Is Metaphysics a Feasible Philosophical Option?

A. Çüçen

doi:10.20981/kuufefd.51995

Is Metaphysics a Feasible Philosophical Option?

Abstract

Before attempting to answer our primary question “is metaphysics a feasible philosophical option?”, I believe that it is necessary to explain and to discuss what the nature of philosophy is, and how it differs from science because my assumption that metaphysics is a feasible philosophical option will get its meaning by showing that metaphysics differs from science as well as philosophy differs from science; furthermore, it would be shown that metaphysics differs from the other options of philosophy. Therefore, in this paper, three concepts will be examined and compared with each other: Philosophy, science, and metaphysics.

Keywords

Philosophy; Metaphysics; Ontology; Science; Being; Tradition

References

ARISTOTLE. (1941) Metaphysics: The Basic Works of Aristotle. Edited and with an introduction by Richard McKeon, New York: Random House.
AYER, A. J. (1959) Logical Positivism. Illonois: The Free Press.
BECK, J. ( 1905) The Metaphysics of Descartes. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Blackwell.
FRANKFURT, Heny J. ( 1992) Essay on Modern Philosophers. Edited by Vere Ckappell, New York: Gorland Publication Inc.
HEIDEGGER, Martin, (1962) Being and Time, translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Rabinson. Harper & Row, New York.
HEIDEGGER, Martin, (1962) Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, translated by James Churchill. Bloomington: University Press, Indiana.
HEIDEGGER, Martin, (1977) “What is Metaphysics”, Basic Writings. New York: Harper & Row. Türkçeye çeviren Yusuf Örnek. Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, 1991 ve 1994.
HEIDEGGER, Martin, (1959) An Introduction to Metaphysics, trans. by Ralph Manheim. New Haven and Yale University Press, London.

Details

Primary Language

eng

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

A. Çüçen This is me

Publication Date

October 30, 2014

Submission Date

February 24, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2014 Number: 23

DOI

https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.51995

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA78EY83ED

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Çüçen, A. (2014). Is Metaphysics a Feasible Philosophical Option? Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 23, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.51995

AMA

1.Çüçen A. Is Metaphysics a Feasible Philosophical Option? Kaygı. 2014;(23):1-9. doi:10.20981/kuufefd.51995

Chicago

Çüçen, A. 2014. “Is Metaphysics a Feasible Philosophical Option?”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, nos. 23: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.51995.

EndNote

Çüçen A (October 1, 2014) Is Metaphysics a Feasible Philosophical Option? Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 23 1–9.

IEEE

[1]A. Çüçen, “Is Metaphysics a Feasible Philosophical Option?”, Kaygı, no. 23, pp. 1–9, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.20981/kuufefd.51995.

ISNAD

Çüçen, A. “Is Metaphysics a Feasible Philosophical Option?”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi. 23 (October 1, 2014): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.51995.

JAMA

1.Çüçen A. Is Metaphysics a Feasible Philosophical Option? Kaygı. 2014;:1–9.

MLA

Çüçen, A. “Is Metaphysics a Feasible Philosophical Option?”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, no. 23, Oct. 2014, pp. 1-9, doi:10.20981/kuufefd.51995.

Vancouver

1.A. Çüçen. Is Metaphysics a Feasible Philosophical Option? Kaygı. 2014 Oct. 1;(23):1-9. doi:10.20981/kuufefd.51995