YDYO ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN BİLGİSAYAR DESTEKLİ DİL ÖĞRENİMİNE YÖNELİK TUTUMLARI

Öz

Çok yönlü bilgisayar iletişim araçları ve internetin ortaya çıkışıyla birlikte dil öğretiminde bilgisayarların rolü dünyanın dört bir yanındaki yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin karşılaştığı önemli bir konu haline gelmiştir. Bilgisayar destekli dil öğrenme etkinlikleri ve internet kaynakları İngilizce öğretmenlerine bilgiye tek başlarına hızlı ve rahat şekilde erişmelerine yardımcı olur. Ayrıca eğitim alanlarında Yabancı Dil Hazırlık Okulu’nda yoğun bir programla İngilizce öğrenen öğrenciler, gelecek yaşamları için çok çeşitli beceri ve nitelikler kazanırlar. Bu bakımdan teknoloji insanları çok fazla bilgiye ulaşmak için kendi kendilerine ayırt edebilme özelliğine sahip olmaya zorlamaktadır. Bu çalışma Yabancı Dil Hazırlık Okulunda öğrenim gören öğrencilerin bilgisayar destekli dil öğrenme ile ilgili yeni bakış açılarının farkına varabilmeleri için dile getirdikleri ifadelerden ortaya çıkan tutumlarını açıklamaktadır. Selçuk Üniversitesi YDYO’daki 171 öğrencinin katıldığı anket, öğrencilerin internetle ilgili bilinçli olduklarını göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bilgisayar destekli dil öğrenimi,internet,yabancı dil,eğitim teknolojisi

The Attitudes of The Students in Sofl Towards Call

Abstract

With the advent of multimedia computing and the Internet, the role of computers in language instruction has now become an important issue confronting large numbers of language teachers throughout the world. Computer Assisted Language Learning CALL facilities and internet resources help English teachers to search lonely to get information in a stable and comfortable manner. Besides, at educational areas, students who start learning English in an intensive program in School of Foreign Languages get various capacities and properties for their future life. In that sense, technology makes people to have self-differentiated features in order to get wide range of knowledge. This study points out the attitudes of students, who attend School of Foreign Languages, with regard to CALL by considering their tendencies emerging with described statements to realize new generation perspectives. The questionnaire applied to 171 students in SOFL at Selçuk University examined the consciousness of students towards internet

Keywords

• CALL,internet,foreign language,educational technology

References

1. Ahmed, K., Corbett, G., Rogers, M., & Sussex, R. (1985). Computers, language learning and language teaching . Cambridge: CUP
2. Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 15(3), 241-249.
3. Bucher, C. A. and Wuest, D. A. (1987). The Foundations of physical education and sport. (10th ed.), St. Louis, Toronto, Santa Clara: Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing.
4. Calif, S. C. (2000). “Education by Increasing Access to Internet Resources”. http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m3337/n5_v15/21143804/print.jhtml.
5. Crane, Beverley E. (2000). Teaching With the Internet. Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc. in New York.
6. Dybek, A. (2002). “How Students Use the Internet for Education”. http://www.newswise.com/articles/2002/8/NETHOM.WK.UIC.html
7. Forcier, R. C. (1996). The Computer as a Productivity Tool in Education. Prentice Hall Company in United States of America.
8. Fort, L. (2000). “Internet Starts up Signs Teaming Agreement with IBM. http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m4PRN/2000_April_7/61380531/print.jhtml.

9. Grabe, Mark, et al. (2001). “Integrating Technology For Meaningful Learning” Houghton Mifflin Company in United States of America.
10. Higgins, J. (1988). Language, leaners and computers. Longman Group UK Limited.
11. Jones, C. & Fortescue, S. (1988). Using computers in the language classroom. New York: Longman.
12. Kılınçoğlu, O. & Altun, A. (2002). Ortaögretim okullarindaki ögrencilerin bilgisayar destekli egitime yönelik tutumlari. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8, 175-187.
13. Lamy M.-N. & Hapel R. (2007) Online communication in language learning and teaching, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Levy M. (1997) Call: context and conceptualisation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Maddux, C., et al. (1997). “Educational Computing”. A Viacom Company in United States of America.
16. Motsching, R. (2001). “Using Internet With the Student-centered Approach to Teaching Method http://www.pri.univie.ac.at/~renatan/rogers/StudCentr2001.doc and Case-study”.
17. Petropolus, H. (2001). “Are We There Yet? How To Know When You Have Enough Technology in a School”. Eric no:: EJ 637658
18. Plomp, T., and et al. (1996). “International Encyclopedia of Educational Technology”. Cambridge University Press in United Kingdom.
19. Ray, K., and et al. (1998). “Student Attitudes towards Electronic Information Resources”. http://informationr.net/ir/4-2/paper54.html
20. Schmid Euline Cutrim (2009). Interactive whiteboard technology in the language classroom: exploring new pedagogical opportunities, Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
21. Shaver, James P. (1999). “Electronic Technology and The Future of Social Studies”. Eric no: EJ622455.
22. Shield L. & Kukulska-Hulme A. (eds.) (2008) Special edition of ReCALL (20, 3) on Mobile Assisted Language Learning.
23. Spears, B. and Swanson, R. (1993). Individual pre-game state anxiety in the United States (2nd ed.) Dubuque, IA: Brown. R. http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/JUNOO Issue/story02.htm A Model Of Internet Learning”.
24. Wright, M. D., and et all. (1998). “They Want to Teach: Factors Influencing Students to Become Technology Education Teachers”. Eric no: EJ 573018.