Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE

Year 2019, , 210 - 221, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.34186/klujes.626588

Abstract



Surface quality behaviour was investigated for one step production
system compared to traditional painting process. This study was conducted to
compare and analyse the effect of one step production cycle on surface quality
when compared with traditional production system. Sample plates were prepared
by traditional painting process with acrylic solvent based paint and one step
production cycle with polyurethane (PU) coating systems. Surface quality of
plates were analysed regarding scratch resistance, thermal aging resistance and
orange peeling formation. Test methods were determined according to Fiat
painted plastic part qualification norms. Test results revealed that gloss
loss, roughness values and orange peeling formation affinity were less for one
step production system with PU than conventional system with solvent based
acrylic paint. This study contributes to revealing surface quality performance
for the methods of producing painted parts that are more resistant to scratch,
thermal conditions and having much fewer surface defects like orange peeling.




Supporting Institution

TOFAŞ TÜRK OTOMOBİL FABRİKASI A.Ş.

Thanks

We would like to thank to TOFAŞ Türk Otomobil Fabrikası A.Ş. and VOTTELER Lackfabrik GmbH & Co. KG for their support and motivation. All tests were conducted at Tofaş Türk Otomobil Fabrikası A.Ş. R&D Material Engineering Department Laboratory

References

  • Referans 1: Mitzler J., Dykhuis M., Reuter S., Schelter D. (2014). One Surface, Three Effects. Kunststoffe International, 9, 41-44.
  • Referans 2: Mitzler J., Dykhuis M., Moch t., Gerndorf R. (2014). An Affordable Alternative to Conventionally Painted Parts. Kunststoffe International, 10, 85-88.
  • Referans 3: Kienzl W., Fischer M., Steinbichler G., Plinke S., Kralicek M. (2016). High Quality Interior Components at Low Unit Cost. Kunststoffe International, 12, 43-45.
  • Referans 4: Hanson A. R. (2006). Measurement Good Practice Guide No.94. Teddington: Crown.

SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE

Year 2019, , 210 - 221, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.34186/klujes.626588

Abstract

Surface
quality behaviour was investigated for one step production system compared to
traditional painting process. This study was conducted to compare and analyse
the effect of one step production cycle on surface quality when compared with
traditional production system. Sample plates were prepared by traditional
painting process with acrylic solvent based paint and one step production cycle
with polyurethane (PU) coating systems. Surface quality of plates were analysed
regarding scratch resistance, thermal aging resistance and orange peeling
formation. Test methods were determined according to Fiat painted plastic part
qualification norms. Test results revealed that gloss loss, roughness values
and orange peeling formation affinity were less for one step production system
with PU than conventional system with solvent based acrylic paint. This study
contributes to revealing surface quality performance for the methods of
producing painted parts that are more resistant to scratch, thermal conditions
and having much fewer surface defects like orange peeling.

References

  • Referans 1: Mitzler J., Dykhuis M., Reuter S., Schelter D. (2014). One Surface, Three Effects. Kunststoffe International, 9, 41-44.
  • Referans 2: Mitzler J., Dykhuis M., Moch t., Gerndorf R. (2014). An Affordable Alternative to Conventionally Painted Parts. Kunststoffe International, 10, 85-88.
  • Referans 3: Kienzl W., Fischer M., Steinbichler G., Plinke S., Kralicek M. (2016). High Quality Interior Components at Low Unit Cost. Kunststoffe International, 12, 43-45.
  • Referans 4: Hanson A. R. (2006). Measurement Good Practice Guide No.94. Teddington: Crown.
There are 4 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Issue
Authors

Sevil Demirci 0000-0002-3555-4607

Semih Ertürk This is me 0000-0002-0002-4075

Uğur Üzel This is me 0000-0001-5819-6841

Publication Date December 31, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Demirci, S., Ertürk, S., & Üzel, U. (2019). SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE. Kirklareli University Journal of Engineering and Science, 5(2), 210-221. https://doi.org/10.34186/klujes.626588