Management Theories: The Contribution of Contemporary Management Theorists in Tackling Contemporary Management Challenges

Yıl 2019, , 156 - 169, 30.11.2019

Nadeem Hussain Adnan Ul Haque , Akhtar Baloch

https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.635061

Cited By: 6

Öz

Management theories have been the subject matter
view for over the decades as there are schools of thoughts that affirms certain
ways of managerial practices whereas other contradicts them. Three distinctive
schools of thoughts included in this essay are namely; classical management
theory, neo-classical management theory and modern management theory
respectively. Classical theories emphasise heavily on scientific methods,
administrative approach and bureaucratic structures for managerial practices
while focusing on the task efficiency. On the other hand, neo-classical school
of thoughts looked at the human’s individual needs, their relations at work,
behavioural aspects and motivations behind effectiveness. Lastly, the modern
management school found “no one fit method for all situations” by considering
systems, contingent approaches while organisational humanism and management
science as core concept to operate in the dynamic environment. Additionally,
the latest work of Foucault and Bourdieu is used to explain the modernity of
management. The present trends and issues in the management practices are also
addressed at the end.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Classical Management School, neo-classical school, modern management theory, management schools of thoughts, issues and trends in management practices

Kaynakça

• Alter, S. (2008). Service System fundamentals: Work system, value chain and life cycle. IBM System Journal, 47(1), 71-85.
• Barile, S., & Polese, F. (2010). Linking the viable system and many-to-many network approaches to service-dominant logic and service science. Journal of Quality and Service Science, 2(1).
• Barnett, T. (2017). Theory X and Theory Y in the Twenty-First Century. Reference for Business Retrieved from: https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Str-Ti/Theory-X-and-Theory-Y.html (Accessed: 10-04-2019).
• Bartol, K.M., & Martin, D.C. (1998). Management, USA, NY: McGraw Hill.
• Bazrkar, A., Heravi, A. J., & Abedzadeh, M. (2014). The Impact of Postmodernism on Management and Organization Theories, International Journal of Management and Humanity Sciences, 3(8), 2739-2743.
• Bort, S., & Kieser, A. (2011). Fashion in organization theory: An empirical analysis of the diffusion of theoretical concepts. Organization Studies, 32, 655-681.
• Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (2003). Participant objectivation. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, 282–294.
• Brown, C. (2014). How Relevant are Fayol's principles of Management Today? Liquid Training. Retrieved from: http://www.liquid-training.co.uk/blog/how-relevant-are-fayols-principles-of-management-today (Accessed: 10-04-2019).
• Caramela, S. (2018). The Management Theory of Frank and Lillian Gilbreth, Business. Retrieved from: https://www.business.com/articles/management-theory-of-frank-and-lillian-gilbreth/ (Accessed: 10-04-2019).
• Caramela, S. (2018). The Management Theory of Mary Parker Follett, Business. Retrieved from: https://www.business.com/articles/management-theory-of-mary-parker-follett/ (Accessed: 10-04-2019).
• Cherry, K. (2018). The Hawthorne Effect and Behavioral Studies. VeryWellMind. Retrieved from: https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-the-hawthorne-effect-2795234 (Accessed: 13-04-2019).
• Clegg, S. (1998). Chapter 3: Foucault, Power and Organizations. In Foucault, Management and Organization Theory: From Panoptic on to Technologies of Self, Alan McKinlay and Ken Starkey (Eds). London: Sage publication. DOI: 10.4135/9781446221686.n3
• Cooper, D. J., Ezzamel, M., & Robson, K. (2017). The Multiplicity of Performance Management Systems: Heterogeneity in Multinational Corporations and Management Sense-Making, University of Alberta School of Business Research Paper No. 3051551. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3051551 (Accessed: 02-05-2019).
• Doucet, J. (2017). Theory of Organizational Humanism. Biz-Fluent. Retrieved from:https://bizfluent.com/info-8710096-theory-organizational-humanism.html (Accessed: 03-05-2019).
• Drucker, P. F. (1963). Managing for Business Effectiveness. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/1963/05/managing-for-business-effectiveness (Accessed: 10-04-2019).
• Ferreira, D., & Kittsteiner, T. (2011). Competition and Organizational Change. Working Paper, RWTH Aachen University.
• Festejo, L. (2012). How Organizational Culture Helps W.L. Gore & Associates Drive Innovation. Retrieved from: https://www.greatplacetowork.com/publications-and-events/blogs-and-news/973 (Accessed: 14-04-2019).
• Furnham A. (2012) Money as a motivator. In: The Talented Manager. Palgrave Macmillan, London. pp. 152-154. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-230-36976-4_41
• Ganson, B. (2013). Managing Change in Complex Environment: Questions for Leaders. Sweden: Kombi Nation.
• Ghuman, K., & Aswathapa, K. (2010). Management: Concepts, Practice & Cases, India, New Delh: Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Limited.
• Grandey, A. (2004). Emotions at Work: Theory, Research and Applications for Management. Human Relations, 57(10), 1351–1356.
• Grant, R.M., Shani, R., and Krishnan, R. (1994). TQM’s Challenge to Management Theory and Practice, Sloan Management Review. Winter, 25-35.
• Greenwood, R., & Meyer, R.E. (2008). Influencing ideas: A celebration of DiMaggio and Powell (1983). Journal of Management Inquiry, 17, 258-264.
• Hanks, G. (2017). Examples of Differentiation & Integration in a Company, Chron. Retrieved from: https://smallbusiness.chron.com/examples-differentiation-integration-company-71759.html (Accessed: 14-04-2019).
• Hanyes, N. M. (2013). Behavior Management: Traditional and Expanded Approaches. USA, NY: University Press of America.
• Haque, A. U., Aydin, E., & Uysal, E. (2017). A Comparison of Effectiveness of Global Leaders and Domestic Leaders in Electronic Retail Industry, Global Journal of Management and Business Research (G), 17(3), version 1, 11-20.
• Hitt, Michael A, Middlemist, R Dennis & Mathis, Robert L. (1979). Effective Management, New York, USA: West Publishing Company.
• Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Life Cycle Theory of Leadership, Training and Development Journal, 23, 26-34.
• Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man. Cleveland: World Publishing.
• Hodge, S. B. (2002). 21st Century Management: How the game has changed. BedTimes Magazine. Retrieved from: https://bedtimesmagazine.com/2002/11/21st-century-management-how-the-game-has-changed/ (Accessed: 10-04-2019).
• Islam, J., & Hu, H. (2012). A review of literature on contingency theory in managerial accounting, African Journal of Business Management, 6(15), 5159-5164. DOI: 10.5897/AJBM11.2764
• Katzenbach, J. R., & Khan, Z. (2010). Money Is Not The Best Motivator, Forbes. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/2010/04/06/money-motivation-pay-leadership-managing-employees.html#529bda6f3e13 (Accessed: 10-04-2019).
• Khuran, A. (2009). Scientific Management: A Management Idea to Reach a Mass Audience, India, New Delhi: Global India Publications PVT Ltd.
• Kim, D.H., and Burchill G. (1992). System Archetypes as a Diagnostic toll: a field-based study of TQM implementations. Working Paper No. 07. 005. Cambridge: MIT.
• Koontz, H. (1961). The management theory jungle. The Journal of the Academy of Management, 4(3), 174-188.
• Lee, B., & Cassell, C. (2011). Challenges and Controversies in Management Research. New York, USA: Routledge.
• Luthans, F., & Stewart, T. I. (1977). A General Contingency Theory of Management, The Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 181-195.
• Koontz, H. (1988). Management, 9th Edition, USA, NY: McGraw Hill Inc.
• McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. USA, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
• McKinlay, A., & Starkey, K. (1998). Foucault, Management and Organization Theory: From Panoptic on to Technologies of Self, London: Sage publication. DOI: 10.4135/9781446221686.n3
• McLeod, S. (2018). Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, Simply Psychology. Retrieved from: https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html (Accessed: 14-04-2019).
• Mele, C., & Colurcio, M. (2006). The evolving path of TQM: towards business excellence and stakeholder value. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 23(5).
• Mele, C., Pels, J., & Polese, F. (2010). A Brief Review of Systems Theories and Their Managerial Applications. Service Science, 2(1/2), pp. 126-135. DOI: 10.1287/serv.2.1_2.126
• Naranjo-Gil, D., Sánchez-Expósito, M. J., & Gómez-Ruiz, L. (2016). Traditional vs. Contemporary Management Control Practices for Developing Public Health Policies, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(7). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13070713.
• Ng, Irene C.L., Maull, R., & Yip, N. (2009). Outcome-based Contracts as a driver for Systems thinking and Service-Dominant Logic in Service Science: Evidence from the Defence industry, European Management Journal, 27, 377-387
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press, New York.
• Ozbilgin, M., & Tatli, A. (2005). Book Review Essay: Understanding Bourdieu’s Contribution to Organization and Management Studies, Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 855-877.
• Pham, M., Yu, J., & Agha, M. (2018). Management Connectedness and Corporate Investment, Asian Finance Association AsianFA) Conference. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3108227 (Accessed: 10-04-2019).
• Prasad, L., & Gulshan, S.S. (2011). Management Principles and Practices, India, New Delhi: Excel Books.
• Rahman Seresht, H. (1998). Organization and management theories; from modernity to post-modernity. The first volume. Tehran, Iran.
• Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2012). Management, 11th Edition, USA, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Robinson, M., (2010). Sports Club Management: Manager's leadership style influence by personality, activity. Retrieved from: http://www.humankinetics.com/excerpts/excerpts/managers-leadership-style-influenced-by-personality-activity (Accessed: 14-04-2019).
• Rogers, B. (2006). Behaviour Management: A Whole-School Approach. London, UK: SAGE Publication Inc.
• Sheldrake, J. (2003). Henry Gantt and humanized scientific management. Management Theory (2nd ed.). Thompson Learning. pp. 35–43.
• Smith, P. G., (2010). Fired up-Leading your organisation to achieve exceptional results. Georgia, USA. 33-37
• Splitter, V., & Seidl, D. (2011). Does practice-based research on strategy lead to practically relevant knowledge? Implications of a Bourdieusian perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47, 98-120.
• Sridhar, M. S. (2017). Schools of Management Thought, Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224952289_Schools_of_Management_Thought (Accessed: 10-04-2019).
• Stros, D., Bukovinski, D., & Coner, M. (2014). Globalization and management. Economski, Vjesnik. 2, 425-436. Retrieved from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/ekonomskivjesnik (Accessed: 10-04-2019).
• Sullivan, J. (2017). Management Theory of Henry Gantt, Business. Retrieved from: https://www.business.com/articles/management-theory-of-henry-gantt/ (Accessed: 10-04-2019).
• Tuttle, a. (2003). What Employees want. Industrial Distribution, 92 (5), 63-67.
• Van de Ven AH, Drazin R (1985). The concept of fit in contingency theory. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7(4), 333-365.
• Wilson, J. F., and Thomson, A. (2006). Management in Historical Perspective: Stages and Paradigms, Competition & Change, 10(4). DOI: 10.1179/102452906X160996.