Hegemonic conflict in post-cold war Türkiye: Established elites encountering rising elites and changing dynamics

Year 2024, Volume: 2 Issue: 4, 368 - 382, 01.12.2024

Abdulvahap Alıcı

Abstract

This paper aims at explaining why and how the civic sphere became a site of contestation in Turkey from the mid-1990s, using a Gramscian framework. Turkey, no longer having to choose between the two blocks after the Cold War, entered a period of uncertainty. This situation led to the outbreak of a long-hidden conflict between the hegemonic and counter-hegemonic civil movements. While the counter-hegemonic structure consisted of new urban religious people, the hegemons consisted of urban Kemalists. It is viewed that counter-hegemonic civil society sought to undermine the Kemalist hegemonic discourse, while some civil society organisations were appropriated by the state as apparatuses. This study draws on archival resources and periodicals to explore the state-society relationship in Turkey during the 1990s, with a specific focus on civil society. The paper begins with a historical overview of civil society in Turkey, tracing its development since the Ottoman period. Following this, a theoretical examination of civil society theory is presented. The final section discusses the hegemonic struggle over civil space in Turkey during the 1990s.

Keywords

türkiye, civil space, public sphere, 28 february

References

• Altan-Olcay, O., & İçduygu, A. (2012). Mapping civil society in the Middle East: The cases of Egypt, Lebanon and Türkiye. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 39(2), 157–179.
• Başkan, F. (2010). The rising Islamic business elite and democratization in Türkiye. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 12(4), 399–416.
• Çınar, M. (2006). Türkiye’s transformation under the AKP rule. Muslim World, 96(3), 469–486.
• Cindoglu, D., & Zencirci, G. (2008). The headscarf in Türkiye in the public and state spheres. Middle Eastern Studies, 44(5), 791–806.
• Cizre‐Sakallioglu, U. M., & Yeldan, E. (2000). Politics, society, and financial liberalization: Türkiye in the 1990s. Development and Change, 31(2), 481–508.
• Dagi, I. D. (2004). Rethinking human rights, democracy, and the West: Post‐Islamist intellectuals in Türkiye. Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies, 13(2), 135–151.
• Davison, R. H. (1963). Reform in the Ottoman Empire 1856–1876. Princeton University Press.
• Erbakan, N. (1997). Refah Partisi savunması. Fast Yayıncılık.
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80.
• Fraser, N. (2007). Transnational public sphere: Transnationalizing the public sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 7–30.
• Gerber, H. (1994). State, society, and law in Islam: Ottoman law in comparative perspective. State University of New York Press.
• Grigoriadis, I. N. (2009). Islam and democratization in Türkiye: Secularism and trust in a divided society. Religion and Democratizations, 16(6), 1194–1213.
• Guidry, J. A., & Sawyer, M. Q. (2003). Contentious pluralism: The public sphere and democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 1(2), 273–289.
• Gumuscu, S., & Sert, D. (2009). The power of the devout bourgeoisie: The case of the Justice and Development Party in Türkiye. Middle Eastern Studies, 45(6), 953–968.
• Habermas, J. (2007). Communication and the evolution of society. Beacon Press.
• Habermas, J. (2018). The postnational constellation: Political essays. John Wiley & Sons.
• Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1974). Entry on Jürgen Habermas: The Public Sphere Encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique, 3, 49–55.
• Heper, M., & Güney, A. (2000). The military and the consolidation of democracy: The recent Turkish experience. Armed Forces & Society, 26(4), 635–657.
• Heper, M., & Yıldırım, S. (2011). Revisiting civil society in Türkiye. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 11(1), 1–18.
• Jalali, R. (2002). Civil society and the state: Türkiye after the earthquake. Disasters, 26(2), 120–139.
• Jenkins, G. (2003). Muslim democrats in Türkiye? Survival, 45(1), 45–66.
• Jenkins, G. (2007). Continuity and change: Prospects for civil-military relations in Türkiye. International Affairs, 83(2), 339–355.
• Kadıoğlu, A. (2005). Civil society, Islam and democracy in Türkiye: A study of three Islamic non-governmental organizations. The Muslim World, 95(1), 23–41.
• Kandiyoti, D. (2012). The travails of the secular: Puzzle and paradox in Türkiye. Economy and Society, 41(4), 513–531.
• Karpat, K. H. (2015). Türkiye’s politics: The transition to a multi-party system (Vol. 2395). Princeton University Press.
• Keyman, E. F., & İçduygu, A. (2003). Globalization, civil society and citizenship in Türkiye: Actors, boundaries, and discourses. Citizenship Studies, 7(2), 219–234.
• Kodaman, B. (1990). Tanzimat’tan sonra Türk kadını. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Education Faculty, 5(1), 135–182. Lombardi, B. (1997). Türkiye—The return of the reluctant generals? Political Science Quarterly, 112(2), 191–215.
• Menek, A. (2016). 28 Şubat: Postmodern darbe. Şehir ve İrfan Araştırmaları Dergisi, (2), 138–149.
• Müftüler‐Bac, M. (1998). The never‐ending story: Türkiye and the European Union. Middle Eastern Studies, 34(4), 240-258.
• Navaro-Yashin, Y. (1998). Uses and abuses of “State and Civil Society” in contemporary Türkiye. New Perspectives on Türkiye, 18, 1-22.
• Özdemir, H. (2015). 28 Şubat süreci arifesinde ve ertesinde iki Millî Görüş Partisi: Refah Partisi (RP)-Fazilet Partisi (FP) (karşılaştırmalı bir analiz). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2), 165–193.
• Özbudun, E. (2006). From political Islam to conservative democracy: The case of the Justice and Development Party in Türkiye. South European Society & Politics, 11(3–4), 543–557.
• Patton, M. J. (2007). AKP reform fatigue in Türkiye: What has happened to the EU process? Mediterranean Politics, 12(3), 339–358.
• Rabasa, A., & Larrabee, F. S. (2008). The rise of political Islam in Türkiye. Rand Corporation.
• Sarkissian, A., & Özler, Ş. İ. (2013). Democratization and the politicization of religious civil society in Türkiye. Democratization, 20(6), 1014–1035.
• Şimşek, S. (2004). The transformation of civil society in Türkiye: From quantity to quality. Turkish Studies, 5(3), 46–74.
• Taniyici, S. (2003). Transformation of political Islam in Türkiye: Islamist Welfare Party’s pro-EU turn. Party Politics, 9(4), 463–483.
• Tilly, C. (1993). Contentious repertoires in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Social Science History, 17(2), 253–280.
• Uzgel, İ. (2003). Between praetorianism and democracy: The role of the military in Turkish foreign policy. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, (34), 177–211.
• Waldman, S., & Çalışkan, E. (2017). The new Türkiye and its discontents. Oxford University Press.