Sartre ve İbn Sina Arasında Ontolojik Bir Karşılaştırmanın İmkanı Üzerine
Öz
It is clear that Avicenna, having considered the fact that the closest being to human is his own existence, sought to know and prove the existence of being/existence. The way in which it was to be done is ?to comprehend existence and its principle directly, without mediation.? In a parallel way, Heidegger thought that the way for one to understand existence is to understand and grasp one?s own existence. However, since understanding existence precedes understanding what existence is, Sartre, referring to this in his own way, coined the concepts en soi and pour soi and claimed that the real issue was for man to grasp his own existence. The aim of this article is limited to the efforts towards indicating the similarities and differences between the concepts of existence and essence that is the primary emphasis of the existentialist movement initiated by Descartes and given a new dimension by Sartre, and the concepts of existence-essence in Islamic philosophy, especially in that of Avicenna.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Altıntaş, Hayrani, İbn Sînâ Metafiziği, Ankara 1985.
- Aquinas, Thomas, Varlık ve Öz, çev. Oğuz Özügül, İstanbul 2007.
- Aristoteles’in, II. Analitikler(Posterior Analytics), çev. Ragıp Atademir, İstanbul 1996.
- Atay, Hüseyin, Fârâbî ve İbn Sînâ’ya Göre Yaratma, Ankara 1974.
- Atay, Hüseyin, İbn Sînâ’da Varlık Nazariyesi, Ankara 1983.
- Ay, Mahmut, Sadruşşerî’a’da Varlık, Ankara 2006.
- Barnes, Hazel E., “Sartre’s ontology: The revealing and making of being”, Sartre içinde, ed. Christina Howells, Cambridge 1992.
- Bayrakdar, Mehmet, “Fârâbî ve İbn Sînâ’da Ontolojik Delil Üzerine”, İbn Sînâ Doğumunun Bininci Yılı Armağanı içinde, der. Aydın Sayılı, Ankara 1984.
- Burrell, David B., “Essence and Existence: Avicenna And Greek Philosophy”, Melanges, c. , Beyrut 1986.
- Cevizci, Ahmet, Felsefe Sözlüğü, Ankara 1997.