BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Challenges in Clinical Electrocardiography: Artifact or not?

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 0 - , 01.01.2013

Öz

A 53-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of chest pain and palpitation. The patient’s clinical history was unremarkable such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus or drug use. Physical examination was normal. Biochemical variables were within normal limits. Also, thyroid function tests and electrolytes were normal. Transthoracic echocardiography, Holter rhythm monitoring and electrophysiologic study revealed normal findings. Because of positive exercise test we performed coronary angiography which revealed normal coronary arteries. Surface electrocardiography (ECG) taken on admission is shown in Figure 1 (also see all leads and arrows in V5). Questions What is the most likely explanation for slurred QRS complexes and what rhythm abnormalities would you consider in the differential diagnosis? Comment Differential diagnosis comprises preexcitation, pseudodelta wave, blocked atrial premature beats and artifact. Electrocardiographic artifacts are typically unintentional and are not associated with hemodynamic findings(1). It may cause unnecessary diagnosis and treatment(1). They are usually caused by poor surface electrode contact or patient movement. In our case, the top tracing shows a burst of apparent wide complex tachycardia seen in leads I, II, aVr and aVL but not in lead III. Because of this, the most likely diagnoses is artifact. Thought it was the left arm but subsequently seen in aVL but not in lead II, so artifact may be variable depending on specific body movements. The bottom strip shows a constant sinus rhythm with erratic P wave activity, however the ventricular rate is constant. Note that some of the putative P waves fall very close to one another which would be unphysiological since the atrium needs a refractory period. Also note the erratic rhythm in lead II below. Take home messages: Electrocardiographic artifacts may cause unnecessary diagnosis and treatment

Kaynakça

  • Pinter A, Sklar L, Dorian P. Factitious ventricular tachyarrhythmia outbreak. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:191-3. Figure 1. Surface electrocardiography on admission

Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 0 - , 01.01.2013

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Pinter A, Sklar L, Dorian P. Factitious ventricular tachyarrhythmia outbreak. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:191-3. Figure 1. Surface electrocardiography on admission
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mustafa Yıldız Bu kişi benim

Okan Erdogan Bu kişi benim

Ahmet Guler Bu kişi benim

Cevat Naci Oner Bu kişi benim

Melvin M. Scheinman Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2013
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2014 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Yıldız, M. ., Erdogan, O. ., Guler, A. ., Oner, C. N. ., vd. (2013). Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi, 17(1).
AMA Yıldız M, Erdogan O, Guler A, Oner CN, Scheinman MM. Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi. Ocak 2013;17(1).
Chicago Yıldız, Mustafa, Okan Erdogan, Ahmet Guler, Cevat Naci Oner, ve Melvin M. Scheinman. “Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt Mı Değil Mi?”. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi 17, sy. 1 (Ocak 2013).
EndNote Yıldız M, Erdogan O, Guler A, Oner CN, Scheinman MM (01 Ocak 2013) Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi 17 1
IEEE M. . Yıldız, O. . Erdogan, A. . Guler, C. N. . Oner, ve M. M. . Scheinman, “Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?”, Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi, c. 17, sy. 1, 2013.
ISNAD Yıldız, Mustafa vd. “Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt Mı Değil Mi?”. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi 17/1 (Ocak 2013).
JAMA Yıldız M, Erdogan O, Guler A, Oner CN, Scheinman MM. Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi. 2013;17.
MLA Yıldız, Mustafa vd. “Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt Mı Değil Mi?”. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi, c. 17, sy. 1, 2013.
Vancouver Yıldız M, Erdogan O, Guler A, Oner CN, Scheinman MM. Klinik Elektrokardiyografide Zorluklar: Artefakt mı Değil mi?. Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi. 2013;17(1).