A Discourse on the Ontology of Violence

Year 2016, Issue: 27, 151 - 166, 30.10.2016

Olanrewaju Abdul Shıtta-bey

https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.287702

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The sophistication and reoccurrence of violence has continued to gain increasing attention in contemporary discourse. Scholars that take interest in the study of violence have made efforts only in understanding and addressing the causes, forms, and the management mechanism. Such intellectual efforts have proved not to be sufficiently adequate as evident by the recurring decimal of violence in limitless proportion, even in places where it has been under-studied. This inadequacy has made the need for renewed interest in the study of the nature and dynamics of violence imperative. Concerned about the lack of consideration for the ontological root of violence in previous studies, this paper seeks to critically explore the ontology of violence. It aims at examining classical philosophical texts on human nature with a view to expose the ontological origin of violence and shows how such consideration is apt in the understanding, addressing, and management of violence; that is, this paper makes a case for the study of the ontology of violence as a way of addressing the lacuna currently existing in the studies on violence. Thus, it argues that this ontological study entails as a matter of necessity an understanding of human nature in relation to the subject-matter of violence. The methodology used in achieving the aim of this paper is the analytic and phenomenological approaches, that is, analysis and phenomenological examination of textual materials are employed by the study.

Keywords

Violence, Human nature, Desires, Ontology, Plato, Hume, Hobbes

References

• Addis L., (1975) The Logic of Society: A Philosophical Study. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Annas J. (2003) Plato: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Armstrong, J.A., (1997) “Religious Nationalism and Collective Violence” in Nations and Nationalism, 3 (4). ASEN. Pp. 597-606.
• Coffey P., (1914) Ontology or The Theory of Being: An Introduction to General Metaphysics. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (2016) http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/youthviolence/ retrieved at 16:47 on the 18th of March.
• Dahlberg L.L, & Krug E.G. (200) “Violence: A Global Public Health Problem” in World Report on Violence and Health by Krug E.G, Dahlberg L.L, Mercy J.A, Zwi A.B, and Lozano R. (eds.). Geneva: World Health Organization. Pp. 1-21.
• Fox R. (2016) “The Human Nature of Violence”, retrieved from the website of Social Issues Research Centre http://www.sirc.org/publik/foxviolence5.html at 14:33 on the 24th of March.
• Friedman S.S (2001) “Feminism, State Fictions and Violence: Gender, Geopolitics and Trans-nationalism” in Communal/Plural, Vol. 9, No. 1. Pp. 111-129.
• Ganley A.L., (2016) “Understanding Domestic Violence” retrieved from http://www.ecu.edu/tnwe/Endowment/Resources_files/improvinghealthcare_1.pdf on the 15th of April.
• Gellner E.A (1954) “Reflections on Violence” in The British Journal of Sociology Vol. 5, No. 3 (Sept. edition) Pp. 267-271. London: Blackwell Publishing and The London School of Economics and Political Science. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/587073.
• Hobbes T. (1651) Leviathan. 1909 edition by The Online Library of Liberty available at http://oll.libertyfund.org
• Hume D. (1739) A Treatise of Human Nature. Reprinted from the Original Edition in three volumes and edited, with an analytical index, by L.A. SelbyBigge, M.A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1896).
• Kalyvas S.T., (2006) The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Keane J. (2004) Violence and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Mayer A.J., (2000) The Furies: Violence and Terror in the French and Russian Revolutions. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Munn K. and Smith B., (2008) (Eds.) Applied Ontology:An Introduction. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Books and Rutgers University.
• North D.C., Wallis J.J, & Weingast B.R. (2009) Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Okoro C., (2011) “Problems of Metaphysical Philosophy” in African Nebula, Issue 3, (June edition).
• Payne J, (2005) “The Prospects for Democracy in High Violence Societies” in The Independent Review, v. IX, n.4, (Spring edition), Pp. 563-572.
• Plato (1968) The Republic. Second Edition. , Translated with Notes and an Interpretative Essay by Allan Bloom. USA: Basic Books.
• Pojman L. (2005) Who Are We? Theories of Human Nature. USA: Oxford University Press.
• Rutherford A, Zwi A.B, Grove N.J, & Butchart A. (2007) “Violence: A Glossary” in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Aug; 61(8): 676–680. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
• Spear A.D., (2006) Ontology for the Twenty First Century: An Introduction with Recommendations. Saarbrücken, Germany: Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science (IFOMIS),
• Toffler A, (1990) Power shift: Knowledge, Wealth, and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century. New York: Bantam Books.
• Willem de Haan (2008) “Violence as an Essentially Contested Concept” in Violence in Europe: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives by S. Body-Gendrot, &P. Spierenburg (eds.). New York: Springer