Altyapı Sporlarında Değerler Ölçeği-2’nin Türk Kültürüne Uyarlanması ve Psikometrik Özellikleri

Year 2019, , 1395 - 1402, 15.07.2019

Bahri Gürpınar , Serkan Toprak , Merve Ayvalı , Jean Whitehead

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2547

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı literatürde spordaki değer araştırmalarında sıkça kullanılan ve Lee, Whitehead, Ntoumanis ve Hatzigeorgiadis (2008) tarafından geliştirilen Altyapı Sporlarında Değerler Ölçeği-2 (YSVQ-2)’yi Türk kültürüne uyarlamak ve psikometrik özelliklerini rapor etmektir. Araştırma grubunu oluşturan yaşları 11 ile 18 arasında değişen (M=14,05±SS=1,92) toplam 292 sporcu öğrencinin 175’i ortaokulda 107’si lisede eğitimlerine devam etmektedirler. YSVQ-2’nin geçerliği DFA ile test edilmiştir. Uyum indeksleri tüm para-metrelerde iyi veya mükemmle uyum göstermiştir (Ki-kare/SD=1,79; GFI=0,94; AGFI=0,92; CFI=0,97; NFI=0,96; RMSEA=0,05; SRMR=0,06). Sonuç olarak, YSVQ-2’nin Türkçe for-mundan elde edilen verilerin teorik yapıyla açıklandığı ve güvenilirlik katsayılarının sporcu öğrencileri değer türlerini değerlendirmek için yeterli olduğu söylenebilir. 

Keywords

Spor değerleri, değer türleri altyapı sporu, sporcu öğrenci

Adaptation of the Youth Sport Values Questionnaire-2 Into Turkish Culture and Its Psychometric Properties

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt the Youth Sport Values Questionnaire (YSVQ-2) develo-ped by Lee, Whitehead, Ntoumanis and Hatzigeorgiadis (2008) into Turkish culture which is frequently used in the literature and to report its psychometric properties. A total of 292 athle-tes , aged between 11 and 18 (M=14.05, SD=1.92) constituted the study group. 175 of them are in secondary school and 107 are in high school. The validity of the YSVQ-2 analyzed with CFA. Fit indices values for all parameters were found to be good or excellent (Chi-square/df=1,79; GFI= 0,94; AGFI= 0,92; CFI= 0,97; NFI= 0,96; RMSEA= 0,05; SRMR= 0,06). In conclusion, it can be said that the data obtained from the Turkish form of YSVQ scale was described by the theoretical structure and reliability coefficients were sufficient to evaluate the value types of youth student athletes.

Keywords

Sport values, value types, youth sport, student athlete

References

• Alpar, R. (2010). Spor, Sağlık ve Eğitim Bilimlerinde Örneklerle Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Ge-çerlik-Güvenirlik, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Bolat, Y. (2013). Bir değer ölçme aracı: çok boyutlu sosyal değerler ölçeği. Turkish Journal of Education, 2(4).
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
• Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(4), 584.
• Danioni, F., Barni, D., & Rosnati, R. (2017). Transmitting Sport Values: The Importance of Parental Involvement in Children’s Sport Activity. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 75.
• Dilmac, B., Aricak, O. T., & Cesur, S. (2014). A Validity and Reliability Study on the Deve-lopment of the Values Scale in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(5), 1661-1671.
• Goggins, L.P. (2015). The role of parents in youth sport values. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Exeter Üniversitesi.
• Hançer, M. (2003). Ölçeklerin Yazım Dilinden Başka Bir Dile Çevirileri ve Kullanılan Değişik Yaklaşımlar. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6, 47-59.
• Hatzigeorgiadis, A. ve Whitehead J. (2013). Cross Cultural Use Validation and Modification of the YSVQ-2. Whitehead, J., Telfer, H., & Lambert, J. (Eds.). Values in youth sport and phy-sical education. Routledge.
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. ve Mullen, M.: Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Deter-mining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60
• Hu, L. T. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analy-sis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
• Ichimura, S., Kawakita, H., Ishimura, I., Urai, T., Hatori, H., Kondo, A. (2013). Do Values and Achievement Orientations of University Basketball Players Predict Their Sporting Attitudes? Tokyo Tokushima Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Bülteni Uygulamalı Psikoloji Bölümü – No:20 (東京成徳大学研究紀要 ―人文学部・応用心理学部―第 20 号).
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford press.
• Kluckhohn, C. (1951) Value and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In T. Parsons and E. Shils (eds) Towards a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 388—433.
• Lee, M. J., & Cockman, M. (1995). Values in children's sport: Spontaneously expressed values among young athletes. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 30(3-4), 337-350.
• Lee, M. J., Whitehead, J., & Balchin, N. (2000). The measurement of values in youth sport: Development of the Youth Sport Values Questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psyc-hology, 22(4), 307-326.
• Lee, M. J., Whitehead, J., Ntoumanis, N., & Hatzigeorgiadis, A. (2008). Relationships among values, achievement orientations, and attitudes in youth sport. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 30(5), 588-610.
• Pitts, S. L. (2015). Sport Values of Bantam, Midget and Intermediate Female Hockey Players and Their Minor Hockey Associations. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Brock Üniversitesi.
• Reynolds, W.M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe- Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125.
• Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Free press.
• Saldanha, R. P., Balbinotti, M. A. A., & Balbinotti, C. A. A. (2015). Tradução e validade de conteúdo do Youth Sport Value Questionnaire 2. Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Esporte, 37(4), 383-388.
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 Countries. In M. P. Zanna (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. London: Academic Press.
• Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of social issues, 50(4), 19-45.
• Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different met-hod of measurement. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 32(5), 519-542.
• Shields, D.L.L. and Bredemeier, B.J.L. (2007) Advances in sport morality research. In Tenen-baum, G. and Eklund, R.C. (eds) Handbook of Sport Psychology, 3rd. edn. Indianapolis, IN: John Wiley, pp. 662-84.
• Stupuris, T., Šukys, S., & Tilindienė, I. (2013). Relationship between adolescent athletes ‘va-lues and behavior in sport and perceived coach‘s character development competency. Educa-tion, Physical Training, Sport, 4(91), 37-45.
• Šukys, S. (2010). Adaptation and validation of the prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport scale and youth sport values questionnaire for Lithuanians. Education, Physical Training, Sport, 17(2), 104.
• Šukys, S., & Jansonienė, A. J. (2012). Relationship between athletes’ values and moral disen-gagement in sport, and differences across gender, level and years of involvement. Education, Physical Training, Sport, 1(84), 55-61.
• Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psi-koloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74.
• Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S.(2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th edition). MA: Allyn&Bacon, Inc.
• Webb, H. (1969) Professionalisation of attitudes towards play among adolescents. In G. S. Kenyon (ed.) Aspects of Contemporary Sport Sociology. Chicago, IL: The Athletic Institute, pp. 161-78.
• Whitehead J. (2017). Values Symposium 2: Exploring youth sport values with sport-specific value questionnaires. ISSP 14th World Congress of Sport Psychology, 10-14 July 2017, Se-villa, Spain.