Covid-19 Salgınının Kentsel Yaşam Kalitesi Açısından Potansiyel Etkileri Çin Örneği

Abstract

2022 yılına doğru ilerlerken, dünya Covid-19 salgınından hala tam olarak kurtulabilmiş değildir. Bu salgın hastalık hem insanları hem de dünyayı yaşam kalitesi açısından değiştirmiştir. Dünyada çok sayıda ülke ve şehir, pandeminin getirmiş olduğu kısıtlama politikaları nedeniyle adeta “uyku moduna” girmiştir. Pandemi kısıtlamaları Çin’de özellikle ulaşım, ticaret, turizm vb. alanları olumsuz yönden etkileyerek, ülkenin ekonomisine büyük zararlar vermiştir. Ekonominin zarar görmesi ise doğal olarak ülkede yaşayan bütün insanları, nakit para akışını zora sokmuştur. Diğer yandan pandemi, hava kirliliğinden yıllardır yakınan Çin’de mavi gökyüzünün görülmesine olanak sağlayarak, olumlu bir etki yaratmıştır. Havanın yanı sıra toplu yaşam alanlarındaki gürültü ve çevre kirliliği azalmış, sahiller daha temiz duruma gelmiş, kısacası doğa olumlu anlamda kendini yenileme sürecine girmiştir. Sürecin sosyal yaşam adı altında insanlar üzerindeki etkisinde ise kabaca üreten ve tüketen olarak iki tip insan çeşitliliği oluşmuştur. İnsanlar sokağa çıkma kısıtlamalarında evlerine ve ailelerine daha fazla odaklanmış, psikolojik bir tedavi olarak kendilerine yeni uğraşlar bularak üretime geçmişlerdir. Öte yandan bu kısıtlamalar bazı insanların psikolojisini bozarak onları sadece tüketici olmaya itmiştir. Yani bu doğrultuda pandeminin yaşam kalitesi üzerinde hem olumlu hem de olumsuz sonuçları olmuştur demek mümkündür. Bu çalışmanın amacı Covid-19 pandemisinden kaynaklı insan hareketliliği kısıtlamalarının Çin genelinde ekonomik, sosyal yaşam ve çevre üzerindeki etkilerini ele almaktır. Bu amaca uygun şekilde makalede China Academic Journals (CNKI) veri tabanı ve açık kaynaklardan elde edilen bilgiler kullanılarak, Covid-19 pandemisinin Çin’deki olumlu-olumsuz etkileri sosyal bilimler çerçevesi içinde incelenmiştir. Bu doğrultuda Çin’de pandeminin özellikle ekonomiyi genellikle olumsuz yönde, çevreyi genellikle olumlu yönde ve insan yaşamını ise hem olumlu hem de olumsuz yönde etkilediği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Keywords

• Covid-19
• Çin
• Ekonomi
• Sosyal Yaşam
• Çevre.

Potential Effects of the Covid-19 Outbreak: The Case of China

Abstract

As we move towards 2022, our world still has not fully recovered from the Covid-19 epidemic. This epidemic has changed both people and the world in terms of quality of life. Many countries and cities in the world have almost entered "sleep mode" due to the restriction policies brought by the pandemic. Pandemic restrictions have caused great damage to China, especially to the country's economy. On the other hand, the pandemic has had a positive effect by allowing the blue sky to be seen in China, which has been complaining about air pollution for years. In the effect of the process on people under the name of social life, there are two types of human diversity as producing and consuming. People focused more on their homes and families, and they started production by finding new occupations for themselves as a psychological treatment. On the other hand, these restrictions have disrupted the psychology of some people and pushed them to become consumers only. In other words, it is possible to say that the pandemic has had both positive and negative consequences on the quality of life. The aim of this study is to address the effects of human mobility restrictions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic on economy, social life, and environment throughout China. For this purpose, CNKI database and information obtained from open sources were used in the article. In this direction, it has been concluded that the pandemic in China generally affects the economy negatively, the environment generally positively, and human life both positively and negatively.

Keywords

• Covid-19
• China
• Economy
• Social Life
• Environment.

References

1. ABC News. (2020, Mart 14). Coronavirus update: Morrison brings in travel restrictions, Australian cases pass 250, Donald Trump’s COVID-19 test is clear. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-15/coronavirus-update-latest-news-us-travel-ban-extended-trump-test/12057094 Erişim tarihi: 10.09.2021.
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018, Nisan 24). Population density. https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Previousproducts/3218.0Main%20Features702016-17?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=3218.0&issue=2016-17&num=&view= Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2021
3. Bao, R. & Zhang, A. (2020). “Does lockdown reduce air pollution? evidence from 44 cities in northern China.” Science of the Total Environment. 731, 139052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139052
4. Calma, J. (2020, Mart 26). The Covid-19 pandemic is generating tons of medical waste. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/26/21194647/the-covid-19-pandemic-is-generating-tons-of-medical-waste Erişim Tarihi: 11.09.2021
5. Chan, J. W. , Yuan, S., Kok, K.H. & Chu, H. (Ed.). (2020). “A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster.” The Lancet. 395, 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9
6. Chen, N., Masiero, L. & Hsu, C. (2019). “Chinese outbound tourist preferences for all-inclusive group package tours: a latent class choice model.” Journal of Travel Research. 58(6), 916-931. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518794331
7. Copernicus Europe’s Eyas on Earth (CAMS). (2020, Mart 4). Amid Coronavirus outbreak: Copernicus monitors reduction of particulate matter (PM2.5) over China. https://www.copernicus.eu/en/amid-coronavirus-outbreak-copernicus-monitors-reduction-particulate-matter-pm25-over-china Erişim Tarihi: 08.09.2021
8. Cowling, B. & Lim, W. (2020, Mart 13). They’ve contained the coronavirus: here’s how. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/coronavirus-best-response.html Erişim Tarihi: 02.09.2021

9. Dass, M. & McDermott, H. (2020). “Travel & Tourism: Global Potential Impact of the Coronavirus.” Tourism Economics: An Oxford Economics Company. 1-10. https://s3.amazonaws.com/tourism-economics/craft/Latest-Research-Docs/Potential-Impact-of-the-Coronavirus.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 09.09.2021.
10. De Wit, E., van Doremalen, N., Falzarano, D. & Munster, V. J. (2016). “SARS and MERS: recent insights into emerging coranaviruses.” Nature Reviews Microbiology. 14(8), 523-534. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrmicro.2016.81 Erişim Tarihi: 09.09.2021.
11. Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID). (2020, Haziran 4). Phylogeny of SARS-like betacoronaviruses including novel coronavirus (nCoV). https://nextstrain.org/groups/blab/sars-like-cov Erişim tarihi: 09.09.2021.
12. Görün, M. & Kara, M. (2010). “Kentsel Dönüşüm ve Sosyal Girişimcilik Bağlamında Türkiye’de Kentsel Yaşam Kalitesinin Artırılması.” Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi. 8(2), 137-164. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/704543 Erişim Tarihi: 08.10.2021.
13. Guan, W., Ni, Z. & Yu, H. ve diğ. (2020). “2019冠状病毒病中国患者的临床特征(Clinical characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in China).” The New England Journal of Medicine. 382(18), 1708-1720. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032
14. Hanrahan, J.D. & Melly, D. (2019). “Tourist biosecurity awareness and risk mitigation for outdoor recreation: Management implications for Ireland.” European Journal of TourismResearch. 22, 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2020.100313
15. Hofstede, G. (1980). “Culture and organizations.” International Studies of Management & Organization. 10(4), 15-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300
16. Hsu, C. & Huang, S. (2016). “Reconfiguring Chinese cultural values and their tourism implications.” Tourism Management. 54, 230-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.11.011
17. Jin, X. Qu, M. & Bao, J. (2019). “Impact of crisis events on Chinese outbound tourist flow: a framework for post-events growth.” Tourism Management. 74, 334-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.04.011
18. Johnson, K. & Palmer, J. (2020, Şubat 28). Knock-on Effects of China’s Coronavirus May Be Worse Than Thought. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/02/03/knock-on-effects-china-coronavirus-weak-economy-markets/ Erişim Tarihi: 09.09.2021.
19. Kuo, H.-I., Chen, C.-C., Tseng, W.-C., Ju, L.-F. & Huang, B.-W. (2008). “Assessing impacts of SARS and avian flu on international tourism demand to Asia.” Tourism Management. 29(5), 917-928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.10.006
20. Lewis, S. (2020, Nisan 22). Before-and-after photos show dramatic decline in air pollution around the world during coronavirus lockdown. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/coronavirus-photos-decline-air-pollution-lockdown/ Erişim tarihi: 09.09.2021.
21. Li, Q., Guan, X. & Wu, P. ve diğ. (2020). “新型冠状病毒感染肺炎在中国武汉的初期传播动力学(Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia.)” The New England Journal of Medicine. 382(13), 1199- 1207. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001316
22. Lucrezi, S., Saayman,M. & Van der Merwe, P. (2016). “An assessment tool for sandy beaches: a case study for integrating beach description, human dimension, and economic factors to identify priority management issues.” Ocean & Coastal Management 121, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.12.003
23. Ma, G. (2015). “Food, eating behavior, and culture in chinese society.” Journal of Ethnic Foods. 2(4), 195-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jef.2015.11.004
24. Ma, Y. (2020, Kasım 17), Tourism industry in China – Statistics & facts. Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/1210/tourism-industry-in-china/ Erişim Tarihi: 09.09.2021
25. Mao, C., Ding, C. & Lee, H. (2010). “Post-SARS tourist arrival recovery patterns: an analysis based on a catastrophe theory.” Tourism Management. 31(6), 855-861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.09.003
26. Marans, R. (2007). “Kentsel yaşam kalitesi.” Handan Dülger Türkoğlu (çev.). Mimarlık Dergisi. 335. http://www.mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi=53&RecID=1326
27. Marshall, S. & Banister, D. (2007). Land Use and Transport. Elsevier Ltd. Amsterdam: London.
28. Meng, F. (2010). “Individualism/collectivism and group travel behavior: a cross-cultural perspective.” International Journal of Culture. Tourism and Hospitality Research. 4(4), 340-351. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506181011081514
29. Mourad, M. (2016). “Recycling, recovering and preventing “food waste”: competing solutions for food systems sustainability in the United States and France.” Journal of Cleaner Production. 126, 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.084
30. National Health Commission of the Peoples’s Republic of China. (2021, Eylül 10). 截至9月9日24时新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情最新情况 (9 Eylül İtibariyle Yeni tip Korana virüs Salgınının Son Durum Raporu) http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/yqtb/202109/0cad54ae53804c7192daf85cb1bd08a1.shtml Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2021
31. Novelli, M., Burgess, L.G., Jones, A. & Ritchie, B.W. (2018). “No Ebola . . . still doomed’ – the Ebolainduced tourism crisis.” Annals of Tourism Research. 70, 76-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.03.006
32. Page, S., Song, H. & Wu, D.C. (2011). “Assessing the impacts of the global economic crisis and swine flu on inbound tourism demand in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Travel Research. 51(2), 142-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287511400754
33. Peter, S. (2020, Şubat 26). China’s Coronavirus Has Revived Global Economic Fears.The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/27/business/coronavirus-china-economic-impact.html Erişim tarihi: 04.12.2021.
34. Ravlin, E., Liao, Y., Morrell, D., Au, K. & Thomas, D. (2012). “Collectivist orientation and the psychological contract: mediating effects of creditor exchange ideology.” Journal of International Business Studies. 43(8), 772-782. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41674521?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
35. Robinson, L. & Jarvie, J. (2008). “Post-disaster community tourism recovery: the tsunami and arugam Bay, Sri Lanka.” Disasters. 32(4), 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01058.x
36. Singh, R. P. & Chauhan, A. (2020). “Impact of lockdown on air quality in India during COVID-19 pandemic.” Air Quality Atmosphere & Health. 13, 921–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00863-1
37. The Free Dictionary. (2012). https://www.thefreedictionary.com/quality+of+life Erişim Tarihi: 08.12.2021.
38. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2020, Şubat 3). The state council’s announcement on the arrangement of public holidays in 2020. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2019-11/21/content_5454164.htm Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2021
39. Triandis, H. (1995). New Directions in Social Psychology: Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
40. Triandis, H., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M., Asai, M. & Lucca, N. (1988). “Individualism and collectivism: cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 54(2), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323
41. Tyrrell, D.A. & Bynoe, M.L. (1966). “Cultivation of viruses from a high proportion of patients with colds.” The Lancet. 287: 7428, 76–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(66)92364-6
42. UNWTO. (2020). Tourism and coronavirus disease (COVID 19). https://www.unwto.org/international-tourism-and-covid-19 Erişim Tarihi: 09.09.2021.
43. Varotto, A. & Spagnolli, A. (2017). “Psychological strategies to promote household recycling. A systematic review with meta-analysis of validated field interventions.” Journal of Environmental Psychology. 51, 168–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.011
44. World Health Organization (WHO). (2016). Air Pollution. https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_2 Erişim Tarihi: 18.08.2021
45. World Health Organization. (2020, Ocak 5). Pneumonia of unknown cause — China. https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2020-DON229 Erişim Tarihi: 12.09.2021.
46. World Health Organization. (2021). WHO Coronavirus Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/ Erişim tarihi: 09.09.2021.
47. Worldometer. (2020a). China population (live). https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/china-population/ Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2021
48. Worldometer. (2020b). COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2021
49. Wu, M. & Wall, G. (2016). “中国家庭旅游之文献评述与研究启示(Chinese research on family tourism: review and research implications).” Journal of China Tourism Research. 12(3/4), 274-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2016.1276873
50. Xu, H., Yan, C., Fu, Q., Xiao, K. & Cheng, J. (2020) “Possible environmental effects on the spread of COVID-19 in China.” Science of the Total Environment. 731, 139211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139211
51. Ying, T. & Wen, J. (2019). “Exploring the male Chinese tourists’ motivation for commercial sex when travelling overseas: scale construction and validation.” Tourism Management. 70, 479-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.014
52. Zambrano-Monserrate M. A., Ruano, M. A. & Alcalde, L. S. (2020). “Indirect Effects of COVID-19 on the Environment.” Science of the Total Environment. 728, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138813
53. Zambrano-Monserrate, M.A. & Ruano, M.A. (2019). “Does environmental noise affect housing rental prices in developing countries? Evidence from Ecuador.” Land Use Policy 87, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104059
54. Zambrano-Monserrate, M.A., Silva-Zambrano, C.A. & Ruano, M.A. (2018). “The economic value of natural protected areas in Ecuador: a case of Villamil Beach National Recreation Area.” Ocean & Coastal Management 157, 193–202 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.02.020
55. Zhang, Q., Jiang, X., Tong, D., Davis, S.J., Zhao, H., Geng, G. & Ni, R. (2017). “Transboundary health impacts of transported global air pollution and international trade.” Nature 543, 705–709. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21712
56. Zhong, P., Guo, S. & Chen, T. (2020). “Correlation between travellers departing fromWuhan before the spring festival and subsequent spread of COVID-19 to all provinces in China.” Journal of Travel Medicine. 27(3), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa036
57. Zhou, P., Yang, X.L. & Wang, X.G. ve diğ. (2020). “A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.” Nature. 579, 270-273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7