Exploring Preservice Science Teachers’ Socioscientific Reasoning Competence
Abstract
Purpose: Contemporary science education standards underscore the importance of scientific literacy. To this end, science education researchers have been discussing what scientific literacy entails in a globalized world. A recent approach defines scientific literacy not only as the ability to comprehend and apply science concepts but also as the competence to construct arguments about complex, science-based societal issues. This requires scientifically literate individuals to go beyond science concepts and examine societal issues from multiple perspectives, such as economic, social, and ethical, a practice known as socioscientific reasoning. Undoubtedly, developing students' socioscientific reasoning depends on having science teachers who are themselves competent socioscientific reasoners. In this respect, this study aims to document the socioscientific reasoning competencies of preservice science teachers through open-ended tasks incorporating societal issues.
Design/Methodology/Approach: To assess preservice science teachers’ socioscientific reasoning competencies, an open-ended response task with two different socioscientific scenarios was designed and administered to 76 third and fourth year teacher candidates. Responses were analyzed with using inductive analysis method. Through constant comparison method, the responses of students were categorized into three level competency.
Findings: The results show that while preservice teachers understood the complexity of these societal issues, their reasoning was naive in approaching the issues from the perspectives of different stakeholders, appreciating the need for further inquiry, and skeptically examining the issue.
Highlights: The study concludes with implications for preservice science teacher education programs.
Keywords
Socioscientific issues, Preservice Science Teachers, Socioscientific reasoning
References
- Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education 31(2): 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701787909
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
- Ha, H., Park, W., & Song, J. (2023). Preservice elementary teachers’ socioscientific reasoning during a decision-making activity in the context of COVID-19. Science & Education, 32, 1869-1886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00359-7
- Herman, B. C., Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020). Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction on students’ contextualization of socioscientific orientations. Science Education, 105, 585-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21618
- Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. H., (2017). Secondary school students’ understanding of science and their socioscientific reasoning. Research in Science Education 47 (4): 755–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9527-9
- Kinslow, A. T., Sadler, T. D., & Nguyen, H. T. (2019). Socio-scientific reasoning and environmental literacy in a field-based ecology class. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 388-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1442418
- Kolstø, S.D., Paulsen, V.H., & Mestad, I. (2024). Critical thinking in the making: students’ critical thinking practices in a multifaceted SSI project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 19, 499-530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-024-10217-3
- Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2024). Science course curriculum for primary and lower secondary schools. MoNE Publications, Ankara.
- National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy of the Sciences.
- Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020). Developing socioscientific perspective taking. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1302-1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1756515