Çanakkale-Balıkesir Çıkışlı Çok Modlu Lojistik Faaliyetlerinde 1915 Çanakkale Köprüsünün Rolü

Year 2022, , 387 - 403, 16.01.2023

Mehmet Gürtürk , Yener Pazarcık

https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2022.1151822

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Çanakkale-Balıkesir çıkışlı çok modlu lojistik faaliyetlerinde 1915 Çanakkale Köprüsü’nün rolünün ortaya koyulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu doğrultuda nitel araştırma yönteminin benimsendiği çalışmada, Köprü’nün paydaşı olarak belirlenen kişi, kurum ve kuruluşlar ile yüz yüze görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yapılan analizler neticesinde 1915 Çanakkale Köprüsü bölgenin lojistik, sosyo-kültürel, ekonomik ve sanayi gelişimine önemli katkılar sağlayacağı belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Çok Modlu Taşımacılık, 1915 Çanakkale Köprüsü, Lojistik

The 1915 Çanakkale Bridge’s Role in Multimode Logistics Activities Between Çanakkale and Balıkesir

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the role of the 1915 Çanakkale Bridge in the multi-modal logistics activities between Çanakkale and Balıkesir. The study adopted the qualitative research method and conducted face-to-face interviews with the people, institutions, and organizations that were determined as the bridge’s stakeholders. As a result of the analysis, the 1915 Çanakkale Bridge has been determined to contribute significantly in the future to the region’s logistics, socio-cultural, economic, and industrial development.

Keywords

Multimode Transportation, 1915 Çanakkale Bridge, Logistics

References

• Atmaca, D. (2022). 1915 Çanakkale Köprüsü’nün Biga ve Bandırma’ya Yönelik Sektörel Etkileri. Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(1), 241-259.
• Aydın, M., & Perk, E. (2012). Boğaz Köprüsü ve Dışsalık: Çanakkale’ye Yönelik Nitel ve Nicel Bir İnceleme. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(24), 1-30.
• Baltacı, A. (2018). Nitel araştırmalarda örnekleme yöntemleri ve örnek hacmi sorunsalı üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 231-274.
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Sage publications.
• ERM (2018). Çevresel ve Sosyal Etki Değerlendirmesi (Teknik Olmayan Özet). https://www.1915canakkale. com/cmsfiles/Galleries/6796/teknik-olmayan-ozet.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 14.07.2022).
• Flodén, J. (2007). Modelling Intermodal Freight Transport. The Potential of Combined Tranport in Sweden. Department of Business Administration Företagsekonomiska institutionen.
• Guo, J., Du, Q., & He, Z. (2021). A method to improve the resilience of multimodal transport network: Location selection strategy of emergency rescue facilities. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 161, 107678.
• Hao, C., & Yue, Y. (2016). Optimization on combination of transport routes and modes on dynamic programming for a container multimodal transport system. Procedia Engineering, 137, 382-390.
• Harris, I., Wang, Y., & Wang, H. (2015). ICT in multimodal transport and technological trends: Unleashing potential for the future. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 88-103.
• Ilicali, M., Catbas, N., Kiziltas, M., & Ongel, A. (2014). Multimodal Transportation Issues in Istanbul: A Case Study for Traffic Redistribution Due to Long Span Bridge Rehabilitation. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 831, pp. 413-417). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
• Jarašūnienė, A., Batarlienė, N., & Vaičiūtė, K. (2016). Application and management of information technologies in multimodal transportation. Procedia Engineering, 134, 309-315.
• Kundakçı, B., & Nas, S. (2022). Vessel Traffic Characteristics Analysis on the Cross-section of the 1915 Çanakkale Bridge at the Strait of Çanakkale. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 9(2), 60-70.
• Macharis, C., & Bontekoning, Y. M. (2004). Opportunities for OR in intermodal freight transport research: A review. European Journal of operational research, 153(2), 400-416.
• Macharis, C., & Pekin, E. (2009). Assessing policy measures for the stimulation of intermodal transport: a GIS-based policy analysis. Journal of transport geography, 17(6), 500-508.
• Papoušková, K. (2021). The Concept of Railway Transport in the Czech Republic. Transportation Research Procedia, 53, 154-158.
• Regmi, M. B., & Hanaoka, S. (2012). Assessment of intermodal transport corridors: Cases from North-East and Central Asia. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 5, 27-37.
• Skjött-Larsen, T., Paulsson, U., & Wandel, S. (2003). Logistics in the Öresund region after the bridge. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(2), 247-256.
• Stemler, S. (2000). An overview of content analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 7(1), 17. Tanoğlu, M., & Yücesan, M. (2020). Bölgesel Kalkınma ve Yönetişim: 1915 Çanakkale Köprüsü Örneği. Journal of Academic Value Studies, 6(1), 97-107.
• Tanoğlu, M., Yücesan, M., & Yağmur, İ. (2019). Lapseki Halkının 1915 Çanakkale köprüsüne bakışı ve beklentileri üzerine bir inceleme. In ICOAEF VI-International Conference on Applied Economics and Finance and Extended With Socıal Sciences (Vol. 90, p. 97).
• Tsao, Y. C., & Linh, V. T. (2018). Seaport-dry port network design considering multimodal transport and carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 481-492.
• Ulaştırma ve Altyapı Bakanlığı (2022). 2053 Ulaştırma ve Lojistik Ana Planı. https://www.uab.gov.tr/uploads/ pages/bakanlik-yayinlari/2053-ulastirma-ve-lojistik-ana-plani-rev.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 21.10.2022).
• UN. (1980). United Nations Convention on International Multimodal Transport. https://unctad.org/system/ files/official-document/tdmtconf17_en.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 24.06.2022).
• UNECE (2001). Terminology on combined transport. https://unece.org/DAM/trans/wp24/documents/term. pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2022).
• Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (Vol. 49). Sage.