To Examine How The Skills Of Class Teacher Candidates In Terms Of Interpreting Tables and Graphics Hange According To Mathematical Reasoning Skills

Sefa Dündar; Hakan Yaman

EN TR

To Examine How The Skills Of Class Teacher Candidates In Terms Of Interpreting Tables and Graphics Hange According To Mathematical Reasoning Skills

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine how the skills of class teacher candidates in terms of interpreting tables and graphics change according to their class levels and mathematical reasoning skills. This study has been conducted among teacher candidates studying at a state university, department of class teachers, in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Grades. 220 teacher candidates participated in the study. Data collection tools have been used “Mathematical Reasoning Assessment Scale”, “Table Interpretation Test” and “Graphics Interpretation Test” in this study. The findings of the study showed that the mathematical reasoning skills of the teacher candidates varied meaningfully according to the class levels. There is a meaningful relation between the table interpretation and graphic interpretation performances of the teacher candidates in terms of mathematical reasoning skill levels.

Keywords

Mathematical reasoning, class teacher prospective, interpreting table, interpreting graphic

References

Abruscato, J. (2000). Teaching children science, Needham Heights, M.A: Allyn and Bacon, 37-52.
Akkuş Çıkla, O. ve Duatepe, A. (2002). “İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının orantısal akıl yürütme becerileri üzerine niteliksel bir araştırma”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakütesi Dergisi, 23, 32-40.
Alamolhodaei, H. (1996). A study in higher education calculus and students’ learning styles. (Phd thesis), University of Glasgow.
Alkan, H., & Bukova Güzel, E. (2005). Öğretmen adaylarında matematiksel düşünmenin gelişimi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(3), 221-236.
Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American journal of Physics, 62(8), 750-762.
Capraro, M. M., Kulm, G., & Capraro, R. M. (2005). Middle grades: Misconceptions in statistical thinking. School Science and Mathematics, 105(4), 165-174.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Çoban, H. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel muhakeme becerileri ile bilişötesi öğrenme stra- tejilerini kullanma düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki (Yüksek Lisans), Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Tokat.
Demirci, N., & Uyanık, F. (2009). Onuncu sınıf öğrencilerinin grafik anlama ve yorumlamaları ile kinematik başarıları arasındaki ilişki. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED), 3(2), 22-51.
Diezmann, C., & English, L. D. (2001). Developing young children’s mathematical power. Reoper Review, 24(1), 11-13.

Dunham, P. H., & Osborne, A. (1991). Learning How to See: Students Graphing Difficulties. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 13(4), 35-49.
Fischbein, E., & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions. Journal for research in mathematics education, 28(1), 96-105.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Newyork:McGraw-Hill.
Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
Kaya, D., & Keşan, C. (2014). İlköğretim seviyesindeki öğrenciler için cebirsel düşünme ve cebirsel muhakeme becerisinin önemi. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education (IJTASE), 3(2).
Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 390-419). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z. R., & Lieberman, A. (2001). Effects of multilevel versus unilevel metacog- nitive training on mathematical reasoning. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(5), 292-300.
Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255-276.
Liu P. H (2003), Do teachers need to incorporate the history of mathematics in their teaching? The Mathematics Teacher. Reston: Sep .Vol.96, Iss. 6; pg. 416.
Martin, D. J. (2002). Elementary Science Methods a Constructivist Approach. Newyork: Delmar Publishers, 57-117.
Mevarech, Z.R. ve Kramarskı, B. (1997) IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathe- matics in heterogeneous classrooms, American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), (365-395).
McKenzie, D. L., & Padilla, M. J. (1984). Effect of the laboratory activities and written simulations of the acquisition of the graphing skills by eight grade students. Paper presented at the 57th meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB] (2009). İlköğretim Matematik Dersi (1-5. sınıflar) Öğretim Progra- mı, Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı, Ankara.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB] (2013). Ortaokul Matematik Dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) Öğretim Programı, Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı, Ankara.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989) .Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, Virginia.
Olkun, S., & Toluk, Z. (2003). İlköğretimde Etkinlik Temelli Matematik Öğretimi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Peresini, D. & Webb, N. (1999). Analyzing Mathematical Reasoning in Students’ Responses Across Multiple Performance Assessment Tasks. Developing Mathematical Reasoning in Grades K-12/ Lee V. Stiff, 1999 Yearbook Editör, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia.
Pilten, P. (2008). Üstbiliş stratejileri öğretiminin ilköğretim beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik- sel muhakeme becerilerine etkisi. (Doktora Tezi), Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Schneicer, W. & Lockl, K. (2002). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children an adolescents. In T. Perfect, B. Scwartz (Eds.). Applied Metacognition. West Nyack, NY, USA: Cambiridge University Pres.
Tall, D. (1996). Functions and calculus International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 289- 325): Springer.
Türk Dil Kurumu [TDK] (2014). www.tdk.gov.tr, 10.05.2014 tarihinde erişim.
Umay, A. (2003). Matematiksel muhakeme yeteneği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Der- gisi, 24(3), 234-243.
Yackel, E. & Hanna, G. (2003). Reasoning and Proof. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin and D. Schifter (Ed.), A Research Companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 227- 236). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Sefa Dündar This is me
ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, MATEMATİK VE FEN BİLİMLERİ EĞİTİMİ BÖLÜMÜ, İLKÖĞRETİM MATEMATİK EĞİTİMİ ANABİLİM DALI

Hakan Yaman This is me
ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, MATEMATİK VE FEN BİLİMLERİ EĞİTİMİ BÖLÜMÜ, İLKÖĞRETİM MATEMATİK EĞİTİMİ ANABİLİM DALI

Publication Date

December 15, 2015

Submission Date

July 15, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2015 Volume: 23 Number: 4

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA38ED33YA

APA

Dündar, S., & Yaman, H. (2015). To Examine How The Skills Of Class Teacher Candidates In Terms Of Interpreting Tables and Graphics Hange According To Mathematical Reasoning Skills. Kastamonu Education Journal, 23(4), 1695-1710. https://izlik.org/JA38ED33YA

AMA

1.Dündar S, Yaman H. To Examine How The Skills Of Class Teacher Candidates In Terms Of Interpreting Tables and Graphics Hange According To Mathematical Reasoning Skills. Kastamonu Education Journal. 2015;23(4):1695-1710. https://izlik.org/JA38ED33YA

Chicago

Dündar, Sefa, and Hakan Yaman. 2015. “To Examine How The Skills Of Class Teacher Candidates In Terms Of Interpreting Tables and Graphics Hange According To Mathematical Reasoning Skills”. Kastamonu Education Journal 23 (4): 1695-1710. https://izlik.org/JA38ED33YA.

EndNote

Dündar S, Yaman H (December 1, 2015) To Examine How The Skills Of Class Teacher Candidates In Terms Of Interpreting Tables and Graphics Hange According To Mathematical Reasoning Skills. Kastamonu Education Journal 23 4 1695–1710.

IEEE

[1]S. Dündar and H. Yaman, “To Examine How The Skills Of Class Teacher Candidates In Terms Of Interpreting Tables and Graphics Hange According To Mathematical Reasoning Skills”, Kastamonu Education Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1695–1710, Dec. 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA38ED33YA

ISNAD

Dündar, Sefa - Yaman, Hakan. “To Examine How The Skills Of Class Teacher Candidates In Terms Of Interpreting Tables and Graphics Hange According To Mathematical Reasoning Skills”. Kastamonu Education Journal 23/4 (December 1, 2015): 1695-1710. https://izlik.org/JA38ED33YA.

JAMA

1.Dündar S, Yaman H. To Examine How The Skills Of Class Teacher Candidates In Terms Of Interpreting Tables and Graphics Hange According To Mathematical Reasoning Skills. Kastamonu Education Journal. 2015;23:1695–1710.

MLA

Dündar, Sefa, and Hakan Yaman. “To Examine How The Skills Of Class Teacher Candidates In Terms Of Interpreting Tables and Graphics Hange According To Mathematical Reasoning Skills”. Kastamonu Education Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, Dec. 2015, pp. 1695-10, https://izlik.org/JA38ED33YA.

Vancouver

1.Sefa Dündar, Hakan Yaman. To Examine How The Skills Of Class Teacher Candidates In Terms Of Interpreting Tables and Graphics Hange According To Mathematical Reasoning Skills. Kastamonu Education Journal [Internet]. 2015 Dec. 1;23(4):1695-710. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA38ED33YA

Kastamonu Education Journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.

To Examine How The Skills Of Class Teacher Candidates In Terms Of Interpreting Tables and Graphics Hange According To Mathematical Reasoning Skills

To Examine How The Skills Of Class Teacher Candidates In Terms Of Interpreting Tables and Graphics Hange According To Mathematical Reasoning Skills

Abstract

Keywords

Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Muhakeme Becerilerine Göre Tablo ve Grafikleri Yorumlama Başarılarının İncelenmesi

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

IZ

Cite