PRESERVICE SECONDARY MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF TURKISH AND AMERICAN HIGH SCHOOL GEOMETRY TEXTBOOK

Year 2006, Volume: 14 Issue: 2, 509 - 516, 01.10.2006

Hasan Ünal

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the preservice mathematics teachers’ comparative analyses of Turkish and American geometry textbook. This study explores issues emerging from a teacher education activity from a course called “Textbook Analyses in Mathematics Education” in which preservice mathematics teachers were invited to analyze selected sections of different mathematics instructional materials i.e. US textbook, Turkish textbook . Findings of study showed that comparative analyses open up new windows into teaching and learning mathematics for preservice teachers. Textbook writers should consider the international curriculum materials

Keywords

Textbook Analyses in Mathematics Education, Comparative analyses of geometry textbook

LİSE MATEMATİK ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ TÜRK VE AMERİKAN LİSE GEOMETRİ KİTAPLARINI KARŞILAŞTIRMALI OLARAK ANALİZİ

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, lise matematik öğretmen adaylarının Türk ve Amerikan geometri kitaplarının karşılaştırmalı analizi hakkındadır. Bu çalışma “Konu Alanı Ders Kitabı İncelemesi” dersinde yapılan aktiviteden Türk ve Amerikan kitaplarının karşılaştırmalı analizi ortaya çıkan analiz sonuçlarını incelemektedir. Bu çalışma göstermiştir ki karşılaştırmalı analiz öğretmen adayları için matematik öğreniminde ve öğretiminde yeni bakış açıları oluşturmuştur. Matematik kitaplarının yazarları da uluslararası kitapları kaynak olarak göz önünde bulundurmalıdırlar.

Keywords

Konu Alanı Ders Kitabı İncelemesi, Geometri kitaplarının karşılaştırmalı analizi

References

• 1. Pepin, B. Haggarty, L.& Keynes M. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: a way to understand teaching and learning cultures. Zentralblatt fuer Didaktik der Mathematik, 33(5), 158-175.
• 2. Fujita, T. and Jones, K. (2003). Interpretations of National Curricula: the case of geometry in Japan and the UK. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference
• 3. Kauffman D. (2002) A Search for Support: Beginning Elementary Teachers' Use of Mathematics Curriculum Materials. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA , Heriot-Watt University
• 4. Stigler, J.W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom.
• 5. Ball, D. L. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers’ guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18, 401–423. New York, NY: Free Press.
• 6. Ball, D. L. (1996). Teacher eacher learning and the mathematics reforms. eforms. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 500–508.
• 7. Ball, D. L. & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be— the role ole of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform. Educational Researcher, 25, 6–8, 14.
• 8. Lloyd, G. M., & Behm, S. L. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers' analysis of mathematics instructional materials. Action in Teacher Education, 26(4). 48-62
• 9. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), p. 3-14 10. Remillard, J.T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29 11. Remillard, J.T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331-350. (3), 315-342. 12. Reys, B., Reys, R., & Chávez, O. (2004) Why mathematics textbooks matter. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 61–66. 13. Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German Classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567-590