Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Common Knowledge Construction Model Applications: Investigating the Effects on Academic Achievement and Retention

Year 2025, Volume: 33 Issue: 3, 585 - 601, 25.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1750183

Abstract

This research investigates the effects of the Common Knowledge Construction Model (CKCM) applied to the 6th-grade "matter and heat" unit of the Science Curriculum on students' academic achievements retention. The study employed "pre-test post-test non-equivalent control group design" was adopted. The research was conducted during the 2018-2019 academic year and lasted for 9 weeks, involving a total of 72 students from a middle school located in a province in the Aegean region in Turkey. Data collection instrument was developed by the researchers. Matter and Heat academic achievement test was applied to the groups as pre-test, post-test and retention test. From the results it was determined that lessons taught according to CKCM were more effective in improving students' academic achievements and retentions compared to the instructional practices included in the Science Curriculum.

References

  • Akgun, A., Duruk, U. and Gülmez-Güngörmez, H. (2016). Views of sixth grade students on the common knowledge construction model, Amasya University Journal of Education Faculty, 5(1), 184-203.
  • Atater, M. (2019). The effect of common knowledge structuring model on the academic achievement and attitudes of middle school 4th grade students in the unit of the structure and properties of matter in science course, Master Thesis, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Institute of Educational Sciences, Muğla.
  • Bakırcı, H. and Çepni, S. (2012). A new model for science and technology teaching: Common knowledge construction model, X. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Niğde University, Niğde.
  • Bakırcı, H. and Çepni, S. (2014). Examination of the common knowledge construction model on the basis of the science curriculum, Journal of Science Education, 2(2), 83-94.
  • Bakırcı, H., Çepni, S., and Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2015). Science teachers' opinions about the common knowledge construction model, Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education Faculty, 12(1), 97-127.
  • Bakırcı, H. and Ensari, Ö. (2018). The effect of the common knowledge construction model on the academic achievement and conceptual understanding of high school students about heat and temperature, Education and Science, 43, 196.
  • Bayar, M. F. (2019). The effect of common knowledge construction model on science process skills and academic achievement of secondary school students on solar system and eclipse, Online Science Education Journal, 4(1), 4-19.
  • Benli-Ozdemir, E. (2014). Examining the effects of common knowledge construction model in science teaching on cognitive and affective learning of primary school students, PhD Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  • Biernacka, B. (2006). Developing scientific literacy of grade five students: A teacher researcher collaborative effort, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Manitoba, Canada.
  • Bowden, J. A. (1994). The nature of phenomenoraphic research, Phenomenographic Research: Variations in a method, Eds.: J. A. Bowden & E. Walsh, The Warburton Symposium, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, 1-16.
  • Bozkurt, O., Ay, Y. & Fansa, M. (2013). The effects of inquiry-based learning on students‟ science achievement and on their attitudes towards science and students‟ opinions about the implementation of the method in the teaching process. Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Education Journal, 13(2), 241–256.
  • Büyüköztürk, S. (2004). Data analysis handbook (20th Edition), Pegem A Publishing, Ankara.
  • Büyüköztürk, S. (2010). Data analysis handbook for social sciences, Pegem A Akademi, Ankara.
  • Caymaz, B. (2018). Investigation of the effect of common knowledge structuring model in teaching 7th grade electrical energy unit in schools with different socio-economic levels, PhD Thesis, Kastamonu University Institute of Science and Technology, Kastamonu.
  • Caymaz, B., & Aydin, A. (2021). The effect of common knowledge construction model-based instruction on 7th grade students’ academic achievement and their views about the nature of science in the electrical energy unit at schools of different socio-economic levels. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 233-265.
  • Cresswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.), Sage Journals, Thousand Oaks, California.
  • Çalık, M. and Cobern, W. W. (2017). A cross-cultural study of CKCM efficacy in an undergraduate chemistry classroom, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 691-709.
  • Demirel, O.E. (2014). Effects of problem based learning and argumentation based learning on the chemistry achievement mixtures unit, their science process skills and science reasoning aptitudes. Master’s Thesis, Mustafa Kemal University Social Sciences Institute, Hatay.
  • Demirel, O. E. (2022). Examination of the common knowledge construction model applications for the 6th grade “matter and heat” unit in terms of various variables. Ph. D. Dissertation. Uşak University Graduate Educatıon Instıtute, Uşak.
  • Demirel, O, E. (2024a). Understanding the Nature of Critical Thinking and Academic Achievement: An Analysis within the Scope of Science Education, Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Research, 8(17), 75-86, DOI: 10.57135/jier. 1447227
  • Demirel, O.E. (2024b). The effect of scientific reasoning skills of male and female students in 7th grade science course on life-based success. Bay, E. and Ozturk, G. (Eds.). International Research and Evaluations in Science Education (pp. 35-52). Ankara Seruven Publications.
  • Demirel, O. E. & Türkmen, L. (2023). Student opinions on the use of common knowledge construction model (CKCM) in science and technology lessons. Anatolian Turkish Journal of Education 5 (1), 29-53.
  • Duschl, R. A. and Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education, Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
  • Ebel, R. L. (1965). Measuring educational achievement, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
  • Ebenezer, J.V. and Connor, S. (1999). Learning to teach science: A model for the 21st century, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  • Ebenezer, J.V. and Fraser, D. M. (2001). First year chemical engineering students' conceptions of energy in solution processes: Phenomenographic categories for common knowledge construction, Science Education, 85(5), 509–535.
  • Ebenezer, J.V. and Puvirajah, A. (2005). WebCT dialogues on particle theory of matter: Presumptive reasoning schemes, Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(6), 561–589.
  • Ebenezer, J.V., Chacko, S., Kaya, O. N., Koya, S. K. and Ebenezer, D. L. (2010). The effects of common knowledge construction model sequence of lessons on science achievement and relational conceptual change, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 25–46.
  • Ertugrul, N. (2015). The effect of common knowledge structuring model on learning products in science teaching, Master Thesis, Kırıkkale University, Institute of Science and Technology, Kırıkkale.
  • Iyibil, U. (2011). A new approach for teaching 'energy' concept: The common knowledge construction model, Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences (WAJES), Dokuz Eylül University Institute, Turkey. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12397/5147
  • Karabal, M. (2018). The effect of the Common Knowledge Construction Model on the decision-making and problem-solving tendencies of prospective teachers in the teaching of socioscientific issues, Pamukkale University Institute of Educational Sciences, Denizli.
  • Karasar, N. (2010). Scientific research method, 21st Edition, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  • Kaya, Z. (2014). The effect of blended learning on the development of pre-service science teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge and classroom teaching skills on global warming, Ph.D. Thesis, Fırat University Institute of Educational Sciences, Elazig.
  • Kolsto, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., Mestad, I., Quale, A., Tonning, A. S. V. and Ulvik, M. (2006) . Science students' critical examination of scientific information related to SSI, Science Education, 90, 632-655.
  • Ministry of National Education (MEB). (2018). Science curriculum (primary and secondary school 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades), Board of Education and Discipline, Ankara.
  • Pedretti, E. (1999). Decision making and STS education: Exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issue-based approach, School Science and Mathematics, 99(4), 174-181.
  • Prosser, M. and Trigwell, K. (1997). Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 25-35.
  • Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: a critical review of research, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 513-536.
  • Tekin, H. (2000). Assessment and evaluation in education (14th Edition), Judicial Publishing House, Ankara.
  • Topçu, M. S. (2015). Socioscientific issues and teaching, Pegem Academy, Ankara.
  • Toptaş, V. (2016). Opinions of prospective classroom teachers on the use of interactive whiteboards, Kırıkkale University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 117-130.
  • Tumay, H. (2008). Argumentation-oriented chemistry teaching, PhD Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  • Tuysuz, C. & Demirel, O. E. (2020). Probleme ve argümantasyona dayalı öğrenme yöntemlerinin “karışımlar” konusundaki etkilerinin incelenmesi. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Institute of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 43-61.
  • Tuysuz, C., Demirel, O. E., & Yildirim, B. (2013). Investigating the effects of argumentation, problem and laboratory based instruction approaches on pre-service teachers’ achievement concerning the concept of “acid and base”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1376-1381.
  • Tuysuz, C., Yildirim, B. ve Demirel, O., E. (2014). The Effects of Argumentation, Problem and Laboratory Based Learning Methods in Chemistry Lectures on Pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Scientific Process and Critical Thinking Skills, Pensee Journal, 76(3), Part no: 2, 401-408.
  • Vygotsky, L. (1987). The collected works of Vygotsky: Problems of general psychology, including the volume thinking and speech, Eds: R. W. Rieber and A. S. Carton, Plenum Press, New York.
  • Walker, A. K. and Zeidler, L. D. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry, International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387-1410.
  • Weinfurt, K. P. (1995). Multivariate Analysis of Variance, Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics, Eds.: L. G. Grimm and P. R. Yarnold, American Psychological Association, Washington D.C., US, 245-276.
  • Wood, L. C. (2012). Conceptual change and science achievement related to a lesson sequence on acids and bases among African American alternative high school students: A teacher's practical arguments and the voice of the “other”, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Wayne State University, Michigan.
  • Wood, L. C., Ebenezer, J. and Boone, R. (2013). Effects of an intellectually caring model on urban African American alternative high school students' conceptual change and achievement in chemistry, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 390-407.
  • Yıldızbaş, H. (2017). The effect of teaching based on common knowledge construction model on students' academic achievement and critical thinking skills, Master Thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Konya.

Ortak Bilgi İnşa Modeli Uygulamaları: Akademik Başarı ve Kalıcılık Üzerindeki Etkilerin İncelenmesi

Year 2025, Volume: 33 Issue: 3, 585 - 601, 25.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1750183

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, 6. sınıf fen bilimleri dersi "madde ve ısı" ünitesine yönelik uygulanan Ortak Bilgi İnşa Modeli'nin (OBİM) öğrencilerin akademik başarıları ve bilgilerinin kalıcılığı üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiştir. Çalışmada "ön test son test eşitlenmemiş kontrol gruplu araştırma deseni kullanılmıştır. Araştırma 2018-2019 eğitim öğretim yılında yürütülmüş ve 9 hafta sürmüş olup çalışmaya Türkiye'nin Ege Bölgesi'ndeki bir ilde bulunan bir ortaokuldan toplam 72 öğrenci katılmıştır. Veri toplama aracı araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilmiştir. Madde ve Isı akademik başarı testi gruplara ön test, son test ve kalıcılık testi olarak uygulanmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlardan, OBİM’e göre işlenen derslerin, Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı'nda yer alan öğretim uygulamalarına kıyasla öğrencilerin akademik başarılarını ve bilgilerinin kalıcılıklarını arttırmada daha etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir.

References

  • Akgun, A., Duruk, U. and Gülmez-Güngörmez, H. (2016). Views of sixth grade students on the common knowledge construction model, Amasya University Journal of Education Faculty, 5(1), 184-203.
  • Atater, M. (2019). The effect of common knowledge structuring model on the academic achievement and attitudes of middle school 4th grade students in the unit of the structure and properties of matter in science course, Master Thesis, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Institute of Educational Sciences, Muğla.
  • Bakırcı, H. and Çepni, S. (2012). A new model for science and technology teaching: Common knowledge construction model, X. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Niğde University, Niğde.
  • Bakırcı, H. and Çepni, S. (2014). Examination of the common knowledge construction model on the basis of the science curriculum, Journal of Science Education, 2(2), 83-94.
  • Bakırcı, H., Çepni, S., and Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2015). Science teachers' opinions about the common knowledge construction model, Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education Faculty, 12(1), 97-127.
  • Bakırcı, H. and Ensari, Ö. (2018). The effect of the common knowledge construction model on the academic achievement and conceptual understanding of high school students about heat and temperature, Education and Science, 43, 196.
  • Bayar, M. F. (2019). The effect of common knowledge construction model on science process skills and academic achievement of secondary school students on solar system and eclipse, Online Science Education Journal, 4(1), 4-19.
  • Benli-Ozdemir, E. (2014). Examining the effects of common knowledge construction model in science teaching on cognitive and affective learning of primary school students, PhD Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  • Biernacka, B. (2006). Developing scientific literacy of grade five students: A teacher researcher collaborative effort, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Manitoba, Canada.
  • Bowden, J. A. (1994). The nature of phenomenoraphic research, Phenomenographic Research: Variations in a method, Eds.: J. A. Bowden & E. Walsh, The Warburton Symposium, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, 1-16.
  • Bozkurt, O., Ay, Y. & Fansa, M. (2013). The effects of inquiry-based learning on students‟ science achievement and on their attitudes towards science and students‟ opinions about the implementation of the method in the teaching process. Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Education Journal, 13(2), 241–256.
  • Büyüköztürk, S. (2004). Data analysis handbook (20th Edition), Pegem A Publishing, Ankara.
  • Büyüköztürk, S. (2010). Data analysis handbook for social sciences, Pegem A Akademi, Ankara.
  • Caymaz, B. (2018). Investigation of the effect of common knowledge structuring model in teaching 7th grade electrical energy unit in schools with different socio-economic levels, PhD Thesis, Kastamonu University Institute of Science and Technology, Kastamonu.
  • Caymaz, B., & Aydin, A. (2021). The effect of common knowledge construction model-based instruction on 7th grade students’ academic achievement and their views about the nature of science in the electrical energy unit at schools of different socio-economic levels. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 233-265.
  • Cresswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.), Sage Journals, Thousand Oaks, California.
  • Çalık, M. and Cobern, W. W. (2017). A cross-cultural study of CKCM efficacy in an undergraduate chemistry classroom, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 691-709.
  • Demirel, O.E. (2014). Effects of problem based learning and argumentation based learning on the chemistry achievement mixtures unit, their science process skills and science reasoning aptitudes. Master’s Thesis, Mustafa Kemal University Social Sciences Institute, Hatay.
  • Demirel, O. E. (2022). Examination of the common knowledge construction model applications for the 6th grade “matter and heat” unit in terms of various variables. Ph. D. Dissertation. Uşak University Graduate Educatıon Instıtute, Uşak.
  • Demirel, O, E. (2024a). Understanding the Nature of Critical Thinking and Academic Achievement: An Analysis within the Scope of Science Education, Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Research, 8(17), 75-86, DOI: 10.57135/jier. 1447227
  • Demirel, O.E. (2024b). The effect of scientific reasoning skills of male and female students in 7th grade science course on life-based success. Bay, E. and Ozturk, G. (Eds.). International Research and Evaluations in Science Education (pp. 35-52). Ankara Seruven Publications.
  • Demirel, O. E. & Türkmen, L. (2023). Student opinions on the use of common knowledge construction model (CKCM) in science and technology lessons. Anatolian Turkish Journal of Education 5 (1), 29-53.
  • Duschl, R. A. and Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education, Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
  • Ebel, R. L. (1965). Measuring educational achievement, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
  • Ebenezer, J.V. and Connor, S. (1999). Learning to teach science: A model for the 21st century, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  • Ebenezer, J.V. and Fraser, D. M. (2001). First year chemical engineering students' conceptions of energy in solution processes: Phenomenographic categories for common knowledge construction, Science Education, 85(5), 509–535.
  • Ebenezer, J.V. and Puvirajah, A. (2005). WebCT dialogues on particle theory of matter: Presumptive reasoning schemes, Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(6), 561–589.
  • Ebenezer, J.V., Chacko, S., Kaya, O. N., Koya, S. K. and Ebenezer, D. L. (2010). The effects of common knowledge construction model sequence of lessons on science achievement and relational conceptual change, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 25–46.
  • Ertugrul, N. (2015). The effect of common knowledge structuring model on learning products in science teaching, Master Thesis, Kırıkkale University, Institute of Science and Technology, Kırıkkale.
  • Iyibil, U. (2011). A new approach for teaching 'energy' concept: The common knowledge construction model, Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences (WAJES), Dokuz Eylül University Institute, Turkey. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12397/5147
  • Karabal, M. (2018). The effect of the Common Knowledge Construction Model on the decision-making and problem-solving tendencies of prospective teachers in the teaching of socioscientific issues, Pamukkale University Institute of Educational Sciences, Denizli.
  • Karasar, N. (2010). Scientific research method, 21st Edition, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  • Kaya, Z. (2014). The effect of blended learning on the development of pre-service science teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge and classroom teaching skills on global warming, Ph.D. Thesis, Fırat University Institute of Educational Sciences, Elazig.
  • Kolsto, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., Mestad, I., Quale, A., Tonning, A. S. V. and Ulvik, M. (2006) . Science students' critical examination of scientific information related to SSI, Science Education, 90, 632-655.
  • Ministry of National Education (MEB). (2018). Science curriculum (primary and secondary school 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades), Board of Education and Discipline, Ankara.
  • Pedretti, E. (1999). Decision making and STS education: Exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issue-based approach, School Science and Mathematics, 99(4), 174-181.
  • Prosser, M. and Trigwell, K. (1997). Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 25-35.
  • Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: a critical review of research, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 513-536.
  • Tekin, H. (2000). Assessment and evaluation in education (14th Edition), Judicial Publishing House, Ankara.
  • Topçu, M. S. (2015). Socioscientific issues and teaching, Pegem Academy, Ankara.
  • Toptaş, V. (2016). Opinions of prospective classroom teachers on the use of interactive whiteboards, Kırıkkale University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 117-130.
  • Tumay, H. (2008). Argumentation-oriented chemistry teaching, PhD Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  • Tuysuz, C. & Demirel, O. E. (2020). Probleme ve argümantasyona dayalı öğrenme yöntemlerinin “karışımlar” konusundaki etkilerinin incelenmesi. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Institute of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 43-61.
  • Tuysuz, C., Demirel, O. E., & Yildirim, B. (2013). Investigating the effects of argumentation, problem and laboratory based instruction approaches on pre-service teachers’ achievement concerning the concept of “acid and base”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1376-1381.
  • Tuysuz, C., Yildirim, B. ve Demirel, O., E. (2014). The Effects of Argumentation, Problem and Laboratory Based Learning Methods in Chemistry Lectures on Pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Scientific Process and Critical Thinking Skills, Pensee Journal, 76(3), Part no: 2, 401-408.
  • Vygotsky, L. (1987). The collected works of Vygotsky: Problems of general psychology, including the volume thinking and speech, Eds: R. W. Rieber and A. S. Carton, Plenum Press, New York.
  • Walker, A. K. and Zeidler, L. D. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry, International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387-1410.
  • Weinfurt, K. P. (1995). Multivariate Analysis of Variance, Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics, Eds.: L. G. Grimm and P. R. Yarnold, American Psychological Association, Washington D.C., US, 245-276.
  • Wood, L. C. (2012). Conceptual change and science achievement related to a lesson sequence on acids and bases among African American alternative high school students: A teacher's practical arguments and the voice of the “other”, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Wayne State University, Michigan.
  • Wood, L. C., Ebenezer, J. and Boone, R. (2013). Effects of an intellectually caring model on urban African American alternative high school students' conceptual change and achievement in chemistry, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 390-407.
  • Yıldızbaş, H. (2017). The effect of teaching based on common knowledge construction model on students' academic achievement and critical thinking skills, Master Thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Konya.
There are 51 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Science Education
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ozan Emre Demirel 0000-0003-4594-055X

Lütfullah Türkmen 0000-0002-6022-0633

Publication Date July 25, 2025
Submission Date June 5, 2024
Acceptance Date July 25, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 33 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Demirel, O. E., & Türkmen, L. (2025). Common Knowledge Construction Model Applications: Investigating the Effects on Academic Achievement and Retention. Kastamonu Education Journal, 33(3), 585-601. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1750183