Kayınvalide Kayınpeder Kabul-Red Ölçeği/Kısa Formun Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 342 - 353, 26.12.2022

Büşra Aslan Cevheroğlu Şennur Tutarel Kışlak Gülen Say

https://doi.org/10.5455/kpd.26024438m000073

Abstract

Kayınvalide ve kayınpederden algılanan kabul-red düzeyini değerlendirmede kullanılan “Kayınvalide Kayınpeder Kabul-Red Ölçeği/Kısa Formu”nun (KKRÖ/K) Türkiye’de geçerlik ve güvenirliğini belirlemek bu çalışmanın amacını oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmaya, yaşları 18-66 (Ort. = 35.36, SS = 8.64) arasında değişen 369 kadın (%65.1) ve 198 (%34.9) erkek olmak üzere toplam 567 evli yetişkin katılmıştır. Çalışmada katılımcılar hakkında bilgi edinmek amacıyla demografik bilgi formu, ölçüt bağıntılı geçerliği değerlendirmek amacıyla Kişilik Değerlendirme Ölçeği (KİDÖ) ve alt ölçekleri ve Kayınvalide Kayınpeder Kabul-Red Ölçeği/Kısa Form (KKRÖ/K) kullanılmıştır. Kişilerarası kabul-red ölçeklerinin geçerliğini araştıran diğer çalışmalarda önerildiği gibi bu çalışmada da ölçeğin faktör yapısı doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda, ölçeğin orijinal formunda kayıtsızlık/ihmal faktöründe yer alan 13. maddenin sıcaklık/şefkat faktörüne yüklenmesi ile oluşturulan düzeltilmiş 4 faktörlü modelin kabul edilebilir uyum indekslerine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlık ile iki yarım test güvenirliği katsayılarının ve madde toplam korelasyonunun yeterli düzeyde olduğu ve ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik özelliklerini de karşıladığı saptanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, KKRÖ/K; kültürümüzde çeşitli bilimsel çalışmalarda ve klinik uygulamalarda kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olarak değerlendirilebilir.

Keywords

kayınvalide, kayınpeder, kabul-red, geçerlik, güvenirlik, mother-in-law, father-in-law, acceptance-rejection, validity, reliability

Turkish adaptation of In-Law Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire/Short Form

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to examine the reliability and validity of In-Law Acceptance Rejection Questionnaire/Short Form (ILARQ/SF) which is used to evaluate the perceived acceptance and rejection from spouse’ family in a normal population in Turkey. A total of 567 married individuals, 369 females (65.1%) and 169 (34.9%) males, aged between 18-66 (M = 35.36, SD = 8.64) participated in the study. In the study, demographic information form was used to obtain information about the participants, Personality Assessment Scale (PAQ) and its subscales were used to evaluate criterion-related validity and also In-Law Acceptance-Rejection Scale/Short Form (ILARQ/SF) was used. As suggested in other studies investigating the validity of interpersonal acceptance-rejection scales, the factor structure of the scale was evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis in this study. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, it was found that the revised 4-factor model, which was obtained by loading the item 13 to warmth/affection factor instead of the indifference/neglect factor in the original form has acceptable fit index values. It was determined that the scale had good internal consistency and split half reliabilities, and the criterion related validity features also were supported. As a result, it can be evaluated that ILARQ/SF, Mother-in-law and Father-in-law forms, is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in various scientific studies and in clinical practice in Turkey.

Keywords

kayınvalide, kayınpeder, kabul-red, geçerlik, güvenirlik, mother-in-law, father-in-law, acceptance-rejection, validity, reliability

References

• Abiodun, O. A. (2006). Postnatal depression in primary care populations in Nigeria. General Hospital Psychiatry, 28(2), 133-136.
• Akün, E. (2019). Yetişkin Yakın İlişki Ölçeği-Kısa formun uyarlama çalışması. Nesne, 7(15), 269-280.
• Arduman, E. (2013). A perspective on evolving family therapy in Turkey. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35, 364 -375.
• Aslan, B. (2018). Erken evlenen kadınların psikolojik belirtileri ve evlilik uyumlarını etkileyen faktörler (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Aydın, E. (2017). Anne-oğul bağlanmasının gelin-kayınvalide ilişkisi ve evlilik doyumunu yordamadaki rolü (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Bentler, P. M. ve Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
• Bryant, C. M., Conger, R. D. ve Meehan, J. M. (2001). The influence of in‐laws on change in marital success. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(3), 614-626.
• Cao, H., Fine, M., Fang, X. ve Zhou, N. (2019). Chinese adult children’s perceived parents’ satisfaction with adult children’s marriage, in-law relationship quality, and adult children’s marital satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(4), 1098-1122.
• Çoğalan, Y. (2017). Evli bireylerin kök aileleriyle ilişkileri ve evlilik uyumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Samsun.
• Danaci, A. E., Dinç, G., Deveci, A., Şen, F. S. ve İçelli, İ. (2002). Postnatal depression in Turkey: Epidemiological and cultural aspects. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 37(3), 125-129.
• Dedeler, M., Akün, E. ve Batıgün, A. D. (2017). Yetişkin Ebeveyn Kabul-Red Ölçeği-Kısa Form’un uyarlama çalışması. Düşünen Adam, 30(3), 181-193.
• Erkman, F. ve Öztürk, M. (2011). Development and reliability of the In-Law Acceptance-Rejection/Control Questionnaire. E. Kourkoutas ve F. Erkman (Ed.), Interpersonal acceptance and rejection: Social emotional and educational contexts içinde. Brown Walker Press.
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage.
• Fingerman, K. L. (2004). The role of offspring and in-laws in grandparents’ ties to their grandchildren. Journal of Family Issues, 25(8), 1026-1049.
• Fischer, L. R. (1983). Mothers and mothers-in-law. Journal of Marriage Family, 45, 87-193.
• Fowler, C. ve Rittenour, C. (2017). A life-span approach to children-in-law’s perceptions of parent-in-law communication. Journal of Family Communication, 17(3), 254-272.
• Gomez R. ve Rohner R. P. (2011). Tests of factor structure and measurement invariance in the United States and Australia using the Adult Version of The Parental Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire. Cross Cultural Research 45, 267-285.
• Gomez, R. ve Suhaimi, A. F. (2014). Malaysian parent ratings of the Parental Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire-Short Form: Factor structure and invariance across girls and boys and mothers and fathers. Parenting, 14, 195-214.
• Green, K., Broome, H. ve Mirabella, J. (2006). Postnatal depression among mothers in the United Arab Emirates: Socio-cultural and physical factors. Psychology, Health ve Medicine, 11(4), 425-431.
• Hortaçsu, N. (2007). Family‐versus couple‐initiated marriages in Turkey: Similarities and differences over the family life cycle. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 103-116.
• Hu, L. T. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
• Inglés, C. J., Hidalgo, M. D. ve Méndez, F. X. (2005). Interpersonal difficulties in adolescence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 11-22.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, C. ve Ataca, B. (2005). Value of children and family change: A three decade portrait from Turkey. Applied Psychology, 54(3), 317-337.
• Kandiyoti, D. (1974). Some social-psychological dimensions of social change in a Turkish village. The British Journal of Sociology, 25(1), 47-62.
• Kavas, S. ve Thornton, A. (2013). Adjustment and hybridity in Turkish family change: Perspective from developmental idealism. Journal of Family History, 38(2),223-241.
• Kim, K., Zarit, S. H., Fingerman, K. L. ve Han, G. (2015). Intergenerational exchanges of middle aged adults with their parents and parents-in-law in Korea. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 791-805.
• Kurter, M. F., Jencius, M. ve Duba, J. D. (2004). A Turkish perspective on family therapy: An interview with Hurol Fisiloglu. Family Journal, 12(3), 319-323.
• Labi Ades, L. (2003). Predictors of the quality of the relationship between daughter-in-law and mother-in-law (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Adelphi University, New York.
• Lim, S. L. ve Lim, B. K. (2012). Po xi wen ti: The mother-in-law problem-navigating tradition and modernity in transforming familial relationships in the Chinese family. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 23(3), 202-216.
• Morr-Serewicz, M. C. (2006). Getting along with the in-laws: Relationships with parents-in-law. K. Floyd ve M. T. Mormon (Ed.), Widening the family circle: New research on family communication içinde (s. 101-116). Sage.
• Morr Serewicz, M. C., Hosmer, R., Ballard, R. L. ve Griffin, R. A. (2008). Disclosure from in-laws and the quality of in-law and marital relationships. Communication Quarterly, 56(4), 427-444.
• Nunnally J. C., ve Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3. baskı). McGraw Hill Inc.
• Prentice, C. (2009). Relational dialectics among in-laws. Journal of Family Communication 9(2),67-89.
• Rohner, R. (2005). Intimate Adult Relationship Questionnaire/Control Questionnaire (IPAR/CQ): Test manual. R. P. Rohner ve A. Khaleque (Ed.), Handbook for the study of parental acceptance and rejection içinde. Rohner Research Publications.
• Rohner, R. P. (1975). They love me, they love me not: A worldwide study of the effects of parental acceptance and rejection. HRAF Press.
• Rohner, R. P. (1986). The warmth dimension: Foundations of Parental Acceptance-Rejection Theory. Sage Publications Inc.
• Rohner, R. P. (2001). Intimate Partner Attachment Questionnaire. Rohner Research Publications.
• Rohner, R. P. (2004). The parental ‘acceptance–rejection syndrome’: Universal correlates of perceived rejection. American Psychologist, 5, 830-840.
• Rohner, R. P. (2008). Introduction: Parental Acceptance-Rejection Theory studies of intimate adult relationships. Cross Cultural Research, 42(1), 5-12.
• Rohner, R. P. (2010, 2014'te revize edilmiş). In-Law Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire, Mother-in-law and Father-in- law versions. Rohner Research Publications.
• Rohner R. P. (2016). Introduction to Interpersonal Acceptance-Rejection Theory (IPARTheory), methods, evidence, and implications. http://csiar.uconn.edu/introduction-to-partheory/
• Rohner, R. P., Khaleque, A. ve Cournoyer, D. E. (2012). Introduction to Parental Acceptance-Rejection Theory, methods, evidence, and implications. Journal of Family Theory ve Review, 2(1), 73-87.
• Rohner, R. P., Saavedra, J. ve Granum, E. (1978). Development and validation of The Personality Assessment Questionnaire: Test manual. ERIC/CAPS.
• Rohner, R. P. ve Khaleque, A. (2010). Testing central postulates of parental acceptance‐rejection theory (PARTheory): A meta‐analysis of cross-cultural studies. Journal of Family Theory ve Review, 2(1), 73-87.
• Schumacker, R. E. ve Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Senese, V. P., Bacchini, D., Miranda, M. C., Aurino, C., Somma, F., Amato, G. ve Rohner, R. P. (2016). The Adult Parental Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire: A cross-cultural comparison of Italian and American short forms. Parenting, 16(4), 219-236.
• Tabachnick, B. ve Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education.
• Tezcan, M. (2000). Türk Ailesi Antropolojisi. İmge Yayınları.
• Timmer, S. G. ve Veroff, J. (2000). Family ties and the discontinuity of divorce in Black and White newlywed couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 349-361.
• Varan, A. (2003). Ebeveyn Kabul-Red/Kontrol Ölçeği (EKRÖ/K) ve Kişilik Değerlendirme Ölçeği (KİDÖ) çocuk formlarının Türkiye güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Yayınlanmamış Araştırma.
• Wang, Y. Y., Li, H., Wang, Y. J., Wang, H., Zhang, Y. R., Gong, L., Ma, J., Wang, Y., Wang, M. Z. Qiu, S. X. ve Yuan, S. X. (2017). Living with parents or with parents-in-law and postpartum depression: A preliminary investigation in China. Journal of Affective Disorders, 218, 335-338.
• Yoshimura, C. G. (2006). Getting along with the in-laws: Relationships with siblings-in-law. K. Floyd ve M. T. Mormon (Ed.), Widening the family circle: New research on family communication içinde (s. 117-128). Sage.
• Yuan, X. (2019). Family-of-origin triangulation and marital quality of Chinese couples: The mediating role of in-law relationships. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 50(1), 98-112.