Investigation of 3rd Grade Life Science Textbook Texts and Activities According to Lipman's Critical Thinking Theory

Year 2024, , 576 - 586, 28.10.2024

Elif Alkar , Kemal Kaya

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574336

Abstract

Aim: Individuals need to have a philosophical critical thinking skill in order to have a reasonable approach to the situations and events they will encounter throughout their lives and to benefit themselves and the society Philosophical critical thinking is a process that enhances individuals' capacity to interrogate, analyse, and assess. In this regard, an inquisitive critical approach acquired at an early age makes important contributions to personality development. The current study aims to examine the text and activity contents in the 3rd grade Life Science textbook according to Matthew Lipman's critical thinking theory.
Methodology: Methodologically, document analysis was used in the study. In the 3rd grade Life Science textbook, the main approach in the data on text contents, activity questions and statements are that the statements have both a philosophical and critical meaning. The relevant data were analyzed according to the categories in Lipman's critical thinking approach and presented in tables.
Findings: The findings revealed that the questions and statements that meet Lipman's critical thinking categories were insufficient. While the expressions among the categories were predominantly judgment formation and being criterion/measure based, the least common categories were context sensitivity and self-correction.
Highlights: In this context, it is essential to consider the developmental stages of primary education students and contemporary educational requirements, while integrating a philosophical critical thinking approach more thoroughly into the curriculum and practices to foster an active and inquisitive student personality.

Keywords

3rd grade Life Science textbook, Critical thinking, Matthew Lipman, Primary Education

References

• Akbay, F. (2017). Examining the activities of critical thinking skills acquisition in life science textbooks. Master dissertation, Gazi Universirty, Ankara.
• Alanç, S. (2019). Student experiences and teachers' views on the content of visuals in primary school life science and social studies textbooks. Master dissertation, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli.
• Alkın-Şahin, S., & Tunca, N. (2015). Philosophy and Critical Thinking. Trakya University Journal of Education, 5(2), 192-206.
• Bağ, H. K. (2020). The effect of critical thinking embedded english course curriculum to the improvement of critical thinking skills of the 7th grade secondary school learners. Master dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa.
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., & Bankert, E. (1990). Meta-analysis of effects of explicit instruction for critical thinking. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
• Birdoğan, R., & Akagün, B. (2022). 3rd Grade Life Science Textbook. Dizin Publishing.
• Bodur, H. (2010). Effect of content based critical thinking education on critical thinking skills of students in second grade social studies. Master dissertation, Selçuk University, Konya.
• Brookfield, S. (1987). Developing critical thinkers. Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
• Büyükdüvenci, S. (2019). Pragmatism and education. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 20(1), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001074
• Cheek, L. R., Carter, V., & Daugherty, M. K. (2021) STEL Practice and the ıntegration of tinkering and take apart in the elementary classroom. The Journal of Technology Studies, 47(2), 60-71.
• Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Çakı-Kaytancı, M. (2022). Matthew Lipman's community of inquiry as a philosophy learning environment. Master dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara.
• Elder L., (2022). Critical thinking. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138609877-REE215-1
• Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking dispositions: Their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18(2), 165-182. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v18i2.2378
• Fajari, L. E. W. (2020). Student critical thinking skills and learning motivation in elementary students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1440, No. 1, p. 012104). IOP Publishing
• Foo, S. Y. Quek, C. L. (2019). Developing students’ critical thinking through asynchronous online discussions: A literature review. Malaysian Onlıne Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 37-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2019.02.003
• Gevrek, Y. E. (2023). Developing critical thinking skills with activities in the life study course. Master dissertation, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Nevşehir.
• Güzel. İ. (2022). The effect of critical thinking education on secondary students' critical thinking skills and attitudes to the Turkish course. Doctoral dissertation, İnönü University, Malatya.
• Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it's here to stay. Corwin Press.
• Kalender, B., & Baysal, Z. N. (2021). Examination of the curriculum and textbooks in terms of the harmony of the program elements: An example of life knowledge. Bogazici University Journal of Education, 38(2), 75-96. https://doi.org/10.52597/buje.990925
• Kaya, H. (2006). Critical thinking and asking questions. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 14(56), 71-78.
• Kökten, H. (2023). Philosophical inquiry in education and philosophy for children (P4C). Bursa Uludağ University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Journal of Philosophy, 22(3), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.1291864
• Ku, K.Y.L. (2009). Assessing students’ critical thinking performance: Urging for measurements using multi-response format. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.02.001
• Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16-46. http://www.imap.educationforthinking.org/
• Kulkul, Y. (2022). Analysis of the 3rd grade curriculum of the elementary school according to the philosophy for children (P4C) method. Master dissertation, İbni Haldun Unı̇versı̇ty, İstanbul.
• Kuşçu, Ş. (2023). Philosophical concepts and philosophy for children. Master dissertation, Üsküdar University, İstanbul.
• Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry: Establishing Trustworthiness, Beverly Hills.
• Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking-what can it be? Educational Leadership, 46(1), 33-48.
• Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press.
• MoNE (2018). 3rd Grade Life Science Teaching Program. Ankara.
• Moore, B. N. & Parker, R. (2009). Critical thinking, 9th Ed., New York.
• Nasırcı, H., & Aybek, B. (2018). The survey of the opinions of the teachers in textbooks writing commission on critical thinking. Scientific Educational Studies, 2(1), 22-38.
• Nuraini, N. L. S., Cholifah, P. S., Mahanani, P., & Meidina, A. M. (2020, November). Critical thinking and reflective thinking skills in elementary school learning. In 2nd Early Childhood and Primary Childhood Education (ECPE 2020) (pp. 1-5). Atlantis Press.
• Onur, V. (2009). The accessibility level of primary education social studies curriculum's objectives oriented critical thinking skills. Master dissertation, Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu.
• Özkan-Elgün, İ., & Uysal, F. (2022). Analysis of the attainments of life science course curriculum within the scope of life skills. Baskent University Journal of Education, 9(2), 122-135.
• Öztürk, T., & Kalafatçı, Ö. (2017). Analysis of the life studies course curriculum in terms of teacher opinions. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(2), 102-123.
• Patton, M.Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Wise publications.
• Paul, R. W. (1989) Critical thinking in North America: A new theory of knowledge, learning and literacy, Argumentatatiion, 3, 197-235.
• Paul, R., Binker, A. J. A., & Weil, D. (1990). Critical thinking handbook: K-3rd grades. Rohnert Park, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
• Peker, R. (2024). Problems encountered by classroom teachers in life sciences lessons. International Journal of Social Sciences, 8(33), 182-200.
• Renaud, R. D., & Murray, H. G. (2008). A comparison of a subject-specific and a general measure of critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.005
• Sarwanto, Fajari, L. E. W., & Chumdari. (2021). Critical thinking skills and their impacts on elementary school students. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 161-188. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.6
• Seyidoğlu, H. (2016). Scientific research and writing manual. Güzem Can Publishing.
• Simon, H. A., & Kaplan, C. A. (1989). Foundations of cognitive science. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), The foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 1–47.
• Smith-Stoner, M. (1999). Critical thinking activities for nursing. Lippincott Raven.
• Stahl, N. N., & Stahl, R. J. (1991). We can agree after all: Achieving a consensus for a critical thinking component of a gifted program using the Delphi technique. Roeper Review, 14(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199109553392
• Suhartoyo, E. (2017). The importance of critical thinking competence: An investigation of students’ writing experiences. Proceedings: International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture, 34-42.
• Turan, M. (2012). The teachers' usage level of the suggested activities for teaching students the crictical thinking skills in primary education third class life science course: The example of Siirt. Master dissertation, İnönü University, Malatya.
• Wild, P. J., McMahon, C., Darlington, M., Liu, S., & Culley, S. (2009). A diary study of information needs and document usage in the engineering domain. Design Studies 31(1), 46-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2009.06.002
• Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2000). Mass media research: An ındroduction. Belmont, Wadsworth Publishing Company.
• Woolfolk H. A. (2000). Educational psychology in teacher education, Educational Psychologist, 35(4), 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3504_04