Comparison of Design Gmrt Wind Turbine Plant Effectively with other Power Wind

Aybaba Hançerlıoğulları; Yavuz Ali Şener; Sabri Ünal; Mertcan Karadeniz; Gülşah Hançerlıoğulları; Aslı Kurnaz; Atıf Çetiner; Salem Ashufat; Yosef G.Ali Madee; Seçil Karatay

doi:10.17475/kastorman.296495

TR EN

GMRT Rüzgar Türbünün Diğer Güç Rüzgar Türbünleriyle ile Efektif Olarak Karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Gelibolu Model Rüzgâr Türbini (GMRT) ve üç adet PTDW (güç-işleme yönlendirme kanadı) oluşan gelişmiş özel bir türbin tasarım araştırlmıştır. Bu model, dikey türbin türbinlerinin (DARRIEUS) tip güç kanatlarının özel bir parçasıdır. PTDW kanatları negatif rüzgâr enerjilerini pozitif ek bir vakum gücüne dönüştürür ve katkı, türbinlerin güç kanatlarının verimliliğini, diğer geleneksel dikey şaft rüzgâr türbinleriyle orantılı olarak 5 kat artırır. Güç dengesinin diğer modellerden çok daha etkili olduğunu gösteriyor. Çalışmamız gösteriyorki, bu model çevre için daha uygundur. Türbinin aerodinamik etki bölgesi tarama alanına kıyasla geniş olduğundan, türbinin toplam maliyeti, diğer rüzgâr türbinlerine göre kilovat başına maliyet ve tam kapasite maliyeti açısından daha az maliyetlidir. Tasarladığı üstünlük sayesinde oluşur. Bu çalışmada, türbin gücü ve üstün tasarım bakımından simülasyon hesaplamaları Monte Carlo bilgisayar yöntemi kullanılmıştır.

Keywords

Darrieus,Gmrt,Monte Carlo simülasyonu,Optimizasyon

References

Ackermann T., 2005. Windpower in power systems print ISBN: 9780470855089.
Akdağ SA and Güler Ö., 2010. Evalution of wind energy investment interest and electricity generation cost analysis for turkey, applied energy 87, 2574-2580
Aras H., 2003. Wind energy status and its assessment in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 28, 2213-2220.
Byon E, Ntaimo L and Ding Y., 2010. Optimal maintenance strategiesfor wind turbine systemsunder stochastic weather conditions, IEEE transactıons on reliability, 59 (2),393-404.
Ertek, G, Asian S., Haksoz,C., Pakter, S., Ulun.,S., 2016. Wind Turbine Accidents: A Data Mining Study., IEEE Systems Journal, vol: PP, issue: 99, Pages: 1 - 12, DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2016.2565818.
EuropeanWindEnergyAssociation Report, 2013a .deepwater, thenext step for offshore windenergy.
EuropeanWindEnergyAssociation Report., 2013b. The European offshore wind ındustry keytrend sand statistics.
Güler Ö. 2009. Wind energy status in electrical energy production of Turkey: Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 13,473-478.
Güleren KM and Demir S., 2011. Performance analysis of different airfoils for turbine blades at low angles of attack. J.of thermal science and technology, 31,51-59.
Haessig P, Multon B., 2015. Energy Storage ControlwithAgingLimitation.PowerTechconference.

Hançerlioğulları, A., 2006. Monte Carlo Simulation and mcnp Code System. Kastamonu Universitiy education of journal 2,545-556.
Hansen NY, Sorensen JN,Voutsinas S, Sorensen N, Madsen HA., 2006. State of theartinwindturbineaerodynamicsandaeroelasticity. Prog.Aerosp.Sci. 42, 285–330.
Hau E. 2005. Wind turbines, fundamentals, technologies, application, economics, ısbnno: 3-540-57064-0.
Holttinen H, Orths AG. Currents of change. Ieee power&energy magazine 2011; 9(6),47–59.
Kooijman HJT, Lindenburg C, Winkelaar D, van der Hooft EL., 2003. Dowec 6 Mwpre-design. aero-elastic modelling of thedowec 6,mwpre-design in phatas, dowec-f1w2-hjk-01-046/9publicversion.
Le Gourieres, D., 1982. Wind power plants, theory and design. Pergamon press.
Luo N, Pacheco L, Vidal Y, Li H., 2012. Smart structural control strategies for offshore wind power generation with floating wind turbines. Proceedings of the international conference on renewable energy sand power quality, santiago de compostel -Spain.
Marmidis G, Lazerou S, Pyrigioti E., 2008.
Menter FR., 1994. Two-equationeddy-viscosityturbulencemodelsforengineringapplications. AIAAJ; 32(8), 1598–1605.
Optimal placement of windturbines in a wind park using Monte Carlo simulation, renewable energy. 33, 1455-1460.
Penedo RJM, 2008. Aero-elastic bladeoptimizationfor an urban windturbine.
Ragheb M, Ragheb A., 2011. Wind turbines theory-the Betz equation and optimal rotor tip speed ratio.
Randolph J and Master G, 2008. Energyforsustainability: technology, planning, ısbn-13: 978-1597261036.
Rethore PE, Fuglsang P, Larsen GC, Buhl T. Laesen TJ, Aagaard MHT., 2014. Multi-fidelityoptimization of windfarms, WindEnergy. 17(12), 1797-1816.
Sarun B., 2006. Computationa lstudies of horizontalaxiswindturbines in high wind speed condition using advanced turbulence models. Georgia Institute of Technology, United States.
SebastianT, Lackner MA., 2012. Development of a free vortex wake method code for off shore floating wind turbines: renew energy, 46,269–275.
Şener YA., 1995. Comparison of efficiency parameters in “gelibolu model” wind turbine.Tubitak technical report.
Song DL, Yang ZX.,2015,.Design, simulation and optimization of a novel permanent magnetic driver for vertical axis wind turbine,ieee 12th international conference on networking, sensing and control howard civil service ınternational house, taipei, Taiwan.
Butterfield S, Musial W, Jonkman J, SclavounosP, 2005. Engineering ch
Tande JO., 2005. Power quality standards for wind turbines, wind power in power systems.
Toan T.T, Kim D.H,2015. The platform pitching motion of floating offshore wind turbine: A preliminary unsteady aerodynamic analysis, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.,142(2015)65–81.
Uslu N, Peker İ, Ünal S, Nasırlı C. ,2012. Alternative sources of wood consumption in ilgaz mountain forest villages and their effects on the protection of forests, mountains of turkey, First National Symposium, Kastamonu.
Windtürbine, RST Technology,2015. Http://www.renewablesystemstechnology.com/diy-tutorials.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Aybaba Hançerlıoğulları

Yavuz Ali Şener This is me

Sabri Ünal

Mertcan Karadeniz

Gülşah Hançerlıoğulları

Aslı Kurnaz

Atıf Çetiner

Salem Ashufat This is me

Yosef G.Ali Madee This is me

Seçil Karatay

Publication Date

March 5, 2017

Submission Date

March 6, 2017

Acceptance Date

January 23, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 17 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.296495

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA22YT36GG

APA

Hançerlıoğulları, A., Şener, Y. A., Ünal, S., Karadeniz, M., Hançerlıoğulları, G., Kurnaz, A., Çetiner, A., Ashufat, S., Madee, Y. G., & Karatay, S. (2017). Comparison of Design Gmrt Wind Turbine Plant Effectively with other Power Wind. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 17(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.296495

AMA

1.Hançerlıoğulları A, Şener YA, Ünal S, et al. Comparison of Design Gmrt Wind Turbine Plant Effectively with other Power Wind. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty. 2017;17(1):69-79. doi:10.17475/kastorman.296495

Chicago

Hançerlıoğulları, Aybaba, Yavuz Ali Şener, Sabri Ünal, et al. 2017. “Comparison of Design Gmrt Wind Turbine Plant Effectively With Other Power Wind”. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty 17 (1): 69-79. https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.296495.

EndNote

Hançerlıoğulları A, Şener YA, Ünal S, Karadeniz M, Hançerlıoğulları G, Kurnaz A, Çetiner A, Ashufat S, Madee YG, Karatay S (March 1, 2017) Comparison of Design Gmrt Wind Turbine Plant Effectively with other Power Wind. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty 17 1 69–79.

IEEE

[1]A. Hançerlıoğulları et al., “Comparison of Design Gmrt Wind Turbine Plant Effectively with other Power Wind”, Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 69–79, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.17475/kastorman.296495.

ISNAD

Hançerlıoğulları, Aybaba - Şener, Yavuz Ali - Ünal, Sabri - Karadeniz, Mertcan - Hançerlıoğulları, Gülşah - Kurnaz, Aslı - Çetiner, Atıf - Ashufat, Salem - Madee, Yosef G.Ali - Karatay, Seçil. “Comparison of Design Gmrt Wind Turbine Plant Effectively With Other Power Wind”. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty 17/1 (March 1, 2017): 69-79. https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.296495.

JAMA

1.Hançerlıoğulları A, Şener YA, Ünal S, Karadeniz M, Hançerlıoğulları G, Kurnaz A, Çetiner A, Ashufat S, Madee YG, Karatay S. Comparison of Design Gmrt Wind Turbine Plant Effectively with other Power Wind. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty. 2017;17:69–79.

MLA

Hançerlıoğulları, Aybaba, et al. “Comparison of Design Gmrt Wind Turbine Plant Effectively With Other Power Wind”. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, vol. 17, no. 1, Mar. 2017, pp. 69-79, doi:10.17475/kastorman.296495.

Vancouver

1.Aybaba Hançerlıoğulları, Yavuz Ali Şener, Sabri Ünal, Mertcan Karadeniz, Gülşah Hançerlıoğulları, Aslı Kurnaz, Atıf Çetiner, Salem Ashufat, Yosef G.Ali Madee, Seçil Karatay. Comparison of Design Gmrt Wind Turbine Plant Effectively with other Power Wind. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty. 2017 Mar. 1;17(1):69-7. doi:10.17475/kastorman.296495

GMRT Rüzgar Türbünün Diğer Güç Rüzgar Türbünleriyle ile Efektif Olarak Karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Keywords