DAĞITIMCI LİDERLİK: OKULLARDA DİKKATE ALINMASI GEREKEN BİR LİDERLİK YAKLAŞIMI

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı dağıtımcı liderlik teorisini, bu teorinin ilişkili bulunduğu diğer teoriler temelinde ele almak ve bu yaklaşımın en bilinen savunucuları olan Gronn 2000 , Spillane 2005 ve Elmore‘nin 2000 görüşleri çerçevesinde analiz etmektir. Çalışmanın alt amacı, dağıtımcı liderliğe ilişkin ulaşılan bu sonuçları okullarda yönetimin yeniden yapılandırması süreçlerine yansıtarak bu konuya bir ışık tutmaktır. Çalışmada dağıtımcı liderliğe ilişkin bilgiler birincil ve ikincil kaynaklara dayalı literatür taraması yöntemiyle toplanmıştır. Dağıtımcı liderlik hakkında belirlenen anahtar kavramlar yardımıyla konunun farklı veri tabanlarında taraması yapılmış ve elde edilen bilgiler bir dosyada depolanarak ayıkamaya tabi tutulmuştur. İngilizce kaynakların Türkçeye çevirisi yapılmış, çeviri geçerliği bir örnek metin üzerinde üç dil uzmanının görüşleri alınarak saptanmaya çalışılmıştır. Bilgilerin sunumunda çoklu referans yolu tercih edilmiştir. Kavramsal analiz sonuçları, dağıtımcı liderliğin bilim diğer alanındaki gelişmelere paralel okul liderliği konu alanında hızla önem kazandığını göstermektedir. Çalışmada dağıtımcı liderliğin formal ve informal uygulama biçimlerinin okul yönetimini yeniden yapılandırılma çalışmalarında dikkate alınması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Okul liderliği,Dağıtımcı liderlik,Yeniden yapılanma

Distributed Leadership: A Leadership Approach That Should Be Taken Into Account in the Schools

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to analyze and explain the distributed leadership approach, on the basis of this theory in relation with other theories and Gronn 2000 , Spillane 2005 and Elmore's 2000 opinions that most well-known advocates of this approach. The second aim of the study is to reflect in light of the results of this analysis to processes of school management's restructuring. A review of the related literature was used to collect from primary and secondary sources information on distributed leadership. In order to be able to do that, with the help of the key words consisted on distributed leadership; electronic data base searched was conducted by the researcher. Resources that collected from the literature were stored in a file and some the articles translated to Turkish. Translation reliability was defined with the help of three English language experts on a sample text. A multi-reference method was preferred to present literature collected. The conceptual analysis and relevant literature showed that the distributed leadership model gained momentum quickly by drawing attention which is similar to improvement in the field of general leadership literature. It is suggested that formal and informal practice aspects of the application of distributed leadership should be taken into consideration in the process of restructuring the school administration

Keywords

• School leadership,distributed leadership,restructuring

References

1. Ancona D. & E. Backman. Distributed Leadership Leadership Excellence; Jan 2010; 27, 1; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 11
2. Bağcı M. (2002) Klasik fizik (Newton paradigmasının) ilkeleri bağlamında modern bilincin ve iktidarın imkanları: Özgürlük ve yetkinlik. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 4 (3) 33–57.
3. Balcı A. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntem, Teknik ve İlkeler. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık, Ankara.
4. Bennett, N., Harvey, J.A., Wise, C. & Woods, P.A. (2003) Distributed leadership: A desk study. See reviews at: http://www.ncsl.org.uk/literature 17.01.2011 Tarihinde erişilmiştir.
5. Bohm D. (1993).The Undivided Universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory, London: Routledge
6. Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Camburn, E. M., B. Rowan, and J. Taylor. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 25(4): 347-73.
8. Çelik V. (1999) Eğitimsel Liderlik. Doğuş Matbaası: Ankara.

9. Çelik V, (2008) Türk Eğitim Sistemi ve Okul Yönetimi. (Editor) Pegem Akademi Yayınları: Ankara
10. Davis M.W. (2009) Distributed Leadership and School Performance. Dissertation Submitted to The faculty of The Graduate School of Education and Human Development of The George Washington University, UMI Number: 3344534
11. Elmore, R. F., (2000) Building a New Structure for School Leadership The Albert Shanker Erişim tarihi: 21.01.2011
12. http://www.shankerinstitute.org/Downloads/building.pdf
13. Engeström, Y. (1999) Innovative learning in work teams: analysing cycles of knowledge creation in practice, in: Y. ENGESTRÖM et al (Eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 377–406.
14. Erçetin Ş.Ş. ve M.C. Kamacı (2008) Quantum Leadership Paradigm. World Applied Sciences Journal 3 (6): 865–868
15. Fink, A. (2005) Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From Paper to the Internet, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a Construct: History and Issues, Emergence, I (1): 49– 72.
17. Gronn, P. (2000) Distributed properties: a new architecture for leadership. Educational Management and Administration, 28 (3), 371&endash;338.
18. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. In K. Leithwood ve P. Hallinger (Eds.). Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. (653– 696) (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
19. Gronn, P. (2003) The New Work of Educational Leaders: Changing Leadership Practice in an Era of School Reform London: Paul Chapman.
20. Gronn P. (2006) The significance of distributed leadership, Educational Leadership Research, 7. http://slc.educ.ubc.ca/eJournal/Issue7/index7.html
21. Gronn, P. (2009a) From distributed to hybrid leadership practice, in A. Harris (Ed.) Distributed School Leadership: Different Perspectives Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 197–217.
22. Gronn, P. (2009b) Leadership configurations, Leadership, 5(3): 381–394.
23. Gürak H. (2007) ―Denge‖li Bilimsel ( ) İktisadın Sefaleti veya ―Kutsal İdeoloji‖nin Eleştirisi. http://www.hasmendi.net/makale_gurak/kutsal_ideoloji.pdf Sanal Kitap
24. Hallinger, P. and Heck, R. H. (1996) Reassessing the Principal's Role in School Effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32 (1), 5–44.
25. Harris, A. (2008) ‗Distributed Leadership: The Evidence‘, in Distributed School Leadership: Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders, London: Routledge.
26. Harris, A. (2002) Distributed leadership in schools: leading or misleading? Keynote Address to the Annual Conference of the British Educational Leadership, Management www.shu.ac.uk/bemas/harris2002.html (accessed December 8, 2004).
27. Harris, A. and Lambert, L. (2003) Building Leadership Capacity for School Improvement (Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press).
28. Harris, A. (2005a). Distributed Leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.). The Essentials of School Leadership. (160–172) Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press/Paul Chapman Publishing.
29. Harris, A. (2005). Leading or misleading? Distributed leadership and school improvement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3), 255–265.
30. Heck H.R. & P. Hallinger (2010) Collaborative leadership effects on school capacity and student learning. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and School Improvement Kuala Lumpur, Januar, Malasia
31. Lambert, L., Collay, M., Dietz, M. E., Kent, K., & Richert, A. E. (1997). Who will save our schools? Teachers as constructivist leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
32. Lambert, L. (1998). Building leadership capacity in schools. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
33. Lambert, L., Walker, D., Zimmerman, D. P., Cooper, J. E., Lambert, M. D., Gardner, M. E., et al. (1995). The constructivist leader. New York: Teachers College.
34. Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss,T., Sacks, R., Memon, N. & Yashkina, A. (2007) Distributing leadership to make schools smarter. University of Toronto, OISE.
35. Mayrowetz D. (2008) Making Sense of Distributed Leadership: Exploring the Multiple Usages of the Conccept in the Field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 424–435.
36. Olson, L. (2000). Principals try new styles as instructional leaders. Education Week, 20 (9).
37. Olson, L. (2000, November 1). Principals try new styles as instructional leaders. Education Week, 20(9), 1, 15–17.
38. Printy S. (2008) Distributed Leadership: A Quick Tour of Theory and Practice, Michigan Principal‘s Fellowship. Michigan Principals Fellowship Summer Institute.
39. Ross L, Rix M & Gold J (2005) ―Learning Distributed Leadership: Part 1‖ Industrial & Commercial Training 37(3) 130–137
40. Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Gray, P. (2004). Prior student achievement, collaborative school processes, and collective teacher efficacy? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 163–188.
41. Seibert S.E & M.L Kraimer ve R.C. Liden (2001) A social capital theory of career success. Acadumy of Management Journal. 2001. Vol. 44. No: 2, 219-237.
42. Smylie, M. Conley, S. & Marks, H. (2002). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement. In J. Murphy (Ed.), Educational Leadership Challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century. pp. 162-188
43. Spillane, J. P., R. Halverson, and J. B. Diamond. 2001, Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher 30(3): 23–28.
44. Spillane, J., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. (2004). Toward a theory of school leadership practice: Implications of a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34.
45. Spillane, J. 2005. Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum 69(2): 143–50.
46. Spillane, J. 2005. Primary school leadership practice: How the subject matters. School Leadership & Management 25(4): 383–97.
47. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
48. Tarlaci, S.(2003) Quantum Mechanics: Basic Concepts NeuroQuantology (4) 428–448
49. Töremen F., Okullarda Sosyal Sermaye: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, yıl 8 sayı 32, 556-573, Güz (2002).
50. Yıdırım A. & H.Şimşek (2005) Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (Beşinci Basım) Seçkin Yayıncılık San. Ve Tic.A.Ş. Ankara.
51. Walker, D. (2002). Constructivist leadership: standards, equity and learning—weaving whole cloth from multiple strands. In L. Lambert. D. Walker, D. Zimmerman, J. Cooper, M. Gardner, M.D. Lambert, & M. Szabo (Eds.), The constructvist leader. (2nd Ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
52. Wertsch J.V. (1992) The voice of rationality in a sociocultural approach to mind. In Wygotsky and Education, edited by Luis C. Moll, Cambridge university press. UK.
53. http://www.felsefeevi.net/bilyaskes.html 20.02.2011
54. http://www.genbilim.com/content/view/1148/90/ 22.02.2011
55. http://www.partnersinrenewal.com/articles/Leadership.htm 22.02.2011
56. http://www.allaboutphilosophy.org/dualism.htm 24.01.2011
57. http://plato.stanford.edu/ 28.01.2011
58. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism_(philosophy_of_mind) 17.01.2011
59. http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/351.page 05.01.2011
60. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/robertson.pdf 10.04.2011