Research Article

Alternatives to Solar Power Plant Location Through GIS and AHP: Case of Karaman, Turkey

Volume: 13 Number: 4 December 31, 2020
EN TR

Alternatives to Solar Power Plant Location Through GIS and AHP: Case of Karaman, Turkey

Abstract

In meeting today's increasing energy needs, the use of renewable energy sources becomes widespread comparing with the thermal and nuclear power plants, which cause great harm to nature. While hydroelectric power plants are most common among renewable energy plants in Turkey, national policies towards increasing wind power plants and solar power plants are gaining momentum. Due to its geographical location, Turkey is more advantageous position compared to many other countries in terms of solar energy potential. The region receiving the most solar energy in Turkey is Southeastern Anatolia, followed by the Mediterranean and Eastern Anatolia. It is seen that the solar energy potentials of Antalya, Karaman, Mersin and Van provinces are higher than other provinces of Turkey. With the help of a well-known Turkey map on the solar potential of cities, it is possible to determine the advantageous cities which solar power plants (SPP) can be placed. However, there is a need for a multi-criteria decision-making method regarding where position solar power plants in these cities. With this work; according to the solar radiation values of Turkey, it is aimed to determine the alternatives for the most suitable SPP locations in Karaman Province, which has an important potential for the establishment of a solar power plant. Appropriate locations were determined by a multi-criteria and geographic information systems (GIS) supported method. Eleven criteria with data for the city of Karaman have been identified among the criteria mentioned in the related literature. The scores obtained from these criteria (in grids of 100x100 meters) are classified into five categories. The weighted scores were then standardized to a range of 1-5 with tools to reclassify in GIS environment. Reclassified weighted criteria were overlapped with Weighted Overlay Analysis to determine the most suitable regions for SPP investment.

Keywords

Solar Power Plant , Geographical Information Systems , Overlay Analysis , Multi Criteria Decision Making

References

  1. Akad, M., & Gedizlioğlu, E. (2007). Toplu Taşıma Türü Seçiminde Simülasyon Destekli Analitik Hiyerarşi Yaklaşımı, İTÜ Dergisi.
  2. Akkas, O. P., Erten, M. Y., Cam, E., & Inanc, N. (2017). Optimal Site Selection for a Solar Power Plant in the Central Anatolian Region of Turkey. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2017.
  3. Asakereh, A., Omid, M., Alimardani, R., & Sarmadian, F. (2014). Developing A GIS-Based Fuzzy AHP Model for Selecting Solar Energy Sites in Shodirwan Region in Iran. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 68, 37-48.
  4. Atak, A., Çabuk, S. N., Bakış, R., & Çabuk, A. (2019). Determination of Suitable Sites for Solar Power Plants by Using Weighted Overlay Analysis: Sivrihisar Case.
  5. Ayday. C., Yaman. N., Sabah. L., & Höke. O. (2016). Güneş Enerji Santrali Yer Seçiminde Açık Kaynak Kodlu CBS Kullanımı-Eskişehir Il Örneği, 6. Uzaktan Algılama-CBS Sempozyumu (UZAL-CBS2016), S:510-520, 5-7 Ekim 2016, Adana.
  6. Aydin, N. Y. (2009). GIS-Based Site Selection Approach for Wind and Solar Energy Systems: A Case Study from Western Turkey (MS Thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  7. Aydin, N. Y., Kentel, E., & Duzgun, H. S. (2013). GIS-Based Site Selection Methodology For Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems: A Case Study From Western Turkey. Energy Conversion And Management, 70, 90-106.
  8. Brunner, I. M., Kim, K., & Yamashita, E. (2011). Analytic Hierarchy Process and Geographic Information Systems to Identify Optimal Transit Alignments. Transportation Research Record, 2215(1), 59-66.
  9. Chandio, I. A., Abd Nasir, B. M., WanYusof, K. B., Talpur, M. A. H., Balogun, A. L., & Lawal, D. U. (2013). GIS-Based Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Multicriteria Decision Analysis İnstrument: A Review. Arabian Journal Of Geosciences, 6(8), 3059-3066.
  10. Çanka Kılıç, F. (2015). Güneş Enerjisi, Türkiye’deki Son Durumu ve Üretim Teknolojileri. Mühendis ve Makina, 56(671), 28-40.
APA
Salihoğlu, T., Seyrek, E. C., & Kaymakçıoğlu, M. (2020). Alternatives to Solar Power Plant Location Through GIS and AHP: Case of Karaman, Turkey. Kent Akademisi, 13(4), 651-667. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.746845