Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Incidence of Adenomyosis in Histerectomy Cases

Year 2018, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 128 - 132, 01.08.2018
https://doi.org/10.5505/kjms.2018.38159

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the incidence of adenomyosis in histerectomy
cases.
Material and Method: The incidence of adenomyosis was evaluated in cases who had undergone hysterectomy of any cause between January 2005-December 2015.
Results: In 58% of 205 cases with vaginal hysterectomy the final histopathological evalaution was adenomyosis. The indication
for operations of these cases was: pelvic organ prolapsus (n: 117,
57%), endometrial hyperplasia (n: 40, 19.5%), servical displasies
(n: 15, 7.3%), postmenoposal bleeding (n: 11, 5.3%), treatment
resistant menometroragia (n: 10, 4.9%), leimyoma (n: 9, 4.4%),
endometrial polip (n: 2, 1%) and mole hydatiform (n: 1, 0.5%). An
additional operation was performed together with vaginal hysterectomy in 64.8% (n: 133) of the cases. The additional operations
were sistorectosel operation (n: 46, 34.5%), rektosel operation (n:
26, 19.5%), sistosel operation (n: 22 16.5%), sacrospinosis fixation
(n: 21, 15.7%) and transobturatuar tape.
Conclusion: Preoperative adenomyosis can be diagnosed more
frequently between the ages 40–50 years. Especially in treatment
resistant menometroragia cases adenomyozis should be thought
in aethiology

References

  • 1. Pernoll ML. Obstetrik ve Jinekoloji El Kitabı. Ayhan A (Çeviren) 10. baskı, Ankara: Palme, 2002:755–67. 2. Hunter WC, Smith LL, Reiner WC. Uterine adenomyosis; incidence, symptoms and pathology in 1856 hysterectomies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1947;53(4):663–8. 3. Bird CC, McElin TW, Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus-revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972;112(5):583–93. 4. Israel SL, Woutersz TB. Adenomyosis: a neglected diagnosis. Obstet. Gynecol 1959;14(2):168–73. 5. Kavak SB. Histerektomi materyallerinde adenomyozis sıklığının araştırılması. Fırat Tıp Dergisi 2009;14(4):247–9. 6. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, M. Noe S. Kissler G. Leyendecker. Adenomyosis in endometriosis prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 2005;20(8):2309–16. 7. Serin İS, Özçelik B, Öztürk F, Yılmaz MO, Başbuğ M, Ökten T. Adenomyosis uteri: clinicopathologic analyses of 460 cases. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 2002;8(1):34–6. 8. Fong YF, Singh K. Medical treatment of a grossly enlarged adenomyotic uterus with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception 1999;60(3):173–5. 9. Sheng J, Zhang WY, Zhang JP, Lu D. The LNG-IUS study on adenomyosis: a 3-year follow-up study on the efficacy and side effects of the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system for the treatment of dysmenorrhea associated with adenomyosis. Contraception 2009;79(3):189–93. 10. Igarashi M, Abe Y, Fukuda M, Ando A, Miyasaka M, Yoshida M et al. Novel conservative medical therapy for uterine adenomyosis with a danazol-loaded intrauterine device. Fertil Steril 2000;74(2):412–3. 11. Lin J, Sun C, Zheng H. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and laparoscopy in the treatment of adenomyosis and infertility. Chin Med J 2000;113(5):442–5. 12. Reinhold C, McCharty S, Bret PM, Mehio A, Atri M, Zakarian R et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1996;199:151–8. 13. Shaikh H, Khan KS. Adenomyosis in pakistani women: four year experience at the Aga Khan University Medical Centre, Karachi. J Clin Pathol 1990;43(10):817–9. 14. Vercellini P, Parazzini F, Oldani S, Panazza S, Bramante T, Crosignani PG. Adenomyosis at hysterectomy: a study on frequency distribution and patient characteristics. Hum Reprod 1995;10(5):1160–2. 15. Parazzini F, Vercellini P, Panazza LC, Chatenoud L, Oldani S, Crosignani PG. Risk factors for adenomyosis. Hum Reprod 1997;12(6), 1275–9. 16. Emge LA. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1962;83:1541–63. 17. Azziz R. Adenomyosis in pregnancy. J. Reprod Med 1986;31(4):224–7. 18. Matalliotakis IM, Katsikis IK, Panidis DK. Adenomyosis: what is the impact on fertility? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005;17(3):261–4. 19. Takahashi K, Nagata H, Kitao M. Clinical usefulness of determination of estradiol level in the menstrual blood for patients with endometriosis. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 1989;41(11), 1849–50. 20. Lee NC, Dicker RC, Rubin GL, Ory HW. Confirmation of the preoperative diagnosis for hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;150(3):283–7. 21. Kim MH. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding. In: Copeland IJ editor. Textbook of Gynecology 15t ed. WB Saunders Comp 1993;391–7.

Histerektomi Olgularında Adenomyozis İnsidansı

Year 2018, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 128 - 132, 01.08.2018
https://doi.org/10.5505/kjms.2018.38159

Abstract

Amaç: Histerektomi yapılan olgularda adenomyozis insidansının
araştırılması.
Materyal ve Metot: Ocak 2005-Aralık 2015 tarihleri arasında değişik nedenlerle vajinal histerektomi yapılan olgularda adenomyozis
insidansı araştırıldı.
Bulgular: Vajinal histerektomi yapılan 205 olgunun 58’inde (%28,3)
final histopatolojide adenomyozis tespit edildi. Bu olguların operasyon endikasyonları; pelvik organ prolapsusu (n: 117, %57), endometrial hiperplaziler (n: 40, %19,5), servikal displaziler (n: 15,
%7,3), postmenopozal kanama (n: 11, %5,3), tedaviye dirençli menometroraji (n: 10, %4,9), leiomyomlar (n: 9, %4,4), endometriyal polip (n: 2, %1) ve mol hidatiform (n: 1, %0,5) idi. Bu olguların
%64,8’ine (n: 133) vajinal histerektomi ile beraber ek operasyon
uygulandı. Uygulanan ek operasyonlar; sistorektosel operasyonu
(n: 46, %34,5), rektosel operasyonu (n: 26, %19,5), sistosel operasyonu (n: 22 %16,5), sakrospinöz fiksasyon (n: 21, %15,7) ve trans
obturatuar tape uygulamasıydı.
Sonuç: Preoperatif adenomyozis tanısı, olguların bir bütün halinde
değerlendirilmesi halinde özellikle 40–50 yaş grubunda daha sık
konulabilir. Özellikle tedaviye dirençli menometroraji olgularında
etyolojide adenomyozis olabileceği akılda tutulmalıdır. 

References

  • 1. Pernoll ML. Obstetrik ve Jinekoloji El Kitabı. Ayhan A (Çeviren) 10. baskı, Ankara: Palme, 2002:755–67. 2. Hunter WC, Smith LL, Reiner WC. Uterine adenomyosis; incidence, symptoms and pathology in 1856 hysterectomies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1947;53(4):663–8. 3. Bird CC, McElin TW, Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus-revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972;112(5):583–93. 4. Israel SL, Woutersz TB. Adenomyosis: a neglected diagnosis. Obstet. Gynecol 1959;14(2):168–73. 5. Kavak SB. Histerektomi materyallerinde adenomyozis sıklığının araştırılması. Fırat Tıp Dergisi 2009;14(4):247–9. 6. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, M. Noe S. Kissler G. Leyendecker. Adenomyosis in endometriosis prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 2005;20(8):2309–16. 7. Serin İS, Özçelik B, Öztürk F, Yılmaz MO, Başbuğ M, Ökten T. Adenomyosis uteri: clinicopathologic analyses of 460 cases. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 2002;8(1):34–6. 8. Fong YF, Singh K. Medical treatment of a grossly enlarged adenomyotic uterus with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception 1999;60(3):173–5. 9. Sheng J, Zhang WY, Zhang JP, Lu D. The LNG-IUS study on adenomyosis: a 3-year follow-up study on the efficacy and side effects of the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system for the treatment of dysmenorrhea associated with adenomyosis. Contraception 2009;79(3):189–93. 10. Igarashi M, Abe Y, Fukuda M, Ando A, Miyasaka M, Yoshida M et al. Novel conservative medical therapy for uterine adenomyosis with a danazol-loaded intrauterine device. Fertil Steril 2000;74(2):412–3. 11. Lin J, Sun C, Zheng H. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and laparoscopy in the treatment of adenomyosis and infertility. Chin Med J 2000;113(5):442–5. 12. Reinhold C, McCharty S, Bret PM, Mehio A, Atri M, Zakarian R et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1996;199:151–8. 13. Shaikh H, Khan KS. Adenomyosis in pakistani women: four year experience at the Aga Khan University Medical Centre, Karachi. J Clin Pathol 1990;43(10):817–9. 14. Vercellini P, Parazzini F, Oldani S, Panazza S, Bramante T, Crosignani PG. Adenomyosis at hysterectomy: a study on frequency distribution and patient characteristics. Hum Reprod 1995;10(5):1160–2. 15. Parazzini F, Vercellini P, Panazza LC, Chatenoud L, Oldani S, Crosignani PG. Risk factors for adenomyosis. Hum Reprod 1997;12(6), 1275–9. 16. Emge LA. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1962;83:1541–63. 17. Azziz R. Adenomyosis in pregnancy. J. Reprod Med 1986;31(4):224–7. 18. Matalliotakis IM, Katsikis IK, Panidis DK. Adenomyosis: what is the impact on fertility? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005;17(3):261–4. 19. Takahashi K, Nagata H, Kitao M. Clinical usefulness of determination of estradiol level in the menstrual blood for patients with endometriosis. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 1989;41(11), 1849–50. 20. Lee NC, Dicker RC, Rubin GL, Ory HW. Confirmation of the preoperative diagnosis for hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;150(3):283–7. 21. Kim MH. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding. In: Copeland IJ editor. Textbook of Gynecology 15t ed. WB Saunders Comp 1993;391–7.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Clinical Sciences
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Yakup Baykuş

Rulin Deniz This is me

Ebru Çelik Kavak This is me

Hasan Çılgın This is me

Haldun Arpacı This is me

Nazan Ardıç This is me

Ömür Öztürk This is me

Publication Date August 1, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Baykuş, Y., Deniz, R., Çelik Kavak, E., Çılgın, H., et al. (2018). Histerektomi Olgularında Adenomyozis İnsidansı. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences, 8(2), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.5505/kjms.2018.38159
AMA Baykuş Y, Deniz R, Çelik Kavak E, Çılgın H, Arpacı H, Ardıç N, Öztürk Ö. Histerektomi Olgularında Adenomyozis İnsidansı. KAFKAS TIP BİL DERG. August 2018;8(2):128-132. doi:10.5505/kjms.2018.38159
Chicago Baykuş, Yakup, Rulin Deniz, Ebru Çelik Kavak, Hasan Çılgın, Haldun Arpacı, Nazan Ardıç, and Ömür Öztürk. “Histerektomi Olgularında Adenomyozis İnsidansı”. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences 8, no. 2 (August 2018): 128-32. https://doi.org/10.5505/kjms.2018.38159.
EndNote Baykuş Y, Deniz R, Çelik Kavak E, Çılgın H, Arpacı H, Ardıç N, Öztürk Ö (August 1, 2018) Histerektomi Olgularında Adenomyozis İnsidansı. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences 8 2 128–132.
IEEE Y. Baykuş, R. Deniz, E. Çelik Kavak, H. Çılgın, H. Arpacı, N. Ardıç, and Ö. Öztürk, “Histerektomi Olgularında Adenomyozis İnsidansı”, KAFKAS TIP BİL DERG, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 128–132, 2018, doi: 10.5505/kjms.2018.38159.
ISNAD Baykuş, Yakup et al. “Histerektomi Olgularında Adenomyozis İnsidansı”. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences 8/2 (August 2018), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.5505/kjms.2018.38159.
JAMA Baykuş Y, Deniz R, Çelik Kavak E, Çılgın H, Arpacı H, Ardıç N, Öztürk Ö. Histerektomi Olgularında Adenomyozis İnsidansı. KAFKAS TIP BİL DERG. 2018;8:128–132.
MLA Baykuş, Yakup et al. “Histerektomi Olgularında Adenomyozis İnsidansı”. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 8, no. 2, 2018, pp. 128-32, doi:10.5505/kjms.2018.38159.
Vancouver Baykuş Y, Deniz R, Çelik Kavak E, Çılgın H, Arpacı H, Ardıç N, Öztürk Ö. Histerektomi Olgularında Adenomyozis İnsidansı. KAFKAS TIP BİL DERG. 2018;8(2):128-32.