Examining the Efficiency of Automation in Container Terminals

Abstract

An increase in container traffic, larger tonnage of vessels, scarcity of port area, and shorter turnaround times have driven terminals to process more containers in less time and less space. Thereby, the increasing focus on costs, safety, and environmental control is forcing terminal operators to search for innovative solutions. Automated container terminals are the potential candidates to improve the performance of container terminals and represent a challenge to any subsequent future fluctuations in maritime transport. In this study, we examine the improvement in the performance of container ports by adopting automation through simulation modeling. The effect of the automated guided vehicles and automatic stacking cranes-based automatic container terminal system (AGV-ACT/Automated Guided Vehicles - Automatic Container Terminal system) on container handling operations was evaluated. To create a complete port simulation model, the main objects of the container terminal such as tugboats, berths, quay cranes, stacking blocks, stacking cranes, horizontal transport vehicles, external trucks, and the layout of the terminal are simulated as a whole. Firstly, we created a model representing the existing port to evaluate the overall performance of the port and to validate the simulation model by comparing the actual data with those of the real system. Then, a simulation model for the proposed automatic system was created and evaluated. The simulation model was divided into four main logics: ships arrival and berth allocation, ship loading/unloading, external trucks arrival, and containers storage/retrieval logic. The results of the two systems were compared based on the performance criteria such as ship turnaround time, external trucks turnaround time, and equipment utilization rate. Automation has reduced the turnaround time of the ships and provided a smooth movement for the equipment which showed a high utilization rate. The automated system decreased the ship turnaround time from 9.52 hours to 7.81 hours (18%). The reduction in the waiting times of the container transport vehicles for quay cranes reached 47% and 30% in berths 1 and 2, respectively. On the other hand, external trucks’ turnaround time increased by 124% as only one ASC (Automatic Stacking Crane) is run in each block to perform both seaside and landside operations (seaside operations were prioritized). Automation has improved the overall performance of the terminal. Also, the layout of the automated handling system raised the storage capacity of the port. In the new proposed automated layout, the storage area capacity increased by 27.27%.

Keywords

• Container Terminals
• Simulation
• Automation

References

1. Ioannou, P., 2008, Intelligent Freight Transportation, CRC Press: Taylor & Francis Group LLC, USA, ISBN: 13: 978-0-8493-0770-6. google scholar
2. Martm-Soberon, A.M., Monfort, A., Sapina, R., Monterde, N. and Calduch, D., 2014, Automation in Port Container Terminals, Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 160 (2014), 195-204. google scholar
3. Saanen, Y., 2003, The Design and Assessment of Next Generation Automated Container Terminals, 15th European Simulation Symposium, 2003 CS European Council / SCS Europe, ISBN 3-936150-28-1. google scholar
4. Saanen, A.Y., 2004, An Approach for Designing Robotized Marine Container Terminals, Thesis (PhD), Delft University of Technology. google scholar
5. Container-xchange . [cited 2021 25 April]; Available from: https://container-xchange.com/blog/container-terminal-automation/. google scholar
6. Kim, K.H., Thi Phan, M. and Woo, Y.J., 2012, New Conceptual Handling Systems in Container Terminals, Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 11 (4), 299-309. google scholar
7. Rademaker, W.C.A., 2007, Container Terminal Automation Feasibility of Terminal Automation for mid-sized Terminals, Thesis (Master), Delft University of Technology. google scholar
8. Liu, C., Jula, H. and Ioannou, P., 2002, Design, Simulation, and Evaluation of Automated Container Terminals, IEEE Transactions On Intelligent Transportation Systems, 3 (1), 12-26. google scholar

9. Ballis, A., Golias, J. and Abakoumkin, C., 1997, A Comparison Between Conventional and Advanced Handling Systems for Low Volume Container Maritime Terminals, MARIT. POL. MGMT., 24 (1), 73-92. google scholar
10. City of Los Angeles, Harbor Department Planning and Economic Development Division, Container Terminal Automation; 2014. google scholar
11. DP World. [cited 2021 25 March]; Available from: https://safety4sea.com/dp-world-celebrates-for-brisbane-terminal/. google scholar
12. Altiok, T. and Melamed, B., 2007, Simulation Modeling and Analysis With Arena, Elsevier Inc., USA, ISBN 10: 0-12-370523-1. google scholar
13. D. Rossetti M., 2016, Simulation Modeling and Arena, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons Inc., Publication, New Jersey and Canada, ISBN 13: 978-0-12-370523-5. google scholar
14. Kelton, D., Sadowski, R. and Swets, N., 2010, Simulation With Arena, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill Publications, Singapore, ISBN: 978-007-126771-7. google scholar
15. Kamal, B., Kara, G., ve Okşaş, O., 2020, An Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to Overcapacity Absorbing Methods in Container Shipping. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 162 (331-344). google scholar
16. Kamal, B., 2019, Deniz Taşımacılığında Risk Sermayesi, Kent Akademisi,Volume, 12 (39), Issue 3 (618-633). google scholar
17. Yanga, Y. and Shen, K., 2013, Comparison of The Operating Performance of Automated and Traditional Container Terminals, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 16 (2), 158-173. google scholar
18. Rockwell Automation, 2014, User’s Guide: Getting Started With Arena, Rockwell Automation, Inc., USA. google scholar
19. Rockwell Automation, 2014, User’s Guide: OptQuest for Arena, Rockwell Automation, Inc., USA. google scholar
20. Rockwell Automation, 2014, User’s Guide: Variables Guide, Rockwell Automation, Inc., USA. google scholar
21. UNCTAD., 2018, Review of Maritime Transport 2018. United Nations publication. Sales No. E.18. II. D.5. New York & Geneva. google scholar
22. Yanga, Y., Zhonga, M., Dessoukyb, Y. and Postolache, O., 2018, An Integrated Scheduling Method forAGV Routing in Automated Container Terminals, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 126 (2018), 482-493. google scholar
23. Luo, J., Wu, Y. and Mendes, A.B., 2016, Modelling of Integrated Vehicle Scheduling and Container Storage Problems in Unloading Process at an Automated Container Terminal, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 94 (2016), 32-44. google scholar
24. Luo, J. and Wu, Y., 2015, Modelling of Dual-Cycle Strategy for Container Storage and Vehicle Scheduling Problems at Automated Container Terminals, Transportation Research Part E, 79 (2015), 49-64. google scholar
25. Lau, Y.K.H. and Zhao, Y., 2008, Integrated Scheduling of Handling Equipment at Automated Container Terminals, Int. J. Production Economics, 112 (2008), 665-682. google scholar
26. Vis, F.A.I. and Harika, I., 2004, Comparison of Vehicle Types at an Automated Container Terminal, OR Spectrum, 26 (2004), 117-143. google scholar
27. Grunow, M., Günther, H. and Lehmann, M., 2004, Dispatching Multi-Load AGVs in Highly Automated Seaport Container Terminals, OR Spectrum, 26(2004), 211-235. google scholar