Research Article

Investigating Teacher Candidates’ Use of Formative Assessment: Action Research Model

Volume: 25 Number: 6 November 15, 2017
Pınar Karaman , Ayhan Karaman
EN TR

Investigating Teacher Candidates’ Use of Formative Assessment: Action Research Model

Abstract

The purpose of this action research study was to identify the views of teacher candidates

about the contribution of practicing formative assessment activities in an authentic learning

environment to their pedagogical improvement. In this study, 12 senior preschool teacher

candidates performed a variety of formative assessment activities as a part of their teaching

practicum in a kindergarten. The data reflecting the specific experiences of the teacher

candidates in the process of conducting formative assesment activities in a half-semester

term were collected from the field notes prepared by the teacher candidates and the responses

given by the teacher candidates to open-ended questions posed by the researcher. The data

obtained from the teacher candidates were analyzed using a content analysis approach. The

findings of the study revealed that the formative assessment practices of the teacher candidates

generally supported their pedagogical development at a basic level. The time limitations

and incompetency of teacher candidates in performing appropriate assessment strategies

for preschool-age children were identified by teacher candidates as the potential challenges

encountered during the formative assessment practices.

Keywords

Formative assessment,preschool teacher candidates,action research

References

  1. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment. A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practices, 18(1), 5–25.
  2. Bennett, K.R., & Cunningham, A.C. (2009). Teaching Formative Assessment Strategies to Preservice Teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25:3, 99-105.
  3. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. Maidenhead, Open University Press.
  4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, Principles, Policy and Practice, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 7–73.
  5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Changing teaching through formative assessment: research and practice. The King’s-Medway-Oxfordshire formative assessment project. In Formative assessment improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 223–40). Paris: OECD.
  6. Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn & Bacon.
  7. Bowman, B., Donovan, S. & Burns, S. (Eds.) (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our pre-schoolers. Report of Committee on Early Childhood Pedagogy, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
  8. Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T. (Eds.). (1992). Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
  9. Brown, L. (1988). Group self-evaluation: learning for improvement. School Improvement Plan. Secretariat, Education Department of Victoria Canada.
  10. Buck, G. A., Trauth-Nare, A., & Kaftan, J. (2010). Making formative assessment discernable to preservice teachers of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 402–21.
APA
Karaman, P., & Karaman, A. (2017). Investigating Teacher Candidates’ Use of Formative Assessment: Action Research Model. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(6), 2385-2400. https://izlik.org/JA29CH42HC
AMA
1.Karaman P, Karaman A. Investigating Teacher Candidates’ Use of Formative Assessment: Action Research Model. Kastamonu Education Journal. 2017;25(6):2385-2400. https://izlik.org/JA29CH42HC
Chicago
Karaman, Pınar, and Ayhan Karaman. 2017. “Investigating Teacher Candidates’ Use of Formative Assessment: Action Research Model”. Kastamonu Education Journal 25 (6): 2385-2400. https://izlik.org/JA29CH42HC.
EndNote
Karaman P, Karaman A (November 1, 2017) Investigating Teacher Candidates’ Use of Formative Assessment: Action Research Model. Kastamonu Education Journal 25 6 2385–2400.
IEEE
[1]P. Karaman and A. Karaman, “Investigating Teacher Candidates’ Use of Formative Assessment: Action Research Model”, Kastamonu Education Journal, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2385–2400, Nov. 2017, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA29CH42HC
ISNAD
Karaman, Pınar - Karaman, Ayhan. “Investigating Teacher Candidates’ Use of Formative Assessment: Action Research Model”. Kastamonu Education Journal 25/6 (November 1, 2017): 2385-2400. https://izlik.org/JA29CH42HC.
JAMA
1.Karaman P, Karaman A. Investigating Teacher Candidates’ Use of Formative Assessment: Action Research Model. Kastamonu Education Journal. 2017;25:2385–2400.
MLA
Karaman, Pınar, and Ayhan Karaman. “Investigating Teacher Candidates’ Use of Formative Assessment: Action Research Model”. Kastamonu Education Journal, vol. 25, no. 6, Nov. 2017, pp. 2385-00, https://izlik.org/JA29CH42HC.
Vancouver
1.Pınar Karaman, Ayhan Karaman. Investigating Teacher Candidates’ Use of Formative Assessment: Action Research Model. Kastamonu Education Journal [Internet]. 2017 Nov. 1;25(6):2385-400. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA29CH42HC