Research Article
Year 2018,
Volume: 9 Issue: 17, 1 - 20, 30.06.2018
Abstract
Bu çalışmanın amacı Post Keynesyen paranın
içselliği teorisinin 2001-2015 yıllarını kapsayan dönemde 13 Avrupa Birliği
ülkesi için analiz edilmesidir. Bu amaç çerçevesinde birim kök testi,
eşbütünleşme testleri, Panel ARDL ve ardından Granger nedensellik testleri
yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak çalışmanın genel sonuçları,
13 Avrupa Birliği ülkesi için Post-Keynesyen paranın içselliği yaklaşımını
desteklemektedir. Bu bağlamda ampirik bulgular, bu ülkelerde halkın para
talebini karşılamak için bankalar tarafından yaratılan kredilerin para arzı
için temel teşkil ettiğini göstermektedir.
Keywords
References
- Aktakaş, B. G., Akın, C. S., & Uçan, O. (2015). The Nature of Money in Post-Keynesian Institutionalists: Turkey Case. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 277-287. Alkın, H. (2015). Yeni Uzlaşı Modeli'nin Eleştirisi, Post-Keynesyen Enflasyon Hedeflemesi Modelleri ve Post-Keynesyen Para Politikası Kuralları. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Akdeniz üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Badarudin, Z. E., Ariff, M., & Khalid, A. M. (2013). Post-Keynesian money endogeneity evidence in G-7 economies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 33, 146-162. Bozoklu, Ş. (2013). Money, income, and causality: an examination for the Turkish economy. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 26(1), 171-182. Chick, V. (1983). Macroeconomics After Keynes: A Reconsideration of the General Theory, Oxford: Philip Allan. Cottrell, A. (1986). Endogeneity of Money and Money-Income Causality. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 3(1), 1-27. Çifter, A., & Ozun, A. (2007). The monetary transmission mechanism in the new economy: Evidence from Turkey (1997-2006). South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 2(1), 15-24. Davidson, P. (1972). Money And Ihe Real World. New York: John Wiley & Sons (second edition 1978). Dow, S. (1993). Post Keynesian Monetary Theory. Money and the Economic Process. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, Chapter5. Dow, S. (1996). Horizontalism: A Critiqu. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20, 497-508. Dow, A,S. ve S, C.Dow. (1989), “Endogenous Money Creation and Idle Balances”, L. Pheby (der.), New Directions in Post Keynesian Economics içinde, Aldershot: Elgar: 141-163. Eicher, A. (1987). The Macrodynamics of Advanced Market Economies. Armonk: ME. Sharp. Enders W. (2010). Applied Econometric Time Series. 3, John Wiley&Sons. Erataş, F., Nur, H. B., & Çınar, S. (2015). Para arzının Post Keynesyen yorumu: gelişmiş ülkeler örneği. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(15), 398-409. Güney, I. E., & Çepni, O. (2016). Endogeneity of Money Supply: Evidence From Turkey (No. 1619). Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. Haghighat, J. (2011). Endogenous and Exogenous Money: an empirical investigation from Iran. Journal of Accounting, 1(1). Howells, P. ve K.H. (1998), “The Endogenity of Money: Evidence from The G7”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 45 (3), 329-340.
Year 2018,
Volume: 9 Issue: 17, 1 - 20, 30.06.2018
Abstract
References
- Aktakaş, B. G., Akın, C. S., & Uçan, O. (2015). The Nature of Money in Post-Keynesian Institutionalists: Turkey Case. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 277-287. Alkın, H. (2015). Yeni Uzlaşı Modeli'nin Eleştirisi, Post-Keynesyen Enflasyon Hedeflemesi Modelleri ve Post-Keynesyen Para Politikası Kuralları. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Akdeniz üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Badarudin, Z. E., Ariff, M., & Khalid, A. M. (2013). Post-Keynesian money endogeneity evidence in G-7 economies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 33, 146-162. Bozoklu, Ş. (2013). Money, income, and causality: an examination for the Turkish economy. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 26(1), 171-182. Chick, V. (1983). Macroeconomics After Keynes: A Reconsideration of the General Theory, Oxford: Philip Allan. Cottrell, A. (1986). Endogeneity of Money and Money-Income Causality. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 3(1), 1-27. Çifter, A., & Ozun, A. (2007). The monetary transmission mechanism in the new economy: Evidence from Turkey (1997-2006). South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 2(1), 15-24. Davidson, P. (1972). Money And Ihe Real World. New York: John Wiley & Sons (second edition 1978). Dow, S. (1993). Post Keynesian Monetary Theory. Money and the Economic Process. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, Chapter5. Dow, S. (1996). Horizontalism: A Critiqu. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20, 497-508. Dow, A,S. ve S, C.Dow. (1989), “Endogenous Money Creation and Idle Balances”, L. Pheby (der.), New Directions in Post Keynesian Economics içinde, Aldershot: Elgar: 141-163. Eicher, A. (1987). The Macrodynamics of Advanced Market Economies. Armonk: ME. Sharp. Enders W. (2010). Applied Econometric Time Series. 3, John Wiley&Sons. Erataş, F., Nur, H. B., & Çınar, S. (2015). Para arzının Post Keynesyen yorumu: gelişmiş ülkeler örneği. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(15), 398-409. Güney, I. E., & Çepni, O. (2016). Endogeneity of Money Supply: Evidence From Turkey (No. 1619). Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. Haghighat, J. (2011). Endogenous and Exogenous Money: an empirical investigation from Iran. Journal of Accounting, 1(1). Howells, P. ve K.H. (1998), “The Endogenity of Money: Evidence from The G7”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 45 (3), 329-340.
There are 1 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 30, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Volume: 9 Issue: 17 |
KAUJEASF is the corporate journal of Kafkas University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal Publishing.
KAUJEASF has been included in Web of Science since 2022 and started to be indexed in the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI ), a Clarivate product.
2025 June issue article acceptance and evaluations are ongoing.