TÜRK CEZA HUKUKUNDA AF VE 7456 SAYILI KANUN İLE 7571 SAYILI KANUN’UN AF KAPSAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Fatma Betül Şeker

doi:10.70011/kahd.1889044

TR EN

TÜRK CEZA HUKUKUNDA AF VE 7456 SAYILI KANUN İLE 7571 SAYILI KANUN’UN AF KAPSAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Abstract

Türk ceza adalet sisteminde af müessesesi; devletin cezalandırma yetkisinden vazgeçmesi anlamına gelebilecek olan, yasama organının anayasal sınırlar içerisinde kullanması gerektiği ve diğer kanun çeşitlerine göre nitelikli oy çoğunluğunun arandığı bir tasarruf şeklini temsil etmektedir. Kanun koyucu af müessesine çeşitli gerekçelerle, kamu yararını da göz önünde bulundurarak başvurabilmekte, bazı durumlarda genel af, bazı durumlarda ise özel affa karar vermektedir. Genel af düzenlemeleri bakımından çoğu zaman bir nitelik tartışması yaşanmamakla birlikte, özellikle özel af düzenlemeleri ile benzer özelliklere sahip infaz düzenlemeleri arasında hukuki niteliğin belirlenmesi açısından bazı sorunlar yaşanmaktadır. Bu sorunların sıklıkla yaşanmasının sebebi ise kanun koyucunun son dönemlerde özel af kanunları bakımından aranan nitelikli çoğunluğun sağlanamama ihtimali sebebiyle veya af düzenlemesinin toplumda yaratabileceği olumsuz etkilerin önüne geçebilmek maksadıyla, esasında özel af niteliğinde olmasına rağmen infaz değişikliği adı altında kabul edilen hukuki düzenlemeleri tercih etmesidir. Bu çalışmamızda, ceza hukuku sistemimiz bakımından af müessesinin genel özelliklerine değinilmeye ve özellikle 7456 sayılı Kanun ile daha sonrasında kabul edilen 7571 sayılı Kanun’un hükümleri ve hukuki niteliği, Anayasa Mahkemesi kararları esas alınarak af kapsamında değerlendirmeye çalışılacaktır.

Keywords

Amnesty in Turkish Criminal Law and an Assessment of Law No. 7456 and Law No. 7571 in the Context of Amnesty

Abstract

In the Turkish criminal justice system, the institution of amnesty represents a legislative act through which the state renounces its power to punish, and it must be exercised by the legislature within constitutional limits. In this respect, amnesty regulations are subject to a qualified majority requirement, unlike ordinary legislation, and are regulated as an exceptional legislative power. The legislator may resort to either general or special amnesty on the basis of public interest considerations. While the legal characterization of general amnesty rarely gives rise to debate, certain problems arise in determining the legal nature of enforcement regulations that produce effects similar to those of special amnesty. The primary reason for these problems is that, in recent years, some legal arrangements which in substance bear the characteristics of special amnesty have been enacted under the title of enforcement amendments, either because the qualified majority required for special amnesty laws could not be secured or in order to avoid possible negative public reactions to amnesty measures. This study examines the general characteristics of the institution of amnesty within the Turkish criminal law system and, in particular, evaluates the provisions and legal nature of Law No. 7456 and the subsequently enacted Law No. 7571 within the scope of amnesty, in light of the decisions of the Constitutional Court.

Keywords

References

Akbulut, Berrin, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 3. Baskı, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2016.
Alacakaptan, Uğur, “780 Sayılı Bazı Suç ve Cezaların Affı Hakkında Kanun”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22-23, Sayı: 1-4, 1965-1966, s. 21-33.
Anayurt, Ömer, Anayasa Hukuku: Genel Kısım (Temel İlkeler, Kavram ve Kurumlar), 8. Baskı, Seçkin, Ankara, 2025.
Arslan, Uğur, Türk Af Hukuku (1923’ten Günümüze Af Kanunları ve Afla İlgili Anayasa Mahkemesi Kararları İle Birlikte), Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara, 2022.
Centel, Nur/Zafer, Hamide/Çakmut, Özlem, Türk Ceza Hukukuna Giriş, 10. Baskı, Beta, İstanbul, 2017.
Demirbaş, Timur, “Af Tartışmaları ve 4616 Sayılı ’23 Nisan 1999 Tarihine Kadar İşlenen Suçlardan Dolayı Şartla Salıverilmeye Dava ve Cezaların Ertelenmesine Dair Kanun’”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Sayı:18, TAKAV, Ankara, 2001, s. 78-98.
Demirbaş, Timur, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 19. Baskı, Seçkin, Ankara, 2024.
Demirbaş, Timur, İnfaz Hukuku, 9. Baskı, Seçkin, Ankara, 2023.

Dönmezer, Sulhi/Erman, Sahir, Nazari ve Tatbiki Türk Ceza Hukuku, Umumi Kısım, C.II, Yeniden Gözden Geçirilmiş, 3. Baskı, Sermet Matbaası, İstanbul, 1966.
Dönmezer, Sulhi/Erman, Sahir, Nazari ve Tatbiki Türk Ceza Hukuku, Umumi Kısım, C.III, Yeniden Gözden Geçirilmiş, 3. Baskı, Sermet Matbaası, İstanbul, 1966.
Dülger, Murat Volkan, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 3. Baskı, Seçkin, Ankara, 2025.
Erem, Faruk, Ümanist Doktrin Açısından Türk Ceza Hukuku, Cilt: II Genel Hükümler, 10. Baskı, Sevinç Matbaası, Ankara, 1976.
Gerçeker, Hasan, Yorumlu&Uygulamalı Türk Ceza Kanunu, Cilt-1, Madde 1-140, 7. Baskı, Seçkin, Ankara, 2025. Hafızoğulları, Zeki, “Dava ve Cezanın Sukutu”, Ceza Hukuku El Kitabı, 1. Baskı, Beta, İstanbul, 1989.
İçel, Kayıhan, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 7. Baskı, Beta, Ankara, 2023.
İnceloğlu, Sibel, “Türk Anayasa Mahkemesi ve İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Eşitlik ve Ayrımcılık Yasağı Çerçevesinde Af, Şartla Salıverme, Dava ve Cezaların Ertelenmesi”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Sayı:18, TAKAV, Ankara, 2001, s.41-70.
İnceloğlu, Sibel, “Türk Anayasa Mahkemesi ve İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Eşitlik ve Ayrımcılık Yasağı”, Çalışma ve Toplum Ekonomi ve Hukuk Dergisi, Birleşik-Metal İş Sendikası Yayını, 2006/4, s. 45-62.
Keyman, Selahattin, Türk Hukukunda Af, (Genel Af-Özel Af), Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, 1965. Koca, Mahmut/Üzülmez, İlhan, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 18. Baskı, Seçkin, Ankara, 2025.
Kuzu, Burhan, “Terörle Mücadele Kanunu ve Anayasa Mahkemesinin İptal Kararı”, Hayri Domaniç’e Armağan, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, İstanbul, 1995, s. 317-347.
Meray, Seha L., Ceza Hukukunda Af, Zerbamat Yayınevi, Ankara, 1944.
Özbek, Veli Özer, İnfaz Hukuku, 21. Baskı Seçkin, İstanbul, 2025.
Özbek, Veli Özer/Doğan, Koray/Meraklı, Serkan/Bacaksız, Pınar/Başbüyük, İsa, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 16. Baskı, Seçkin, Ankara, 2025.
Özbek, Veli Özer, “Ceza ve Güvenlik Tedbirlerinin İnfazı Hakkında Kanun ile Bazı Kanunlarda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun Teklifi Hakkında Değerlendirmelerimiz”, Ceza Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 15, Sayı: 42, 2020, s. 301-312.
Özek, Çetin, “Umumi Af”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt: 24, Sayı: 1-4, 1959, s. 118-175.
Özgenç, İzzet, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 21. Baskı, Seçkin, Ankara, 2025.
Öztürk, Bahri/ Erdem, Mustafa Ruhan, Uygulamalı Ceza Hukuku ve Güvenlik Tedbirleri Hukuku, 25. Baskı, Seçkin, Ankara, 2025.
Sınmaz Sönmez, Cahide, “Demokrat Parti İktidarının İlk İcraatlarına Bir Örnek: ‘Bazı Suç ve Cezaların Hakkında Kanun’”, Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt:10, Sayı:20, 2012, s. 111-136.
Sözüer, Adem, “Türk Hukukunda Af, 4454 ve 4616 Sayılı Kanunlarda Öngörülen Şartla Salıverilme ve Ertelemeye İlişkin Hükümlerin Hukuksal Niteliği ile Bu Hükümlerin Anayasaya Uygunluğu Sorunu”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Sayı:18, TAKAV, Ankara, 2001, s. 219-253.
Şen, Ersan, “Türk Ceza Hukuku Yönünden Af”, Türk Hukukunda ve Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Af Sorunu Sempozyumu (7 Aralık 2010, Okan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi), Bildiriler Kitabı, Okan Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2011, s. 101-123.
Türk Dil Kurumu, Güncel Türkçe Sözlük, https://sozluk.gov.tr/ (Erişim Tarihi: 10.02.2026)
Türk Hukuk Lügati, Başbakanlık Basımevi, Ankara, 1991.
Ünal, Osman Gazi, “Ceza ve Güvenlik Tedbirlerinin İnfazı Hakkında Kanun’a Getirilen Geçici Madde 10 Hükmü Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, Cilt: 36, Sayı: 171, 2024, s. 67-120.
Yalçın Sancar, Türkan, “23 Nisan 1999 Tarihine Kadar İşlenen Suçlardan Dolayı Şartla Salıverilmeye, Dava ve Cezaların Ertelenmesine Dair Kanun’un Hukuksal Niteliği ve Sonuçları”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Sayı:18, TAKAV, Ankara, 2001, s. 149-196.
Zafer, Hamide, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, TCK m. 1-75, 8. Baskı, Beta, İstanbul, 2021.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Criminal Law

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Fatma Betül Şeker ^*
0000-0001-7922-4709
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 5, 2026

Submission Date

February 13, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 5, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 4 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.70011/kahd.1889044

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA33EL54WD

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Şeker, F. B. (2026). TÜRK CEZA HUKUKUNDA AF VE 7456 SAYILI KANUN İLE 7571 SAYILI KANUN’UN AF KAPSAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Karatekin Hukuk Dergisi, 4(2), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.70011/kahd.1889044

AMA

1.Şeker FB. TÜRK CEZA HUKUKUNDA AF VE 7456 SAYILI KANUN İLE 7571 SAYILI KANUN’UN AF KAPSAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Karatekin Hukuk Dergisi. 2026;4(2):123-143. doi:10.70011/kahd.1889044

Chicago

Şeker, Fatma Betül. 2026. “TÜRK CEZA HUKUKUNDA AF VE 7456 SAYILI KANUN İLE 7571 SAYILI KANUN’UN AF KAPSAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Karatekin Hukuk Dergisi 4 (2): 123-43. https://doi.org/10.70011/kahd.1889044.

EndNote

Şeker FB (June 1, 2026) TÜRK CEZA HUKUKUNDA AF VE 7456 SAYILI KANUN İLE 7571 SAYILI KANUN’UN AF KAPSAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Karatekin Hukuk Dergisi 4 2 123–143.

IEEE

[1]F. B. Şeker, “TÜRK CEZA HUKUKUNDA AF VE 7456 SAYILI KANUN İLE 7571 SAYILI KANUN’UN AF KAPSAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”, Karatekin Hukuk Dergisi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 123–143, June 2026, doi: 10.70011/kahd.1889044.

ISNAD

Şeker, Fatma Betül. “TÜRK CEZA HUKUKUNDA AF VE 7456 SAYILI KANUN İLE 7571 SAYILI KANUN’UN AF KAPSAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Karatekin Hukuk Dergisi 4/2 (June 1, 2026): 123-143. https://doi.org/10.70011/kahd.1889044.

JAMA

1.Şeker FB. TÜRK CEZA HUKUKUNDA AF VE 7456 SAYILI KANUN İLE 7571 SAYILI KANUN’UN AF KAPSAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Karatekin Hukuk Dergisi. 2026;4:123–143.

MLA

Şeker, Fatma Betül. “TÜRK CEZA HUKUKUNDA AF VE 7456 SAYILI KANUN İLE 7571 SAYILI KANUN’UN AF KAPSAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Karatekin Hukuk Dergisi, vol. 4, no. 2, June 2026, pp. 123-4, doi:10.70011/kahd.1889044.

Vancouver

1.Fatma Betül Şeker. TÜRK CEZA HUKUKUNDA AF VE 7456 SAYILI KANUN İLE 7571 SAYILI KANUN’UN AF KAPSAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Karatekin Hukuk Dergisi. 2026 Jun. 1;4(2):123-4. doi:10.70011/kahd.1889044

1. Prerequisites for Manuscripts Submitted to our Journal
a. All submissions must be original, unpublished , and not under the review of any other publication synchronously. Authors are deemed to have committed to this when submitting their work to our Journal. In this regard, the Ethical Declaration Form in the DergiPark system must be signed by the author and sent to our journal through the same system.
b. Manuscripts submitted to our journal are checked by Turnitin plagiarism program. Manuscripts with a similarity rate of more than 15% (bibliography, footnotes and similarities less than 3% are excluded in the Turnitin review) are rejected without being sent to the referee review.

2. Manuscript Submission Procedure
a. Manuscripts should be submitted in two copies in ".doc" or ".docx" format only through the DergiPark system. One of the copies should be anonymous and should not contain information about the author(s). Articles sent via e-mail will not be considered for the publication.
b. The manuscripts to be sent via the DergiPark system should cover all the information about the author (titles, institutions, e-mail addresses, ORCID numbers) fully.

3. Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to our Journal
a. Word Limits:
Manuscripts submitted to the journal should consist of Turkish and English title, Turkish and English abstracts, Turkish and English keywords, text, bibliography and footnotes. The text of the manuscripts submitted to the journal should not be less than 3,000 words and not more than 15,000 words. Abstracts and bibliography are not taken into account in the calculation of the word count limits for the text. Turkish and English abstracts should be at least 150 words and should not exceed 250 words. The number of keywords should not be less than 5 words and not more than 10 words.
b. Title and Author Name:
The title of the text should be written in 14-point font, all letters capitalized, bold and centered. The author's name should appear to the right of the title. The author's name should be written in 13 pt, bold, right justified, with capitalized initial letters. In the footnote to be created with the (*) symbol next to the author's surname, the title, institution, e-mail address and ORCID number of the author should be included respectively.
For example: Prof. Dr., Çankırı Karatekin University Faculty of Law, Department of Civil Law, e-mail: example@karatekin.edu.tr, ORCID: 0000-0000-0000-0000
Turkish and English Abstract and Keywords: Turkish abstract, English abstract, Turkish keywords and English keywords should be bold and capitalized.

c. Text:
1. There should be no indented paragraphs in the text and all paragraphs should be left justified.
2. The body of the manuscript should be in Times New Roman font, 12 pt., 1.5 line spacing; footnotes should be in Times New Roman font, 10 pt., 1 line spacing and justified.
3. Headings should be formed as shown below respectively:
I. FIRST DEGREE SUBSECTION

A. SECOND DEGREE SUBDIVISION (A, B)

1. Third Order Subdivision (1, 2)

a) Fourth Order Subdivision (a, b)

aa) Fifth Order Subdivision (aa, bb)

aaa) Sixth Order Subdivision (aaa, bbb)

aaaa) Seventh Order Subdivision (aaaa, bbbb)
4. Foreign words used in the text must be written in italic.
5. A table of contents should not be included in the text.
6. There should not be a table of abbreviations for abbreviations used in the text; when the name or title to be abbreviated is used for the first time in the text, it should be written without abbreviation and the abbreviation should be indicated in parentheses next to it.
7. The citation system adopted in footnotes and bibliographies is "Chicago-Style", click here for examples according to this citation system. (Link ekle)
8. Footnotes used at the end of a sentence should be given without a space and inserted before the end-of-sentence punctuation mark.
9. If more than one work is cited in a footnote, each work should be separated by a semicolon.
10. Abbreviations in footnotes and bibliographies should not use periods.
11. The abbreviations supra, infra, ante, id, loc cit, op cit, contra should not be used in citations.
12. A single bibliography should be organized regardless of the nature of the works used in the bibliography (e.g. books, articles, etc.) and the works used should be listed in alphabetical order according to the surnames of the authors.
13. References should be written in Times New Roman, 12 font size, 1.5 line spacing and justified.
14. Legislation or court decisions cited in the text should not be included in the bibliography.
YOU CAN ACCESS THE SAMPLE TEMPLATE CONTAINING THE SPELLING RULES FROM THIS LINK.

1) Journal Publication Ethics
Karatekin Law Journal continues its publication life in accordance with national and international standards regarding ethical principles and values in its publication policy.
KLJ is based on the directives and guidelines prepared by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA), World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) and the Council of Higher Education (YÖK) in terms of ethical responsibilities, roles and duties of authors, journal editor, referees and publisher, and ethical principles and rules.

2) Obligations of the Editors and Editorial Board
Editor;
a. carries out the evaluation process of the works regardless of the religion, gender, nationality and political opinion of the author.
b. undertakes to act in confidentiality within the scope of his/her duties.
c. ensures that the principle of blind refereeing is respected in the publication process. He/she takes into account the COPE guidelines ( https://publicationethics.org/files/What_To_Do_If_Suspect_Peer_Review_Manipulation.pdf ) in order to ensure that the refereeing process complies with ethical standards.
d. provides the necessary cooperation and coordination to complete the evaluation process of the works within the specified period.
e. observes the principles determined by COPE ( https://publicationethics.org/files/Sharing%20_of_Information_Among_EiCs_guidelines_web_version_0.pdf in sharing information about the publication process of the journal and article evaluation processes with other members of the Board.
f. complies with the principles determined by COPE and YÖK's Directive on Scientific Research and Publication Ethics of Higher Education Institutions in terms of ethical violations that may be encountered in works submitted to the journal or published in previous issues of the journal. Click here to access COPE's guidelines on these issues.
( https://publicationethics.org/files/Full_set_of_flowcharts_Turkey_2017%20%281%29.pdf )
( https://publicationethics.org/files/Recognise_Potential_Authorship_Problems.pdf )
( https://publicationethics.org/files/Web_A29298_COPE_Text_Recycling.pdf )

3) Obligations of Authors
Authors who submit their works to the Journal are obliged to comply with the provisions of the Law No. 5846 on Intellectual and Artistic Works, the principles set out by YÖK in the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive of Higher Education Institutions, the standards set forth by COPE and other principles and standards accepted by the Journal.
Authors are deemed to have undertaken that they have prepared their works submitted to the Journal for publication in accordance with the Law No. 5846 on Intellectual and Artistic Works, the Directive on Scientific Research and Publication Ethics of Higher Education Institutions, and the standards of research and publication ethics announced by COPE.

4) Obligations of Reviewers
The referees complete the review of the works sent to them by the Journal or the units authorized by the Journal within the time allotted to them, taking into account the principles announced by COPE ( https://publicationethics.org/files/Ethical_Guidelines_For_Peer_Reviewers_2.pdf ), in accordance with their fields of expertise, impartially and fairly.
Referees are obliged to inform the Editorial Board of the Journal immediately if they find any violation of academic principles and ethical values, national or international principles or standards during the review of the relevant work.

Publication Policy:

Publication Language
KLJ only reviews scientific studies written in Turkish and English.

Publication Frequency
KLJ which begins its publication life in 2023, is a national peer-reviewed journal that will be published electronically in two issues per year, in January and July.

Pricing Policy
KLJ does not charge authors/authors a fee at any stage of the publication process (submission, evaluation and publication of the relevant work).

Publication Process
1) Preliminary Evaluation Process
a. Manuscripts can only be submitted to the journal through the DergiPark system. Manuscripts submitted to the journal must not have been published or sent elsewhere for publication. The submission of the manuscript to our journal means the author's commitment to this principle. In this regard, the "Ethical Declaration Form" must be signed by the author and sent to our journal via the Dergipark system. In addition, the "Declaration of No Need for Ethics Committee Approval Form" should be uploaded to the system. In addition, for translated manuscripts, a written permission document indicating that permission for publication has been obtained from the author/authors of the work and/or the person or institution holding the right to publish should also be uploaded to the system.
b. Authors are deemed to have accepted that their work is ready for "publication" in terms of spelling as submitted to our journal.
c. By submitting their work to our journal, authors are deemed to have accepted our journal's ethical principles, publication policy and writing rules. The Editorial Board has the right to reject manuscripts that are contrary to ethical principles, editorial policy or scientific criteria, that do not comply with the spelling rules, or that contain more than usual spelling mistakes at any stage.
d. The manuscripts submitted to our journal are examined by the Turnitin plagiarism program. Manuscripts with a similarity rate of more than 15% (bibliography, footnotes and similarities of less than 3% are excluded from the Turnitin review) are rejected by the Editorial Board without being sent for peer review.
e. The preliminary evaluation process is completed within a maximum of 1 month.

2) Evaluation Process
The manuscripts submitted to our journal are subjected to peer review in accordance with the double-blind peer-review system after passing the preliminary evaluation process. If corrections are requested in the referee report, the author can only make changes within the framework of the specified mandatory corrections. After the corrections suggested by the referee are made by the author, the manuscript is sent to the referee again if specified in the report. If the reports of both referees are negative, the manuscript is not sent to a third referee and is removed from the publication process. If one of the referee reports is positive and the other is negative, a third referee evaluation is applied. If the third referee's evaluation is negative, the manuscript is returned to the author and removed from the publication process.
The referee has 7 days to respond to the invitation sent for the evaluation. The referee has 1 month to evaluate the article. If deemed necessary, referees may be given up to 15 days additional time by the editor.

3) Preparation for Publication
The preparation for publication process is the process in which peer-reviewed manuscripts are prepared for publication in the relevant issue. In this process, the status of the article appears as In Process of Publication.
The manuscript, whose layout is completed during the preparation for publication process, is sent to the author for a final review in terms of grammar, spelling rules and semantic integrity and to identify possible typographical errors. After the author completes the process, the Editorial Board presents the final version of the article to be published in the relevant issue to the users in the DergiPark system in early view. During this process, if the author detects minor errors in his/her work, he/she can notify the technical communication unit of our journal ( kahddestek@karatekin.edu.tr ) by e-mail. The Editorial Board receives the change request from the technical communication and makes the necessary correction.
NOTE: All stages related to the manuscript you send to our journal are completed through the DergiPark system and you should contact through the DergiPark system for any questions. You only need to notify the technical communication unit of our journal ( kahddestek@karatekin.edu.tr ) by e-mail at the EARLY VIEW stage for minor errors you detect about your work after the publication of the relevant issue of our journal in the DergiPark system.

Price Policy
No fee is charged from the author or institution under any name.
KLJ does not charge authors/authors a fee at any stage of the publication process (submission, evaluation and publication of the relevant work).

Chief Editor

MY

Mehmet YEŞILLER

Law and Legal Studies, Roman Law

Section Editors

ŞB

Şükriye Esra BASKAN

Labour and Social Security Law

Fikret Sami TIYEK

Civil Procedure Law, Commercial Law, Civil Procedure

ÇM

Çolpan MÜCAHIT KÜÇÜK

Administrative Law

Sarp ŞAHANKAYA

Family Law, Contract Law, Private Law and Civil Obligations (Other)

ZE

Zeynep ERHAN BULUT

Law and Legal Studies, Public International Law, International Law

Serdar DEMIRCI

Law and Legal Studies, Law of Private Insurance

Gülen SOYASLAN AKDEMIR

Criminal Law, International Security, International Law

Language Editors

ŞK

Şerife Esra KIRAZ

Commercial Law

Deputy Chief Editors

Salih YILDIZ

Law and Legal Studies, Climate Change Law, Labour and Social Security Law, Labour Law

SŞ

Seniyye ŞAHIN

Law and Religion, Islamic Law

İD

İsmail DEMEZ

Law and Legal Studies, Information and Technology Law, Administrative Law

Editorial Board

DS

Doğan SOYASLAN

Criminal Law

HÇ

Hayrettin ÇAĞLAR

Intellectual Property Law, Corporations and Associations Law, Commercial Law (Other)

MA

Musa AYGÜL

Migration, Asylum and Refugee Law, Banking, Finance and Securities Law, Commercial Law (Other), International Arbitration, International Trade and Investment Law

Advisory Board

MY

Mehmet Zahid YENER

Family Law, Labour and Social Security Law, Tort Law, Property Law (Excl. Intellectual Property Law), Contract Law

İdris Hakan FURTUN

Tax Law

İştar URHANOĞLU

Labour and Social Security Law, Labour Law

Burçak YILDIZ

Intellectual Property Law, Banking, Finance and Securities Law, Corporations and Associations Law, Commercial Law (Other)

Elif UZUN

Law and Legal Studies

ZÖ

Zeynep ÖZCAN

Family Law, Medical and Health Law, Property Law (Excl. Intellectual Property Law), Private Law and Civil Obligations (Other)

NÖ

Neslihan ÖZKERIM GÜNER

Public International Law

SÇ

Serkan ÇINARLI

Administrative Law

ÖA

Özge ARPACI

Family Law, Contract Law, Private Law and Civil Obligations (Other)

SA

Stelios ANDREADAKIS

Banking, Finance and Securities Law, Corporations and Associations Law, European Union Law

AY

Abdulkerim YILDIRIM

Family Law, Tort Law, Property Law (Excl. Intellectual Property Law), Contract Law, Private Law and Civil Obligations (Other)

DK

Damla KÜÇÜK

Commercial Law, Commercial Law (Other)

ÖT

Önder TOZMAN

Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure

Cemal DURSUN

Mining, Energy and Natural Resources Law, Tort Law, Property Law (Excl. Intellectual Property Law), Contract Law, Commercial Law, Comparative Law

Elif ŞEN BOYNUEĞRI

Law and Legal Studies, Family Law, Equity and Trusts Law, Tort Law, Contract Law, Private Law and Civil Obligations (Other)

NK

Neslihan KARATAŞ DURMUŞ

Public Economics - Taxation and Revenue, Tax Law, Banking, Finance and Securities Law, Taxation Law, Budget and Financial Planning, Public Finance, Financial Law, Theory of Treasury, Taxation Accounting

Esra YILDIZ ÜSTÜN

British and Irish Language, Literature and Culture, International Arbitration, Conflict of Laws (Incl. Private International Law), International Migration, Law of International Law

Muhammed Fatih UŞAN

Labour and Social Security Law

IT

Ivan TOT

Contract Law, Banking, Finance and Securities Law, Comparative Law

EY

Erdal YERDELEN

Criminal Law

Nesibe KURT KONCA

Legal Education, Civil Procedure Law, Access To Justice, Litigation, Adjudication and Dispute Resolution, Civil Procedure

EK

Elvan KEÇELIOĞLU

Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure

OC

Ozan CAN

Law and Legal Studies, Commercial Law

Murat BATI

Financial Law

TŞ

Taner ŞAHIN

Commercial Law (Other)

BÖ

Bahri ÖZTÜRK

Criminal Law

Olgun DEĞIRMENCI

Information and Technology Law, Criminal Law

Technical Editor

Salih YILDIZ

Law and Legal Studies, Climate Change Law, Labour and Social Security Law, Labour Law

	Index Copernicus International (ICI)
	DOAJ
	ROAD
	Academindex
	ERIH PLUS
	EBSCO - Central & Eastern European Academic Source
	Sherpa Romeo
	EuroPub
	HeinOnline
	ACARINDEX

TÜRK CEZA HUKUKUNDA AF VE 7456 SAYILI KANUN İLE 7571 SAYILI KANUN’UN AF KAPSAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

TÜRK CEZA HUKUKUNDA AF VE 7456 SAYILI KANUN İLE 7571 SAYILI KANUN’UN AF KAPSAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Abstract

Keywords

Amnesty in Turkish Criminal Law and an Assessment of Law No. 7456 and Law No. 7571 in the Context of Amnesty

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Aim & Scope

Author Guidelines

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Price Policy

Indexes

Citation Indexes

Other Indexes

Journal Boards

Chief Editor

Section Editors

Language Editors

Deputy Chief Editors

Editorial Board

Advisory Board

Technical Editor