A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF UNIDIMENSIONAL FACTOR STRUCTURE OF TRICE ACADEMIC LOCUS OF CONTROL SCALE IN EFL STUDENTS

Year 2016, Issue: 32, 325 - 336, 17.12.2016

Hakan Aydoğan

https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.279654

Abstract

 Locus of control is one of the major factors of school/academic performance. People who have external locus of control believe that life events are controlled by fate, chance, or luck. Conversely, those who have internal locus of control believe that life events are influenced by their behavior. The aim of this study is to check psychometric properties (i.e. the reliability and validity) of Trice Academic Locus of Control Scale using a sample of 402 EFL students involved in tertiary education in Europe (Nmales = 198, 50.5%; Nfemales = 204, 49.5%; Mage = 21.56, SDage = 1.88). Their ages ranged between 18 and 27 years old. After excluding eight items with poor psychometric characteristics, a unidimensional underlying factor structure was examined of the TALCS from the data. The reliability coefficient (Cronbach's Alpha) for the revised version of the TALCS scale was .96. The mean value of their years of study was calculated as M = 3.02 whereas the standard deviation was SD = 1.24. Gender differences in academic locus of control were not statistically significant at predefined alpha level of .05. The correlation between participants' academic locus of control and their age was very small and statistically insignificant. Some implications of these findings were discussed as well as suggestions for future studies in this field of pedagogic psychology. Keywords: academic locus of control, EFL students, reliability, validity. 

Keywords

academic locus of control, EFL students, reliability, validity

ПРЕДВОРИТЕЛЬНЫЙ ОБЗОР ОДНОМЕРНОЙ СТРУКТУРЫ ТРЕУГОЛНИКА TRİCE С ЦЕЛЬЮ ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ ЗНАНИЙ У СТУДЕНТОВ ИЗУЧАВШИХ АНГЛИЙСКИЙ КАК ИНОСТРАННЫ ЯЗЫК

Abstract

Цель статьи расскрыть надёжность и фактор действия системы академического контроля Trice. Для этого был проведён опрос 402 студентов одного из вузов эгейсского региона, где студенты изучают английский как иностранный язык (EFL). Возраст опрошенных студентов является от 18 до 27 лет. В течении опроса не было использовано 8 слабых метрических элементов. После чего, исследование было проведено по принципе одномерой системы TALCS. Оно было равно к (Cronbach’ın Alfası) α = .96. Средний период обучения равно M=3.02, а стандартное отклонение - SD=1.24. Разница данных между полами является - альфа 05. Для измерения срока обучения по шкале ровно M=3.02, а средних арифметических данные ровно SD= 1.24. Было установлено, что академический локус контроля и коллерация по отшошениис возрастом низкая и с точки зрения статистики значительная. Эту статью можно использовать как рекомендацию в сфере педпсихологии. 

Keywords

академическая локус контроля, надёжность, студенты изучающие английский, срок действия

İNGİLİZCEYİ YABANCI DİL OLARAK ÖĞRENEN ÖĞRENCİLERDE TRİCE AKADEMİK KONTROL ODAĞI ÖLÇEĞİNİN TEK BOYUTLU FAKTÖR YAPISININ ÖN İNCELEMESİ

Abstract

Denetim odağı okul ve akademik performansının önde
gelen belirleyici faktörlerindendir. Dışa yönelik denetim odağı olanlar
olayların kader, şans ve başka güçler tarafından kontrol edildiğine inanırlar.
Bunun aksine, içsel denetim odağı olanlar hayattaki olayların kendi
davranışları tarafından etkilendiğine inanırlar. Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de
üniversite seviyesinde İngilizceyi Yabancı Dil Olarak (EFL) öğrenen ve
Türkiye’nin Ege Bölgesinde bir üniversitede okumakta olan 402 katılımcı
üzerinde Trice Akademik Kontrol Ölçeğinin güvenirliğini ve geçerliğini ortaya
çıkarmaktır. Katılımcıların yaşları 18 ve 27 arasında değişkenlik
göstermektedir. Çok kuvvetli olmayan sekiz tane metrik unsur çıkarıldıktan
sonra verilerden TALCS’ın tek boyutlu öncelikli faktör yapısı incelenmiştir.
TALCS ölçeğinin güvenirlik katsayısı (Cronbach’ın Alfası) α = .96’ya eşitti.
Öğrencilik yıl sürelerinin ortalama değeri M=3.02 olmasına karşın standart
sapma SD=1.24’dür. Akademik kontrol odağı üzerindeki cinsiyet farklılıklarının
ise istatiksel olarak önemli olmadığı ve önceden tanımlanan alfa. 05
seviyesinde olduğu görülmüştür. Katılımcıların okuma sürelerinin aritmetik
ortalaması M=3.02 olmasına karşın SD= 1.24 olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Katılımcıların
akademik kontrol odağı ve yaşları ile korelasyonunun düşük ve istatistiksel
olarak anlamlı olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Araştırma bulgularının sonuçları
tartışılmış olup pedagojik psikoloji alanında ileride yapılabilecek çalışmalar
için önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Keywords

akademik kontrol odağı, güvenirlik, İngilizce öğrenen öğrenciler, geçerlilik

References

• AKIN, A. (2007). The academic locus of control scale: A validity and reliability study. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 34 (3), pp. 9-17.
• BALBAG, Z., CEMREK, F., MUTLU, T. (2010).The role of self-esteem, locus of control and big five personality traits in predicting hopelessness. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, pp. 1788-1792. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.401.
• BLANCHARD-FIELDS, F., IRION, J. C. (1988). The relation between locus of control in coping in two contexts: Age as a moderator variable. Psychology and Aging, 3, pp. 197-203.
• CAIRNS, E., McWHIRTER, L., DUFFY, U., BARRY, R. (1990). The stability of self-concept in late adolescence: Gender and situational effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, pp. 937-944.
• CLARKE, D. (2004). Neuroticism: moderator or mediator in the relation between locus of control and depression. Journal Personality and Individual Differences, 37, pp. 245-258.
• DURNA, U., SENTURK, F. K. (2012). A study to determine the locus of control of university students with the contribution of different variables. Zonguldak Karaelmas University Journal of Social Sciences, 8 (15), pp. 37-48
• GORUSCH, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• HAIDER ZAIDI, I. , NAEEM MOHSIN, M. (2013). Locus of control in graduation students. International Journal of Psychological Research, 6 (1), pp. 15-20.
• HASAN, S. S. , KHALID, R. (2014). Academic locus of control of high and low achieving students. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 8 (1), pp. 22-33.
• HATCHER, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS® system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute, Inc.
• KAZAK ÇETINKALP, Z. (2010). The relationship between academic locus of control and achievement goals among physical education teaching program students. World Applied Sciences Journal, 10 (11), pp. 1387-1391.
• LEVENSON, H. (1972). Distinction within the concept of internal-external control: Development of a new scale. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 7, pp. 261-262.
• McLEOD, M., CARTER, V., NOWICKI, S., TOTTENHAM, D., WAINWRIGHT, P., & WYNER, D. (2015). Evaluating the study abroad experience using the framework of Rotter’s Social learning theory. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 26, pp. 30-38.
• NAIK, A. R. (2015). A study on locus of control among college students of Gulbarga City. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 2 (4), pp. 47-54.
• RINN, A. N., BOAZMAN, J., JACKSON, A., BARRIO, B. (2014). Locus of control, academic self-concept, and academic dishonesty among high ability college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14, pp. 88-114. doi:10.14434/josotl.v14i4.12770.
• ROTTER, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1), pp.609.
• ROTTER, J. B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement. American Psychologist, 45 (4), pp. 489-493.
• SAGONE, E. , DE CAROLI, M. E. (2014). Locus of control and academic self-efficacy in university students: the effects of self-concepts. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, pp. 222-228.
• SARICAM, H. (2015). Academic locus of control and motivational persistence: Structural equation modeling. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 5 (1), 79-92. doi:10.12973/jesr. 2015.51.5.
• STIPEK, D. J., WEISZ, J. R. (1981). Perceived personal control and academic achievement. Review of Education Research, 51, pp. 101-137.
• TRICE, A. D. (1985). An Academic locus of control scale for college students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, pp. 1043-1046.
• YESILYURT, E. (2014). Academic locus of control, tendencies towards academic dishonesty and test anxiety levels as the predictors of academic self-efficacy: Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14 (5), pp. 1945-1956. doi:10.12738/estp.2014.5.1841.