modelling approach. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 2384-2393.
  • Bastug, S., Arabelen, G., Vural, C. A. and Deveci, D. A. (2020). A value chain analysis of a seaport from the perspective of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 12(4), 367-397.
  • Blockchain Turkey (2020). Blockchain Turkey Platform. https://www.google.com/ search?q=Blockchain+Turkey&rlz=1C1GCEU _trTR821TR821&oq=Blockchain+Turkey&aqs=chrome.. 69i57j0i22i30l4.759j0j7&sourceid= chrome&ie=UTF-8, Access Date: 20.07.2020.
  • Brennen, B. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods for Media Studies. New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Bucak, U., Dincer, M.F., Demirel, H. (2019). Evaluation of The Maritime 4.0 Using The AHP Method. III. Global Conference on Innovation in Marine Technology and the Future of Maritime Transportation, 18-19 April 2019, Selcuk-Izmir.
  • Castelo-Branco, I., Cruz-Jesus, F. and Oliveira, T. (2019). Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing: Evidence for the European Union. Computers in Industry, 107, 22-32.
  • Chauhan, C., Singh, A. and Luthra, S. (2021). Barriers to industry 4.0 adoption and its performance implications: An empirical investigation of emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124809.
  • Cointelegraph (2020). TradeLens’e Dünyaca Ünlü Bir Banka Katıldı. https:// tr.cointelegraph.com/news/ standard-chartered-joins-ibm-and-maersks-blockchain-shipping-platform. Access Date: 01.09.2020.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. USA: Sage Publications.
  • Deloitte (2015). Industry 4.0. Challenges and solutions for the digital transformation and use of exponential technologies. Deloitte, 1–30.
  • Deniz Haber (2020). Yılport Holding, Gebze Ve Gemport Terminallerinde Blockchain Kullanacak. https://www.denizhaber.net/mobi/news_detail. php?id=96612. Access Date: 01.09.2020.
  • DP World (2020). DP World Joins With TradeLens To Digitise Global Supply Chains. https://www.dpworld.com/ news/releases/dp-world-joins-with-tradelens-to-digitise-global-supply-chains/. Access Date: 01.09.2020.
  • Duck, D. (2017). Global threats: cybersecurity in ports, Hemispheric Conference on Port Competitiveness & Security, Miami (USA), University of Miami. Retrieved on 01.01.2022 from http://portalcip.org/wp- content/uploads/2017/03/Max-Bobys.pdf.
  • Erdogdu, M. (2021). Dünya’da Lojistik 4.0, Dijital Lojistiğin Gelişiminin Dünya Ticaretine Etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
  • Esmer, S. (2017). Endüstri 4.0, Lojistik 4.0, Denizcilik 4.0, Liman 4.0…. https://www.7deniz.net/haber- endustri-40-lojistik-40-denizcilik-40-liman-40- 22601.html. Access Date: 21.06.2020.
  • Gromovs, G. and Lammi, K. (2017). Blockchain and internet of things require innovative approach to logistics education. Transport Problems, 12 (Special Edition), 23-34.
  • Haddud, A., DeSouza, A., Khare, A. and Lee, H. (2017). Examining potential benefits and challenges associated with the Internet of Things integration in supply chains. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(8), 1055-1085.
  • Heilig, L., Schwarze, S. and Voss, S. (2017). An analysis of digital transformation in the history and future of modern ports, Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 1341–1350.
  • Horváth, D. and Szabó, R. Z. (2019). Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 119-132.
  • Krippendorf, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. USA: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A. and Sharma, R. (2018). Analysis of the driving and dependence power of barriers to adopt industry 4.0 in Indian manufacturing industry. Computers in Industry, 101, 107-119.
  • Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., Parekh, H. and Joshi, S. (2019). Modeling the internet of things adoption barriers in food retail supply chains. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 48, 154-168.
  • Kasypi, M. and Shah, M. (2012). Agile supply chain for container terminal. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(5), 69-82.
  • Khan, U. and Haleem, A. (2015). Improving to smart organization: an integrated ISM and fuzzy-MICMAC modelling of barriers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(6), 807-829.
  • Kumar, P., Bhamu, J. and Sangwan, K. S. (2021). Analysis of barriers to Industry 4.0 adoption in Manufacturing Organizations: an ISM Approach. Procedia CIRP, 98, 85-90.
  • Kvale S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
  • Kumar, S., Raut, R. D., Nayal, K., Kraus, S., Yadav, V. S. and Narkhede, B. E. (2021). To identify industry 4.0 and circular economy adoption barriers in the agriculture supply chain by using ISM-ANP. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126023.
  • Luthra, S. and Mangla, S. K. (2018). Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 168-179.
  • Luthra, S., Yadav, G., Kumar, A., Anosike, A., Mangla, S. K. and Garg, D. (2020). Study of key enablers of industry 4.0 practices implementation using ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach. In International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Proceedings of IEOM Society International, 241-251.
  • Lee, J., Kao, H. A. and Yang, S. (2014). Service innovation and smart analytics for industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia CIRP, 16, 3-8.
  • Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18-23.
  • Machado, C. G., Winroth, M., Carlsson, D., Almström, P., Centerholt, V. and Hallin, M. (2019). Industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing companies: challenges and enablers towards increased digitalization. Procedia Cirp, 81, 1113-1118.
  • Maersk (2019). Major ocean carriers CMA CGM and MSC to join TradeLens blockchain-enabled digital shipping platform. https://www.maersk.com/ news/articles/2019/05/28/cma-cgm-and-msc-to-join- tradelens-digital-shipping-platform. Access Date: 01.09.2020.
  • Majeed, A. A. and Rupasinghe, T. D. (2017). Internet of things (IoT) embedded future supply chains for industry 4.0: An assessment from an ERP-based fashion apparel and footwear industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 6(1), 25-40.
  • Majumdar, A., Garg, H. and Jain, R. (2021). Managing the barriers of Industry 4.0 adoption and implementation in textile and clothing industry: Interpretive structural model and triple helix framework. Computers in Industry, 125, 103372.
  • Malhotra, N. and Birks, D. (2007). Marketing Research: An Applied Approach. Essex/UK: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Marcon, E., Marcon, A., Le Dain, M. A., Ayala, N. F., Frank, A. G., & Matthieu, J. (2019). Barriers for the digitalization of servitization. Procedia CIRP, 83, 254-259.
  • Martín-Soberón, A. M., Monfort, A., Sapiña, R., Monterde, N. and Calduch, D. (2014). Automation in port container terminals, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 160(2014), 195-204.
  • McKinsey Digital (2016). Industry 4.0 after the Initial Hype. Where Manufacturers Are Finding Value and How They Can Best Capture it. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/ mckinsey%20digital/our%20insights/getting%20the%20most%20out%20of%20industry%204%200/ mckinsey_industry_40_2016.pdf, Access Date: 06.07.2021.
  • Miles, B. and Huberman, A. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Moeuf, A., Lamouri, S., Pellerin, R., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., Tobon-Valencia, E. and Eburdy, R. (2020). Identification of critical success factors, risks and opportunities of Industry 4.0 in SMEs. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1384-1400.
  • Moktadir, M. A., Ali, S. M., Kusi-Sarpong, S. and Shaikh, M. A. A. (2018). Assessing challenges for implementing Industry 4.0: Implications for process safety and environmental protection. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 730-741.
  • Mollaoglu, M. (2021). Endüstri 4.0’ın Denizcilik Sektörü Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Bulanık Tabanlı Yöntemlerle Değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit Universitesi, Zonguldak.
  • Morrar, R., Arman, H. and Mousa, S. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): A social innovation perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11), 12-20.
  • Oesterreich, T. D. and Teuteberg, F. (2016). Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers in Industry, 83, 121-139.
  • Peillon, S. and Dubruc, N. (2019). Barriers to digital servitization in French manufacturing SMEs. Procedia CIRP, 83, 146-150.
  • Petrillo, A., De Felice, F., Cioffi, R. and Zomparelli, F. (2018). Fourth industrial revolution: Current practices, challenges, and opportunities. Digital Transformation in Smart Manufacturing, 1-20.
  • Raj, A., Dwivedi, G., Sharma, A., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. and Rajak, S. (2020). Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 224, 107546.
  • Riedl, J., Delenclos, F. X. and Rasmussen, A. (2018). To Get Smart, Ports Go Digital. https://image-src. bcg.com/Images/BCG-To-Get-Smart-Ports-Go- Digital-Apr-2018_tcm9-188400.pdf. Access Date: 20.06.2020.
  • Rüssmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P. and Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group, 9(1), 54-89.
  • Salido, M. A., Rodriguez-Molins, M. and Barber, F. (2011). Integrated intelligent techniques for remarshaling and berthing in maritime terminals. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(3), 435-451.
  • Sanchez-Gonzalez, P. L., Díaz-Gutiérrez, D., Leo, T. J. and Núñez-Rivas, L. R. (2019). Toward digitalization of maritime transport? Sensors, 19(4), 926.
  • Schroder C. (2017). The challenges of industry 4.0 for small and medium-sized enterprises. Friedrich-Ebert- Stiftung, Bonn. Germany 2017. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/wiso/12683.pdf., Access Date: 25.08.2021.
  • Shahbakhsh, M., Emad, G. R. And Cahoon, S. (2021). Industrial revolutions and transition of the maritime industry: The case of Seafarer’s role in autonomous shipping. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 38(1), 10-18.
  • Solé, M. (2018). Workplace implications of Industry 4.0 at the Port of Barcelona, Published Thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
  • Sullivan, B. P., Desai, S., Sole, J., Rossi, M., Ramundo, L., & Terzi, S. (2020). Maritime 4.0–opportunities in digitalization and advanced manufacturing for vessel development. Procedia manufacturing, 42, 246-253.
  • Szozda, N. (2017). Industry 4.0 and its impact on the functioning of supply chains. Logforum, 13(4), 401-414. Tas, A. (2021). Lojistik Sektörü Özelinde Endüstri 4.0 Farkındalık Düzeyleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Doktora Tezi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
  • Thaver, V. (2019). A Smart Port City. 1st Annual Durban Maritime Summit, Municipal Institute of Learning, EThekwini Municipality, Durban, South Africa. Retrieved on 30.11.2021 from http://www.mile.org.za/ QuickLinks/News/Pages/news_20160225.aspx.
  • Thoben, K. D., Wiesner, S. and Wuest, T. (2017). “Industrie 4.0” and smart manufacturing-a review of research issues and application examples. International Journal of Automation Technology, 11(1), 4-16.
  • TradeLens (2020). TradeLens Offical Web Site. www.tradelens.com. Access Date: 01.09.2020.
  • Turkish Time Magazine (2018). Maersk ve IBM’den, TradeLens adlı Blockchain Sevkiyat Çözümünün tanıtımı. http://www.turkishtimedergi.com/sponsorlu/ guler-dinamik/maersk-ve-ibmden-tradelens-adli- blockchain-sevkiyat-cozumunun-tanitimi/. Access Date: 01.09.2020.
  • Turkyilmaz, A., Dikhanbayeva, D., Suleiman, Z., Shaikholla, S. and Shehab, E. (2021). Industry 4.0: Challenges and opportunities for Kazakhstan SMEs. Procedia CIRP, 96, 213-218.
  • Zarzuelo, I..P., Soeane, M. J. F. And Bermúdez, B. L. (2020). Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 20, Article 100173.
  • Zarzuelo, I..P. (2021). Cybersecurity in ports and maritime industry: Reasons for raising awareness on this issue. Transport Policy, 100, 1-4.
  • Zhou, K., Liu, T. and Zhou, L. (2015). Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges.
  • 12th International conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD), 2147-2152. IEEE.
There are 69 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Operation
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Elif Koç 0000-0002-0235-086X

Publication Date January 16, 2023
Submission Date December 12, 2021
Acceptance Date January 20, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022

Cite

APA Koç, E. (2023). What Are The Barriers to the Adoption of Industry 4.0 in Container Terminals? A Qualitative Study on Turkish Ports. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 7(2), 367-386. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1035565
AMA Koç E. What Are The Barriers to the Adoption of Industry 4.0 in Container Terminals? A Qualitative Study on Turkish Ports. JTL. January 2023;7(2):367-386. doi:10.26650/JTL.2022.1035565
Chicago Koç, Elif. “What Are The Barriers to the Adoption of Industry 4.0 in Container Terminals? A Qualitative Study on Turkish Ports”. Journal of Transportation and Logistics 7, no. 2 (January 2023): 367-86. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1035565.
EndNote Koç E (January 1, 2023) What Are The Barriers to the Adoption of Industry 4.0 in Container Terminals? A Qualitative Study on Turkish Ports. Journal of Transportation and Logistics 7 2 367–386.
IEEE E. Koç, “What Are The Barriers to the Adoption of Industry 4.0 in Container Terminals? A Qualitative Study on Turkish Ports”, JTL, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 367–386, 2023, doi: 10.26650/JTL.2022.1035565.
ISNAD Koç, Elif. “What Are The Barriers to the Adoption of Industry 4.0 in Container Terminals? A Qualitative Study on Turkish Ports”. Journal of Transportation and Logistics 7/2 (January 2023), 367-386. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1035565.
JAMA Koç E. What Are The Barriers to the Adoption of Industry 4.0 in Container Terminals? A Qualitative Study on Turkish Ports. JTL. 2023;7:367–386.
MLA Koç, Elif. “What Are The Barriers to the Adoption of Industry 4.0 in Container Terminals? A Qualitative Study on Turkish Ports”. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, vol. 7, no. 2, 2023, pp. 367-86, doi:10.26650/JTL.2022.1035565.
Vancouver Koç E. What Are The Barriers to the Adoption of Industry 4.0 in Container Terminals? A Qualitative Study on Turkish Ports. JTL. 2023;7(2):367-86.



The JTL is being published twice (in April and October of) a year, as an official international peer-reviewed journal of the School of Transportation and Logistics at Istanbul University.