Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Culture and the Possibility of Social Change

Year 2020, Volume: 19 Issue: 2, 590 - 610, 15.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.790368

Abstract

This article critically analyzes Pierre Bourdieu’s ideas on the social change in the context of his sociology of culture. Around this analysis the study presents how Bourdieu places social change in his sociology of culture and shows his theoretical possibilities and limitations about the change within the social. Thus, it is claimed that Bourdieu’s sociology of culture inserts the agency into the cultural analysis to open a space for the change within the social through assigning an active role to the agents vis-a-vis objective social conditions and structures, however, his ideas on agency delimits the scope of change in the social. Correspondingly, the study sets forth the possibilities and limitations of theory of social change in Bourdieu’s sociology of culture critically by means of examining his general theoretical procedures and ideas on the social.

References

  • ADORNO, T., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • ALTHUSSER, L.(2014). On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. London: Verso.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1995). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1996). Distinction. New York: Routledge.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • BUTLER, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power. California: Stanford University Press.
  • CERTEAU, M. (1988). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • DEBORD, G. (1995). The Society of Spectacle. New York: Zone Books.
  • DELEUZE, G., Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • DELEUZE, G., Guattari, F. (2000). Anti-Oedipus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • FOUCAULT, M. (1977). Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
  • FOUCAULT, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantehon.
  • GRAMSCI, A. (2003). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
  • LEFEBVRE, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • LEFEBVRE, H. (2008). Critique of Everyday Life. London; New York: Verso.
  • LUKACS, G. (1988). Estetik. İstanbul: Payel Yayınları.
  • LUKACS, G. (1962). The Historical Novel. London: Merlin.
  • LUKACS, G. (1963). The Meaning of Contemporary Realism. London: Merlin.
  • SAUSSURE, F. (1966). Course in General Linguistics. New York: Macgrave-Hill Book.
  • VOLOSHINOV, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press.
Year 2020, Volume: 19 Issue: 2, 590 - 610, 15.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.790368

Abstract

References

  • ADORNO, T., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • ALTHUSSER, L.(2014). On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. London: Verso.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1995). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1996). Distinction. New York: Routledge.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • BUTLER, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power. California: Stanford University Press.
  • CERTEAU, M. (1988). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • DEBORD, G. (1995). The Society of Spectacle. New York: Zone Books.
  • DELEUZE, G., Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • DELEUZE, G., Guattari, F. (2000). Anti-Oedipus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • FOUCAULT, M. (1977). Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
  • FOUCAULT, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantehon.
  • GRAMSCI, A. (2003). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
  • LEFEBVRE, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • LEFEBVRE, H. (2008). Critique of Everyday Life. London; New York: Verso.
  • LUKACS, G. (1988). Estetik. İstanbul: Payel Yayınları.
  • LUKACS, G. (1962). The Historical Novel. London: Merlin.
  • LUKACS, G. (1963). The Meaning of Contemporary Realism. London: Merlin.
  • SAUSSURE, F. (1966). Course in General Linguistics. New York: Macgrave-Hill Book.
  • VOLOSHINOV, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Recep Akgün 0000-0001-5944-4544

Publication Date September 15, 2020
Submission Date September 4, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 19 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Akgün, R. (2020). Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Culture and the Possibility of Social Change. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 19(2), 590-610. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.790368
AMA Akgün R. Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Culture and the Possibility of Social Change. Kaygı. September 2020;19(2):590-610. doi:10.20981/kaygi.790368
Chicago Akgün, Recep. “Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Culture and the Possibility of Social Change”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 19, no. 2 (September 2020): 590-610. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.790368.
EndNote Akgün R (September 1, 2020) Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Culture and the Possibility of Social Change. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 19 2 590–610.
IEEE R. Akgün, “Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Culture and the Possibility of Social Change”, Kaygı, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 590–610, 2020, doi: 10.20981/kaygi.790368.
ISNAD Akgün, Recep. “Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Culture and the Possibility of Social Change”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 19/2 (September 2020), 590-610. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.790368.
JAMA Akgün R. Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Culture and the Possibility of Social Change. Kaygı. 2020;19:590–610.
MLA Akgün, Recep. “Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Culture and the Possibility of Social Change”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 2, 2020, pp. 590-1, doi:10.20981/kaygi.790368.
Vancouver Akgün R. Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Culture and the Possibility of Social Change. Kaygı. 2020;19(2):590-61.

e-ISSN: 2645-8950