Journal of Yaşar University
Kapak Resmi
Amaç ve Kapsam Yazım Kuralları Son Sayı Arşiv Editör Kurulu İletişim ... Giriş
ISSN 1305-970X | Periyot Yılda 4 Sayı | Başlangıç: 2006 | Yayıncı Yaşar Üniversitesi | journal.yasar.edu.tr


Peer Reviewing of articles is an essential part of the publishing process for scholarly work, and is employed by all reputable scientific journals. It is an objective process that often provides useful feedback to authors and ensures that their work is presented in the best possible way. The Editorial Board of Journal of Yasar University would like to take this opportunity of publicly thanking our referees, past, present and future, for giving us their valuable time and for their vital contribution to the success of this journal. 

• Initial Screening: Each manuscript is reviewed by a member of the Editorial Board, who may suggest referees if the paper passes the initial evaluation. Authors of papers rejected at this stage will be informed within about two weeks of submission. 

• Reviewing Process: The Editor may seek the advice of up to three referees, chosen in consultation with appropriate members of the Editorial Board, from among experts in the field of specialization of the paper. Referees are asked to comment on the originality and scientific correctness of the work, and to note deviations from appropriate ethical guidelines, lack of references to the available literature, etc. A referee may recommend acceptance, perhaps following minor corrections; acceptance conditional on the successful completion of a more extensive revision; re-evaluation following a major revision that may involve extensions to the original manuscript; or rejection. The time taken by the reviewing process will vary, depending on such factors as the availability of appropriate referees, the number and nature of any requested revisions, etc., but every effort is made to complete this process as quickly as possible. 

• Confidentiality: The reviewing process is conducted in strict confidence and the identity of a referee is not disclosed to the authors at any point.

• Final Decision: At the completion of the reviewing process the Editor makes the final decision to accept or reject the article. This decision is communicated to the corresponding author, together with any remaining feedback from the referees.​

Journal of Yaşar University

ISSN 1305-970X | Periyot Yılda 4 Sayı | Başlangıç: 2006 | Yayıncı Yaşar Üniversitesi | journal.yasar.edu.tr
Kapak Resmi


Peer Reviewing of articles is an essential part of the publishing process for scholarly work, and is employed by all reputable scientific journals. It is an objective process that often provides useful feedback to authors and ensures that their work is presented in the best possible way. The Editorial Board of Journal of Yasar University would like to take this opportunity of publicly thanking our referees, past, present and future, for giving us their valuable time and for their vital contribution to the success of this journal. 

• Initial Screening: Each manuscript is reviewed by a member of the Editorial Board, who may suggest referees if the paper passes the initial evaluation. Authors of papers rejected at this stage will be informed within about two weeks of submission. 

• Reviewing Process: The Editor may seek the advice of up to three referees, chosen in consultation with appropriate members of the Editorial Board, from among experts in the field of specialization of the paper. Referees are asked to comment on the originality and scientific correctness of the work, and to note deviations from appropriate ethical guidelines, lack of references to the available literature, etc. A referee may recommend acceptance, perhaps following minor corrections; acceptance conditional on the successful completion of a more extensive revision; re-evaluation following a major revision that may involve extensions to the original manuscript; or rejection. The time taken by the reviewing process will vary, depending on such factors as the availability of appropriate referees, the number and nature of any requested revisions, etc., but every effort is made to complete this process as quickly as possible. 

• Confidentiality: The reviewing process is conducted in strict confidence and the identity of a referee is not disclosed to the authors at any point.

• Final Decision: At the completion of the reviewing process the Editor makes the final decision to accept or reject the article. This decision is communicated to the corresponding author, together with any remaining feedback from the referees.​

Journal of Yasar Temmuz 2019 Son Sayı
Cilt 14 - Sayı 55 - Tem 2019
  1. Temmuz 2019 Editoryal
    Sayfalar 0 - 0
    Yaşar Üniversitesi
  2. The Effect of Tourism Sector on Economic Growth: An Empirical Study on Turkey
    Sayfalar 215 - 225
    Gülay Bulgan, Selen IŞIK MADEN, Sinan Yıldırım
  3. Kurumsal İtibar ve Kuramsal Temelleri
    Sayfalar 226 - 236
    Belgin Bahar
  4. A Survey on the Attitudes of Passengers Towards Green Airlines
    Sayfalar 237 - 250
    Serap Çabuk, Nuriye Güreş, Hilal İnan, Seda Arslan
  5. KOBİ’lerin Finansal Performansının MACBETH-COPRAS Bütünleşik Yaklaşımıyla Değerlendirilmesi
    Sayfalar 251 - 265
    Ejder AYÇİN, Enver Çakın
  6. Kısıtlar Teorisi Kavramının Başabaş Analizi ile Birlikte Değerlendirilmesi ve Uygulaması
    Sayfalar 266 - 276
    Z. Figen Antmen, Adem Erik
  7. Türkiye’de Dolaylı ve Dolaysız Vergilerin Gelir Dağılımına Etkisi: Ekonometrik Bir Uygulama
    Sayfalar 277 - 287
    Tuğay Günel
  8. Stres Oluşturan Etmenlerin İş Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Mersin İlinde Kuyumculuk Sektörü Yöneticileri Üzerine
    Sayfalar 288 - 298
    Onur Başar Özbozkurt, Emin Kırmızısaç
  9. Washington Consensus, Neo-Liberalism and Beyond: Does Beijing Consensus Break the Routine?
    Sayfalar 299 - 317
    Mehmet Ozan Saray
  10. Türkiye’nin Otomotiv İhracat Gelirinin ARIMA modeli ile Tahmin Edilmesi
    Sayfalar 318 - 328
    Esra Karakaş
  11. An Evaluation for Participation Motivations of Professional and Non-Professional Visitors: The Case of Travel Turkey İzmir Fair
    Sayfalar 329 - 338
    SILA KARACAOĞLU, Ayşe Nevin SERT
  12. Ülkelerin Faktör Yoğunlukları Bakımından Rekabet Gücünün Ölçümü: BRICS-T Özelinde Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz
    Sayfalar 339 - 357
    Ali Celik
  13. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERMEDIATE AND CAPITAL GOODS IMPORTS, INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: THE CASE OF TURKEY
    Sayfalar 358 - 368
    Kemal Erkişi, Ümit Engin Tekin
Dizinler