Havalimanı Gelişimi ve Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik Dengesi: İstanbul Havalimanı Hakkında Paydaş Görüşlerine Dayalı Nitel Bir Çalışma

Abstract

Bu çalışma, önemli bir küresel havacılık merkezi olan İstanbul Havalimanı'nda havalimanı gelişimi ile çevresel sürdürülebilirlik arasındaki dengeyi incelemektedir. Havalimanı operasyonları, çevre mühendisliği, düzenleyici uyumluluk ve sürdürülebilirlik analizi alanlarında çalışan sekiz uzmandan alınan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ile endüstri raporları ve politika belgelerinden elde edilen nitel veriler kullanılarak, havalimanının sürdürülebilirlik stratejileri kapsamlı bir şekilde değerlendirilmiştir. NVivo kullanılarak eş oluşum haritalama analizi, Python’un TextBlob kütüphanesi ile duygu analizi ve tematik analiz yöntemleri uygulanarak temel endişeler, bağlantılar ve paydaş görüşleri belirlenmiştir. Bulgular, orman tahribatı, biyolojik çeşitlilik kaybı, hava ve gürültü kirliliği ile zayıf düzenleyici uygulamaların önemli sürdürülebilirlik zorlukları olarak öne çıktığını, ancak yenilenebilir enerji entegrasyonu, yapay zeka destekli verimlilik iyileştirmeleri ve atık yönetimi girişimlerinin olumlu ilerleme kaydettiğini göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, ekonomik kısıtlamalar ve politika tutarsızlıkları sürdürülebilirlik önlemlerinin etkinliğini sınırlamaktadır. Çalışmanın özgünlüğü, uzman görüşleri ile belge analizini birleştirerek bulguları çapraz doğrulayan çoklu yöntem yaklaşımında yatmaktadır. Araştırma, daha güçlü politika uygulamaları, paydaş iş birliği ve sürdürülebilir havacılık yakıtı için finansal teşvikler gerekliliğini vurgulayarak, İstanbul Havalimanı'nın küresel havalimanlarından en iyi uygulamaları benimseyerek çevresel performansını artırabileceğini ve stratejik büyüme hedeflerini sürdürülebilir bir şekilde gerçekleştirebileceğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Keywords

• Havalimanı Sürdürülebilirliği
• Çevresel Etki
• Paydaş Görüşleri
• Sürdürülebilir Havacılık
• İstanbul Havalimanı

Balancing Airport Development and Environmental Sustainability: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Perspectives on Istanbul Airport

Abstract

This study examines the balance between airport development and environmental sustainability at Istanbul Airport, a major global aviation hub facing significant ecological challenges. Using qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with eight experts across airport operations, environmental engineering, regulatory compliance, and sustainability analysis, alongside industry reports and policy documents, this research provides a comprehensive assessment of the airport’s sustainability strategies. Thematic analysis, co-occurrence mapping using NVivo, and sentiment analysis via Python’s TextBlob were employed to identify key concerns, interconnections, and stakeholder sentiments. Findings reveal that deforestation, biodiversity loss, air and noise pollution, and weak regulatory enforcement remain critical sustainability challenges, while renewable energy integration, AI-driven efficiency improvements, and waste management initiatives have shown positive progress. However, economic constraints and policy inconsistencies limit the effectiveness of sustainability measures. This study’s novelty lies in its multi-method approach, integrating expert insights with document analysis to cross-validate findings. The research underscores the need for stronger policy enforcement, stakeholder collaboration, and financial incentives for sustainable aviation fuel to achieve long-term sustainability goals. By aligning with best practices from global airports, Istanbul Airport can enhance its environmental performance while maintaining its strategic growth trajectory.

Keywords

• Airport Sustainability
• Environmental Impact
• Stakeholder Perspectives
• Sustainable Aviation
• Istanbul Airport

References

1. AeroTime. (2024). İGA Istanbul Airport unveils 2023 sustainability report – Notes achievements like ACI Level 4 carbon accreditation and Turkey’s first Greenstars sustainability certificate. AeroTime. Retrieved from https://www.aerotime.aero
2. Al Sarrah, M., Ajmal, M. M., & Mertzanis, C. (2021). Identification of sustainability indicators in the civil aviation sector in Dubai: a stakeholders' perspective. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(5), 648-668.
3. Albano, J., Rahn, A., Bachmann, J., & Wende, G. (2024). Life cycle inventories for aviation: Background data, shortcomings, and improvements. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 22, 100813.
4. Ansell, P. J. (2023). Review of sustainable energy carriers for aviation: Benefits, challenges, and future viability. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 141, 100919.
5. Aviation Turkey. (2024). İGA Istanbul Airport 2023 Sustainability Report – Highlights Istanbul Airport’s performance: 25.6% emissions reduction vs 2019, 10.7% energy reduction, 34.66% waste recycling, 35% water from recycling. Aviation Turkey. Retrieved from https://www.aviationturkey.com
6. Baxter, G., Srisaeng, P., & Wild, G. (2018). An assessment of airport sustainability, part 2—energy management at Copenhagen Airport. Resources, 7(2), 32.
7. Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

9. Bridger, R. (2015). Campaigners resist destruction of Istanbul forests and wetlands for airport megaproject. The Ecologist.Retrieved from https://www.theecologist.org
10. Ceken, S. (2025). Sustainability Reporting on Istanbul Airport: Analyzing Risks and Best Practices. In Cases on Security, Safety, and Risk Management. IGI Global.
11. Changi Airport Group. (2022). Sustainability at Changi – Highlights Changi’s focus on emissions, waste, water (extensive NEWater use). Changi Airport Group. Retrieved from https://www.changiairport.com
12. Chaouk, M., Pagliari, R., & Moxon, R. (2020). The impact of national macro-environment exogenous variables on airport efficiency. Journal of Air Transport Management, 82, 101740.
13. Corazza, M. V. (2024). Flying High: Revealing the Sustainability Potential of Women in Aviation. Sustainability, 16(16), 7229.
14. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
15. Deng, S., Zhou, S., Zhang, L., & Zhao, J. (2025). Study on Green Airport Construction and Aviation Pollution Control: A Case Study of Four International Airports. Atmosphere, 16(3), 261.
16. Edie. (2022). Heathrow Airport’s “Nature Positive” plan for climate and biodiversity gain. Edie. Retrieved from https://www.edie.net
17. EIA Report. (2013). Final Environmental Impact Assessment for Istanbul New Airport – Details the project’s environmental footprint: ~80% forest land, 9% wetlands, millions of trees affected. I-SEM. Retrieved from https://www.i-sem.info
18. Future Travel Experience. (2022). Changi Airport solar panel installations targeting 20,000 tCO₂ reduction. Future Travel Experience. Retrieved from https://www.futuretravelexperience.com
19. Gonzalez-Garay, A., Heuberger-Austin, C., Fu, X., Klokkenburg, M., Zhang, D., van der Made, A., & Shah, N. (2022). Unravelling the potential of sustainable aviation fuels to decarbonise the aviation sector. Energy & Environmental Science, 15(8), 3291-3309.
20. Graham, A. (2020). Airport privatisation: A successful journey?. Journal of air transport management, 89, 101930.
21. Greer, F., Rakas, J., & Horvath, A. (2020). Airports and environmental sustainability: A comprehensive review. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 103007.
22. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage publications. Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining.
23. Heathrow Airport. (2022). Heathrow 2.0 Sustainability Strategy – Outlines Heathrow’s use of 100% renewable electricity since 2017. Heathrow Airport. Retrieved from https://www.heathrow.com
24. Heinrich Böll Stiftung (TR.BOELL). (2023). Trees versus Concrete: Deforestation in the North Bosphorus. Retrieved from https://www.tr.boell.org
25. Heinrich Böll Stiftung. (2016). Trees versus Concrete: Deforestation in the North Bosphorus. TR.BOELL. Retrieved from https://www.tr.boell.org
26. I-SEM. (2023). Final Environmental Impact Assessment for Istanbul New Airport. Retrieved from https://www.i-sem.info
27. İGA Havalimanı İşletmesi A.Ş. (n.d.). Istanbul New Airport ESIA Environmental Baseline and Impact Assessment: Chapter 7.5 - Water Resources. Retrieved from https://www.igairport.aero/media/cr3h0gdu/chapter-7_5-water-resources.pdf
28. International Airport Review. (2023). İGA Istanbul Airport on sustainability – Confirms the net-zero by 2050 commitment and 21% carbon reduction by 2022. International Airport Review. Retrieved from https://www.internationalairportreview.com
29. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2019). ICAO environmental report 2019: Chapter on sustainability policies. Retrieved from https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Documents/EnvironmentalReports/2019/ENVReport2019_pg268-274.pdf
30. Khalifa, R., Alherbawi, M., Bicer, Y., & Al-Ansari, T. (2024). Fueling circularity: A thorough review of circular practices in the aviation sector with sustainable fuel solutions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 200223.
31. Lau, J. I. C., Wang, Y. S., Ang, T., Seo, J. C. F., Khadaroo, S. N., Chew, J. J., ... & Sunarso, J. (2024). Emerging technologies, policies and challenges toward implementing sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Biomass and Bioenergy, 186, 107277.
32. Leal Filho, W., Ng, A. W., Sharifi, A., Janová, J., Özuyar, P. G., Hemani, C., ... & Rampasso, I. (2023). Global tourism, climate change and energy sustainability: assessing carbon reduction mitigating measures from the aviation industry. Sustainability science, 18(2), 983-996.
33. Liu, B. (2022). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Springer Nature.
34. Mizrak, F., Polat, L., & Tasar, S. A. (2024). Applying Entropy Weighting and 2-Tuple Linguistic T-Spherical Fuzzy MCDM: A Case Study of Developing a Strategic Sustainability Plan for Istanbul Airport. Sustainability, 16(24), 11104. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411104
35. Nazeer, S., Saleem, H. M. N., & Shafiq, M. (2024). Examining the influence of adoptability, alignment, and agility approaches on the sustainable performance of aviation industry: An empirical investigation of supply chain perspective. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 11(1), 8.
36. Pagliarin, S., & Marks, P. (2025). Airports’ environmental effects and limits to growth: an integrated framework. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1-17.
37. Postorino, M. N., Mantecchini, L., & Paganelli, F. (2019). Improving taxi-out operations at city airports to reduce CO2 emissions. Transport Policy, 80, 167-176.
38. Qiu, R., Hou, S., Chen, X., & Meng, Z. (2021). Green aviation industry sustainable development towards an integrated support system. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2441-2452.
39. Santa, S. L. B., Ribeiro, J. M. P., Mazon, G., Schneider, J., Barcelos, R. L., & de Andrade, J. B. S. O. (2020). A Green Airport model: Proposition based on social and environmental management systems. Sustainable Cities and Society, 59, 102160.
40. Sharno, M. A., & Hiloidhari, M. (2024). Social sustainability of biojet fuel for net zero aviation. Energy for Sustainable Development, 79, 101419.
41. Smart Energy Decisions. (2023). Schiphol Airport’s electrification of ground operations and transition to zero-emission by 2030. Smart Energy Decisions. Retrieved from https://www.smartenergydecisions.com
42. Sulej-Suchomska, A. M., Szumińska, D., de la Guardia, M., Przybyłowski, P., & Polkowska, Ż. (2024). Airport runoff water: State-of-the-art and future perspectives. Sustainability, 16(18), 8176.
43. The Ecologist. (2023). Campaigners resist destruction of Istanbul forests and wetlands for airport megaproject.Retrieved from https://www.theecologist.org
44. Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.
45. Travelwires. (2024). İGA Airport High Marks in Climate Change and Water Security – Reports Istanbul Airport’s CDP scores (A- Climate, B Water), 26% emissions cut from 2019, 30% recycled water use, 35% waste recycled. Travelwires.Retrieved from https://www.travelwires.com
46. Trivedi, S., Negi, S., & Tiwari, S. (2024). Business sustainability in aviation industry in post-COVID era through information technology and triple bottom line perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Aviation, 10(1), 43-59.
47. US Green Building Council / GBCI. (2020). LEED Gold Certification for Istanbul Airport – Recognizes 23% energy savings, 57% water savings in the terminal’s design. US Green Building Council. Retrieved from https://www.usgbc.org
48. Wikipedia. (2023). Istanbul Airport – Environmental impact section citing the April 2013 EIA. Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org
49. Zieba, M., & Johansson, E. (2022). Sustainability reporting in the airline industry: Current literature and future research avenues. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 102, 103133.