William Hogarth’ın Sanatında Çirkinlik Kodlarının Cinsiyet Farkları Üzerinden Bir Okuması
Abstract
Keywords
Supporting Institution
Ethical Statement
Thanks
References
- Cambridge University Press. (t.y.). Wanton. Cambridge Dictionary içinde. Erişim tarihi: 22 Aralık 2025, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/wanton
- Bassett, M. (1944). The Fleet Prison in the Middle Ages. The University of Toronto Law Journal ,5, 383–402.
- Brewer, D. A. (2000). Making Hogarth heritage. Representations, 72, 21–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/2902907
- Crockford, C. H. (1971). Hogarth’s “Progress”: A detailed analysis (Yüksek lisans tezi). University of British Columbia.
- Dick, S. (1929). William Hogarth: 1697-1764. Bulletin of the Pennsylvania Museum, 5(129), 2–11.
- Eco, U. (2012). Çirkinliğin tarihi. Doğan Kitap.
- Erwin, T. (2001). William Hogarth and the aesthetics of nationalism. Huntington Library Quarterly, 64(3–4), 383–410. https://doi.org/10.2307/3817918
- Gombrich, E. H. (1952). A classical “Rake's progress”. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 15, 255 –256. Hogarth, W. (1732). A Harlot's Progress. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Hogarth, W. (1753). Analysis of beauty. J. Reeves.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
Sociology of Gender
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Ali Erdem Ekşi
*
0009-0002-7952-3746
Türkiye
Publication Date
December 31, 2025
Submission Date
October 26, 2025
Acceptance Date
December 5, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Volume: 1 Number: 1