ÖRGÜTLERDE PERFORMANS YÖNETİM SİSTEMLERİ TASARIMINDA KARŞILAŞILAN SORUNLAR

Öz

Performance Management applications are taking place in forefront applications in human resources management. These applications are becoming the base for HR applications such as human resources planning and training. Operating the human resources processes in the right way is dependent on a right established system beside the effect of Yrd.Doç.Dr., Ege Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi İşletme Bölümü, [e-mail] factor. In this study basic problems in development process of performance management systems are discussed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Performance Management, Performance Appraisal, Problems in

ÖRGÜTLERDE PERFORMANS YÖNETİM SİSTEMLERİ TASARIMINDA KARŞILAŞILAN SORUNLAR

Öz

Performans yönetimi uygulamaları bugün insan kaynağı yönetiminde ön plana çıkan temel uygulamalar içinde yer almaktadır. Ücretlendirmeden başlayarak insan kaynakları planlaması ve eğitim gibi uygulamalara temel veri teşkil etmektedir. İnsan kaynakları süreçlerinin doğru işletilmesi insan faktörünün etkisi yanında oluşturulacak sistemin de doğru kurgulanmasına bağlıdır. Bu çalışmada performans yönetim sistemlerinin kurulumunda karşılaşılan temel sorunlar tartışılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Performans Yönetimi, Performans Değerlendirme, Performans Yönetim Sistemlerinde Sorunlar

Kaynakça

1. Campbell, D.J. & Lee, C. ( 1988). Self-Appraisal in Performance Evaluation: Development versus Evaluation. The Academy Of Management Review, 13(2): 302-314.
2. Campbell, D. J., Campbell, K. M. & Chia, H.B.( 1998). Merit Pay, Performance Appraisal, and Individual Motivation: An Analysis and Alternative. Human Resource Management, 37(2): 131.
3. Cronbach, L. (1955). Processes Affecting Scores in Understanding of Others and Assuming Similarity. Psychological Bulletin, 52: 177-193.
4. Dipboye, R.L. & De Pontbriand R. (1981). Correlates of Employee Reactions to Performance Appraisals and Appraisal Systems, Journal Of Applied Psychology, 66(2): 248-251.
5. Feldman, J.M. (1981). Beyond Attribution Theory: Cognitive Processes in Performance Appraisal, Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2): 127-148.
6. Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective Influences on Judgments and Behavior in Organizations: An Information Processing Perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1): 3–34.
7. Ittner, C.D., Larcker D.F. & Meyer, M.W. (2003). Subjectivity and the Weighting of Performance Measures: Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard. The Accounting Review, 78(3): 725-758.
8. Jawahar, I.M. (2010). The Mediating Role of Appraisal Feedback Relationship between Rater Feedback-Related Behaviors and Ratee Reactions on the Performance. Group & Organization Management, 35: 494-526.

9. Judge T. A. & Ferris G.R. (1993). Social Context Of Performance Evaluation Decisions. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(1): 80-105.
10. Klimoski, R.& Inks, L. (1990). Accountability forces in performance appraisal. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 45(2): 194-208.
11. Kluger, A. N. & DeNisi, A. (1996). The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, Meta-Analysis and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 254-2
12. Levy, P. E. & Williams, J. R. (2004). The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future. Journal of Management, 30: 881-905.
13. Miller, D. T. & Ross, M. (1975). Self-Serving Biases in the Attribution of Causality: Fact or Fiction?. Psychological Bulletin 82: 213-225.
14. Mitchell, T.R. (1983).The Effects of Social, Task, and Situational Factors on Motivation, Performance, and Appraisal. Landy, F., Zedeck, S., Cleveland, J. (Ed.), Performance Measurement and Theory, 39Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Mount, M. K. (1984). Satisfaction with a performance appraisal system and appraisal discussion. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 5(4), 271-279.
16. Nemeroff, W. F., & Wexley, K. N. (1979). An Exploration of the Relationship between Performance Feedback Interview Characteristics and Interview Outcomes as Perceived by Managers and Subordinates. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52: 25-34.
17. Prendergast, C. & Topel, R. (1993). Discretion and Bias in Performance Evaluation. European Economic Review, 37: 355-365.
18. Schleicher, D.J., Bull, R.A. & Green, S.G. (2009). Rater Reactions to Forced Distribution Rating Systems. Journal of Management, 35: 899-927.
19. Strazdins, L., Clements, M.S., Korda, R.J., Broom, D.H. & D'Souza, A.M. (2006). Unsociable Work? Nonstandard Work Schedules, Family Relationships, and Children's Well-Being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(2): 394-410.