Öz

The purpose of this research is to examine the factors in students‘ adoption of a distance education environment. An action research model was used for this study. The researcher was the system administrator of the learning management system. The action research methodology was used to profile student‘s adaption process. The findings are obtained from the researchers‘ observations and data collected from the learning management system. The study included 132 students enrolled in Educational Administration, Controlling, Planning, and Economics non-thesis Master‘s program. The results suggest that organizational structure and the technologies used are the main factors in assisting students to adopt distance education and reducing the adoption period.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Distance education,adoption to distance education,action research

Students’ Adoption of Distance Education Environments: an Action Research of a Non-Thesis Masters’ Program

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the factors in students‘ adoption of a distance education environment. An action research model was used for this study. The researcher was the system administrator of the learning management system. The action research methodology was used to profile student‘s adaption process. The findings are obtained from the researchers‘ observations and data collected from the learning management system. The study included 132 students enrolled in Educational Administration, Controlling, Planning, and Economics non-thesis Master‘s program. The results suggest that organizational structure and the technologies used are the main factors in assisting students to adopt distance education and reducing the adoption period

Keywords

• Distance education,adoption to distance education,action research

References

1. Ali, A. (2003). Faculty Adoption Of Technology: Training Comes First. Educational Technology, 43, 51-53.
2. Argyris, C., Putname, R., & Smith, D. (1985). Action Science: Concepts, Methods and Skills for Research and Intervention. (Pp.4). San Francisco, Ca: Joessey-Bass.
3. Attewell P. (1992). Technology Diffusion And Organizational Learning: The Case Of Business Computing, Organization Science 3 (1), 1–19.
4. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science 35 (8), 982–1003.
5. Hanna, D. (1998). Higher Education In An Era Of Digital Competition: Emerging Organizational Models. Journal Of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1), Pp. 66-95.
6. Hsu, C.L. & Lu, H.P. (2004). Why Do People Play Online Games? An Extended Tam With Social Influences And Flow Experience, Information And Management, Vol. 41, Pp. 853-68.
7. Kettinger, W.J. & Grover, V. (1997). The Use Of Computer-Mediated Communication In An Interorganizational Context, Decision Sciences 28 (3), 513–555.
8. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers İn Group Dynamics Iı. Human Relations, 1, 143-153.

9. Lewis, L., Levin, D. & Greene, B. (1997). Distance Education At Postsecondary Institution: 1997–1998. Retrieved November 02, 2010 from the World Wide Web: Http://Nces.Ed.Gov/Pubs2000/2000013.Pdf.
10. Ocak, M. A. & Goktalay Ş. B. (2006). Faculty Adoption of Online Technology in Higher Education, the Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5, 4, 5-37
11. Trombley, K. B. & Lee, D. (2002). Web-Based Learning In Corporations: Who Is Using It and Why, Who Is Not And Why Not?, Journal Of Educational Media, Vol. 27 No. 3, Pp. 137-46.
12. Venkatesh, V. & Brown, S.A. (2001). A Longitudinal Investigation Of Personal Computers In Homes: Adoption Determinants And Emerging Challenges, Mis Quarterly, 25: 1, 71-102.
13. Venkatesh, V. Morris, M.G. &Ackerman, P.L. (2000). A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences In Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 83 (1), Pp. 33–60.
14. Xia, W. & Lee, G. (2000). The Influence of Persuasion, Training, and Experience on User Perceptions and Acceptance of It Innovation, Proceedings of Icis, 371- 184.
15. Zafer, D., Ozdemir, A. & Jason Abrevaya, B. (2007). Adoption Of Technology-Mediated Distance Education: A Longitudinal Analysis, Information & Management 44 , 467–479
16. Grundy, S. (1988). Three modes of action research. In Kemmis, S. & McTaggert, R. (Eds.), The Action Research Reader (3rd ed.). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
17. Holter, I. M., & Schwartz-Barcott, D. (1993). Action research: What is it? How has it been used and how can it be used in nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing 128, 298-304.
18. McKernan, J. (1991). Curriculum Action Research. A Handbook of Methods and Resources for the Reflective Practitioner. London: Kogan Publishers.
19. Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or Praxis. London. England: The Falmer Press.
20. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation. The Free Press, New York (1995).
21. Sehnaz B,G & Mehmet A, O. (2006 ). Faculty Adoption Of Online Technology In Higher Educatıon The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology . Vol:5-4 No: 5