Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

MULTI-DIMENSIONAL PANEL DATA GRAVITY MODEL: AN ANALYSIS OF APEC COUNTRIES

Year 2019, Volume: 10 Issue: 20, 1007 - 1027, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2019.043

Abstract



The traditional
gravity model of international trade
has been
through many changes in order to develop and answer new research questions. Taking this development into
account this paper investigates a more enhanced panel data approach by extending
the classic approach by allowing for both indiviual and time effects to be
apparent in order to capture country specific and time effects with a
multidimensional panel data model for APEC countries. By using a three
dimensional panel gravity model with a least squares dummy variable approach we
were able to identify countries with stronger propensities to import and
export.



References

  • Aitken, N. D. (1973). The effect of the EEC and EFTA on european trade: a temporal cross-section analysis. The American Economic Review, 63(5), 881-892. Anderson, J. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69(1), 106-116.APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation). (2015). Asia pacific economic cooperation, achievements and benefits. https://www.apec.org/About-Us/About-APEC/Achievements-and-Benefits. 20.01.2019Balazsi, L., Matyas, L., & Wansbeek, T. (2018). The estimation of multidimensional fixed effects panel data models. Econometric Reviews, 37(3), 212-227.Baldwin, R., & Taglioni, D. (2006). Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Papers, (12516), https://www.nber.org/papers/w12516.Baltagi, H.B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Bergstrand, J.H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 143-153.Cheng, I.H., & Wall, J.H. (2005). Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration. Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 87(1), 49-63.Deardorff, A.V. (1995). Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in neoclassical world?. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, (5377), https://www.nber.org/papers/w5377.Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2003). The proper econometric specification of the gravity equation: a three-way model with bilateral interaction effects. Empirical Economics, 28, 571-580. Frankel, J.A., & Romer, D. (1996). Trade and growth: an empirical investigation. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, (5476), https://www.nber.org/papers/w5476. Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2002). Illusory border effects: distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. Centre d'etudes prospectives et d'informations internationales, Working Papers , (2002-01), http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2011/wp2011-25.pdf. Heckscher, E. (1919). The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income. Ekonomisk Tidskrift, 21, 497-512.Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data. New York: Chambridge University Press. Keum, K. (2010). Tourism flows and trade theory: a panel data analysis with the gravity model, The Annals of Regional Science, 44(3), 541-557. Kadaroo, J., & Seetanah, B. (2008). The role of transport infrastructure in international tourism development: a gravity model approach. Tourism Management, 29, 831-840.Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade, The American Economic Review, 70(5), 950-959.Linnemann, H. (1966). An econometric study of international trade flows, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co..Lowe, J.M., & Sen, A. (1996). Gravity model applications in health planning. analysis of an urban hospital market. Journal of Regional Science, 36(3), 437-461.Mansfield E.D., & Bronson, R. (1994). Alliances, preferential trading arrangements and international trade. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 94-107.Mansfield E.D., & Gowa J. (1993). Power politics and international trade. The American Political Science Review, 87(2), 408-420. Matyas, L. (1997). Proper econometrics specification of the gravity model. The World Economy, 20(3), 363-368. Mayer, T., & Zignago, S. (2011). Notes on CEPII’s distance measures: the geodist database. Centre d'etudes prospectives et d'informations internationales, Working papers, (25), http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2011/wp2011-25.pdf.Morley, C., Rossello, J., & Gallego, M.S. (2014). Gravity models for tourism demand: theory and use. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 1-40.Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Year 2019, Volume: 10 Issue: 20, 1007 - 1027, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2019.043

Abstract

References

  • Aitken, N. D. (1973). The effect of the EEC and EFTA on european trade: a temporal cross-section analysis. The American Economic Review, 63(5), 881-892. Anderson, J. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69(1), 106-116.APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation). (2015). Asia pacific economic cooperation, achievements and benefits. https://www.apec.org/About-Us/About-APEC/Achievements-and-Benefits. 20.01.2019Balazsi, L., Matyas, L., & Wansbeek, T. (2018). The estimation of multidimensional fixed effects panel data models. Econometric Reviews, 37(3), 212-227.Baldwin, R., & Taglioni, D. (2006). Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Papers, (12516), https://www.nber.org/papers/w12516.Baltagi, H.B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Bergstrand, J.H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 143-153.Cheng, I.H., & Wall, J.H. (2005). Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration. Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 87(1), 49-63.Deardorff, A.V. (1995). Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in neoclassical world?. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, (5377), https://www.nber.org/papers/w5377.Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2003). The proper econometric specification of the gravity equation: a three-way model with bilateral interaction effects. Empirical Economics, 28, 571-580. Frankel, J.A., & Romer, D. (1996). Trade and growth: an empirical investigation. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, (5476), https://www.nber.org/papers/w5476. Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2002). Illusory border effects: distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. Centre d'etudes prospectives et d'informations internationales, Working Papers , (2002-01), http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2011/wp2011-25.pdf. Heckscher, E. (1919). The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income. Ekonomisk Tidskrift, 21, 497-512.Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data. New York: Chambridge University Press. Keum, K. (2010). Tourism flows and trade theory: a panel data analysis with the gravity model, The Annals of Regional Science, 44(3), 541-557. Kadaroo, J., & Seetanah, B. (2008). The role of transport infrastructure in international tourism development: a gravity model approach. Tourism Management, 29, 831-840.Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade, The American Economic Review, 70(5), 950-959.Linnemann, H. (1966). An econometric study of international trade flows, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co..Lowe, J.M., & Sen, A. (1996). Gravity model applications in health planning. analysis of an urban hospital market. Journal of Regional Science, 36(3), 437-461.Mansfield E.D., & Bronson, R. (1994). Alliances, preferential trading arrangements and international trade. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 94-107.Mansfield E.D., & Gowa J. (1993). Power politics and international trade. The American Political Science Review, 87(2), 408-420. Matyas, L. (1997). Proper econometrics specification of the gravity model. The World Economy, 20(3), 363-368. Mayer, T., & Zignago, S. (2011). Notes on CEPII’s distance measures: the geodist database. Centre d'etudes prospectives et d'informations internationales, Working papers, (25), http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2011/wp2011-25.pdf.Morley, C., Rossello, J., & Gallego, M.S. (2014). Gravity models for tourism demand: theory and use. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 1-40.Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hatice Nazan Çağlar 0000-0003-2152-8747

Elanur Türküz 0000-0002-5176-7792

Publication Date December 31, 2019
Acceptance Date November 12, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 10 Issue: 20

Cite

APA Çağlar, H. N., & Türküz, E. (2019). MULTI-DIMENSIONAL PANEL DATA GRAVITY MODEL: AN ANALYSIS OF APEC COUNTRIES. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(20), 1007-1027. https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2019.043

KAUJEASF is the corporate journal of Kafkas University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal Publishing.

KAUJEASF has been included in Web of Science since 2022 and started to be indexed in the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI ), a Clarivate product.

2025 June issue article acceptance and evaluations are ongoing.