Research Article

Does the Freedom Sentence Work?

Number: 16 April 15, 2011
  • Slávka Démuthová
TR

Does the Freedom Sentence Work?

Abstract

In the presented study, the main objectives of the freedom sentence are stressed. They are compared with the reality of statistics and practice in the imprisonment houses. Numbers of recidivists show the need for a better evaluation of the expected influences of this kind of punishment. Among various theories of criminality, the Cloninger´s biosocial theory is presented. Within these terms, an antisocial personality is characterized through the high level of novelty seeking, low level of reward dependence and harm avoidance. This model provides an explanatory background for understanding persistent social failures as well as low correctional potential of the prison. It turns an attention to the basic problems of freedom and determinism, which are discussed at the closure of the paper.

Keywords

References

  1. CLONINGER, C.R.: (1987) A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 44, June, pp. 537 – 588.
  2. DÉMUTHOVÁ, S.: (2006) Mladistvý delikvent. Pusté Úľany, Schola Philosophica.
  3. DÉMUTHOVÁ, S.: (2005) Dieťa a mladistvý ako páchateľ trestnej činnosti. In: ČECH, J. et al.: Psychológia pre políciu a justíciu. Trnava, UCM, pp. 203 – 216.
  4. DÉMUTHOVÁ, S., MUTALOVÁ, N.: (2010) Prežívanie trestu odňatia slobody dospelými mužmi. In: Démuthová, S. (Ed.): Kondášove dni 2010. Zborník abstraktov. Trnava,Katedra psychológie Filozofickej fakulty Univerzity sv. Cyrila a Metoda v Trnave, p. 11.
  5. FOUCAULT, M.: (1995) Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. New York, Vintage Books.
  6. HEIDBRINK, H.: (1997)Psychologie morálního vývoje. Praha, Portál.
  7. HEIDBRINK, H.: Jean Piaget. In: LÜCK, H. E., MILLER, R.: (1999) Illustrierte Geschichte der Psychologie. 2. Auflage. Weinheim, Psychologie Verlag Union, pp. 131 – 135.
  8. HERETIK, A.: (1994) Základy forenznej psychológie. Bratislava, SPN.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Slávka Démuthová This is me
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of SS. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Nám. J. Herdu 2, 917 01 Trnava, Slovakia
Slovakia

Publication Date

April 15, 2011

Submission Date

February 1, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2011 Number: 16

APA
Démuthová, S. (2011). Does the Freedom Sentence Work? Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 16, 37-45. https://izlik.org/JA93RG44JF
AMA
1.Démuthová S. Does the Freedom Sentence Work? Kaygı. 2011;(16):37-45. https://izlik.org/JA93RG44JF
Chicago
Démuthová, Slávka. 2011. “Does the Freedom Sentence Work?”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, nos. 16: 37-45. https://izlik.org/JA93RG44JF.
EndNote
Démuthová S (April 1, 2011) Does the Freedom Sentence Work? Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 16 37–45.
IEEE
[1]S. Démuthová, “Does the Freedom Sentence Work?”, Kaygı, no. 16, pp. 37–45, Apr. 2011, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA93RG44JF
ISNAD
Démuthová, Slávka. “Does the Freedom Sentence Work?”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi. 16 (April 1, 2011): 37-45. https://izlik.org/JA93RG44JF.
JAMA
1.Démuthová S. Does the Freedom Sentence Work? Kaygı. 2011;:37–45.
MLA
Démuthová, Slávka. “Does the Freedom Sentence Work?”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, no. 16, Apr. 2011, pp. 37-45, https://izlik.org/JA93RG44JF.
Vancouver
1.Slávka Démuthová. Does the Freedom Sentence Work? Kaygı [Internet]. 2011 Apr. 1;(16):37-45. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA93RG44JF

e-ISSN: 2645-8950