The Role of Endosonography in Patients With Moderate and High Probability of Choledocholithiasis

Year 2022, Volume: 12 Issue: 3, 227 - 232, 15.12.2022

Rasim Eren Cankurtaran Zahide Şimşek Yusuf Coşkun

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic efficiency and place of EUS in clinical practice in patients with moderate to a high probability of choledocholithiasis according to their ASGE score.
Material and Method: This study includes patients with moderate to high risk of CBDSs who were admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology between August 2015-August 2016. The results of patients undergoing EUS and ERCP for suspected choledocholithiasis were retrospectively reviewed from the hospital registry.
Results: Two hundred and twenty nine patients were included in the present study and 56.3% of the patients (n=129) were female, and the average age of the patients was 62.8±18.3 (20–91). The sensitivity of EUS was found to be 89.2%. The specificity was 94.6%, the positive predictive value was 95.6%, and the negative predictive value was 86.9%. In addition, the choledochal diameter measured in AUS and EUS was found to have diagnostic values in predicting the CBDSs [AUC (95% GA p); respectively, 0.617 (0.409–0.825) p=0.310 and 0.765 (0.619–0.915) 0.020].
Conclusion: Endosonography is both a high-diagnostic and a low-invasive diagnostic method, so it is increasingly used in patients with suspected CBDSs. Referral of suspected patients with CBDSs to a center with EUS and an experienced endoscopist will ensure that the patient receives the correct diagnosis and is not subjected to unnecessary invasive procedures.

Keywords

EUS, ERCP, choledocholitiasis

References

• 1. Everhart JE, Khare M, Hill M, Maurer KR. Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology 1999;117(3):632-39.
• 2. Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Banerjee S, Cash BD, et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2010;71(1):1-9.
• 3. Morris S, Gurusamy KS, Sheringham J, Davidson BR. Costeffectiveness analysis of endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. PLoS One 2015;10 (3):e0121699.
• 4. Coelho-Prabhu N, Shah ND, Van Houten H, Kamath PS, Baron TH. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: utilisation and outcomes in a 10-year population-based cohort. BMJ open 2013;3(5):e002689.
• 5. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RCG, Meyers WC, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1991;37(3):383-93.
• 6. Ney MV, Maluf-Filho F, Sakai P, Zilberstein B, Gama-Rodrigues J, Rosa H. Echo-endoscopy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the influence of the size of the stone and diameter of the common bile duct. Arq Gastroenterol 2005;42(4):239-43.
• 7. De Lisi S, Leandro G, Buscarini E. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;23 (5):367-74.
• 8. Maruta A, Iwashita T, Uemura S, Yoshida K, Yasuda I, Shimizu M. Efficacy of the endoscopic ultrasound-first approach in patients with suspected common bile duct stone to avoid unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Internal Medicine 2019;2047-18.
• 9. Sentürk S, Miroglu TC, Bilici A, Gumus H, Tekin RC, Ekici F, et al. Diameters of the common bile duct in adults and postcholecystectomy patients: a study with 64-slice CT. European Journal of Radiology 2012;81:39-42.
• 10. McSherry CK, Ferstenberg H, Calhoun WF, Lahman E, Virshup M. The natural history of diagnosed gallstone disease in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Ann Surg 1985;202(1):59-63.
• 11. Shabanzadeh DM, Sørensen LT, Jørgensen T. A Prediction Rule for Risk Stratification of Incidentally Discovered Gallstones: Results From a Large Cohort Study. Gastroenterology 2016;150(1):156-67.e1.
• 12. Friedman GD. Natural history of asymptomatic and symptomatic gallstones. Am J Surg 1993;165(4):399-404.
• 13. Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, Anderloni A, Arvanitakis M, Ah-Soune P, et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2019;51(5):472-91.
• 14. Einstein DM, Lapin SA, Ralls PW, Halls JM. The insensitivity of sonography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142(4):725-8. 
• 15. Cronan JJ. US diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: a reappraisal. Radiology 1986;161(1):133-4.
• 16. O’Connor HJ, Hamilton I, Ellis WR, Watters J, Lintott DJ, Axon AT. Ultrasound detection of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with ERCP in the postcholecystectomy patient. Gastrointest Radiol 1986;11(2):161-4.
• 17. Baron RL, Stanley RJ, Lee JK, Koehler RE, Melson GL, Balfe DM, et al. A prospective comparison of the evaluation of biliary obstruction using computed tomography and ultrasonography. Radiology 1982;145(1):91-8. 
• 18. Patel R, Ingle M, Choksi D, Poddar P, Pandey V, Sawant P. Endoscopic Ultrasonography Can Prevent Unnecessary Diagnostic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Even in Patients with High Likelihood of Choledocholithiasis and Inconclusive Ultrasonography: Results of a Prospective Study. Clin Endosc 2017;50(6):592-7.
• 19. Prachayakul V, Aswakul P, Bhunthumkomol P, Deesomsak M. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with intermediate or high likelihood of choledocholithiasis: a retrospective study from one university-based endoscopy center. BMC Gastroenterol 2014;26(14):165.
• 20. Makmun D, Fauzi A, Shatri H. Sensitivity and Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography versus Endoscopic Ultrasonography against Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Diagnosing Choledocholithiasis: T he Indonesian Experience. Clin Endosc 2017;50(5):486-90.
• 21. Jeon TJ, Cho JH, Kim YS, Song SY, Park JY. Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Symptomatic Patients with High and Intermediate Probabilities of Common Bile Duct Stones and a Negative Computed Tomography Scan. Gut Liver 2017;11(2):290-7.
• 22. Sbeit W, Kadah A, Shahin A, Khoury T. Same day endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography immediately after endoscopic ultrasound for choledocholithiasis is feasible, safe and cost-effective. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021;56(10):1243-7