BibTex RIS Cite

RESIDENTIAL DIFFERENCES IN PROSPECTIVE CLASSROOM TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS GEOGRAPHY SUBJECT

Year 2008, Volume: 16 Issue: 1, 185 - 190, 01.03.2008

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine if there is a residential difference in enjoyment of geography subject among the prospective teachers attending Karadeniz Technical University, Giresun Education Faculty, Classroom Teaching Department. A total number of 226 student from the first, second, third and fourth grades were selected as a sample. Half of the sample consists of the students who came from rural area and the rest of them come from urban area. A five-point Likert-type scale was administered to evaluate the students’ enjoyment of geography. The data obtained was analyzed and interpreted via t-test. The findings showed that there is a significant difference in favor of the students who came from rural area in enjoyment of geography subject.

References

  • 1. Büyükkaragöz, S. & Çivi, C. (1997). Genel Öğretim Metotları. İst.: Öz Eğitim Yay.
  • 2. Fraser, B., Welch W. & Welberg, H. (1986). Using secondary analysis of national assessment data to identify predictors of junior high school students' outcome. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 32 (1), 37-50.
  • 3. Hynd, C., Holschuh, J. & Nist, S. (2000). Learning complex scientific information: Motivation theory and its relation to student perceptions. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 16: 23–57.
  • 4. Jervis, R. (1984). The Acquisition of Some Geographical Concepts by Schoolchildren. Unpublished PhD Thesis: Manchester University.
  • 5. Matthews, M.H. (1984). Cognitive mapping abilities of young girls and boys. Geography, 69, 327-336.
  • 6. Greenwald, A. G. (1989). Why Attitudes are Important: Defining Attitude and Attitude Theory 20 Years Later. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, and A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude Structure and Function (pp. 429-440). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 7. Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS İle Veri Analizi. Ankara: Nobel.
  • 8. Baysal, A.C. & Tekarslan, E. (1996). Davranış Bilimleri. İst.: Avcıol Basım- Yayın.
  • 9. Fraser, B.J. (1981). Deterioration in high school students' attitudes toward social studies. The social studies, Mar/Apr, 65-68.
  • 10. Print, M. (1990). Curriculum Review of Social Studies and Social Sciences Education: An Inquiry Into the Social Studies and Social Sciences Curricula K-12 in Western Australia. Perth: Ministry of Education.
  • 11. Betres, J.J. (1983). The Status of Elementary Social Studies Education in Selected Rhode Island public schools. ERIC Document, 236097.
  • 12. Colley, A. & Comber, C. (2003). School subject preferences: Age and gender differences revisited. Educational Studies, 29 (1), 59-67.
  • 13. Adey, K. & Biddulph, M. (2001). The influence of pupil perceptions on subject choice at 14+ in geography and history. Educational Studies, 27 (4), 439-450.
  • 14. Doğanay, H. & Zaman, M. (2002). Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Coğrafya Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı’na yönelik öğrenci tercihlerinin on yıllık seyri (1992-2002Devresi). Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 7 (7), 37-45.
  • 15. Demirkaya, H. & Arıbaş, K. (2004). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmenliği üçüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin coğrafya dersine yönelik tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12, 179-187.
  • 16. Francek, M.A. et all., (1993). The persistence of selected geographic misconceptions: A study of junior high through undergraduate college students. Journal of Geography, 93, 247-253.
  • 17. Gerber, R.V. (2001). Attitudes to geography in Australia. Australian Geographer, 32 (2), 221–239.
  • 18. Lannes, D. et all., (2002). Brazilian schools: comparing students’ interests with what is being taught. Educational Research, 44 (2) 157–179.
  • 19. Lightbody, P. et all., (1996). Motivation and attribution at secondary school: The role of gender. Educational Studies, 22, 13–25.

SINIF ÖĞRETMENİ ADAYLARININ YAŞADIKLARI YERE GÖRE COĞRAFYA DERSİNE KARŞI TUTUMLARINDAKİ FARKLILIKLAR

Year 2008, Volume: 16 Issue: 1, 185 - 190, 01.03.2008

Abstract

Araştırma Giresun Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Sınıf Öğretmenliği Programında okuyan öğrencilerin coğrafya dersini sevmelerinde, yaşadıkları mekana göre farklılıklar olup olmadığını belirlemek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. 1.2.3. ve 4. sınıfta okuyan toplam 226 öğrenci örneklem olarak seçilmiştir. Örneklemin yarısı kırsal kesim kökenli öğrencilerden, yarısı da kentsel kesim kökenli öğrencilerden oluşmuştur. Seçilen öğrencilerin coğrafya dersi hakkındaki düşüncelerini ölçmek amacıyla 20 maddelik likert tipi bir tutum ölçeği geliştirilmiş ve öğrencilere uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler t-testi ile analiz edilmiş ve yorumlanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları kırsal bölge öğrencilerinin coğrafya dersini daha fazla sevdiklerini ortaya çıkarmıştır.

References

  • 1. Büyükkaragöz, S. & Çivi, C. (1997). Genel Öğretim Metotları. İst.: Öz Eğitim Yay.
  • 2. Fraser, B., Welch W. & Welberg, H. (1986). Using secondary analysis of national assessment data to identify predictors of junior high school students' outcome. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 32 (1), 37-50.
  • 3. Hynd, C., Holschuh, J. & Nist, S. (2000). Learning complex scientific information: Motivation theory and its relation to student perceptions. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 16: 23–57.
  • 4. Jervis, R. (1984). The Acquisition of Some Geographical Concepts by Schoolchildren. Unpublished PhD Thesis: Manchester University.
  • 5. Matthews, M.H. (1984). Cognitive mapping abilities of young girls and boys. Geography, 69, 327-336.
  • 6. Greenwald, A. G. (1989). Why Attitudes are Important: Defining Attitude and Attitude Theory 20 Years Later. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, and A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude Structure and Function (pp. 429-440). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 7. Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS İle Veri Analizi. Ankara: Nobel.
  • 8. Baysal, A.C. & Tekarslan, E. (1996). Davranış Bilimleri. İst.: Avcıol Basım- Yayın.
  • 9. Fraser, B.J. (1981). Deterioration in high school students' attitudes toward social studies. The social studies, Mar/Apr, 65-68.
  • 10. Print, M. (1990). Curriculum Review of Social Studies and Social Sciences Education: An Inquiry Into the Social Studies and Social Sciences Curricula K-12 in Western Australia. Perth: Ministry of Education.
  • 11. Betres, J.J. (1983). The Status of Elementary Social Studies Education in Selected Rhode Island public schools. ERIC Document, 236097.
  • 12. Colley, A. & Comber, C. (2003). School subject preferences: Age and gender differences revisited. Educational Studies, 29 (1), 59-67.
  • 13. Adey, K. & Biddulph, M. (2001). The influence of pupil perceptions on subject choice at 14+ in geography and history. Educational Studies, 27 (4), 439-450.
  • 14. Doğanay, H. & Zaman, M. (2002). Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Coğrafya Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı’na yönelik öğrenci tercihlerinin on yıllık seyri (1992-2002Devresi). Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 7 (7), 37-45.
  • 15. Demirkaya, H. & Arıbaş, K. (2004). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmenliği üçüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin coğrafya dersine yönelik tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12, 179-187.
  • 16. Francek, M.A. et all., (1993). The persistence of selected geographic misconceptions: A study of junior high through undergraduate college students. Journal of Geography, 93, 247-253.
  • 17. Gerber, R.V. (2001). Attitudes to geography in Australia. Australian Geographer, 32 (2), 221–239.
  • 18. Lannes, D. et all., (2002). Brazilian schools: comparing students’ interests with what is being taught. Educational Research, 44 (2) 157–179.
  • 19. Lightbody, P. et all., (1996). Motivation and attribution at secondary school: The role of gender. Educational Studies, 22, 13–25.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Mustafa Cin This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2008
Published in Issue Year 2008 Volume: 16 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Cin, M. (2008). SINIF ÖĞRETMENİ ADAYLARININ YAŞADIKLARI YERE GÖRE COĞRAFYA DERSİNE KARŞI TUTUMLARINDAKİ FARKLILIKLAR. Kastamonu Education Journal, 16(1), 185-190.

10037