Research Article

Subjective Well-Being as a Measure of Economic Welfare and Its Impact on the Integration and Socialization of Migrants

Volume: 18 Number: 5 September 19, 2025
EN TR

Subjective Well-Being as a Measure of Economic Welfare and Its Impact on the Integration and Socialization of Migrants

Abstract

Subjective Well-Being (SWB) as a measure of economic well-being has a significant impact on the integration and socialization of immigrants. The aim and subject of this study is to determine in what direction and to what extent the subjective well-being of immigrants affects their social hopes, social capital, social harmony and economic expectations. The quantitative data set of the study was obtained from the survey conducted in 2022 with Meskhetian Turks settled in Erzincan, located in the east of Turkey. Quantitative analyzes of the study were conducted using Structural Equation Modeling. The horizontal data set was obtained from surveys conducted with 269 Meskhetian Turks. The findings of the study showed that Meskhetian Turks have high and positive subjective well-being. Likewise, the findings revealed that the high and positive subjective well-being of immigrants also highly and positively affects their social hopes, social capital, social harmony and economic expectations. Considering the causes, consequences and costs of migration, which is a global problem, it has been concluded that ways to solve the problem at its source should be investigated.

Keywords

Erzincan , Migration , Subjective Well-Being , Social Cohesion , Social Capital , Social Hope , Economic Expectation

References

  1. Amit, K. (2010). Determinants of life satisfaction among immigrants from Western countries and from the FSU in Israel. Social Indicators Research, 96, 515-534.
  2. Amit, K., & Riss, I. (2014). The subjective well-being of immigrants: Pre-and post-migration. Social Indicators Research, 119, 247-264.
  3. Anonymous, (2024). Erzincan Governorship, "Group of Ahıska Turks Came to Erzincan". http://erzincan.gov.tr/4-grup-ahiska-turkleri-erzincana-geldi
  4. Arpino, B., & De Valk, H. (2018). Comparing life satisfaction of immigrants and natives across Europe: The role of social contacts. Social indicators research, 137, 1163-1184. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205-017-1629-x
  5. Bailey, T., Eng, W., Frisch, M., & Snyder, C. (2007). Hope and optimism as related to life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(3), 168-175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701409546
  6. Bartram, D. (2011). Economic migration and happiness: Comparing immigrants’ and natives’ happiness gains from income. Social Indicators Research, 103, 57-76.
  7. Bell, S., Alves, S., Silveirinha de Oliveira, E., & Zuin, A. (2010). Migration and land use change in Europe: A review. Living Reviews in landscape research, 4(2). https://www.springer.com/it/livingreviews
  8. Bordens, K., & Abbott, B. (2014). Ebook: Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach. McGraw Hill.
  9. Bottoni, G., & Addeo, F. (2024). The Effect of Social Cohesion on Subjective Individual Quality of Life in European Countries. Social Indicators Research, 1-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03284-6
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. J. G. (Ed.) in, Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (s. 241-258). New York and London: Greenwood Press.
APA
Keleş, Ş. (2025). Subjective Well-Being as a Measure of Economic Welfare and Its Impact on the Integration and Socialization of Migrants. Kent Akademisi, 18(5), 2741-2761. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1663071