Risale-i Nur’da İlahî Çevre Değerleri: Bütüncül ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma için Tevhidî Bir Çerçeve

Abstract

Bu makale, Bediüzzaman Said Nursi’nin Risale-i Nur’da ortaya koyduğu çevre felsefesini incelemekte ve onu bütüncül ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma için tutarlı bir “Tevhidî Yeşil Çerçeve” olarak sunmaktadır. Batı çevre düşüncesinde hâkim olan antroposentrik ve ekosentrik paradigmaların ötesine geçen çalışma, Nursi’nin değeri, anlamı ve ahlâkî sorumluluğu insan faydasına ya da doğanın kendi başına özerkliğine değil, ilahî hakikate dayandıran temelde teosentrik bir çerçeve geliştirdiğini ileri sürmektedir. Bu bakış açısında tabiat, nötr bir kaynak değil; değerini İlahi İsimlerin bir tezahürü, kevnî bir metin ve süreklilik arz eden ilahî faaliyetin bir mahalli olmasından alan anlamlı bir varlık alanıdır. Makale, bu ontolojik temelin, “olumlu eylem” merkezli özgün bir çevre etiğini doğurduğunu göstermektedir. Bu çerçevede insan, yeryüzünün aktif ve katılımcı bir biçimde imarından sorumlu, bilinçli bir halife olarak konumlandırılmaktadır. Bu sorumluluk; dünyayı imar etmeyi, kozmik dengeyi korumayı, fesat ve israfı önlemeyi ve yaratılışın düzeni ile temizliğini yöneten ilahî kanunlarla—özellikle Temizlik Kanunu ile—uyumlu bir hayat sürmeyi kapsamaktadır. Böylece çevresel sorumluluk, yalnızca araçsal ya da düzenleyici bir mesele olmaktan çıkıp ibadetin, ahlâkî hesap verebilirliğin ve ilahî bir emanetle bağlılığın bir tezahürü hâline gelmektedir. Çalışma, çağdaş sürdürülebilirlik tartışmalarıyla ilişki kurarak, Nursi’nin tevhidî yaklaşımının Birleşmiş Milletler Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları için derin bir metafizik ve etik zemin sunduğunu savunmaktadır. Bu amaçlar, salt teknik veya politika odaklı bir gündem olarak değil, insanlığın büyük kozmik emanetinin modern bir uygulanış biçimi olarak yorumlanmaktadır. Bu yönüyle Risale-i Nur, ekolojik krizin hem maddî hem de ahlâkî boyutlarını birlikte ele alan, gerçekten bütüncül ve sürdürülebilir bir kalkınma yoluna işaret eden bütünleşik bir çerçeve sunmaktadır.

Keywords

• Tevhidî Çevre Etiği
• Risale-i Nur
• Said Nursi
• Hilafet (Halifelik)
• Kozmik Denge (Mizan)
• Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları (SDG'ler)
• Teosentrik Ekoloji
• İlahi İsimler (el-Esmâü'l-Hüsnâ)

Supporting Institution

Endonezya Cumhuriyeti Ankara Büyükelçiliği, Türkiye

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışma, etik kurul izni gerektirmeyen nitelikte olup kullanılan veriler literatür taraması/yayınlanmış kaynaklar üzerinden elde edilmiştir. Çalışmanın hazırlanma sürecinde bilimsel ve etik ilkelere uyulduğu ve yararlanılan tüm çalışmaların kaynakçada belirtildiği beyan olunur. Bu çalışmanın hazırlanması, yazımı ve değerlendirilmesi süreçlerinin hiçbir aşamasında yapay zekâ tabanlı herhangi bir araç, yazılım veya uygulamadan yararlanılmamıştır. Çalışmanın tüm içeriği, yazar(lar) tarafından bilimsel araştırma yöntemlerine, akademik etik ilkelere ve yayın etiği kurallarına uygun olarak özgün biçimde oluşturulmuştur.

Divine Environmental Values in the Risale-i Nur: A Tauhidic Blueprint for Holistic and Sustainable Development

Abstract

This article examines the environmental philosophy articulated in Bediuzzaman Said Nursi’s Risale-i Nur and presents it as a coherent “Tauhidic Green Blueprint” for holistic and sustainable development. Moving beyond the dominant anthropocentric and ecocentric paradigms of Western environmental thought, the study argues that Nursi advances a framework that can be characterized as theocentric framework in which value, meaning, and ethical responsibility are grounded in divine reality rather than in human utility or the autonomy of nature alone. Within this perspective, the natural world is not a neutral resource but a meaningful domain whose value arises from its function as a manifestation of the Divine Names, a cosmic text, and a locus of continuous divine activity. The article demonstrates that this ontological foundation gives rise to a distinctive environmental ethic centered on positive action, whereby the human being is understood as a conscious vicegerent entrusted with active and participatory stewardship of the earth. This responsibility entails cultivating the world, preserving cosmic balance, preventing corruption and excess, and aligning human conduct with divinely established laws governing the order and purity of creation, including the Law of Cleanliness. Environmental responsibility thus appears not as a merely instrumental or regulatory concern, but as an expression of worship, moral accountability, and fidelity to a divinely conferred trust. By engaging contemporary sustainability discourse, this study attempts to demonstrate that Nursi’s tauhidic vision can be interpreted as providing a potential metaphysical and ethical grounding for the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. This is an interpretive claim based on conceptual reconstruction, not a descriptive statement of Nursi’s own explicit intentions. Rather than treating these goals as a purely technical or policy-oriented agenda, the article interprets them as a modern operational form of humanity’s great cosmic trust. In this way, the Risale-i Nur provides an integrated framework that addresses both the material and moral dimensions of the ecological crisis, suggesting a pathway toward holistic genuinely holistic and sustainable development.

Keywords

• Tauhidic Environmental Ethics
• Risale-i Nur
• Said Nursi
• Vicegerency (Khilafah)
• Cosmic Balance (Mizan)
• Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
• Theocentric Ecology
• Divine Names (al-Asma' al-Husna)

Supporting Institution

Embassy of the Republic of Indonesia Ankara, Türkiye

Ethical Statement

This study does not require ethics committee approval, as the data used were obtained through a literature review and published sources. It is hereby declared that scientific and ethical principles were observed during the preparation of the study, and all referenced works are duly cited in the bibliography. No artificial intelligence–based tools, software, or applications were used at any stage of the preparation, writing, or evaluation of this study. All content was produced solely by the author(s) in accordance with established scientific research methods, academic integrity standards, and publication ethics.

Thanks

I would like to extend my heartfelt gratitude to Prof. Dr. Abdullah Kahraman, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Okur, and to all members of the editorial team whose scholarly dedication continues to inspire researchers worldwide. This submission is also intended as a step toward further strengthening academic cooperation between Turkey and Indonesia.

References

1. Adelman S. ‘The Sustainable Development Goals, Anthropocentrism, and Neoliberalism’. In Sustainable development goals: law, theory and implementation. Ed. Kotzé L French D. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.
2. Ahmad Fuʾād, Bāshā. Falsafat Al-ʿIlm al-Islāmiyyah Madkhalan Li Ruʾyah Kawnīyyah Haḍāriyyah. Kairo: Dār al-Salām li al-Ṭibāʿah wa al-Nashr, 2014.
3. Al-Asfahānī. Al-Mufradāt Fī Gharīb al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Qalam, 1992.
4. Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Exposition of the Fundamental Elements of the Worldview of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Antarabangsa Pemikiran dan Tamadun Islam, 1995.
5. Allen, Stephen - Cunliffe, Ann L. - Easterby-Smith, Mark. ‘Understanding Sustainability Through the Lens of Ecocentric Radical-Reflexivity: Implications for Management Education’. Journal of Business Ethics 154/3 (1 February 2019): 781–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3420-3.
6. ‘Anthropocentrism | Human-Centered Philosophy & Ethics | Britannica’. Accessed: 18 July 2023. https://www.britannica.com/topic/anthropocentrism.
7. Arslan, Adnan. ‘Türk Akademisinde Said Nursi Başlıklı Makalelerin Betimsel Bibliyometrik Analizi’. Kocaeli İlahiyat Dergisi 8/1 (29 June 2024): 107–128.
8. Bayraktaroğlu, Engin. ‘Intrinsic and Extrinsic Values of Destinations’. European Journal of Tourism Research. 1 January 2022. https://www.academia.edu/80098816/Intrinsic_and_extrinsic_values_of_destinations.

9. Brown, Lesley. The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles. Clarendon Press, 1993.
10. Bsoul, Labeeb - Omer, Amani - Kucukalic, Lejla - Archbold, Ricardo H. ‘Islam’s Perspective on Environmental Sustainability: A Conceptual Analysis’. Social Sciences 11/6 (24 May 2022): 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11060228.
11. Capra, Fritjof. The Systems View of Life A Unifying Vision F. Cambridge: University Printing House, 2014.
12. Capra, Fritjof. The Hidden Connections: Integrating the Biological, Cognitive, and Social Dimensions of Life into a Science of Sustainability. 1st ed. New York: Doubleday, 2002.
13. Devall, Bill - Sessions, George. Deep Ecology. Nachdr. Salt Lake City, Utah: Smith, 1999.
14. ‘Environment- Meaning, Definition, Function, Example’. BYJUS. Accessed: 29 August 2023. https://byjus.com/commerce/meaning-and-functions-of-environment/.
15. ‘Getting Right with Nature: Anthropocentrism, Ecocentrism, and Theocentrism - Andrew J. Hoffman, Lloyd E. Sandelands, 2005’. Accessed: 28 August 2023. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1086026605276197.
16. Gray, Joe - Whyte, Ian - Curry, Patrick. ‘Ecocentrism: What It Means’. n.d.
17. Han, Geurim - Kim, Junghwa - Park, Sun W. ‘Extrinsic Value Orientation and Decreased Sustainability of Shared Resources: The Moderating Role of Situational Characteristics’. Sustainability 10/7 (July 2018): 2199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072199.
18. Ibn Asyur. Tahrir Wa Tanwir. n.d.
19. Ibn Athaillah, as-Sakandary. Al-Hikam Al-‘Aṭa’Iyyah Wa Al-Munājāt Al-Ilāhiyyah. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ālamiyyah, 2006.
20. İgalçı, Emine Elif Çakmak. ‘İnsan, Kâinat ve Yaratılış Ekseninde Hallâc-ı Mansûr’un Tevhid Düşüncesinin Felsefî Analizi’. Kocaeli İlahiyat Dergisi 7/1 (25 June 2023): 154–172. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8034701.
21. Ihsan, Nur Hadi - Permana, Ridani Faulika - Maulana, Abdullah Muslich Rizal. ‘Bediuzzaman Said Nūrsi and the Nature of Human Creation in His Major Works: Considering a New Breakthrough in Islamic Philosophy’. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 12/1 (12 June 2022): 81–97. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.121.06.
22. Jütten, Timo. ‘The Colonization Thesis: Habermas on Reification’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19/5 (December 2011): 701–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2011.629672.
23. Kaya, Yakup. ‘The Closure of Darulfunun and Initiatives for Transmitting Religious Values During the Gap Years in Religious Education’. Kocaeli İlahiyat Dergisi 9/1 (26 June 2025): 78–99.
24. Khan, Foyasal - Haneef, Mohamed Aslam. ‘Religious Responses To Sustainable Development Goals: An Islamic Perspective’. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance 8/2 (31 May 2022): 161–180. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v8i2.1453.
25. Mudin, Moh Isom - Ihsan, Nur Hadi - Huringiin, Nabila. ‘Fortifying the Deep Ecology Platform: Nursi’s Tafakkur Īmānī as a Metaphysical Completion to Naess’ Deep Questioning’. Australian Journal of Islamic Studies 11/3 (13 April 2026): e101–e101. https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v11i3.1057.
26. Mudin, Moh Isom - Wennas, Hadi - Saputri, Nafiatus. ‘Paradigma Dominasi Vis As Vis Harmoni Atas Alam: Studi Kritis Perspektif Teo-Ekologi Islam’. Academic Journal of Islamic Principles and Philosophy 6/1 (1 June 2025): 91–124. https://doi.org/10.22515/ajipp.v6i1.10120.
27. Mudin, Moh Isom - Zarkasyi, Hamid Fahmy - Riyadi, Abdul Kadir. ‘Prinsip Ekologis Untuk Kehidupan Berkelanjutan Perspektif Teologi Islam: Kajian Atas Kitab Rasail al-Nur Sa`id Nursi’. FIKRAH 9/1 (23 June 2021): 45. https://doi.org/10.21043/fikrah.v9i1.9018.
28. Naess, Arne. ‘The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement: A Summary’. In The Selected Works of Arne Naess. Ed. Alan Drengson. 2263–2269. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_85.
29. ‘(PDF) Forms of Capital and Intrinsic Values’. Accessed: 28 August 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248203587_Forms_of_capital_and_intrinsic_values.
30. ‘(PDF) Islamic Eco-Theology Vs Deep Ecology: An Outlook Of Basic Principles’. Accessed: 28 August 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303330696_Islamic_Eco-Theology_Vs_Deep_Ecology_An_Outlook_Of_Basic_Principles.
31. Qaradlawi, Yusuf al-. Ri`ayah Al-Bi`ah Fi Syari`ah al-Islam. Cairo: Dar as-Syuruq, 2001.
32. Qashani, Abd al-Razzaq al-. Lathaif Al-I`lam Fi Isyarat Ahl al-Iham. Kairo: Maktabah al-Tsaqafah ad-Diniyyah, 2005.
33. Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn al-. Al-Tafsīr al-Kabīr. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1981.
34. ‘Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics | Work by Taylor | Britannica’. Accessed: 28 August 2023. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Respect-for-Nature-A-Theory-of-Environmental-Ethics.
35. Said Nursî, Bediüzzaman. Al-Kalimāt. Trans. Ihsan Kasim Salihi. 6th Edn. Cairo: Sozler Publications, 2011.
36. Said Nursî, Bediüzzaman. Al-Lama‘āt. Trans. Ihsan Kasim Salihi. 6th Edn. Cairo: Sozler Publications, 2011.
37. Said Nursî, Bediüzzaman. Al-Maktūbāt. Trans. Ihsan Kasim Salihi. 6th Edn. Cairo: Sozler Publications, 2011.
38. Said Nursî, Bediüzzaman. Al-Malāhiq. Trans. Ihsan Kasim Salihi. 6th Edn. Cairo: Sozler Publications, 2011.
39. Said Nursî, Bediüzzaman. Al-Mathnawī al-‘Arabī an-Nūrī. Ed. Ihsan Kasim Salihi. 6th Edn. Cairo: Sozler Publications, 2011.
40. Said Nursî, Bediüzzaman. Asy-Shu‘ā‘āt. Trans. Ihsan Kasim Salihi. 6th Edn. Cairo: Sozler Publications, n.d.
41. Said Nursî, Bediüzzaman. Isyārāt Al-I‘jāz Fī Maẓān al-Ījāz. Ed. Ihsan Kasim Salihi. 6th Edn. Cairo: Sozler Publications, 2011.
42. Said Nursî, Bediüzzaman. Sayqal Al-Islām. Ed. Ihsan Kasim Salihi. 6th Edn. Cairo: Sozler Publications, 2011.
43. Sandler, Ronald. ‘Citation: Sandler, R. (2012) Intrinsic Value, Ecology, and Conservation. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10):4’. n.d.
44. Soulé, Michael E. ‘What Is Conservation Biology?’ BioScience 35/11 (1985): 727–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/1310054.
45. Summary, A - Naess, Arne. ‘The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement’. n.d.
46. ‘Sustainable Development Goals - Localise SDGs Indonesia’. Accessed: 18 July 2023. https://localisesdgs-indonesia.org/17-sdgs#a13.
47. Talukder, Md Munir Hossain - Kamaluddin, Mohammad. ‘[Islam and Sustainable Development: A Review of Bediüzzaman Saïd Nursi’s Philosophy]’. Jurnal Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporari 22/2 (28 December 2021): 207–216. https://doi.org/10.37231/jimk.2021.22.2.601.
48. UN. Secretary-General - World Commission on Environment and Development, eds. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: note. New York: UN, 4.
49. ‘Why Protect Nature? Rethinking Values and the Environment | PNAS’. Accessed: 30 August 2023. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1525002113.
50. Yu, Mouchang. ‘Biocentric Ethical Theories’. Environment And Development. n.d.
51. Zarkasyi, Hamid Fahmy - Mas’ud, Fuad - Umam, Khoirul - Hidayatullah, Rakhmad Agung - Khakim, Usmanul. ‘Developing an Islamic Human Resource Development Mode (IHRD) to Strengthen the Organization’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)’. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review 5/1 (2025): e03289–e03289. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n01.pe03289.