Dinamik Bir Yetenek Olarak Teknoloji Yönetimi: Teknoloji Yönetimi Yeteneği

Abstract

Keywords

• -

Dinamik Bir Yetenek Olarak Teknoloji Yönetimi: Teknoloji Yönetimi Yeteneği

Abstract

Teknoloji Yönetimi, şirketlerin hızla değişen çevresel koşullara ve teknolojik gelişmelere ayak uydurabilmeleri ve hatta bu değişimleri bizzat yaratabilmeleri için başvurdukları bir yönetim disiplinidir. Teknoloji Yönetimi oldukça güncel ve önemli bir yönetim disiplini olmasına karşın, hâlâ Teknoloji Yönetimi disiplininin kapsamı ve sınırları konusunda ortak bir anlayışın oluştuğu söylenemez. Bu çalışmada Teknoloji Yönetimi disiplini, Dinamik Yetenekler teorisi ışığında ele alınmış ve Teknoloji Yönetimi Yeteneği kavramı geliştirilmiştir. Önerilen Teknoloji Yönetimi Yeteneği kavramının, Teknoloji Yönetimi disiplininin kapsam ve sınırları konusunda ortak bir anlayış oluşturma çabalarına katkıda bulunmasının yanı sıra; yeni bilimsel çalışmalar için de önemli bir referans noktası olacağı değerlendirilmektedir

Keywords

• Teknoloji Yönetimi, Stratejik Yönetim, Kaynak Temelli Görüş, Dinamik Yetenekler

References

1. ALLEN, Thomas J. ve SOSA, M. Lourdes. ’’50 Years of Engineering Management Through the Lens of the IEEE Transactions’’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51, 4, 2004, 391-395
2. ANSAL, Hacer; AYGOREN, Hayriye; EKMEKÇİ, Umut. ’’Research Characteristics and Agenda of Technology Management Discipline in Turkey’’, PICMET 2008 Proceedings, 27-31 Temmuz, 2008, 1973- 1984
3. BADAWAY, M. K., “A new paradigm for understanding management technology: A research agenda for ‘technologists’”, International Journal of Technology Management, 1996, 12(5/6), pp. 717-733
4. BALL, Derrick F. ve RIGBY, John. ’’Disseminating research in management of technology: journals and authors’’, R&D Management, 36, 2, 2006, 205-215
5. BEARD, J. W. ’’Management of Technology: A Three-Dimensional Framework with Propositions for Further Research’’, Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 15, 3, 2002, 45-58
6. BRENT, Alan C. ve PRETORIUS, Marthinus W. ’’Sustainable development: A conceptual framework for the technology management field of knowledge and a departure for further research’’, 16th Annual Conference of the International-Association-for- Management-of-Technology, May 2007, pp 623-642
7. CHARANON, J-J. ve GRANGE, T. ’’Towards a Re-definition of Technology Management’’, IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, 2006, 955-959 ÇETİNDAMAR, Dilek; CAN, Özge; PALA, Okan. ’’Technology Management Activities and Tools: The Practice in Turkey’’, PICMET 2006 Proceedings, 9-13 Temmuz, 2006, 92-98
8. ÇETİNDAMAR, Dilek; PHAAL, Robert; PROBERT, David. ’’Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities’’, Technovation, 29, 2009a, 237- 246

9. ÇETİNDAMAR, D.; WASTI, S. N.; ANSAL, H.; BEYHAN, B. ’’Does technology management research diverge or converge in developing and developed countries’’, Technovation, 29, 2009b, 45- 58
10. EDLER, J.; F. MEYER-KRAHMER; REGER, G., “Changes in the strategic management of technology: results of global bencmarking study”, R&D Management, 2002, 32(2):149-65
11. EISENHARDT, Kathleen, M. ve MARTIN, Jeffrey A. ’’Dynamic Capabilities: What are they?’’, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 10- 11, 2000, 1105-1121
12. GREGORY, M. J. ’’Technology management : a process approach’’, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 209, 1995, 347- 356
13. KALAYCI, Orhan. ’’Yöneticiler için Doğru Sorular CMMI’’, Shamrock Process Improvement and Innovation, Toronto, 2007
14. JILIANG, Wang; WEIWEI, Wu; BO, Yu. ’’Technology Management Maturity of Enterprises: An Analysis Based on Four Industries in China’’, PICMET Proceedings, Portland - USA, 5-9 Ağustos 2007, 31- 37
15. KHALIL, T. ve BAYRAKTAR, B.A.. ’’Management of Technology, the Key to Global Competitiveness’’, Proceedings, 2nd International Conference on Management of Technology, Miami, 28 Şubat – 8 Mart, 1990
16. KHAN, Mohsin U. ’’Dynamic techno-management capability of Indian computer firms in comparison with Korea’’, Technovation, 19, 4,
17. MACHER, Jeffrey T. ve MOWERY, David C. ’’Measuring Dynamic Capabilities: Practices and Performance in Semiconductor Manufacturing’’, British Journal of Management, 20, 2009, 41-62
18. MACPHERSON, Allan; JONES, Oswald; ZHANG, Michael. ’’Evolution or revolution? Dynamic capabilities in a knowledge-dependent firm’’, R&D Management, 34, 2, 2004, 161-177
19. MERINO, M. Teresa Garcia; CARMO, M. Liduina Pereira; ALVAREZ, M. Valle Santos. ’’25 years of Technovation: characterisation and evolution of the journal”, Technovation, 26, 2006, 1303-1316
20. JIN, J. ve ZEDTWITZ, M. von. ’’Technological capability development in China’s mobile phone industry’’,Technovation, 28, 2008, 327-334
21. LEVIN, D. Z. ve BARNARD, H. ’’Technology management routines that matter technology managers’’, International Journal of Technology Management, 41,1-2, 2008, 22-37
22. LIAO, Shu-hsien. ’’Technology management methodologies and applications: A literature review form 1995 to 2003’’, Technovation, 25, 2005, 381-393
23. MINER, A. S. ’’Organizational evolution and social ecology of jobs’’, American Socilogical Review, 56, 1991, 772-785
24. PAVITT, K. ’’Innovating routines in the business firm: what corporates task should they be accomplishg?’’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 2002, 117-123
25. PENG, David Xiaosong, SCHROEDER, Roger G., SHAH, Rachna. ’’Linking routines to operation capabilities: A new perspective’’, Journal of Operations Management, 26, 2008, 730-748
26. PHAAL, Robert; FARRUKH, Clare J. P.; PROBERT, David R. ’’Technology management tools: concept, development and application’’, Technovation, 26, 2006, 336-344
27. PILKINGTON, Alan. ’’ Engineering management or management of technology? A bibliometric study of IEEE TEM’’, International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 3, 1, 2008, 63-70
28. PILKINGTON, Alan ve TEICHERT, Thorsten. ’’Management of technology: themes, concepts and relationships’’, Technovation, 26, 2006, 288-299
29. ROBERTS, Edward B. ’’A Perspective 50 Years of Engineering Management Field’’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51, 4, 2004, 398-403
30. RUBENSTEIN, Al H. ’’50 Years of Engineering and Technology Management’’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51, 4,
31. RUSH, H.; BESSANT, J.; HOBDAY, M. ’’Assesing the technological capabilities of firms: developing a policy tool’’, R&D Management, 37, 3, 2007, 221-236
32. SKILBECK, John N. ve CRUICKSHANK, Craig M. ’’A Framework for Evaluating International Conference on Management and Technology, 27-31 Temmuz 1997, 138-142 Management Process’’, Portland
33. TEECE, David. ’’Explicating dynamic capabilities, the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 2007, 1319-1350
34. TEECE, David ve PISANO, Gary. ’’The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 3, 1994, 537- 556
35. TEECE, David; PISANO, Gary; SHUEN, Amy. ’’ Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 7, 1997, 509-553
36. ZOLLO, M. ve WINTER, S. G. ’’Deliberate learning and evolution of dynamic capabilities’’, Organization Science, 13, 2002, 339-351