BibTex RIS Cite

Challenges in Clinical Electrocardiography: Artifact or not?

Year 2014, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 0 - , 01.01.2013

Abstract

A 53-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of chest pain and palpitation. The patient’s clinical history was unremarkable such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus or drug use. Physical examination was normal. Biochemical variables were within normal limits. Also, thyroid function tests and electrolytes were normal. Transthoracic echocardiography, Holter rhythm monitoring and electrophysiologic study revealed normal findings. Because of positive exercise test we performed coronary angiography which revealed normal coronary arteries. Surface electrocardiography (ECG) taken on admission is shown in Figure 1 (also see all leads and arrows in V5). Questions What is the most likely explanation for slurred QRS complexes and what rhythm abnormalities would you consider in the differential diagnosis? Comment Differential diagnosis comprises preexcitation, pseudodelta wave, blocked atrial premature beats and artifact. Electrocardiographic artifacts are typically unintentional and are not associated with hemodynamic findings(1). It may cause unnecessary diagnosis and treatment(1). They are usually caused by poor surface electrode contact or patient movement. In our case, the top tracing shows a burst of apparent wide complex tachycardia seen in leads I, II, aVr and aVL but not in lead III. Because of this, the most likely diagnoses is artifact. Thought it was the left arm but subsequently seen in aVL but not in lead II, so artifact may be variable depending on specific body movements. The bottom strip shows a constant sinus rhythm with erratic P wave activity, however the ventricular rate is constant. Note that some of the putative P waves fall very close to one another which would be unphysiological since the atrium needs a refractory period. Also note the erratic rhythm in lead II below. Take home messages: Electrocardiographic artifacts may cause unnecessary diagnosis and treatment

References

  • Pinter A, Sklar L, Dorian P. Factitious ventricular tachyarrhythmia outbreak. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:191-3. Figure 1. Surface electrocardiography on admission

Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?

Year 2014, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 0 - , 01.01.2013

Abstract

References

  • Pinter A, Sklar L, Dorian P. Factitious ventricular tachyarrhythmia outbreak. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:191-3. Figure 1. Surface electrocardiography on admission
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mustafa Yıldız This is me

Okan Erdogan This is me

Ahmet Guler This is me

Cevat Naci Oner This is me

Melvin M. Scheinman This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 17 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Yıldız, M. ., Erdogan, O. ., Guler, A. ., Oner, C. N. ., et al. (2013). Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi, 17(1).
AMA Yıldız M, Erdogan O, Guler A, Oner CN, Scheinman MM. Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi. January 2013;17(1).
Chicago Yıldız, Mustafa, Okan Erdogan, Ahmet Guler, Cevat Naci Oner, and Melvin M. Scheinman. “Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt Mı Değil Mi?”. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi 17, no. 1 (January 2013).
EndNote Yıldız M, Erdogan O, Guler A, Oner CN, Scheinman MM (January 1, 2013) Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi 17 1
IEEE M. . Yıldız, O. . Erdogan, A. . Guler, C. N. . Oner, and M. M. . Scheinman, “Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?”, Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 1, 2013.
ISNAD Yıldız, Mustafa et al. “Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt Mı Değil Mi?”. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi 17/1 (January 2013).
JAMA Yıldız M, Erdogan O, Guler A, Oner CN, Scheinman MM. Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi. 2013;17.
MLA Yıldız, Mustafa et al. “Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt Mı Değil Mi?”. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 1, 2013.
Vancouver Yıldız M, Erdogan O, Guler A, Oner CN, Scheinman MM. Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi. 2013;17(1).