BibTex RIS Cite

THE EFFECTS AND USES OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN LEARNING AND TEACHING

Year 2009, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 321 - 330, 01.01.2009

Abstract

In this study, the effect of technology on learning and teaching in a classroom environment is invetigated. It is widely known that, the effect of technology in the classroom is highly productive. But to what extent and under what circumstances it should be applied depend on different factors such as; backround knowledge of teachers about the teaching equipments they use, the ability to use this technology, the methods, strategies and techniques about using it, students’ perceptions of technology, technological supports offered by the school, etc. As a result, technology is not an end itself, it should be supported by some other mean.

References

  • 1. Greenfield, P.M., & R. R. Cocking, (eds 1996). Interacting with video. Greenwich, CT: Ablex
  • 2. Bereiter, C., & M. Scardamalia (1993). Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing
  • 3. Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in Play: Computer Game Design as a Context for Children’s Learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  • 4. Linn M. C., N. B. Songer, and B. S. Eylon (1996). Shifts and convergences in science learning and instruction. Pp. 438-490 in Handbook of Educational Psychology, R. C. Calfee and D. C. Berliner, eds. Riverside, NJ: Macmillan
  • 5. Mestre, J. P., W. J. Gerace, R. J. Dufresne, et al., (1997). Promoting active learning in large classer using a classroom communication system. Pp. 1019-1036 in The Changing Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities: Proceedings of International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education. Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics
  • 6. Sivin-Kachala, J. & Bialo, E. (2000). 2000 research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools. (7th ed.). Washington, DC: Software and Information Industry Association
  • 7. O’Dwyer, L. M., Russell, M., Bebell, D., et al., (2005, January). Examining the relationship between home and school computer use and students’ English/ Language Arts tses scores. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment (Vol.3 No.3). Available: www.bc.edu/research/intasc/studies/USEIT/pdf/USEITr10.pdf
  • 8. Schacter, J. (1999, June). The impact of education technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology
  • 9. Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., et al., (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10:2, 76-101
  • 10. Marshall, J. M. (2002). Learning with technology: Evidence that technology can, and does, support learning. San Diego, CA: Cable in the Classroom
  • 11. Cronin, H., Meadows, D., Sinatra, R. (1990). Integarting computers, reading, and writing across the curriculum. Educational Leadership, 48 (1), 57-63
  • 12. Funkhouser, C. (1993). The influence of problem-solving software on student attitudes about mathematics. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25 (3), 339-347
  • 13. George, G., & Sleeth, R. G. (1996). Technology-assisted instruction in business schools: Measured affects on student attitudes, expectations, and performance. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23 (3), 239-245
  • 14. Luna, C. & McKenzie, J. (1997). Testing multimedia in the community college classroom. T. H. E. Journal, 24, 78-82
  • 15. Sherry, L., Jesse, D., & Billig, S. H. (2002). Creating a WEB of evidence of student performance in a technology-rich learning environment. International Journal of E-Learning, 1 (1), 33-42
  • 16. Traynor, P. (2003). Effects of Computer-Assisted-İnstruction on Different Learners. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30 (2), 137- 143
  • 17. Duman, B. Atar, E. (2004). Data show teknolojisinin coğrafya dersinde soyut konuların öğretilmesinde öğrencilerin akademik başarısı ve motivasyonu üzerine etkisi. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - Tojet October 2004 Issn:1303-6521 Volume3, Issue 4, Article 11
  • 18. Ayas, C. (2006). An examination of the relationship between the integration of technology into social studies and constructivist pedagogies. The Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology - Tojet January 2006 Issn: 1303-6521 Volume 5, Issue 1, Article 2
  • 19. Kabadayı, A. (2006). Analyzing pre-school student teachers’ and their cooperating teachers’ attitudes towards the use of educational technology. The Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology - Tojet October 2006 Issn: 1303-6521 Volume 5, Issue 4, Article 1
  • 20. Türkmen, H. (2006). What technology plays supporting role in learning cycle approach for science education. The Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology - Tojet April 2006 Issn: 1303- 6521 Volume 5, Issue 2, Article 10
  • 21. Boster, F. J., Meyer, G. S., Roberto, A. J, et al., (2002). A report on the effect of the unitedstreaming TM aplication on educational performance
  • 22. Hiebert, J. C. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM Standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 3-19
  • 23. Papanastasiou, E., Zemblyas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can computer use hurt science achievement? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12 (3), 325-332
  • 24. Reeves, T. C. (1998). The impact of media and technology in schools: A research report prepared for The Bertelsmann Foundation
  • 25. Ringstaff, C. & Kelley, L. (2002). The learning return on our educational technology investment. San Fransisco: West Ed. Available: http://www.wested.org/cs/we/view/rs/619
  • 26. Murphy, R., Penuel, W., Means B., et al., (2001). E-DESK: A Review of Recent Evidence on the Effectiveness of Discrete Educational Software. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International
  • 27. Bruce, B. & Levin, J. (1997). Educational technology: Media for inquiry, communication, construction, and expression. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 1, 79-102.
  • 29. Radlick, M. (1994). Reconstructing School: What is changing in the classroom. Available at ERIC Microfiche No: ED 397 355 retrieved from http:/erıcır.syr.edu
  • 30. Lemke, C. & Coughin, E. (1998).Technology in American Schools: seven dimensions for gauging progress. Milken Family Foundation. www.mff.org/edtech/
  • 31. Cradler, J. & Bridgeforth, E. (1996). Policy brief: Recent research on the effects of technology on teaching and learning. Retrieved October 17, 2002, from West Ed http://www.wested.org/techpolicy/research.html
  • 32. Byrom, E. & Bingham, M. (2001). Factors influencing the effective use of technology for teaching and learning. Lessons learned from SEIR*TEC Intensive Site Schools, 2nd edition. Greensboro NC: SERVE
  • 33. Kay, K. & Honey, M. (in press). Beyond technology competency: A vision of ICT literacy to prepare students for the 21st century. The Institute for the Advancement of Emerging Technologies in Education. Charleston, W. V.: Evantia
  • 34. Cuban, L. (1998). High-tech schools and low-tech teaching. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 14 (2), 6-7.
  • 35. Kanaya, T.& Light, D. (2005). Duration and relevance of a Professional development program: Using Intel Teach to the Future to Illuminute successful programmatiac features. Presental of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2005. Norfolk, VA: AACE
  • 36. Painter, S. R. (2001). Issues in the observation and evoluation of technology integration in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17 (4), 21-25. Retrieved September 21, 2005, from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Membership/SIGs/SIGTE_Teacher_Educators_/JCTEandNum151_Journal of_Computing_in_Teacher_Education/Past_Issues 2/Volume_17/Number 4_Summer_2001/tel 7421 pai.pdf

ÖĞRETME VE ÖĞRENMEDE EĞİTİM TEKNOLOJİSİNİN ETKİLERİ VE KULLANIMI

Year 2009, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 321 - 330, 01.01.2009

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, öğretme ve öğrenmede eğitim teknolijisinin etkileri ve kullanımı ele alınmıştır. Bilindiği gibi sınıf içinde teknolojinin kullanımının öğrenme ve öğretme üzerindeki etkisi tartışılmazdır. Bu etki programın bütün öğelerini etkilemekte ve daha etkin hale getirmektedir. Fakat bu kullanımın ne kadar ve ne şekilde olacağı çeşitli faktörlere bağlıdır; öğretmenlerin kullanacakları teknoloji hakkındaki altyapı bilgileri, bu teknolojiyi kullanabilme yetenekleri, teknolojileri uygularken kullanacakları yöntem, teknik ve stratejiler, öğrencilerin kullanacakları teknolojiyi kavrayabilmeleri, okulun sunduğu imkanlar vb. Sonuç olarak zengin teknolojik bir ortam tek başına işe yaramamakta, mutlaka söz konusu faktörlerle desteklenmelidir

References

  • 1. Greenfield, P.M., & R. R. Cocking, (eds 1996). Interacting with video. Greenwich, CT: Ablex
  • 2. Bereiter, C., & M. Scardamalia (1993). Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing
  • 3. Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in Play: Computer Game Design as a Context for Children’s Learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  • 4. Linn M. C., N. B. Songer, and B. S. Eylon (1996). Shifts and convergences in science learning and instruction. Pp. 438-490 in Handbook of Educational Psychology, R. C. Calfee and D. C. Berliner, eds. Riverside, NJ: Macmillan
  • 5. Mestre, J. P., W. J. Gerace, R. J. Dufresne, et al., (1997). Promoting active learning in large classer using a classroom communication system. Pp. 1019-1036 in The Changing Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities: Proceedings of International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education. Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics
  • 6. Sivin-Kachala, J. & Bialo, E. (2000). 2000 research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools. (7th ed.). Washington, DC: Software and Information Industry Association
  • 7. O’Dwyer, L. M., Russell, M., Bebell, D., et al., (2005, January). Examining the relationship between home and school computer use and students’ English/ Language Arts tses scores. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment (Vol.3 No.3). Available: www.bc.edu/research/intasc/studies/USEIT/pdf/USEITr10.pdf
  • 8. Schacter, J. (1999, June). The impact of education technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology
  • 9. Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., et al., (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10:2, 76-101
  • 10. Marshall, J. M. (2002). Learning with technology: Evidence that technology can, and does, support learning. San Diego, CA: Cable in the Classroom
  • 11. Cronin, H., Meadows, D., Sinatra, R. (1990). Integarting computers, reading, and writing across the curriculum. Educational Leadership, 48 (1), 57-63
  • 12. Funkhouser, C. (1993). The influence of problem-solving software on student attitudes about mathematics. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25 (3), 339-347
  • 13. George, G., & Sleeth, R. G. (1996). Technology-assisted instruction in business schools: Measured affects on student attitudes, expectations, and performance. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23 (3), 239-245
  • 14. Luna, C. & McKenzie, J. (1997). Testing multimedia in the community college classroom. T. H. E. Journal, 24, 78-82
  • 15. Sherry, L., Jesse, D., & Billig, S. H. (2002). Creating a WEB of evidence of student performance in a technology-rich learning environment. International Journal of E-Learning, 1 (1), 33-42
  • 16. Traynor, P. (2003). Effects of Computer-Assisted-İnstruction on Different Learners. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30 (2), 137- 143
  • 17. Duman, B. Atar, E. (2004). Data show teknolojisinin coğrafya dersinde soyut konuların öğretilmesinde öğrencilerin akademik başarısı ve motivasyonu üzerine etkisi. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - Tojet October 2004 Issn:1303-6521 Volume3, Issue 4, Article 11
  • 18. Ayas, C. (2006). An examination of the relationship between the integration of technology into social studies and constructivist pedagogies. The Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology - Tojet January 2006 Issn: 1303-6521 Volume 5, Issue 1, Article 2
  • 19. Kabadayı, A. (2006). Analyzing pre-school student teachers’ and their cooperating teachers’ attitudes towards the use of educational technology. The Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology - Tojet October 2006 Issn: 1303-6521 Volume 5, Issue 4, Article 1
  • 20. Türkmen, H. (2006). What technology plays supporting role in learning cycle approach for science education. The Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology - Tojet April 2006 Issn: 1303- 6521 Volume 5, Issue 2, Article 10
  • 21. Boster, F. J., Meyer, G. S., Roberto, A. J, et al., (2002). A report on the effect of the unitedstreaming TM aplication on educational performance
  • 22. Hiebert, J. C. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM Standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 3-19
  • 23. Papanastasiou, E., Zemblyas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can computer use hurt science achievement? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12 (3), 325-332
  • 24. Reeves, T. C. (1998). The impact of media and technology in schools: A research report prepared for The Bertelsmann Foundation
  • 25. Ringstaff, C. & Kelley, L. (2002). The learning return on our educational technology investment. San Fransisco: West Ed. Available: http://www.wested.org/cs/we/view/rs/619
  • 26. Murphy, R., Penuel, W., Means B., et al., (2001). E-DESK: A Review of Recent Evidence on the Effectiveness of Discrete Educational Software. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International
  • 27. Bruce, B. & Levin, J. (1997). Educational technology: Media for inquiry, communication, construction, and expression. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 1, 79-102.
  • 29. Radlick, M. (1994). Reconstructing School: What is changing in the classroom. Available at ERIC Microfiche No: ED 397 355 retrieved from http:/erıcır.syr.edu
  • 30. Lemke, C. & Coughin, E. (1998).Technology in American Schools: seven dimensions for gauging progress. Milken Family Foundation. www.mff.org/edtech/
  • 31. Cradler, J. & Bridgeforth, E. (1996). Policy brief: Recent research on the effects of technology on teaching and learning. Retrieved October 17, 2002, from West Ed http://www.wested.org/techpolicy/research.html
  • 32. Byrom, E. & Bingham, M. (2001). Factors influencing the effective use of technology for teaching and learning. Lessons learned from SEIR*TEC Intensive Site Schools, 2nd edition. Greensboro NC: SERVE
  • 33. Kay, K. & Honey, M. (in press). Beyond technology competency: A vision of ICT literacy to prepare students for the 21st century. The Institute for the Advancement of Emerging Technologies in Education. Charleston, W. V.: Evantia
  • 34. Cuban, L. (1998). High-tech schools and low-tech teaching. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 14 (2), 6-7.
  • 35. Kanaya, T.& Light, D. (2005). Duration and relevance of a Professional development program: Using Intel Teach to the Future to Illuminute successful programmatiac features. Presental of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2005. Norfolk, VA: AACE
  • 36. Painter, S. R. (2001). Issues in the observation and evoluation of technology integration in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17 (4), 21-25. Retrieved September 21, 2005, from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Membership/SIGs/SIGTE_Teacher_Educators_/JCTEandNum151_Journal of_Computing_in_Teacher_Education/Past_Issues 2/Volume_17/Number 4_Summer_2001/tel 7421 pai.pdf
There are 35 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Sevilay Sahın This is me

Esen Turan This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2009
Published in Issue Year 2009 Volume: 17 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Sahın, S., & Turan, E. (2009). THE EFFECTS AND USES OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN LEARNING AND TEACHING. Kastamonu Education Journal, 17(1), 321-330.

10037