Eko-Endüstriyel Parkların Sürdürülebilir İnsani Kalkınma Hedefleri Kapsamında Mimari Açıdan Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışma, sürdürülebilir insani kalkınma hedefleri kapsamında eko-endüstriyel parkların mimari bir değerlendirmesini yapmaktadır. Eko-endüstriyel parklar, endüstriyel faaliyetlerin çevresel etkilerinin azaltılmasında kritik öneme sahip alanlardır. Bu parklar, endüstriyel kirliliğin ve sera gazı emisyonlarının azaltılması için yenilikçi ve etkili çözümler sunmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda çalışma, eko-endüstriyel parkların performansını enerji verimliliği, malzeme kullanımı, su yönetimi, atık yönetimi, iç mekan kalitesi, peyzaj-yeşil alanlar, sosyal katılım ve ekonomik sürdürülebilirlik gibi kriterlere göre değerlendirmektedir. Araştırmanın örnek yapıları, dünyada eko-endüstriyel parklar alanında öncü olan Kokkola Eko-Endüstriyel Parkı, Kalundborg Eko-Endüstriyel Parkı, The Ecofactorij, Tianjin Ekonomik Kalkınma Bölgesi, Eco3 Endüstri Parkı ve Daedeok Teknovalley Parkı'dır. Çalışmanın bulguları, eko-endüstriyel parkların tasarımında sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedefleri kapsamında mimari kriterlerin dikkate alınmasının daha verimli sonuçlar doğurduğunu göstermektedir. Öncü eko-endüstriyel parklar birçok açıdan olumlu özelliklere sahip olsa da iç mekan kalitesi, ulaşım, erişilebilirlik ve yenilikçi tasarım açısından yetersiz kalmaktadır. Öte yandan malzeme seçimi, su ve atık yönetimi parkların en başarılı olduğu kriterlerdir. Araştırma bulgularına göre en yüksek puanları alan parklar Kalundborg ve TEDA olurken, en düşük puanları alan parklar Ecofactorij ve Kokkola olmuştur. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma, mevcut parkların iyileştirilmesi ve yeni tasarımların şekillendirilmesi konusunda mimarlara, şehir planlamacılarına ve politikacılara rehberlik etmektedir. Gelecekte, eko-endüstriyel parkların tasarımı ve planlaması konusunda farklı disiplinlerin bakış açılarıyla daha kapsamlı çalışmalar yapılabilir.

Keywords

• Eko-Endüstriyel Park
• Sürdürülebilir Gelişme
• Düşük Karbon Bölgesi
• Yeşil Endüstri Alanı
• Sürdürülebilir İnsani Kalkınma Hedefleri
• Mimari Değerlendirme

Architectural Evaluation of Eco-Industrial Parks within the Scope of Sustainable Human Development Goals

Abstract

This study makes an architectural evaluation of eco-industrial parks within the scope of sustainable human development goals. Eco-industrial parks are areas of critical importance in reducing the environmental impacts of industrial activities. These parks offer innovative and effective solutions to reduce industrial pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. In this direction, the study evaluates the performance of eco-industrial parks according to criteria such as energy efficiency, material use, water management, waste management, indoor quality, landscape-green areas, social participation and economic sustainability. The sample structures of the research are Kokkola Eco-Industrial Park, Kalundborg Eco-Industrial Park, The Ecofactorij, Tianjin Economic Development Zone, Eco3 Industrial Park and Daedeok Technovalley Park, which are pioneers in the field of eco-industrial parks in the world. The findings of the study show that taking architectural criteria into consideration within the scope of sustainable development goals in the design of eco-industrial parks leads to more efficient results. Although pioneering eco-industrial parks have positive features in many aspects, they are inadequate in terms of interior quality, transportation, accessibility and innovative design. On the other hand, material selection, water and waste management are the criteria in which parks are most successful. According to the research findings, the parks with the highest scores were Kalundborg and TEDA, while the parks with the lowest scores were Ecofactorij and Kokkola. As a result, this study provides guidance to architects, urban planners and politicians on improving existing parks and shaping new designs. In the future, more comprehensive studies can be conducted on the design and planning of eco-industrial parks from the perspectives of different disciplines.

Keywords

• Eco-industrial Park
• Sustainable Development
• Low Carbon Zone
• Green Industrial Areas
• Sustainable Human Development Goals
• Architecture Review

References

1. Abu-Qdais, H. A., & Kurbatova, A. I. (2022). The role of eco-industrial parks in promoting circular economy in Russia: A life cycle approach. Sustainability, 14(7), 3893. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073893
2. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future-call for action. Environmental Conservation, 14(4), 291-294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900016805
3. De Sousa Silva, C., Lackóová, L., & Panagopoulos, T. (2017). Applying sustainability techniques in eco-industrial parks. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 210, 135-145. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP160121
4. Edwards, B. (2007). Sürdürülebilirlik kültürü ve mimari tasarımın önündeki güçler. Ekolojik Mimarlık ve Planlama Ulusal Sempozyumu (pp. 22-34). Antalya.
5. Eilering, J. A., & Vermeulen, W. J. (2004). Eco-industrial parks: Toward industrial symbiosis and utility sharing in practice. Progress in Industrial Ecology, an International Journal, 1(1-3), 245-270. https://doi.org/10.1504/PIE.2004.004681
6. Hein, A. M., Jankovic, M., Farel, R., & Yannou, B. (2015). A conceptual framework for eco-industrial parks. In Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE.
7. Jacobsen, N. B. (2006). Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: a quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(1–2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545411
8. Khaled, O., & Shalaby, M. E. (2021). Intellectual framework for transforming conventional industrial zones into eco-industrial parks. Journal of Urban Research, 42(1), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.21608/jur.2021.73266.1061

9. Lowe, E., & Evans, L. (1995). Industrial ecology and industrial ecosystems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 3(2), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-6526(95)00045-G
10. Maha, E., Hoda, H., & Iman, A.-A. (2021). Carbon dioxide emissions: A dynamic panel analysis of energy-intensive industries in Egypt. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(3), 109. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n3p109
11. Nessim, M., Galal, A., Elariane, S., & Adham, R. (2024). A guiding framework for new eco-industrial park. HBRC Journal, 20(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/16874048.2023.2292865
12. New Boliden (2021). Contributing to a circular economy at Kokkola-Boliden. Retrieved June 19, 2024, from https://www.boliden.com/sustainability/case-studies/ce-kokkola/
13. Nordregio (2016). Industrial symbiosis: a key driver of green growth in Nordic regions? Nordregio Policy Brief, Retrieved June 19, 2024, from https://nordregio.org/publications/industrial-symbiosis-a-key-driver-of-green-growth-in-nordic-regions/
14. Oh, D. S., Kim, K. B., & Jeong, S. Y. (2005). Eco-industrial park design: A Daedeok Technovalley case study. Habitat International, 29(2), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2003.09.006
15. Pellenbarg, P.H. (2002). Sustainable business sites in the Netherlands: A survey of policies and experiences. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45, 59-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560120100196
16. Research Report on the Investment Environment of the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area. (2017). Retrieved June 19, 2024, from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/about-deloitte/us-mfg-tianjin-economic-technological-development-area.pdf
17. Saikku, L. (2006). Eco-industrial parks: A background report for the eco-industrial park project at Rantasalmi. Etelä-Savo: Publications of Regional Council of Etelä-Savo 71.
18. Sev, A. (2009). Sürdürülebilir Mimarlık (1st ed.). İstanbul: Yem Yayınları.
19. Shao, C., Yang, J., Tian, X., Ju, M., & Huang, L. (2013). Integrated environmental risk assessment and whole-process management system in chemical industry parks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(4), 1609-1630. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10041609
20. Shi, H., Chertow, M., & Song, Y. (2010). Developing country experience with eco-industrial parks: A case study of the Tianjin economic-technological development area in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(3), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2009.10.002
21. Stewart, G. (2007). Green buildings & green business parks: Striving for sustainability through design & operations. New Zealand: Environment Bay of Plenty & AQUAS Consultants.
22. Temiz, M., & Sağlık, A. (2021). Sürdürülebilir kentler: Yeşil iş parkları. Türkiye Peyzaj Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.51552/peyad.786432
23. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals (2015). Retrieved June 19, 2024, from https://sdgs.un.org/goals
24. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2024). Eco-industrial parks. Retrieved June 23, 2024, from https://www.unido.org/our-focus-safeguarding-environment-resource-efficient-and-lowcarbon-industrial-production/eco-industrial-parks
25. Waisman, H., Bataille, C., Winkler, H., Jotzo, F., Shukla, P., Colombier, M., Buira, D., Criqui, P., Fischedick, M., & Kainuma, M. (2019). A pathway design framework for national low greenhouse gas emission development strategies. Nature Climate Change, 9, 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0442-8
26. Van Beers, D., Alhilali, S., & Meylan, F. (2017). Implementation handbook for eco-industrial parks. Switzerland: UNIDO.
27. Yim, D.S., Kim, W.D., & Yu, J.H. (2004). The evolutionary process of Daedeok Science Town and international comparison - In the Perspective of innovation cluster. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 7(2), 373-395.